Get help from the best in academic writing.

Writer’s Choice

Writer’s Choice. Paper details In everyday life, we judge other people not only by what they say but also to some extent by their appearances and their conduct. Do you feel that the demeanor of witnesses can and does affect the outcome of a trial? Why or why not? Do you feel it is possible for a witnesses’ demeanor to affect his/her credibility while testifying? If so, how could this be used as a tactic by either the prosecution or defense to strengthen their In everyday life, we judge other people not only by what they say but also to some extent by their appearances and their conduct. Do you feel that the demeanor of witnesses can and does affect the outcome of a trial? Why or why not? Do you feel it is possible for a witnesses’ demeanor to affect his/her credibility while testifying? If so, how could this be used as a tactic by either the prosecution or defense to strengthen their case? Under the attorney-client privilege, the privilege applies when a client discloses past wrongdoing to the attorney. For example, if a client told his/her attorney that they had committed a sexual assault a year ago, which was unrelated to the current case, the attorney would not be legally obligated to report this crime to authorities. Do you feel that this privilege should extend to such circumstances? Why or why not? Come up with at least two reasons for and against this privilege. Writer’s Choice
Introduction – Short summary of the business problem. This section will also include a background of the organization.Challenges – Provide for a brief description of the challenges that the organizati. This section will also include a background of the organization. Challenges – Provide for a brief description of the challenges that the organization is facing and how they are planning to address them. This section will provide the audience with a picture of how the organization is planning to address some of the challenges. Change Management – Discuss how change is being managed by the organization. Recommendations – Discuss what you would have done differently and why. Conclusions – Discuss the lessons learned and the key messages that you would like the audience to take away. Introduction – Short summary of the business problem. This section will also include a background of the organization.Challenges – Provide for a brief description of the challenges that the organizati
Table of Contents Introduction Ambivalence Conclusion Reference List Introduction Published in 1991 and written by Art Spiegelman, the MAUS is a book that provides the account of the author’s effort of knowing his Jewish parents’ experience, following the Holocaust as well as their survival in U.S. It gives a picture of the difficult affiliation between the author and his parents where he stands as a survivor of this as well. This tale is presented in the form of a conversation between the author and Vladek – his father. In a humorous manner, Spiegelman employs animals to represent characters. For instance, dogs represent the Americans while reindeers represent Swedes, among others. The setting of this interview is a large area ranging from New York through Germany to Sweden, a style that enables the writer to give a broad picture of the mass destruction during the World War II while at the same time he shows the nature of relationships in his family prior and after the war. The author uses characters like Vladek Spiegelman-Art’s father, Anja-Vladek’s wife, Art- Vladek’s son, among others, all of whom are survivors of the holocaust, either direct or indirect. The concept of ambivalence stands out clearly in the book through the various relationships provided. For instance, Vladek’s ambivalence towards his son, Art, is clear as explained in the following paragraph. Ambivalence Ambivalence is no more than the disagreement of ones feelings towards another person or a thing. This person may simultaneously portray both the positive and negative views towards another. The novel is rich in this concept. For example, Vladek is the father to Art. He loves him but he is unable to show it off. This case is seen when Art, who has been playing with his friends accidentally falls. Art cries of pain and rushes towards his father for assistance.“…until he has spent five days locked in a room with a group of people and no food, he cannot know the meaning of the word friends” (Spiegelman, 1991). These are the father’s comments to his son. Vladek ought to act like a loving parent by soothing his son to stop crying as well as nursing his pain. From the response, it is not clear whether he loves his son or not. Whether he said this to make his son laugh rather than cry or whether he said this out of ignorance is not determined. Moreover, he is willing to converse with his son. In fact he narrates to him about his origin as well as that of their family. But the way he addresses some questions is wanting. When Art enquires about the dairies, Vladek does not hesitate in giving his weird answers. “I looked in, but I don’t remember” (Spiegelman, 1991). These answers fail to classify Vladek’s feeling towards Art. He has a diverse feeling towards his son and this is no more than ambivalence. Art’s feelings towards his father are also strained and uncertain too. Get your 100% original paper on any topic done in as little as 3 hours Learn More Art portrays an all-round relationship with his father. This is apparent because he entirely relies on him for the account of his own story. He frequently visits him at his yard. Following the suicide of his mother, Art declares that his father is a murderer (1991). In addition, when Vladek feels dizzy, he demands the assistance of Art who in turn fails to rescue him. Based on these issues, it is not clear whether Art has positive or negative feelings towards his father. Paying him frequent visits and abusing him portray two opposing feelings, showing how he is unsure towards his father. Another uncertainty stands out between Vladek and his own self. It is apparent that all people love themselves and Vladek is not an exception. When he is visited by Art, he is found putting in place a variety of pills. From their conversation, Vladek posits that in order to be strong, he ought to fight for his own salvation. Art’s healers posit that Vladek has a guilty sensation following his surviving in the holocaust. This makes it vague of the kind of feelings he has for his own self and hence ambivalent. Moreover, in another dialogue between Vladek and Art, neither of the two understands the feelings of the other as Art enquires about the holocaust. Vladek has a real experience of the scenario unlike Art. Art cannot understand the feelings of his father in relation to the episode because he (Art) was not there as it occurred. On the other hand, Vladek is unable to identify his son’s feelings towards him because the two do not relate in the sense that the scenario happened in the presence of one and not both. Therefore the two are ambivalent towards each other. The relationship between Vladek and Anja is also ambivalent as expounded below. Anja meets with Vladek and her boyfriend. They stay together in this relationship until they marry. This shows that Anja loves Vladek because of this evident willing to stay together as husband and wife. However, Anja has another boyfriend, whom she also loves. It is thus unclear of whether Anja is truly in love with Vladek or the other boy. This identifies her as ambivalent towards Vladek. Vladek on the other hand accepts to marry Anja. Following the incidence where Anja’s friend was arrested, Vladek opts to terminate his marriage with Anja. When Anja gives birth to Richieu, their first child, she is taken to a high class hospital where she is well-nursed by Vladek until she recovers. Vladek’s conduct of nursing and ending of their marriage, as depicted here are opposite. Whether he is a real loving husband or not fails to be clear basing on this, hence ambivalent towards Anja. The connection between Vladek and his own father is undefined as well. We will write a custom Essay on Art Spiegelman, MAUS specifically for you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More In their dialogue, Vladek explains to Art that he was almost intentionally starved to death by his father. He adds that he was even denied sleep. This followed from a plan between him (father) and his army, which sought to absorb Vladek as a soldier. Vladek tells his father not to repeat that again implying how mistreated he felt, though he becomes a soldier later. Based on this, his stance as a father, behind this scenario is not defined. His feelings towards his son are no more than ambivalent. Conclusion The concept of ambivalence is well developed in the book. However, it is worthy noting that this concept has some attached functions. For instance, it functions to maintain one’s undefined state which is, to some extend, important. In the book, it has played a crucial role in the represented relationships. For instance, if Art hated his father, he would not have gotten the material for his book. If he loved him, he would have rescued him when he was ailing. In addition, Anja’s ambivalence towards Vladek places her in a position better that she can be if she sticks to either of the two. If Vladek leaves her as he says, Anja will join her other boyfriend. If that is not the case, she is still safe. This shows how ambivalence plays an adaptive role in this relationship since Anja can adapt whichever outcome of her marriage. These, among other illustrations, depict ambivalence as a tool that serves some crucial functions, as discussed above. Reference List Spiegelman, A. (1991). Maus: A Survivor’s Tale: And Here My Troubles Began. New York: Pantheon.
FIN 571 Tusculum College Effects of Helicopter Parenting Journal Article Critique.

Reading the Article: Points to ConsiderRead the article carefully. Record your impressions and note sections suitable for quoting. Who is the intended audience? What is the author’s purpose? To survey and summarize research on a topic? To present an argument that builds on past research? To refute another writer’s argument? Does the author define important terms? Is the information in the article fact or opinion? (Facts can be verified, while opinions arise from interpretations of facts.) Does the information seem well-researched or is it unsupported? What are the author’s central arguments or conclusions? Are they clearly stated? Are they supported by evidence and analysis? If the article reports on an experiment or study, does the author clearly outline methodology and the expected result? Is the article lacking information or argumentation that you expected to find? Is the article organized logically and easy to follow? Does the writer’s style suit the intended audience? Is the style stilted or unnecessarily complicated? Is the author’s language objective or charged with emotion and bias? If illustrations or charts are used, are they effective in presenting information? Please divide your paper into 4 or 5 sections prompted by the list above.Each article is different, so there is no standard format.Have a heading for each section, bold and left justified.Begin with an introductory paragraph introducing the topic and the article. Then write the article and have a paragraph or two of conclusion and reflection. Write a minimum of 1,000words. This means you cannot have an extensive summary of the article (like you did for Article Summary assignment)and will need to be concise.You will be graded on how well you understand the article, so read it the way you are instructed above. Read the article once and then go back and read and highlight according to the questions above. Not all questions will pertain to every article. This is probably the first time you have ever done a writing assignment like this, and we understand that. Just do your best work, proof read, and edit.Include a reference page at the end of your critique in flawless APA style.
FIN 571 Tusculum College Effects of Helicopter Parenting Journal Article Critique

Response Paper

Response Paper. I’m trying to study for my History course and I need some help to understand this question.

You must write a 2 page response to a document from the Major Problemstextbook, before we have discussed it in class.
The first part of your paper should be a candid response to the document. Did you enjoy this document, did you find it overly long, or difficult to understand? Why did you choose this document to respond to? Did something about it stick out as familiar or surprising? Was there something you found interesting or intriguing?
The second part of the paper should be a textual analysis focused on why the document was created in the way it was. What type of document is it (an article, a speech, a letter, etc)? Who was intended to read it? What did the author want to accomplish or say through the work, and just as importantly- were they successful in their aims? Why or why not? What choices did they make that allowed the work to achieve that aim (or not)? Does your analysis of the document relate to your earlier reaction to the document (is it suitable that you didn’t find a supreme court case to be very exciting, or that a political speech was written in clear accessible language)? Remember to be specific and use examples from the text (with citations) to describe your ideas.
topic :How did the market revolution affect the United States
sources:http://www.americanyawp.com/text/08-the-market-rev…
Response Paper

Goodbye, Norma Jean: The World’s Most Famous Documentary Director about the World’s Most Beloved Movie Star Essay

online assignment help When it seemed that there was nothing else people never knew about Marilyn Monroe and when the entire world started to forget about the way an unknown starlet Norma turned into the most famous star the humankind has ever known, Liz Garbus came into the spotlight, promising to shed even more light on the actress’s life and untimely death. Thus, Love, Marilyn was created. And, to the director’s credit, it was a kind of an unexpected movie to come out. It is important that a lot of actors play themselves in the movie, which makes the documentary all the stronger. In addition, the fact that the focus of the story is in the interactions between Marilyn and other people is rather refreshing. Watching her act with the people around, the audience will get a better idea of what kind of person she was and how hard she worked on becoming who the entire world remembered her as. It is also quite inspiring that in the movie, several actresses play Marilyn. Indeed, to show every single stage of her development both as a personality and as an actress, a single performer is not enough. The idea with using only Marilyn’s letters, notes and the existing recordings is rather wise as well – without the forced dialogue, the movie becomes even more realistic. One of the most striking details about the movie was that, according to Garbus, every single line which Marilyn says in the movie actually belongs to her; as Garbus explained, the movie is based off of the memories of the people who interacted with real Marilyn Monroe, the actress. Thus, the movie offers a peculiar cadence of images and scenes which tell about Marilyn more than any biography can. The most important thing about the movie is that it does not rely on the traditional legends surrounding Marilyn’s personality; nor does it create a recognizable image of Marilyn based on the already existing ones. For instance, the movie shows certain scenes which portray Marilyn as a childish and innocent person, yet Garbus does not want the audience to relate to Marilyn only as a woman child. Garbus shows in a rather graphic way that there were far more facets in Marilyn’s personality; the actress is portrayed not only as innocence itself, but also as a woman obsessed with the stage, a woman hooked on drugs and even a femme fatale. In addition, the emphasis in Garbus’ interpretation of Marilyn Monroe’s personality is obviously on a woman who achieved everything she had on her won. Garbus ruins the stereotypical image of Marilyn, making people see her as a human being, which is exactly why the given documentary works so well. Get your 100% original paper on any topic done in as little as 3 hours Learn More Actually, it is unusual to see a woman directing a movie about a woman in such an uncompromising and at the same time true-to-facts manner; without either whitewashing the actress’s story or adding even more gruesome facts to raise the shock values, Garbus actually manages to tell her variant of the famous story in a very new and inspiring way. Portraying Marilyn as a three-dimensional character, admitting her numerous flaws and revealing her good sides, Liz Garbus shows the Marilyn the world has never seen – not an actress, not a woman child, but a human being.

BSAD 320 Franklin University Decision Making Problem Solving & Critical Thinking HW

BSAD 320 Franklin University Decision Making Problem Solving & Critical Thinking HW.

assess your ability to reflect on personal learning related to the concepts and skills addressed in this course and discuss relationships between topic areas.OverviewFor this assignment, students will engage in self-reflection about what they have learned about decision-making, problem-solving, and critical thinking throughout the course.Action ItemsReflect on your learnings throughout the course.Write a 2-3 page reflection paper describing how your perception and understanding of decision-making, problem-solving, and critical thinking has evolved throughout this course. In your discussion, explain how you could apply these insights in the workplace and to what degree you could influence or coach others to help them improve their skills. Add other reflections, take-aways, a-ha moments, and insights to your paper.Format the paper in APA style. Include a brief introduction, use section headings for organization, and end the paper with a brief conclusion.Submission Instructions
BSAD 320 Franklin University Decision Making Problem Solving & Critical Thinking HW

Motivational Interviewing and Obesity Paper

Motivational Interviewing and Obesity Paper.

I’m working on a health & medical multi-part question and need an explanation to help me learn.

Practice Question 1: Does motivational interviewing during a regularly scheduled well-child visit for children between 5-19 years with a BMI of 30 and above as compared to practice as usual, influence BMI, BP, quality of life, and daily physical activity over 8-10 weeks?Identify the PICOT elements.What are key search terms identified in the practice question?Conduct a library search using these search terms to locate a research study addressing this practice problem and consider the following.What is the research-evidence based intervention addressed in the study?What is the quantifiable outcome(s)? How will the outcome(s) be measured? What potential reliable and valid measurements/tools may be used to measure this quantifiable data?Is this practice question answerable within 8-10 weeks? Why or why not?
Motivational Interviewing and Obesity Paper