Get help from the best in academic writing.

Write a 2 page essay on a Minecraft world where preschool students pretend to work to get a fake

Write a 2 page essay on a Minecraft world where preschool students pretend to work to get a fake currency and use that at other shops to get blocks to build houses or to get pets in the pet shop and make sure to point out how it’s open ended and use this new York state standard PK.MATH.4b. [NY-PK.CC.4b] Given a number from 1-10, counts out that many objects and focus on the math aspects and the currency is going to be renamed paper and the only buttons they need to know is w for forward s for backwards a for right d for left and q to drop items if you have any questions please ask
Introduction The way the human body regulates weight is complex and interacting. There are biological, behavioral, and environmental factors included. Bodyweight is the result of how the body regulates energy intake, expenditure, and energy storage; collectively this is called energy balance (Hill 752). Obesity in terms of body mass index is 30 or more. Health risk factors begin to increase with a BMI of 25 (Schneider 272). In simpler terms, obesity is a 20% or more increase in body weight above the normal range expected as a result of fat accumulation. Obesity is a major risk factor in high blood pressure (hypertension) and certain types of diabetes (type II). Many articles, found in the literature, explain other medical problems associated with obesity like heart disease and joint diseases (arthritis). However; the social and psychological effects of obesity received little attention (Brown 225-228). The aim of this thesis is to discuss the causal effect of obesity on hypertension, diabetes (type II), and the socio-psychological impact of obesity using a cause-effect perspective. Main body The association between obesity and hypertension is well documented, although the exact relationship remains unclear. Obesity activates some biochemical-hormonal mechanisms which play a role in raising blood pressure (Davy and Hall 803-813). Also, obesity is associated with increased cholesterol levels which play a role in increased blood vessels rigidity (arteriosclerosis) and accordingly hypertension. Al Atat and others (823-854) showed that control of obesity contributes to control 48% of hypertension in whites and 28% in blacks. Studies that confirmed obesity plays a role in type II diabetes are many. Data collected by Wannamethee and Shape (1266-1272) recommend reducing the risk of type II diabetes by prevention weight gain and encouraging weight loss in obese individuals. Genuth (198-201) conducted a similar study in the UK. They suggested that most type II diabetes patients were obese or have been obese at one time in their lives. Linda and colleagues (371-377); analyzed data from the 1997-2003 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS). They concluded that between 1997 and 2003, the incidence of diagnosed diabetes has increased among US adults. The presented data suggested that obesity is a major cause in increasing the incidence, and the incident cases of diabetes are becoming more obese. Obesity has socio-psychological impacts on the individual (Obesity Education Initiative): Social unacceptability: The general impression in the US, as well as most western societies, is that; people (especially women) should be thin, and being fat is a sign of poor self-control. This creates negative attitudes about the obese that are sometimes translated into a kind of discrimination. Psychological disorders and obesity: Community-based studies, in the US, did not show significant differences in psychological status between obese and nonobese. In European studies, on the other hand, studies suggest an impact of obesity on emotional status. Overeating disorder (Binge): It means eating larger amounts of food than most people would eat in a discrete period of time (2-3 hours) with a sense of lack of control during these periods. It occurs in 20-50% of individuals who seek specialized obesity treatment. Body image: It is sensing one’s own body size and image and the emotional response to this image. Obese people are usually not satisfied and preoccupied with their body image and avoid social appearance. In fact, body image dissatisfaction may be a major driving cause towards treating the obesity condition. Conclusion: Obesity is a challenging problem that needs innovative ways to tackle. Unlike smoking, where passive smokers may direct the society effort towards advertising, legislating for, and encouraging smokers not to smoke; individual eating at Mc Donald’s does not cause harm to anybody else. Therefore; the society driving force is missing. Alternatively, a great way to change eating habits is to go to public schools and start with the generations to come. Encouraging exercise (energy expenditure) is useful in health terms as well as helping those who lost weight not to regain what they lost. Get your 100% original paper on any topic done in as little as 3 hours Learn More Works Cited Hill, James. O. Understanding and addressing the epidemic of obesity: An energy balance prospective. Endocrine Reviews. 27(7) (2006): 750-761. Schneider, M. Introduction to Public Health (2nd ed). Pp. 225-228. Sudbury, Mass: Jones and Bartlett. 2006. Brown, S. P. Clinical Exercise Physiology. Introduction to exercise science.. Pp. 212-234. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams
UMUC Week 5 Woodward Grandparent Visitation Case Research.

I’m working on a law case study and need support to help me study.

PurposeThe purpose of Project 1 is to use different research strategies in Westlaw to find relevant case law, cite case law in Bluebook format, and assess cases’ relevance to a given research question.Course Outcomes Met by Project 1:Use common research methods to locate case law, a type of primary legal authority.Cite to and explain the relevance of primary authority to a given legal topic or issue.****** See the attachment titled Project 1 for full details of the assignment and rubric.
UMUC Week 5 Woodward Grandparent Visitation Case Research

SEU Organizational Change an Action Oriented Toolkit Discussion

SEU Organizational Change an Action Oriented Toolkit Discussion.

One of the most fascinating components of the change management process is the change agent. The change agent, who can be a leader, manager, employee, consultant, or customer, is a person who is often at the center of the change management process and performs several critical functions in the overall process. Address the following regarding change agents:Define the concept of a change agent, including the traits and characteristics that best represent a change agent in today’s organization.Discuss the role of a change agent in the change management process (e.g., formal or informal role, position of authority or power, etc.).Assess how a change agent can influence the generation, direction, success, or failure of a change initiative.Finally, assess any challenges a change agent may have in the change process (e.g., not agreeing with the change, management not truthfully sharing the repercussions of the change, etc.) and how these challenges should be addressed.Your well-written paper should meet the following requirements:Be 4-5 pages in length, which does not include the title page and reference pages, which are never a part of the content minimum requirements.Use Saudi Electronic University academic writing standards and APA style guidelines.Support your submission with course material concepts, principles, and theories from the textbook and at least three scholarly, peer-reviewed journal articles.It is strongly encouraged that you submit all assignments into the Turnitin Originality Check prior to submitting it to your instructor for grading. If you are unsure how to submit an assignment into the Originality Check tool, review the Turnitin Originality Check – Student Guide for step-by-step instructions.Review the grading rubric to see how you will be graded for this assignment.
SEU Organizational Change an Action Oriented Toolkit Discussion

Juvenile Delinquency And The Problems Of Society Criminology Essay

term paper help Juvenile delinquency is a common problem that all societies seem to face. Although it is apparent that all juveniles will at some point in their life commit some sort of delinquent act, it is unclear as to why juveniles behave this way. Many theories have been developed to try to explain the phenomena but, no single theory has the perfect answer to the problem. After researching several theories, a theoretical integration of the Anomie theory of Deviance by theorist Robert Merton and the Social Bond theory by theorist Travis Hirschi, juvenile delinquency could both be better explained and potentially be prevented. Ideas from both theories are both accurate; however, when combined the theories could truly rise to their full potential because of shortcomings that both theories show. While the Anomie theory is a social structure theory relying on the environment, it would complement the social bond control theory by integrating the idea that delinquency is a matter of environment, and it will bring out the inherent evil within all humans (Orcutt 2002). Basically, the environment can enhance the evil or help contain it depending on the positive or negative influence the environment in question has on the individual that is struggling with the internal instinct. The Anomie theory of Deviance offers a good explanation as to why Juveniles are delinquent. In America people live big and our definition of economic well being is very different than those societies in less developed nations, for instance, Africa. The more “stuff” the better off you are in the current time. This includes: a home, a car, an iPod, the latest trends, and a well paying job or essentially the most amount of money you could possibly get your hands on. According to this theory, the main motivation of our society and the way it operates is this most common focal concern: economic stability (Orcutt 2002). Since this theory is a social structure theory, it considers the “macro” or larger level of societal conditions. Furthermore, this theory puts the blame on the structure of society and claims that society is the reason for juvenile delinquency. Merton argues that everyone in our society has been socialized and that money and economic prestige and status are so essential to happiness and life fulfillment. Our concentration on material things and economic status is the motivation for juvenile delinquency within this theory because of the disproportionate opportunities between social classes to achieve the cultural goal (Orcutt 2002). Thus, the problem in society that causes juvenile delinquency, in accordance with this theory, is a lack of legitimate means of achieving what society deems most important: money. Merton believes that that majority of people will conform to the cultural goal and the institutionalized means to achieve it. The ideal and culturally acceptable ways of achieving the cultural goal are what Merton calls “institutionalized means” (Orcutt 2002). These would include opportunities such as a well paying job, a college education, supporting capitalism and free enterprise, starting your own business, and even working hard or overtime for promotions. However, our society has a problem structurally because the means listed previously are not equally offered between the American social structures. Merton says that although everyone wants to achieve this goal of economic success, the social structure does not provide enough institutionalized means to go around (Orcutt 2002). There are not enough opportunities to support all the people in society who are pushing for the same goal. The upper class obviously has the most opportunity to benefit from institutionalized means because they have a monopoly on the means. They can afford universities, have resources to start businesses, and they can leave money to their children to continue economic success. So they take their share of the means first by simply being born into a high social status. The middle class gets second pick because they too share some of the same opportunities as far as legitimate ways of achieving economic success. On the other hand the problem arises when it comes time for the lower class to try to take advantage of the institutionalized means of achieving the cultural goal. Many in the lower class cannot attend college for lack of money to do so, they cannot pass down money to their children, and they do not have access to higher education which hinders them from being competitive in a higher paying work force. Thus, many opportunities are gone before they even reach the age to apply for college. This situation is called “anomie” or nomlessness because people have accepted this goal of economic success, but the norms are not consistent with achieving it. This causes the strain between the cultural goal and institutionalized means. The frustration that the strain causes for people of the lower class causes them to turn to illegitimate, or socially unacceptable, means of pursuing the cultural goal (Orcutt 2002). The first is conformity, or, people who achieve the cultural goal by taking advantage of an institutionalized mean (Agnew 2007). The second is innovation. People who become innovators accept the cultural goal, but because of the lack of institutionalized means, they strive toward economic success by “inventing” illegitimate or illegal means such as: drug dealing, black market selling, illegal gambling, prostitution, or robbery (Agnew 2007). Basically, their goal is the same but their method of achieving it is different and socially unacceptable. The third category is retreatism. People who fall into this category reject the cultural goal. They cannot achieve the goal and give up on wanting to accomplish it. They also give up the institutionalized means of accomplishing it. They become drug addicts, alcoholics, mentally ill, or those who commit suicide. People who just fade out of society and no longer take part in it- they “retreat” from society due to the pressures that the narrow cultural goal causes (Agnew 2007). Fourth is the ritualism category. People who fall into this category give up on the cultural goal, but go through the motions of the institutionalized means blindly. They do the means with no goal in mind (Agnew 2007). For example, someone who gives up on getting a degree but still comes to class and simply sleeps or daydreams through lectures is simply following the ritual. They take exams but flunk them all. People that go to work and work 40 hours a week, then go blow their paycheck in hours also fall into the ritualistic category. This theory declares that this kind of behavior is a result of not having the institutionalized means to try to achieve the more middle/upper class lifestyle (Agnew 2007). These people are most likely going to fall in the working class. Finally the fifth category is rebellion. The goal of people in this category is to replace both the cultural goal and the institutional means to achieve it (Agnew 2007). For example a socialist feels that the cultural goal is not economic success, but more so political reform. The white supremacists and black panthers would fall under this category. The Amish would also (in some respects) fall under this umbrella when considering our societies’ goal by growing their own food and making their own life through means of labor not money. This theory is favorable for consideration as an explanation for all crime except for white collar crime. The reason the strain theory does not apply to white collar crime is because people who have committed such crimes have already achieved the cultural goal and thus dismiss everything the theory stands for. From this perspective, there is no real reason, according to Anomie, for their delinquency. This theory is also favorable because it is relatively easy to test. Travis Hirchi’s Social Bond theory is another interesting perspective to consider as an explanation of Juvenile delinquency. According to Hirchi’s social bond theory, there are four elements to consider and explain why people conform to societies norms. Because this is a Control theory, instead of explaining why crime is committed this theory explains what is needed to prevent delinquency from happening; in other words, control theories explain why people conform (Welch 1998). Hirchi believed that it is necessary for one to have attachment, commitment, involvement, and belief in order to prevent delinquency and promote more pro-social behavior (Shoemaker 2000). Attachment refers to the psychological and emotional connection one feels toward another persons or groups and the extent to which one cares about their opinions and feelings. This is the more social concept of the theory (Shoemaker 2000). Commitment is the result of a cost-benefit approach to delinquency. It refers to investments accumulated in terms of conformity to conventional rules, such as time, money, effort and status, versus the estimated costs or losses of investment associated with nonconformity. This is the rational aspect of the theory. Commitment is also involves the commitment to ones future. This means an individual’s hopes, dreams, aspirations, and desires. The stronger commitment to ones future allows less risk for delinquent behavior because it gives individuals a reason to not commit delinquent acts. Involvement refers to the participation in conventional and legitimate activity, which could include extracurricular activities such as school plays, clubs, organizations, and athletic events (Shoemaker 2000). Belief involves the acceptance of a conventional value system. The weakening of the belief in conventional values and norms is a major factor in the risk of delinquency. If youth does not believe in the values they are being taught, there is much less reason for them to conform. In the Shoemaker book, this theory was evaluated with three relationships in mind; delinquency and religion, delinquency and the family, and delinquency and school (Shoemaker 2000). Although this theory can be used to explain all types of crime, these relationships further proved its accuracy. According to Shoemaker, there is a relationship between delinquency and religion in the aspect that delinquents are less religiously active than nondelinquents (Shoemaker 2000). However, when considering the family lives of delinquents, “broken homes” were a huge pre-indicator of delinquency to come. If a family life is healthy and stable for an individual, the risk of delinquency is much less than that of a single parent home or an abusive home. School can also play a significant part, especially when considering the attachment factor of the theory. School failure is almost always correlated with delinquency therefore it is important that a student feels both attached and committed to their education. The frustration from missing such components in their school experience can be devastating to their future and can run a much higher risk for delinquency (Shoemaker 2000). The social bond theory is favorable because it can be easily tested by breaking down all the components of the bond. Attachment and commitment can be observed as well as the other elements of this theory. Yet, the unfavorable factor about this theory is that it does not adequately explain the drift theory alone. This theory only gives the view on people who are delinquent and by society learn to control their delinquency. It does not account very well for those who commit a delinquent act once in their youth and then grow to be productive citizens of society. Despite this flaw in my integration theory I have included a valid explanation for the drift theory and the “aging out concept.” By integrating these two theories, delinquency can be much more understood in terms of the constant internal struggle that humans face against the inherent evil they are born with. The environment which youths encircle themselves in plays a role in how well they can control the evil that so wishes to emerge. This integrated theory’s outlined struggle between the environment and the inherent evil can also better explain the drift theory and “aging out” because it shows the fact that though youth believe in the socially constructed norms, they are not perfect and sometimes the opposing side of their battle wins and thus causes them to commit a delinquent act. An impressionable, influenced youth who is trying to create an identity may struggle to find a “niche” or environment which they feel can allow them to both express themselves and be in congruence with the morals and values their parents, and society have instilled in them. The struggle to maintain control of internal evil is more difficult for youth than adults because they do not yet have enough commitment to their future to want to control their delinquent impulses. This is why “aging-out” applies because as youths grow older and mature into adults the idea of their future becomes more real and thus they need to find ways to secure the well being of both themselves and their families. Ultimately their attachments grow to more conventional things. My integrated theory is especially important when considering the lower class because with the lack of institutionalized means to create a healthy environment, youths tend to turn to illegitimate means in order to commit and believe in something, regardless if it is healthy or not. The struggle to maintain control of their evil is attributed to the fact that they do not have a secure future due to broken families, school failure and status frustration, and lack of exposure to legitimate means of achieving the cultural goal. This situation is to blame for youths falling into unhealthy peer groups, taking advantage of illegitimate means, and ultimately becoming delinquents. For example a student who is failing in school because his school does not have funding for extracurricular activities does not have as much attachment to school as does a middle class student who is committed to their future by means of programming that influences her to believe education will guide their to success. Also, if a student’s family does not appreciate the value of a college education the student will thus not be in an environment that encourages this particular legitimate mean. Thus in a circular fashion, the parents don’t attend college or pursue a higher education and so the children do not feel an attachment, commitment, or belief in the idea of education. They then cannot make enough money to support themselves, and like many in their community turn to illegitimate means of making money. According to the anomie theory, the disproportion of the institutionalized means is to blame for delinquency. An obvious solution would be to offer more institutionalized means to the lower class. I feel that by both adding and sharing the experiences of the higher social classes, it can offer commitment and attachment to the lower class youth. I believe that if society provides more institutionalized means to the lower class, the youth will then socially bond to the means and the positive influences they will bring. Thus, delinquency will diminish based on the fact that youths will learn skills that will help them control their inherent delinquent impulses. This integrated theory is better than the theories alone because it provides both an explanation for the drift phenomena and it will provide opportunities to help prevent white collar crime as well. The two theories both complement each other and offer a solution for each others’ shortcomings. I also feel that this would address all levels of crime even white collar crime because it could potentially bond those who have achieved the cultural goal with those who have not. This would allow people who “have it all” so to speak have more charitable opportunities and would offer them an opportunity to help others through the legitimate social bond process. This would spread goodwill among the upper class and allow them to have more generous thoughts. Perhaps, if given the opportunities to help others in need of institutionalized exposure, the greed that drives a lot of white collar crime could be potentially lessened as well as the lower class delinquency. Basically, this would bring less divide between the social statuses. The most beneficial delinquency policy prevention to my integrated theory would be mentorship programs and funding for extracurricular activities for youth in underprivileged communities. I believe that by implementing sports teams and after school organizations with students who are of a mixed social class, but similar athletic ability and interests, would both bond the students and offer good role models for the lower income students to look up to. I feel that many children do not get the exposure to legitimate institutionalized means or people who conform to the means enough to fully understand and appreciate them. If a child had a mentor who has a strong commitment to the future, and a low record of delinquent acts, perhaps the child could also learn to have a commitment to their own future. I also feel that schools could sponsor more trade programs and apprenticeships for students who are academically challenged. I also feel that by funding more extracurricular organizations for different cultures, religions, and interests for youth of all kind would attract a more diverse population to the community in question. By forming a stronger more opportunistic community, people would bond with others in different races or of different cultures. We need for people of different backgrounds to attach to the same activities and mentality so they can all pursue a common goal and so they can all believe in and accept the same conventional value system. There needs to be more interaction between the classes so that the environment becomes more neutral and the institutionalized means become more available to people out of the upper class. Children who have a tutor who does well in school and is praised for it may look up to their tutor as a role model and thus decided that they too believe in the value of an education. People need to start using each other as a resource for a better society in the future. If more people acted on the beliefs of this theory not only do I feel delinquency would be significantly less in youth, but those youth would grow to make society as a whole better in their adulthood. This theory helps ensure the future of tomorrow with the youth of today. I feel that this could condition children to believe in and be open to all kinds of people and thus reduce racial tension, gender bias, and even police discretion. I feel that it is time to break the stereotypes and labels that we have been socially conditioned to believe in. I also feel that more academic funding is necessary for scholarships to be given to a wider range of people across the social classes. I think that scholarships are too easily given to those who can afford to attend college without assistance and thus leave little opportunities for students who are truly in need. In addition to college scholarships I think apprenticeship scholarships to pay for job training and equipment is necessary too. I feel that students are too often pressured into thinking that college is the only form of higher education. This theory could be easily tested. I would first take a random sampling of data from youth from different social classes about their experiences with school and their community. This would measure happiness, fulfillment, delinquent acts in the individual, and goals or plans for the future. Then I would do a more restricted sampling and survey from students who have committed delinquent acts and upper class students who have secure grades, access to institutionalized means and seem destined to succeed in society (probably based on teacher recommendations etc). After taking this basic data I would conduct another survey after implementing an afterschool mentorship (with the same delinquents in question) which includes; college visits, community service, job shadowing, sports and recreational activities, and free tutoring. After six months with this mentor, I would administer yet another survey to both the mentor and mentee and see if social bonding occurred and if the delinquent is happier now that he or she has adopted many similar values and beliefs as their mentor. Finally a year after the mentorship ends, I would find those previously deemed delinquent students and hope that the mentorship programming encouraged the students enough that they would then have faith in their futures and would be doing better socially, academically, and legally. It is my belief that the interaction would prove my theory correct. My final step in the policy amendments and testing procedures would be to encourage for the juvenile court system to adopt and attempt to fund such mentorship programming for first time delinquent youth’s. I feel that this would help stop things before they become repeat offenders and thus will quicken the “aging out” process by surrounding youth with a more positive environment. Repeat juvenile offenders could potentially be asked to serve their time and then be placed in a regulated apprenticeship to learn a trade. Hopefully they will socially bond with co-workers and age out of delinquency in pursuit of a steady paycheck. Though I realize that my theory would take a lot of work to implement and would never be able to completely annihilate juvenile delinquency, I do feel that it could create positive changes in the lives of youths everywhere. If more people believed in sharing institutionalized opportunities with the lower class and making institutionalized opportunities more available we could provide positive influences for youths. This would allow youth to learn all the skills necessary to control their delinquent impulses and thus would give youth a reason to conform to the socially accepted norms of society. .

Crim 249 The Ohio State University Uneasy Peace Research Proposal

Crim 249 The Ohio State University Uneasy Peace Research Proposal.

I’m working on a criminal justice writing question and need a sample draft to help me learn.

Guidelines for Uneasy Peace Research ProposalSkim throughUneasy Peace: The Great Crime Decline, the Renewal of City Life, and the Next War on ViolenceBook by Patrick SharkeyFree on apple books or anywhere online The purpose of this paper is to apply 2 criminological theories learned in the course to the evidence you read in Uneasy Peace and then propose a research project that tests this theory using a method and data collection process we discuss in the course. The paper should be 8-10 typed pages, double-spaced with regular margins, in a standard 12 pt font such as Times New Roman. The paper should discuss how your theories explains the evidence in the book. You should apply the concepts and propositions from the theories you choose to particular findings and examples from the book. Make sure that your discussion is at the correct level of analysis (e.g. micro-level or macro-level).  A good suggested structure (though you don’t have to do it this way, if you think of another way that works):o Overview of the book and describing your theories and its overall relevance to the book. (1-2 pages) o Specific discussion applying concepts from your theories to the data and analysis in the book. Are the theories supported or not by the data? (2-3 pages)o Think about how you might collect data to test the theory you chose in understanding patterns of urban violence today and in the future. What kind of data would you want (quantitative or qualitative) and how would you collect it (surveys, historical data, interviews, administrative data).- State the hypotheses connected to your chosen theory and then propose how you would analyze the data to test if your hypotheses were supported or not. (2-3 pages) (hint: make sure data is at the same level as your theories).o Discuss the limitations or challenges of your proposed study. How feasible is it? (1 page)o Conclude with a brief summary of your argument and what you learned about your theory by applying them to the book. (1-2 pages- Description of Theoretical Concepts.o Overview of the Book.o How well you demonstrate mastery over and insightinto the theoretical material from class and the book that you apply. Part of how this is accomplished is to analytically apply the concepts or propositions of a theory. To accomplish this, be specific and appropriately detailed about particular theoretical concepts and explanations of crime, and their implications for what is in the book.o How well you connect your theory to hypothetical data and analyses. Be clear about what type of data and analyses you’d need to test theoretical hypotheses.o Type of hypothetical data you propose to collect and its fit to theory.o Description and justification of proposed method.o Feasibility and challenges of proposed data and method. o The quality and clarity of the writing. By this, I don’t just mean grammar, etc. I mean how clearly and logically you explain your arguments, how one argument connects to another, how well and clearly the paper is organized/structured.
Crim 249 The Ohio State University Uneasy Peace Research Proposal

paper must be done in two days.

paper must be done in two days..

Hi, I need a 8 page paper not including a works cited page in MLA 8 format, double spaced, and 12pt times new roman font done within 48 hours of being selected. It’s an argumentative essay which should identify and evaluate significant consequences/impacts of a revolutionary development (innovation or invention) in emerging tech. Major consequences and/or implications may be economic, social, ethical, cultural, political, medical, and/or scientific, among others. I want my topic to be on iPhones. More specifically about why iPhones are good for us and paper must include a counter argument. These are the sources I’d like you to use but if you’d like to use additional sources please notify me so I can approve it within 24 hours. I do need to have a minimum of 4 online database articles (attached) and can use 3 additional websites.
paper must be done in two days.