Get help from the best in academic writing.

writer thesis statement and conclusion for the file upload and fix anything

writer thesis statement and conclusion for the file upload and fix anything. I’m studying and need help with a English question to help me learn.

writer thesis statement and conclusion for the file upload one page conclusion
Make sure to do and fix all this in the file
1.Clear and concise thesis statement or problem statement
2.The 5 ‘w’s” are used to give a good baseline level of knowledge to understand
3. Appropriate use of technical terminology
4.Proper use of grammar, spelling and punctuation
make sure to show me where you do that in the file
writer thesis statement and conclusion for the file upload and fix anything

MGMT 310 American Public University System Google Management Discussion.

In need of (2) substantive replies of 125 words each to (2) different post. MGMT 310 Topic: W1: How is Work ManagedRubricsPeer replies to further the conversationStudent replied to at least two (2) classmates’ posts and each reply includes at least three (3) to four (4) sentences relating the classmate’s post to at least one (1) question/point of the Discussion Prompt.Responses are substantive and encourage discussion by proposing a different point of view supported by an attribution to a source, personal example, or personal application. All responses include related follow up questions to promote continued discussion.Forum Post 1:Classmates,With the management styles of Google, it is very different than what you would typically think of a large, successful company. During Henri Fayol and Frederick W. Taylor’s time, which was around World War I, and I feel management was different because the culture at that time was different than it is today.During the early 1900s, there was no major factories because the Industrial Age hadn’t happened, yet. There were many family farms, small markets, and some textile mills. There were very few, if any, large companies where there was many employees to manage. As companies got bigger, and had more employees, they had to find out a way to manage those employees in an efficient manner.The culture was also very different in the 1900s compared to today. People got their information from the daily paper or talking to folks around their town since there was very few cars to travel. The stereotype today is that kids are lazy and expect things that they do not deserve. With my time in the Air Force, I do not believe that this philosophy would work in the military. The thought process in the military is “The mission comes first,” and I feel like that mentality works. Is it the best philosophy? No. But, you have to be mentally strong in the military and it does force service members into a certain mentality and as long as the camaraderie, or morale, is high, it is effective. A lot of times the morale is low and service members are unhappy. I would say I am pretty adaptable, and I believe I would be alright and make things work. I do not think I would thrive in that environment because I do like structureForum Post 2:Good Afternoon Class,I absolutely agree with the Google philosophy that working should be fun.If you set employees up for success, there is no reason why they should not be able to properly perform their job duties and meet and exceed their expectations.When employees have the tools and resources they need to perform, they are better able to complete that job duty.This creates less work stress, therefore helps the turnover rate of employees, which benefits both employees and the employer. I do think the Google philosophy has changed the way people work at their jobs. Employers are more open and understanding, and they want to give employees the tools needed for success.For example, some offices have teams and other colleagues people can ask for assistance if they feel overwhelmed or stuck.A company may also consider giving a longer deadline when appropriate. There are many things that the employer can do to help an employee achieve the task successfully. As a matter of fact, we do use this at my job. We have a very fun and understanding work environment. We have open communication. I am great to my staff as the manager, and I tell them as long as they communicate with me, I will work with them when needed. I try to make work a place for employees to enjoy and be happy, while still working. This method seems to work well for our office. Of course, I know when I need to be serious with the employees, and I do not let them take advantage. However, my thought along with Google is, if you set them up for success, they will enjoy the job and do it well!Prompt W1: How is Work ManagedGoogle has a core belief that the challenges of work should be fun. Therefore, if you give employees the necessary tools to properly perform their jobs, they will be key contributors to the organization’s overall success. (Chapter 1, Section 2)When you look at the timeline of the history of management theory and the accompanying historical events that triggered changes in the practice of management (Chapter 3, Section 1), do you think the Google philosophy of management signals a shift in how work is managed? Could this philosophy work in your organization? Would you feel comfortable managing in this type of environment?
MGMT 310 American Public University System Google Management Discussion

Compare and contrast Freuds Psychosexual stages of development

This assignment is going to compare and contrast Freud’s psychosexual stages of development with Erikson’s psychosocial stage model. The similarities and the differences between the two models will be explained and outlined. Developmental psychology is a study of the biological, cognitive, emotional and social changes that take place over a course of time in humans. Sigmund Freud brought about the theory of psychoanalytic development, where he believed that early childhood experiences had an outcome on later development and in adulthood. Freud’s stages of psychosexual development consist of five stages: the oral stage (0 – 1 year), the anal stage (1 – 3 years), the phallic stage (3 – 6 years), the latency period (6 – puberty) and the genital stage (puberty – maturity). The psychosexual stages have three main parts. Each of Freud’s five stages has a physical focal point where the child’s energy is strongest and where their pleasure is obtained. The stages also have a psychological theme and an adult character type. The oral stage is associated with the mouth area as the infant gains pleasure from sucking, swallowing, biting and chewing. The psychological theme to the oral stage is dependency as a baby can do little for itself. Too much or too little fulfilment can result in Oral Fixation. This fixation will be carried onto later life, where this type of personality may have a stronger tendency to smoke, drink, over eat and bite their nails. The anal stage is associated with the anal cavity and sphincter muscles of the bowel, which are now the main sources of pleasure. The child learns to control anal stimulation. Anal fixation can result in obsession with cleanliness and perfection. On the opposite side they may become disorganised and/or untidy. The phallic stage is associated with the genital area where this becomes the primary area pleasure. The child at this stage becomes aware of the sex differences; both boys and girls experience emotional feelings in relation to the opposite sex parent. The latency stage is the period of relative calm. The sexual and aggressive drives are less active and there is little in the way of psychosexual conflict. During this period the balance between the id, ego and superego is greater. The final stage is the genital stage and marks the beginning of adolescence. Through the courses learned during the previous stages, adolescents direct their sexual urges onto opposite sex peers. Like Freud, Erikson also believed that personality develops in stages. While Freud’s theory was based on psychosexual stages, Erikson’s theory describes the impact of social experiences across an individual’s life span. Erikson’s psychosocial stages span across eight stages: Stage 1 – Trust vs. mistrust, Stage 2 – Autonomy vs. shame and doubt, Stage 3 – Initiative vs. guilt, Stage 4 – Industry vs. inferiority, Stage 5 – Identity vs. role confusion, Stage 6 – Intimacy vs. isolation, Stage 7 – Generativity vs. stagnation and Stage 8 – Integrity vs. despair. The first stage of Erikson’s theory occurs between birth to one year of age. The balance of trust with mistrust depends mainly on the quality of maternal care. Lack of interaction with an adult who tends to the infants’ needs, leads to mistrust. During the second stage children develop a greater sense of personal control. Like Freud, much of the conflict during this stage centres around toilet training. Stage three focuses on preschool years where children start to interact through play and try new roles. Stage four covers early school years where children develop a sense of pride in their accomplishments. Stage five covers adolescence, where people explore their independence and form an identity. Stage six covers early adulthood where people explore personal relationships in order to achieve intimacy with others. The seventh stage is where the adult contributes to society and to the development of the next generation. The last stage occurs during old age and is focused on reflecting back on life and feeling a sense of integrity and feeling proud of their accomplishments. Freud’s psychosexual theory and Erikson’s psychosocial theory are two very well known developmental concepts. Erikson was influenced by Freud’s ideas but expanded on the theory in different ways. His theory in comparison to Freud’s varied in a number of different ways. Erikson’s theory emphasised how both early and late experiences are equally important to a person’s development and how personality continued to develop beyond puberty. Where as Freud would argue that most development took place during the earlier period of an individual’s life. Freud’s psychosexual stages consist of five stages and he does not expand any further than puberty. Erikson’s first few psychosocial stages are slightly similar to that of Freud’s stages one to three. Erikson also expands his developmental stages to eight. Similarly to Freud, Erikson believed that personality develops in a series of determined stages and that much of people’s development occurred early in life. The psychologists also believed that a conflict had to be resolved in order to progress onto the next stage. They both agreed that human development is mainly an unconscious growth, and when development occurs it is a gradual process. With both theories similar in this sense the id, ego and super ego play important roles in development. Freud believed that people are born with the id and as we gradually develop, the second part of our personality begins to develop, the ego. By the end of the phallic stage the superego develops. Erikson accepted this theory, but saw the ego of utmost importance. He believed that part of the ego is able to function autonomously of the id and superego. He claimed that a person’s ego gains or loses strength through the resolution of the eight developmental stages. Erikson’s developmental theory was much more comprehensive compared to Freud. His theory describes the impact of social experiences on an individual’s lifetime, unlike Freud who described development solely based on sexuality. The stages in Erikson’s psychosocial development theory highlighted the importance of social experiences as he theorised how all the stages are unconditionally present at birth but start to expand according to one’s upbringing in their family, social development and own culture. Each of Erikson’s stages are characterised by a crisis, which is emphasised on parental and societal impact. Each crisis is defined by a pair of opposing possibilities e.g. trust vs. mistrust, and according to Erikson a healthy development requires a favourable ratio of positive to negative. Another major difference between Freud and Erikson’s developmental theory is the outcome of the stages. Freud believed that when an individual is fixated on a certain stage, the problems associated with that particular stage would be carried out throughout his/her life. Where as in Erikson’s psychosocial stages, the outcome of a particular stage is not permanent and can be changed by later experiences. In conclusion both Freud and Erikson have contributed to the understanding of human development in psychology. Overall, although there are some similarities between their developmental stages there are major differences that stand out. Freud’s stages were very physical where as Erikson’s highlighted the importance of social interaction in an individual’s lifetime.

The Advantages and Disadvantages of Trade Protectionism

term paper help Trade protectionism is implemented by countries when they believe their industries are being affected negatively by unjust competition. It may be seen as a defensive measure and it is almost always driven by political forces. It may turn successful, especially in the short run. In the long run, however it usually does the opposite of its intentions as it can make the country, and the industries it is trying to look after, not so competitive on the global marketplace. While economic theory suggests, and economic history demonstrates, protectionism’s counter productivity on a global scale, we still believe that economists have a responsibility to defy increasing protectionist pressures by more than just recitationfree trade benefits. The typical protectionist argues that the traditional case for free trade is based on an oversimplified model which is no longer applicable to the real world. These charges are usually based on misconstructions or misinterpretations of the role of assumptions in economic theory. The fundamental illustrations of international trade theory are not necessary conditions for the theory’s conclusions to have real world relevance. Protectionism is the government’s actions and policies that restrict or restrain international trade, often done with the purpose of protecting local businesses and jobs from foreign competition. Classic methods of protectionism are import tariffs, subsidies, quotas and direct state intervention. The fact that trade protection hurts the economy of the country that enforces it is one of the oldest but still most astonishing understandings economics has to offer. The idea dates back to the beginning of economic science itself, which gave birth to economics, contains the argument for free trade by specializing in production instead of producing everything, nations would profit from free trade. In international economics, it is the direct opposite to the proposition that people within a national economy will all be better off if they specialize at what they do best instead of trying to be self-sufficient. Current debates and discussions about what kind of trade are good and about how open markets affects economy usually has hypothetical character, or takes place due to the influence of interest groups or subjective reasoning. Recent global economic crisis has caused a big change in ideas and policies against free markets and in favour of government intervention. Regardless, the analysis of trade development allows making simple conclusions which is relevant in the current discussion: countries adopting free trade policy prosper, while closing the markets leads to deficiency and economic slowdown. The main aim of this essay is to analyze if protectionism adopted by many countries, especially European countries can be a valid economic policy and if not, why so. It will look at the European Union and discuss the not so long ago fears of rising protectionism within the EU. Advantages of protectionism Protectionism marks an economic theory that emphasizes the minimization of free trade between nations. There are currently a lot of nations that practice economic protectionism; such countries believe that the manufacturing of goods should take place domestically, rather than in a global setting. Generally there are two main types of government control on international trade; tariff and non-tariff. Previously, the main dispute between supporters and opponents of protectionism was focused on the discussion of arguments again and for using tariff as an economic policy instrument. Non-tariff barriers became usual in the last years and many of them are used by countries as an escape passage in free trade agreements, since WTO agreements have much weaker restraints on non-tariff protectionism than on tariff. The supporters of protectionism build their arguments on the following: 1) An advantage of protectionism is that it keeps the domestic economy rolling. Since there is a decrease in imports, domestic firms have less competition, and so are able to continue. The domestic economy will also be strengthened because unemployment will be down due to the domestic firms and they will be able to produce and sell more goods with a lot less difficulty, giving firms less reason to decrease its costs by decreasing its workforce. Those with jobs will continue to consume while allowing the economy to flow. 2) Protectionism makes domestic firms less competitive in the export market, as import barriers raise domestic prices through higher costs for mediocre inputs this means that export products also become more expensive and decrease in market share against the international competition. 4) Protectionism permits the new and upcoming firms to work and develop at an acceptable rate, because they will not be pressured by foreign, more experienced firms. The new firms can grow until they themselves are big enough to compete in international markets, encouraging positive features for the domestic economy in the future. 5) Protectionism can also prevent dumping, this is where foreign and bigger economies enter an economy and sell their goods at a price lower than the costs of production. Therefore, the consumers of that specific economy are spending more than the consumers in overseas areas. 3) An exception in which protectionism could improve a nation’s economic well-being is when a country has monopoly power over a good. Economists [1] have argued that a country that produces a large percentage of the world’s output of a good can use an ” optimum’ tariff to take advantage of its latent monopoly power, and thus gain more from trade. This is the same as stating that a monopolist will maximize profits by raising prices and reducing outputs. As stated before, many countries practice economic protectionism and it may hold several advantages over the separate notion of free trade. Disadvantages of protectionism Trade protectionism has more than a few disadvantages, the most noteworthy of which are the pressures it places on the very core principles of free trade. Further disadvantages are the protections it offers to firms that contest on a stage of price over quality, the incorrect sense of security that it builds and the denial of easy access to certain products for consumers. At the core of protectionism are tariffs, duties, quotas and any other measures designed to restrict the import of foreign goods in interest of protecting domestic companies from foreign take overs. More disadvantages are as follows: 1) Consumers pay more with protectionism. Without a system of competitive pricing, domestic companies are free to raise their prices without raising the quality of their goods. When a business has no competition then the consumer is left without options. 2) Businesses suffer from protectionism too. Government support often builds corporate contentment, which could lead to a business to believe that it has a pleasant safety net set up behind it in the event of strong foreign competition as these businesses might not have the resources necessary to survive on their own. 3) Trade protectionism limits consumer access to foreign goods and non-domestic companies that offer unique products and services are also subject to the restrictions. 4) Foreign businesses and domestic consumers face the greatest disadvantages of trade protectionism. Businesses face imbalanced restrictions while their domestic competitors are offered financial advantages, and the consumer ends up paying higher prices for a limited variety of products that are not always worth their costs. 5) Protectionism can cause a retaliation reaction from other nations, ruining vital relationships between nations. a clear example of this would be the relationship between USA and China, when the US put boundaries on the Chinese tires , China retaliated by putting up barriers against different U.S. goods such as their chicken. This kind of hostility between nations decreases the specialization between two nations, eventually damaging the economy. Additionally to all of this, some governments provide subsidies and loans to businesses that are not able to compete against their foreign competitors. These actions restrain the free market by giving benefits to domestic companies while creating consequences upon foreign businesses. Some argue that trade protectionism is a step towards anti-globalization because of these reasons. Where is protectionism most prominent The U.S. has a long history as a protectionist country, with its tariffs reaching their highest in the 1820s and during the great depression. The country’s protectionist policies changed toward the middle of the 20th century. In 1947, they were one of the 23 nations to sign mutual trade agreements in the form of the general agreement on tariffs and trade. That agreement, modified in 1994, was substituted in 1995 by the world trade organization in Geneva. Through WTO negotiations, most of the world’s chief trading nations have significantly reduced their customs tariffs. The mutual trade agreements normally bound protectionist measure instead of eradicating them completely, however, calls for protectionism are still heard when industries in different countries suffer from economic struggle or unemployment believed to be aggravated by foreign competition. Critics argue that, over the long term, protectionism often ends up hurting the people it is supposed to protect and often encourages free trade as a greater alternative to protectionism. Another region that protectionism is becoming more popular is Europe. Recently the European commission drew attention to the increase in protectionist inclinations worldwide. It stated that 123 new trade restrictions had been implemented over the time span of 8 months (2012) this was an acceleration of 25% compared with the previous period studied. However the commissions own anticipated trade reforms, were ignored. These would push the EU itself towards further protectionism, they were seen to hamper with the global economy and hurt developing countries, according to an ODI [2] study.EU import likings for low income countries are focused around primary merchandises. That’s why they have lower tariffs for these goods. These encouragements have strengthened structural shortages towards extractive industries especially in sub Saharan Africa. The EU modifications have prevented these economies from expanding into value adding industries, hence slowing their development. Even though the proposals suggests using trade to improve development, there is little acknowledgement of the influence of the EU’s Common Agricultural Policy [3] , which distorts trade and prevents development. The economic subsidy given to farmers alters world prices and the external tariffs punish foreign farmers selling products to the EU market. These interventions prevent many developing countries progressing through export-driven growth. In this context, the EU’s moves towards further protectionist measure are a cause for deep concern. The policies threaten to damage developing countries and reduce the efficiency of the global economic system Based on economic theory, all elimination of trade barriers is beneficial to the world economy. Through increasing trade barriers, by tariff and non-tariff funds, domestic consumer costs increase, foreign exporters sales decrease and efficiency gains through comparative advantage [4] are prevented. These decisions are hence political. Arguable they have been put in place to prevent possible rivals from catching up with EU countries. The statement that the imports from the middle-income countries will be substituted by those from low-income countries seems doubtful. It is vital to distinguish between the cases for free trade for nations own benefit and the case for free trade for all nations. The first is an argument for free trade to improve one nations own well-being, also known as the national-efficiency argument. The other is an argument for free trade to improve every trading country’s welfare. Both of these cases assume that free markets determine prices and there are no market failures. However, the reality is that market failures can and do occur. Market failures can rise from governmental action as well. Hence, governments may misrepresent market prices by subsidizing production, as European governments have notably done and as all wealthy countries governments do in agriculture. Governments can also protect intellectual property unproductively, leading to underproduction of new knowledge; they may also overprotect it. In those cases, production and trade, led by inaccurate prices, will not be effective. Conclusion The history of trade development shows that protectionism and free trade policies were replaced to correspond to a certain economic situation in the world. However, there has been apparent shift to open markets, decreased trade barriers and international cooperation among countries in the last few decades. With all of this said, the impact of recent economic slowdown pushed many countries to stray from free trade agreements in order to support domestic economies and employment. As a result, what we are seeing today is protectionism which is not an upfront declaration of a trade war using tariffs; rather it is protectionism with non-tariff weapons. These metaphorical weapons are used mainly by developed countries especially by many European countries. Demands for labour and domestic market protection stand as a problem for European leaders. They run against EU rules that guarantee the free flow of goods, services and workers. There are two sides of using protective policy, but it is clear that the disadvantages of such policies will almost always prevail over its advantages. Economists stress more on the threats rather than the benefits of protectionism, and claim that it is not a solution for problems in the long run. For European and other countries it is extremely desirable to find ways to increase employment and reduce the impact of the crisis, but using any sort of protection would have very little short run benefits. It would also result in reduced worldwide employment very quickly and make growth prospects much more difficult when recovery does come. It is not even a case of when one country benefits at the expense of another. Such moves might bring upon a chain reaction of protectionism that makes the economic slowdown even worse. One country’s protection will not just hurt partner-country exports. Sooner or later, the formers exports will be affected as well. Therefore Europe should avoid adopting protective measures separately, as free trade is seen to be the only solution to crisis by stimulating future growth and creating jobs in the future.


Child Development essay PLEASE ANSWER EACH SECTION OF THE PROMPT!. I need an explanation for this English question to help me study.

This is the 3rd time I am posting this on studypool and it is due in 3 hours! Please READ THE PROMPT THROUGHLY! Answer EVERY section of the prompt and do EXACTLY what it asks! PLEASE IF YOU ARE STUCK TELL ME. Also, YOU NEED the book THOMLISON! YOU ALSO NEED TO FILL OUT THE ATTACHED FILES DEPENDING ON WHICH ONE YOU PICK!
Everything is in the files section below. Go from section to section. Use proper APA format, she is very strict on format. Also, she is very strict with plagiarism and correct use of DAP language and good grammar. Please try your absolute best and include really good grammar. NO plagiarism, it is going to be on so it will detect it right away.
Please let me know if you have any questions or you are stuck on ANY section! Don’t just do a “whatever” job. I need this very perfect, so please ask! Depending on what section you pick, I attached the paper work you would need to fill out as well. She wants it completed for evidence, so I will turn that in to her. Also, for section one the article is the one right above it, just copy and paste that URL.
Please type at least 8 pages! Also, please fill out the correct paper work I attached depending on what section you pick. Fill out EVERY section. This is my second time putting this on study pool because the other tutor did a very poor job! Please make this a great essay it is worth half of my grade and she is very strict!
Also, provide examples from article and the book, “Thomlison”. I do not have the book, so please have access.

UWM Using Insects for Food and The Concept of Domestication of Livestock Journal

UWM Using Insects for Food and The Concept of Domestication of Livestock Journal.

Read the journal articles uploaded. The citation of the articles are as follows: Rumpold, B.A., and O.K. Schluter.2013.Potential and challenges of insects as an innovative source for food and feed production.Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies.17:1-11. Veldkamp, T., and G. Bosch.2015.Insects: a protein-rich feed ingredient in pig and poultry diets. Animal Frontiers. 5(2):45-50.1- (15 pts) Compare the concept of using insects for food and the concept of domestication of livestock. Identify the ways they are similar.2- (15 pts) Raising insects for food can have similar challenges as raising livestock for food. Identify those challenges.3- (10pts) justify why or why not insects should be used for pet foods.
UWM Using Insects for Food and The Concept of Domestication of Livestock Journal

Essay Writing at Online Custom Essay

5.0 rating based on 10,001 ratings

Rated 4.9/5
10001 review

Review This Service