Get help from the best in academic writing.

WU Wk 9 Mixed Methods Research Oralus Paul Athena Coleman & Maia Junco Discussion

WU Wk 9 Mixed Methods Research Oralus Paul Athena Coleman & Maia Junco Discussion.

1 day agoOralus Paul Week 9 DiscussionCOLLAPSEPost your response to the question, “To what extent is mixed methods research simply taking a quantitative design and a qualitative design and putting them together?”Mixed methods research originated in the social sciences and its procedures have been developed and refined to suit a wide variety of research questions (Creswell and Plano Clark, 2011). It is often referred to as the “third wave” or third research movement, a movement that moves past the paradigm wars by offering a logical and practical alternative. Along the same line of thinking, Mixed methods research can be defined as the class of research where the researcher mixes or combines quantitative and qualitative research techniques, methods, approaches, concepts, or language into a single study (Johnson & Onwuegbuzie, 2004). In essence, it is a more inclusive approach that allows researchers multiple avenues to address the research questions. In fact, many research questions and combinations of questions are best and most fully answered through mixed research solutions (Johnson & Onwuegbuzie, 2004).There are several reasons for using mixed methods in health science research. Researchers may seek to view problems from multiple perspectives to enhance and enrich the meaning of a singular perspective. They also may want to contextualize information, to take a macro picture of a system (e.g., a hospital) and add in information about individuals (e.g., working at different levels in the hospital). Other reasons include to merge quantitative and qualitative data to develop a more complete understanding of a problem; to develop a complementary picture; to compare, validate, or triangulate results; to provide illustrations of context for trends, or to examine processes/experiences along with outcomes (Plano Clark, 2010)Next, explain the types of research questions best served by mixed methods research. Then, explain one strength and one limitation of mixed methods research.As mentioned previously, justification to mix both types of methods and data are that neither quantitative nor qualitative methods could adequately within themselves cover the scopes and depths of the questions on “what”, “how” and “why” (Fung & Siow, 2013). In a mixed-methods study, researchers typically delineate research questions that pertain specifically to the analysis of quantitative data and ones that pertain specifically to the analysis of qualitative data. It is possible also to add research questions that can be answered by the combination of the interpretations of both kinds of analysis (Stanford University, n.d.).Using a mixed methods study has several advantages. One of the most obvious strengths of this method is the fact that it provides methodological flexibility. Mixed methods have great flexibility and are adaptable to many study designs, such as observational studies and randomized trials, to elucidate more information than can be obtained in only quantitative research (Wisdom & Creswell, 2013). However, this method also has some limitations to include among others the fact that it requires increased resources. Mixed methods studies are labor-intensive and require greater resources and time than those needed to conduct a single method study (Wisdom & Creswell, 2013).Finally, provide a rationale for or against the utility of mixed methods research in your discipline.In the field of public health/epidemiology, the quantitative approach has allowed researchers to understand health problems (what) and for computing the magnitude of health problems according to time, place, and person characteristics (when, where, and who) as well as for determining the causes of these problems (why and how). Whereas, the qualitative paradigm allows them to develop an in-depth understanding of the social phenomenon, that is, why and how of human behavior or decision making, rather than finding out only the what, when, where, and who aspects of the behavior, by using research methods which rely more on unstructured interviews, focus group discussion (FGD), case study, participant observation, etc. (Kaur, 2016).In the recent past, public health has witnessed a paradigm shift from only delivering the interventions to understanding the health behavior of people, especially to prioritize options on how the risk behaviors can be addressed to reduce harm. Mixed method research approach may provide some directions in this regard for formulation and evaluation of health communication strategy. Putting the knowledge into practice or translational or implementation research to enhance health equity, that is, reducing health status differences between and within population groups, is another area where mixed method research can lead to formulation of policies that enhance access to effective care by provision of user-friendly public health services to those who need it most (Kaur, 2016).ReferencesCreswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. SAGE.Fung, H. P., & Siow, H. L. (2013). Relationship between team satisfaction and project performance as perceived by project managers in Malaysia – A mixed methods study. Open Journal of Social Science Research, 1(9), 238. https://doi.org/10.12966/ojssr.12.02.2013Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14-26. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x033007014Kaur, M. (2016). Application of mixed method approach in public health research. Indian Journal of Community Medicine, 41(2), 93. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-0218.173495Plano Clark, V. L. (2010). The adoption and practice of mixed methods: U.S. trends in Federally funded health-related research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(6), 428-440. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410364609Stanford University. (n.d.). Mixed-methods research. https://tomprof.stanford.edu/posting/1554Wisdom, J., & Creswell, J. W. (2013). Mixed methods: Integrating quantitative and qualitative data collection and analysis while studying patient-centered medical home models. PCMH Resource Center. https://pcmh.ahrq.gov/page/mixed-methods-integrating-quantitative-and-qualitative-data-collection-and-analysis-while2 days agoAthena Coleman Mixed research wk 9COLLAPSEPUBH 8110H: Research Theory, Design, and MethodsWeek 9 Discussion 1Walden UniversityBy: Athena ColemanInstructor: Dr. Skiranta BanerjeeResearch is the (Dictionary, 2020)” diligent and systematic inquiry or investigation into a subject in order to discover or revise facts, theories, applications.” Research is used to analyze the purpose of the research problem. Therefore, if a qualitative or quantitative method is used, research characteristics have to be generalized. Research characteristics (Bhat, 2020) is” a systematic approach must be followed for accurate data, Rules and procedures are an integral part of the process that set the objective, and Researchers that practice ethics and a code of conduct while making observations or drawing conclusions.” Hence, understanding that “Research is based on logical reasoning and involves both inductive and deductive methods. (Bhat, 2020)”Mixed method research is the composer of one of more principles from the qualitative and quantitative designs. The basics of mixed research “integration permit a more complete and synergistic utilization of data than do separate quantitative and qualitative data collection and analysis (Widsom, Creswell, 2013).” The mixed research method is quantitative data to expand quantitative findings. The analysis uses quantitative tools and qualitative collect tools to answer the research problem.The research addressed the research problem by defining the purpose, problem, and limitations of mixed research frameworks. The research was able to clearly define the research problem with the rationale of both frameworks collecting methods. The research problem was framed from the history to the expansion of the framework to theorized the research. The research wasn’t thoroughly defined to convey the research problem. The citation for the literature review was mostly current, but history details weren’t from new sources. The citation was compared to many resources; the resource was able to support the research problem. The researcher was able to introduce to the audience by staying the combination principles with quantitative and qualitative methods to characterize mixed research. The article provided population and participation details, but the sample size wasn’t detailed. But, the evidence justified the approach of using a mixed research instead of qualitative or quantitative research for health topics. The literature was able to explain mixed research and provided evidence to expand the framework into health subjects.Maternal mortality is an excellent subject for mixed research. The research can analyze statistical information to evaluate the prevalence of MM in the community. Along with the previous survey and data to evaluate the policy change that could impact the prevalence of MM. References:Bhat, Adi.(2020). What is Research – Definition, Methods, Types & Examples. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.questionpro.com/blog/what-is-research/amp/Dictionary.(2020).Research. https://www.dictionary.com/browse/researchWisdom, Jennifer, Ph.D.,John W Creswell, Ph.D.(2013). Mixed Methods: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis While Studying Patient-Centered Medical Home Models. https://pcmh.ahrq.gov/page/mixed-methods-integrating-quantitative-and-qualitative-data-collection-and-analysis-while2 days agoMaia Junco MMR week 9COLLAPSE8110 Research Theory, Design, and MethodsDr. Srikanta Banerjee Maia Junco Mixed-Method Research To what extent is mixed methods research simply taking a quantitative design and a qualitative design and putting them together?” Mixed-method research (MMR) combines both, qualitative – the emic- and quantitative- the etic- perspectives of researchers and participants. Scientists use this method only if the research question and purpose merits the use of inductive and deductive analysis. When a researcher uses the mixed method they should take an intersubjective stance that links objective and statistical information with subjective and constructivist observations(Burkholder et al.,2020). Scholars and practitioners use MMR to improve the quality of studies through triangulation (more quality and validity in data measures), complementarity (a clear view of the content), development of stages in the study, initiation( new views of issues), and the expansion of ideas and knowledge (Burkholder et al.,2020). After defining the research question, the association between the two methods should result in an abductive approach (Burkholder et al.,2020). Types of research questions best served by mixed methods research. The type of research questions used for MMR examines complex issues through measuring data and exploring a phenomenon(Burkholder et al.,2020). The purpose of an MMR should be to have a positive impact on the individual, community, or society. An example of this is the use of MMR in Evidence-based interventions and participatory research that uses randomized control trials to test an intervention combined with interviews and observations that give an idea of the conditions in which this intervention was done. This type of study combines the power of scientific data analysis of an etic perspective with the view of participants, which is an emic perspective, to expand our knowledge and help develop new policies and change society with the power of science. Burkholder et al., 2020; Jhonson & Onwuegbuzie. 2004 discussed MMR as a third paradigm with a core in pragmatism based on ‘purpose, context and consequences’(Burkholder et al.,2020) Explain one strength and one limitation of mixed methods research.MMR studies have several strengths, it improves the quality of a study by making a more complete analysis and using the power of Quantitative and qualitative analysis. A limitation of MMR is that is more difficult to conduct the methodology, it may take a larger group of scientists and it is usually more expensive to conduct. (Jhonson & Onwuegbuzie, 20004)The utility of mixed methods research in your discipline I am in favor of using a mixed-method within my discipline of public health. I see the MMR as an opportunity to study and discover determinants of health in the community with a more holistic approach. I am interested in the effectiveness of health care practice and disease management for the early diagnosis and prevention of Alzheimer’s Disease (AD). I will find out how social and cultural factors influence the development of the disease and the relationship between the healthcare system, patients, and their families. With this approach, I would look forward to decreasing health disparities in minorities such as the Hispanic community through participatory research, by having an impact on the way primary doctors approach AD in the early stages of screening and diagnosis. I was lucky to participate in the Virtual Annual American Public health Convention this week and most of the research studies presented were related to social change in these historic times we are living in, which aligned with the goal of mixed-method to produce a change in policy and society that is proposed by researchers with the transformative view (Burkholder et al., 2020)ReferencesBurkholder, G. J., Cox, K. A., Crawford, L. M., & Hitchcock, J. H. (Eds.). (2020). Research designs and methods: An applied guide for the scholar-practitioner. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Jhonson R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has ome. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14-26. Retrieved from https://ezp.waldenulibrary.org/login?qurl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.proquest.com%2Fdocview%2F216901546%3Faccountid%3D148722 days agocolette smith Week 9 discussion questionCOLLAPSETo what extent is mixed methods research simply taking a quantitative design and a qualitative design and putting them togetherA mixed methods research is taking the elements of both quantitative and qualitative studies and using them in various ways in the study (Collins & O’cathain, 2009). Mixed methods research is defined as the class of research where the researcher mixes or combines quantitative and qualitative research techniques, methods, approaches, or concepts into a single study(Johnson & Onwuegbuzie, 2004, p. 16). It is the cumulation of data that complement each other and compensate for the other methodologies inherit weaknesses. Mixed methods research is a collection of data collected in multiple ways to highlight the strengths of each quantitative and qualitative methodologies. The mixed methods research improves the quality of the study and can be used in various stages within the research.. Types of research questions best served by mixed methods research.Mixed methods research is beneficial when unknown aspects of a phenomena are answered with information that is presented in both narrative and numerical forms. It provides the subjective and objective data. This research takes a holistic approach to understand the phenomena. ’ One strength of mixed methods research.Mixed methods research allows the researcher to maximize on the strengths of one methodology and to augment the weaknesses of another study (Johnson & Onwuegbuzie, 2004). One limitation of mixed methods research. Mixed methods research may be difficult for a single person to carry out especially if it requires the quantitative and qualitative to run concurrently(Johnson & Onwuegbuzie, 2004). Finally, provide a rationale for or against the utility of mixed methods research in your discipline.Mixed methods research is necessary in public health research to present the objective numbers and statistics but also answer the questions as to why this phenomena is happening in the subjective or qualitative sense. ReferencesCollins, K., & O’cathain, A. (2009). Introduction. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 3(1), 2–7. Retrieved October 29, 2020, from https://doi.org/10.5172/mra.455.3.1.2Johnson, R., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26. Retrieved October 29, 2020, from https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189×033007014
WU Wk 9 Mixed Methods Research Oralus Paul Athena Coleman & Maia Junco Discussion

Herzing University Violation of Healthcare Related Laws Analysis.

As a health care manager, you are responsible for ensuring compliance with various healthcare-related laws in your department. For this assignment, you will create a fictional scenario involving yourself as a manager:Construct a scenario where one of the following laws is violated:False Claims ActAnti-Kickback StatutePhysician Self-Referral LawCriminal Healthcare Fraud StatuteExplain your role (as manager) in the department.Explain the violation that occurs, including the circumstances that led up to it.Outline the action steps you, as a manager, must take to address the situation.Summarize the impact of your scenario in a concise, closing paragraph.Include in-text citations to support the information you provided.A minimum of three references should be used.
Herzing University Violation of Healthcare Related Laws Analysis

QSO 500 Florida National University Week 1 Rong Et Al Article Analysis.

Week 1 Assignment:After studying the chapters 1, 2 and 3, do the following activities:1. Have students investigate various journals for an article of interest to them. The article should be no more than two years old and have sufficient content for a two-page report. The object of the critique is to describe how the study followed or failed to follow, the criteria for good research, as described in Chapter 1. Students should speculate on which of the writer’s conclusions were warranted, and which were not. (See handout on the attached document).How to find an article (research paper):Go to http://www.lirn.net/databases/Enter User name: 24439 and Password: smartlearn39 then go to Business subject/click on ABI/INFORM GlobalWhen you are in: Check Full text and Peer Reviewed boxes then write any business subject in the search box, for example, “organizational conflict” and select any research paper by clicking on the PDF attached file. When you have the full article then follow the exercise 1 instructions.If researchers are responsible for the ethical conduct of their research, are they solely responsible for the burden of protecting participants from every conceivable harm?
QSO 500 Florida National University Week 1 Rong Et Al Article Analysis

LGBT Acceptance Score Card Discussion.

InstructionsGo to the Franklin & Marshall College Global Barometer of Gay Rights (Links to an external site.) homepage. Make sure you have read the content in the “About the Project (Links to an external site.)” and “Methodology (Links to an external site.)” sections prior to completing this assignment.On the homepage, scroll down until you see the heading “Look Up Most Recent Score by Country”Using the click-down menu under both columns (“The F&M Global Barometer of Gay Rights” and “The F&M Global Barometer of Transgender Rights”), complete the following activity:Look up the scores for the United States in both categories. You may type the scores in your response but it is not a requirement.Submit a brief response (at least 100 words) in which you answer the following questions:What grade were you expecting the U.S. to receive in both categories? How did the actual grade match your expectation? Do you think the grades provide a realistic depiction of gay rights and trans rights in the U.S.?
LGBT Acceptance Score Card Discussion

Conflict in the work team Case Study

A work team consists of six members who apparently share jobs and adhere to the roster system. The case study under discussion represents the conflict caused by the leader, Kim, who changes an agreed schedule without notifying other members of the team. As a result, some members disagree with the new schedule. The changes in the roster create great problems to Palo who has already created some plans for weekend and it seems inconvenient for him to get up at 6 am on Saturday. Moreover, the conflict is supported by the fact that the roster has been altered several times, creating inconveniences to the team members. The remaining four members of the team, Chris, Pat, Sari and Tuan are angry with a leader as it is not for the first time when Kim changes the arranged planes. The case study under discussion point at some specific problems considered un class. Generally, the case study and the lectures are devoted to the teams. The problems of communication in teams and conflict management are the issues which connect the lecture material and the case under discussion. Conflict in the team is caused when group norms are broken and one person violates the principles of team norms. The nature of the conflict lies in the inability of the team leader to communicate with other members of the team and arrange the changes in such a way that all remain satisfied. The main communication problems which occur in the group are connected with a failure to distribute the roles appropriately and disrespect. Thus, it appears that all of the members believe they work in a group with democratic leadership style, while the leader works in autocratic style and does not want to listen to team members. The conflict can be managed be means of several strategies. The first strategy is being aware of the ways in which conflicts can occur. Had Kim known that conflict would have occurred due to alterations made to the roster, he would have first communicated to the team in order to curb any form of conflict arising. Get your 100% original paper on any topic done in as little as 3 hours Learn More The team leader then should use verbal and non-verbal signs, apply to twelve conflict resolution skills and provide a platform for constructive feedback after communicating with the team members. The brainstorming technique may be used for solving a problem. Each member should have an opportunity to express personal opinion about the roster, make corrections and support the ideas of each other. Team members ought to respect each other instead of arguing. They are to give descriptions of their role in the intended roster system. The team members can put across their ideologies for developing options and establishing a preferable resolution on the subject matter which is the roster system. In case where the members cannot agree on a reasonable solution, it is advisable to turn to a third party to mediate. This work team can apply effective procedures to prevent unnecessary conflict which includes implementation of a win-win approach where team members are contented with the decision made as well as the team leader. Cooperation in decision making and ensuring that all members of the team participate in decision making process and also treatment of team members with respect is a procedure that prevents unnecessary conflict from occurring one.

SO 342 Park University Unit 4 Racial Inequality and Segregation Paper

assignment helper SO 342 Park University Unit 4 Racial Inequality and Segregation Paper.

IntroductionAnswer the prompt in a 2-3 page essay. Your essay will be graded on how well it exhibits: clear sociological understanding of unit and question concept; critically reflective and insightful analysis, explanation and application: clear writing, with strong thesis and organization, proper formatting aligned with disciplinary conventions and citationsDirectionsChoose a city to explore from Mapping Inequality. (Links to an external site.) Read through differently graded area descriptions and explain how race is used to determine risk. Next, explore the same city’s racial makeup today: Mapping Segregation. (Links to an external site.)Identify any correlations between the maps, and describe how federal policy from the past has contributed to the current racial segregation today, and the impact of institutional discrimination.Reading Material Attached, Extra material on subject listed below:Mapping Inequality. (Links to an external site.)Mapping Segregation (Links to an external site.)Video- Race: The Power of Illusion- Part 3 (Links to an external site.)
SO 342 Park University Unit 4 Racial Inequality and Segregation Paper

University of South Florida Business Dimensions and Emotional Branding HW

University of South Florida Business Dimensions and Emotional Branding HW.

Please read table 10.1 on page 162. List a brand or company that you can apply to each dimension. You must choose a different brand or company for each dimension. Post and reply per syllabus instructions.You must reply to the post and respond to at least 2 (two) classmates per the following guidelines to be eligible for credit. The initial post should be a MINIMUM of 250 words, present an in-depth discussion, and utilize APA formatted references/sources (https://www.mendeley.com/guides/apa-citation-guide (Links to an external site.)) to support your assertions. Your replies should EACH be a MINIMUM of 200 words per post, refer to peers’ comments to build on concepts, and include APA formatted references/sources to support your assertions. You are required to submit a post prior to viewing other student posts. However, you may choose to post a video instead. Using the ‘Record/Upload Media’ in the WSYWIG above, you can record or upload your discussion post. If you do decide to use media to respond, then you cannot use the written APA when referencing, but you can mention where you found your information in your recording.
University of South Florida Business Dimensions and Emotional Branding HW

How the Courts Address or Respect Our Rights as Citizens – Outline

How the Courts Address or Respect Our Rights as Citizens – Outline. Paper details Required Resources Read/review the following resources for this activity: Textbook: Chapter 11, 12 Lesson Minimum of 2 scholarly sources in addition to the textbook. Instructions This assignment is comprised of 2 parts, the first of which is due this week. Part II will be due in Week 7. In Part I this week, choose a case from your state that involves civil rights or civil liberties that wound its way up to the United States Supreme Court. If your state does not have a case that ended up in the United States Supreme Court, choose a civil rights case from another state that ended up in the Supreme Court of the United States. Here is a brief description of civil rights and civil liberties: Civil rights refers to equal social opportunities under the law. It gives you these freedoms such as the right to vote, the right to public education, or a fair trial, among other things, regardless of your wealth or race. Civil liberties mean freedom of religion, equal treatment and due process under the law, and the right to privacy. You should be able to go online and look up your state and famous cases that ended up in the Supreme Court. For example, Brown v Board of Education (1951) started in Topeka, Kansas and ended up in the Supreme Court of the United States. Another example would be Calvary Chapel Dayton Valley v Steve Sisolak, Governor of Nevada (2020) that started in Nevada and ended up the United States Supreme Court. Research your court case and write an outline of the case that you will be using to prepare a presentation, which will either be a narrated PowerPoint, a Kaltura Video, or some other format as approved by your instructor. Be sure to verify the presentation format with your instructor before starting work on this assignment. This week’s assignment should include (a) summary of the case, and (b) a case outline A. Summary of the Case In one or two paragraphs, provide a general overview of the case that serves as a snapshot of what the case is about and how it ended up in your state high court. A summary is using your words to write a brief history of the case. Do not give your opinion or your interpretation but stick to the facts only. B: Case Outline Your court case outline should include: Title: Name of the case Facts of the case: Provide key facts involving the case. History of the case: What legal action was taken based on what your state laws say about this case? Legal questions: What were the legal issues the court had to decide? Decision or holdings: Did the court decide for the plaintiff or the defendant? Explain the reason behind the decision? Verdict and opinion (judgement): What were the concurring and dissenting opinions? How many judges decided for the defendant and how many justices decided against the defendant? What was the final verdict from the judge or the jury, if it was a jury trial? Summary: What was the resulting impact of the ruling? How did the citizens of your state benefit from it? Make sure to not give our opinion but stick to the facts only. This summary just gives a brief rundown of the case and conclusion only, just the Writing Requirements (APA format) The length of your outline will vary. Usually an outline is anywhere from 1-3 pages long. Make sure to write full sentences to explain your case. It is a concise list to be used as a reference for you during the presentation. Using the outline, you will be describing the court case in your presentation and the scenario around the court case. The use of Wikipedia as a primary source of information is to be avoided – it is not a reliable source of information. Search for an example of a case outline in the Internet. Without going into much detail at this state, each of the items listed above has a subject sentence with 3-6 bullet points that can help you expand on the topic. For Week 8, you will be creating a narrated PowerPoint, or a video as approved by your instructor, from this week’s outline. This assignment is worth 200 points. 1-inch margins Double spaced 12-point Times New Roman font Title page References page (minimum of 2 scholarly sources in addition to textbook if cited) Grading This activity will be graded based on the Written Assignment Grading Rubric. Course Outcomes (CO): 1, 5, 6 Due Date: By 11:59 p.m. MT on Sunday Rubric Week 6 – Part I: How the Courts Address or Respect Our Rights as Citizens – Outline Week 6 – Part I: How the Courts Address or Respect Our Rights as Citizens – Outline Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSummary 30 pts Includes a stellar summary that accurately describes the critical components of the case. 26 pts Includes a good summary that describes the critical components of the case but omits 1 or 2 minor parts. 23 pts Includes a summary that has the case details but omits 1 or 2 major parts. 20 pts Includes a summary that has some case details only. 0 pts No effort 30 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTitle and Facts of the Case 30 pts There are at least three key facts related to the case, including the parties involved. Answer includes the case title and name. 26 pts There are no more than two key facts related to the case, including the parties involved. Answer contains both the case title and name. 23 pts There is only one key fact about the case. Answer contains either the title or the case name, but not both. 20 pts The answer does not contain key facts about the case. Answer contains either the title or the case name. 0 pts No effort 30 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeHistory of the Case 40 pts The outline covers a sufficient level of case history to make the legal actions surrounding the case clear and detailed. 35 pts The outline demonstrates points of case history surrounding the legal actions of the course case. 31 pts The outline provides brief points of case history surrounding the legal actions of the course case. 27 pts The outline provides such a minimal number of points of case history surrounding the legal actions that the history of the case is not clear. 0 pts No effort 40 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLegal Questions 30 pts The outline clearly points to the specific civil liberty issues that the courts had to determine to issue a verdict. 26 pts The outline points to the general civil liberty issues that the courts had to determine to issue a verdict. 23 pts The outline provides some information regarding the general civil liberty issues that the courts had to determine to issue a verdict. 20 pts The outline is not clear regarding the general civil liberty issues that the courts had to determine to issue a verdict. 0 pts No effort 30 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeHoldings and Court Conditions 20 pts Holdings or court imposed conditions are clearly explained. 17 pts Holdings or court imposed conditions are not clearly explained. 15 pts Omits any holdings or court imposed conditions. 13 pts Holdings or court imposed conditions are also omitted. 0 pts No effort 20 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeVerdict and Opinion 30 pts Includes court verdict, and the legal basis for the verdict is well explained. Reference cases are listed too. 30 pts Includes court verdict, but the legal basis for the verdict has room for improvement. Reference cases are listed too. 23 pts Includes court verdict, but the legal basis for the verdict is inaccurate. Reference cases missing. 20 pts Only includes the court verdict. 0 pts No effort 30 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting: Mechanics and Usage 10 pts The writing is concise, free of errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation. 8 pts The writing is free of errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation. 7 pts The writing contains some errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation. 6 pts The student presents information that is not clear, logical, professional or organized to the point that the reader has difficulty understanding the message 0 pts No effort 10 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCitations 10 pts The references are provided in accurate APA format. 8 pts The references contain a few minor error in APA format. 7 pts The references contain several minor errors in APA format. 6 pts The references contain major errors in APA format. 0 pts No effort 10 pts Total Points: 200 How the Courts Address or Respect Our Rights as Citizens – Outline