there are 9 points to be answered in this paper. Should be around 100 words for each of these 9 points.
Use references and in text citations
Don’t write with bullet points!
Do not plagiarise!
You have been working on a busy orthopedic unit for 6 months. The average patient length of stay in the unit is 4 to 7 days. The program from which you have graduated has subsequently graduated a new class, and three of the new graduates are coming to work on your unit. The nurse manager has told you that she is counting on you to “demonstrate leadership and assist these new nurses to adapt to the work environment.”
Based on the behaviors of an effective leader found in this chapter, how will you assist your new colleagues?1. What are the differences between leadership and followership?
2. Explain the necessity for developing self as an effective follower.
3. Describe a situation in which a person acted as a leader. Explain how you concluded that
the person was a leader.
4. Review the different leadership theories discussed in this chapter. Which ones appeal to
you as a guide for your future leadership development, and why? Which ones might be
more difficult to apply in your life, and why?
5. Have the students identify three goals for the next year that will assist you in becoming a
more effective follower.
6. Review with the class the qualities of effective leaders discussed in this chapter.
7. Develop a 1- to 2-year leadership plan applying the qualities of effective leaders.
8. Identify these qualities in leaders that you known. What specific
situations have you observed where these leaders have been effective and why?
a) -Identify specific situations.
9- You have been working on a busy orthopedic unit for 6 months. The average patient length of stay in the unit is 4–7 days. The program from which you have graduated has subsequently graduated a new class, and three of the new graduates are coming to work on your unit. The nurse manager has told you that she is counting on you to “demonstrate leadership and assist these new nurses to adapt to the work environment.”
Based on the behaviors of an effective leader found in this chapter, how will you assist your new colleagues?
You have been working on a busy orthopedic unit for 6 months. The average patient length of stay in the unit is 4 to 7 days.
The 1918 Influenza Pandemic Paper
The 1918 Influenza Pandemic Paper.
The 1918 influenza pandemic remains the worst pandemic in US history. I recall learning about the pandemic in an epidemiology course, but it really came home to me when I visited a cemetery in Ely, Nevada. In this one small town, there were dozens of tiny graves of children, all with the date of 1918. It looks as though we’ll be spared the worst of what folks endured in 1918 with our current pandemic, but there were lessons from that time that perhaps we need to learn again. So, for this discussion I’m asking you to watch this amazing documentary on the pandemic called “We Heard the Bells.” This documentary records the stories of ordinary people who lived through the pandemic, many from communities whose voices have not been heard in other accounts of the pandemic. Then, read the article from the San Francisco Chronicle, and answer the following 5 questions.1. What factors, both biological and political, promoted the spread of influenza in 1918?2. In hindsight, and knowing what you know from our current pandemic, what actions could have been taken to control the spread of the virus? What prevented those actions from being taken in San Francisco? How does past history relate to what we’ve seen in today’s pandemic?3. In a recent, informal survey of students done by a colleague of mine, over 90% of her students knew about the bubonic plague in Europe in the middle ages, but 78% were ignorant of the 1918 Influenza Pandemic. Were you aware of the 1918 pandemic before the COVID-19 pandemic? Why do you think this important episode in history has not been better retained in our collective memory?4. The film shows some rather draconian measures taken to control the disease, and we’re living through social-distancing and mandatory mask rules that some believe is a violation of our civil rights. How do we balance the needs of public health against individual rights?5. Do you think it was right to “resurrect” this strain of the influenza virus? What are some of the advantages and disadvantages of having this strain of the virus in viable form?https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/article/San-Francisco-s-1918-Spanish-flu-debacle-A-15191518.phphttps://youtu.be/XbEefT_M6xY
The 1918 Influenza Pandemic Paper
ISSC 363 American Military University Denial of Service and Cyber Attack Discussion
research paper help ISSC 363 American Military University Denial of Service and Cyber Attack Discussion.
via the internet and find recent news article regarding denial of
service attack, or distributed denial of service attack. Summarize the article using at least 500 words. The
key to this assignment is to demonstrate your understanding of the
topics, not to re-word the text or reference material. Please see
Appendix A for the grading rubric on all written assignments.Please complete the scenario below following these guidelines for your deliverable.Your assignment must be a minimum of 2 pages double spaced, plus a title page and a reference page for a total of 4 pages.Make sure you are using at least two (2) academic references.This submission should be created following APA 6th edition guidelinesYou
will be required to run your paper through Turnitin.com, ensure that
your similarity index is sufficiently low, and submit an originality
report with your paper. Rubric for Grading: 1. Code Hacking, Denial of Service Attack, or Dstributed Denial of Service Content 50% 2. Writing Conventions (Grammar and Mechanics)10% 3. Organization of Ideas/Format 500 Words 30% 4. Source (APA Format) 10%
ISSC 363 American Military University Denial of Service and Cyber Attack Discussion
Assessing and Managing Risk
Assessing and Managing Risk. I’m trying to study for my Management course and I need some help to understand this question.
Aside from recruiting new employees, another responsibility of the human resource manager is to assess risk. The people that work for the organization are a source of risk. At the same time, people play an important role in managing risk and problem solving. It will be important in your role to proactively assess risks such as economic risks. What steps would you take to assess risks and ensure these risks are being addressed proactively? Be sure to consider journals and organizations an HR professional should subscribe to and become a member of. To complete this assignment, use at least two credible sources to prepare a 4-5-page risk assessment plan that you will present to the CEO. In your plan, you will present a case for the need to proactively evaluate risk and respond to unforeseen risk. Please include the following in your plan:
Explain how an HR department benefits from proactively assessing risk. In your explanation, provide information regarding current trends in the HR industry for assessing risk. Cite your sources of information.
Summarize the process by which HR departments proactively evaluate risk.
Describe at least one potentially unforeseen risk, such as economic changes, and analyze how the HR department would strategically respond.
Once the risk to the company is identified and the HR department has a strategic response, the new operations manager will need to create a policy and process to ensure the risk is mitigated. Provide three points the operations manager must include in the policy and process.
Assessing and Managing Risk
Time to Fly: Predicting Director Exit at Large Firms Critical Essay
Time to Fly: Predicting Director Exit at Large Firms Critical Essay. Introduction The article titled, “Time to Fly: Predicting Director Exit at Large Firms” by Boivie, Graffin and Pollock (2012) presents a unique perspective to the issue of board operations. The writers sought to investigate the factors that influence the decision by directors to quit or to remain on the board of large firms. This paper presents a systematic review of the article with an emphasis on the research decisions made by the writers, as well as the nature of the information presented. Research Question The researchers did not state a clear research question for the project. They however laid out a basis for their research on the fact that it is difficult to study why people choose to serve on boards. Such a study would require access to people who have declined offers to serve on the boards as well as those who have accepted. That said, the introduction of the article points to an interest by the researchers in the reasons why directors “choose to remain or leave boards”. This will suffice as the research question for the purposes of this analysis. Theoretical Framework The theoretical framework used in the research process had two aspects. First, the researchers explored the use of the agency theory in studies relating to director exit. This theory argues that the executives in a firm will tend to pursue their own goals rather than pursue the interests of the owners of the firm. Therefore, the presence of a board encourages the executives to stick to the objectives set by the owners of the firm. The motivation of external directors is the good performance of the company, as well as the potential backlash arising from poor performance by the firm. The researchers faulted this theory because it focuses on extrinsic motivation to the exclusion of intrinsic motivation. In this regard, the researchers chose to use the self-determination theory as the guiding framework for the project because it accounts for intrinsic motivation. Research Design, Data Collection, and Analysis The research design for this project took a long-term view of how directors exit firms. The researchers used data that followed the exit path of directors, rather than following how directors exited from specific firms. The data collected for the research came from various sources. The directors chosen were those listed in Risk Metrics, formerly IRRC. The database contains a list of all directors listed in public firms in the United States. The list used in this project had more than 11,000 names, representing 30% of all directors. Other data, such as the demographic information of all the directors, as well as the characteristics of the boards, and firm sizes came from various sources. These sources include Social Register, LexisNexis, and Compustat. The analysis of the data collected from the sources sampled above involved the identification of dependent and independent variables. The dependent variable in the project was “director exit”. The independent variables were prestige, director influence, as well as reputational and financial risk. The researchers also identified a set of control variables. The control variables were firm size, firm diversification, CEO duality, and total director pay, among others. These variables formed the basis for data analysis. Summary of Findings and Authors’ Contribution The researchers made the following findings. First, the researchers found that prestige contributed to continued board membership in addition to the holding of a formal position within that board. The second main finding reported by the researchers was that the likelihood of board members quitting was higher with increased time demands. Boards that take too much time from the directors tend to have a higher transition rate. The researchers also found that board members are likely to quit from organizations that are performing poorly and those that have little media visibility. Financial and reputational risks are closely correlated to board member retention. The main contribution of the researchers to the issues that they have investigated is that they have done a longitudinal study showing why directors leave, from the perspective of the directors. Critical Examination of the Study The journal article presented by the researchers was well prepared. The researchers were able to show a distinct difference in their approach to the issue of directors leaving organizations by following the career path of directors through several organizations. This made the research question interesting. The research was not groundbreaking, rather it was meant to fill in a gap. In this sense, the research questions were not original, but were very innovative in the context of the other studies that sought to address the same issue. The researchers themselves indicate that the use of historical data was a weakness in their project. While this method made it possible for them to collect and analyse a large quantity of information, it was not possible to check the findings against current realities. The researchers suggested that a study that uses questionnaires and interviews would help to check the attitudes and the views of current board members against their findings. A second way in which the researchers could have undertaken the project would be by looking at specific organizations as well as the directors who served in them. The study results helped to answer the research question. The research question used in this research project was to determine the reasons why directors choose to remain or leave organizations. The researchers did well to find out reasons contributing to the retention of directors as well as those that lead to their exit from organizations. The main limitation of this study was the lack of a mechanism to validate the information collected by the researchers. The researchers did not involve board members in the study. While the goals of the project as set by the researchers were achieved, the research results would have been more authentic if it was subjected to a validation process. Secondly, the researchers relied on very specific databases and listings to get the research results. There is no proper basis given for the use of the Standard and Poor’s 500 list of companies. This betrays a lack of rigour in the choice of information sources by the researchers. What would the results look like if they used the Fortune 500 list of companies, or if they developed their own listing based on a stronger theoretical perspective? Reference List Ambrose, MLTime to Fly: Predicting Director Exit at Large Firms Critical Essay