Get help from the best in academic writing.

Why I Am Who I Am Personality Description my essay help uk Philosophy online class help

Abstract Personality development is a multifaceted concept it’s motivated by genetics, society, education and familial contributions. I have been called many things in regards to my personality aggressive, domineering, honest and opinionated but personally very few hold true. Without question I can admit I am honest but even more than that I am independent and loud. Aspects of my personality have been heavily influenced by not only my family and social relationships. My personality shaped me into the person that I am motivating me to keep being honest with people and going into the mental health field.

Being able to keep people the truth with the right delivery and knowing when to be loud solidified my chosen career path. Personality Characteristics of My Life Many concepts of a personality development through genetic contributions but many develop externally as well. Together nature versus nurture comes together to create a beautiful masterpiece of human and human personality. It’s been said no man is an island and many factors contributed to who I am. Traits I do not want to argue, fuss or fight but no one’s listening to me, so I need to speak louder than anyone else so I won’t be ignored.

A simple yet complex thought; is the most prominent area of my personality. Can you hear me, it’s impossible not to have been labeled as class loud mouth all through high school- I will not be silenced. Growing up my family was loud by normal standards and being one of the youngest my views and opinions were often disregarded but that became unacceptable. If I was to have a voice I had to express it loud and clear emphasis on the loud part. As the youngest child I struggled for anyone to not only listens to me but to take me serious so I began to raise my voice.

What are you waiting for you need to work hard to get your own be independent. Education is paramount to say the least and countless times I heard the question; what do you think? To be educated meant to have an opinion about life and the world around one’s self. Molded to walking alone through education prompted me to rely on myself and my own thoughts to continue my growth not only educationally but with my social life is well. “Our actions are patterned and organized, rather than random and chaotic. As we move from place to place, we retain a stable sense of ourselves, our past, and our goals for the future.

There is a unity to our experiences and action” Cervone and Pervin (2010). Do you call yourself an honest person, generally most people cannot and do not but yet I do. Honesty starts with first being honest with yourself, who you are and what you can accomplish. My friends have a running joke whenever they want my opinion and wanted the brutal truth they always ask for the Byrd truth. The definition of a Byrd truth is an unbiased answer meant to draw direct attention to the problem or solution and will not be sugarcoated. In childhood most we are taught not to lie but told to watch what and how we say things.

My honesty became something I was known for after being told there is nothing wrong with being honest and it makes you look better. In my earlier years I thought this was a direct correlation if you were honest you were prettier and would continue to be, so I invested as much time as possible in being honest. Personality development is perplex and a part of who I am and molded by career choices and the type of people who I socialize with. Any field who can’t accept someone who is loud, honest and independent is not somewhere that I would choose to work for.

Writing Economics Research Papers

Writing Economics Research Papers.

I. Introduction

The single most common failure of students in writing research papers is to misperceive what is expected in a quality research paper. The normal system of teaching what is expected is generally to have you do one, more or less in the dark, and then grade you. High grades provide positive reinforcement and low grades provide negative reinforcement; after a number of papers, the vagaries of individual instructor grading aside, everyone hopefully gets the hang of it.

Our purpose in this missive is to short circuit this process by providing as much information to you in advance of your writing as we can. It presents a number of ideas we have gathered over the years from a number of sources.

A more extensive source of information on writing papers in economics is Donald N. McCloskey, The Writing of Economics(Macmillan Press, 1987) which also appears in condensed form as “Economical Writing” in the April 1985 issue of Economic Inquiry.

II. The Research Process

·    
1. Choose your topic. This topic should have an economic dimension. It should be narrow enough to permit a sharp focusing of ideas, but not so narrow as to make the acquisition of information unreasonably difficult. It has to be manageable in the time allotted.

·    
2. Acquaint yourself with the existing literature. At this stage previous work on the topic is identified and read. The chief bibliographic source in economics is the Journal of Economic Literature, a quarterly subject-classified listing of all recent articles in economics and related journals. An extensive list of other sources, including computer searches, is provided at the end of this handout.

·    
3. Think critically about the material and the topic and identify, if it hasn’t already been identified, the specific focus on your inquiry. In economics this frequently takes the form of framing a hypothesis or limited set of hypotheses which are to be explored in the paper. A hypothesis is a tentative theory or supposition which is provisionally adopted to provide a focus for the research (e.g., inflation helps the younger poor but hurts the aged poor).

·    
4. Organize the research to assess the validity of the hypothesis or hypotheses. Hypotheses can be tested either theoretically (i.e., can they be deduced from accepted axioms?) or empirically (i.e., by confronting them with data) or both. Econometrics provides the standard techniques for empirical work, but , if you have no background in econometrics, other more descriptive forms of data presentation and analysis may be used.

·    
5. Make an outline. We cannot over emphasize this. Although your outline will probably have to be revised several times as the writing proceeds, this is a worthwhile investment of time. The surest way to spend a large amount of time on a poorly organized paper is to start writing without an outline. A tentative outline is also useful during the research stage. You will be surprised at how much discipline a well constructed outline will impose as you do the research and the writing. An outline will also greatly facilitate consultations with faculty on the progress of your research.

·    
6. Draw your conclusions and write a rough draft. This is the toughest step, but it will force you to put all your ideas together. At this stage weaknesses in the argument will become apparent and frequently you will gain some additional key insights during the writing. You will discover that you can improve on this rough draft a great deal if you put it aside for awhile and come back to it later.

·    
7. Write the final paper. If the other steps are done well, this step is relatively easy. You can concentrate mainly on style, organization and the elimination of weaknesses uncovered while writing the rough draft. Be sure to draw out the implications of your conclusions. An author must always be prepared to answer the “so what?” question!

 

 

III. Criteria for Grading Papers

There are four dimensions we consider in grading papers:

·    
1. Economic Content. Does the paper contain some substantive economic content? Although it may seem obvious that one should write an economics paper for an economics course, you would be amazed at the papers we have received which are political science, physics, chemistry, etc., with an occasional dollar sign thrown it. Interdisciplinary papers are fine (even encouraged) but one of the disciplines has to be economics and its representation must be more than token.

·    
2. Analytical Depth. Has the author analyzed the important issues in some depth or is the treatment superficial? Has the author sought out and included relevant facts? Does the research reflect a reasonable awareness of the relevant literature? Does the paper make clear how all the facts fits together?

·    
3. Organization and Style. Is the paper organized into coherent subsections which, when integrated, form a logical sequence of arguments leading directly to the conclusions? Is it well written? Does the introduction provide an overview of the paper and the role of each section? Are the conclusions summarized and clearly specified? Is the paper grammatically correct?

·    
4. Originality. Has the author exhibited some degree of originality or has he/she simply regurgitated readily accessible materials? Has the author clearly identified the nature of the original contribution for the reader?

IV. Rules for Papers

·    
1. The papers should be in a publishable format. Each one should contain a title page, the body, the footnotes or end notes (if any) and a bibliography. A table of contents is not required, but should be considered. Usually the construction of a table of contents facilitates the organization of the paper.

·    
2. A paper which is done jointly for an economics course and another non-economics course will be acceptable only when the two faculty members involved have cleared the topic and method of approach in advance. (See below on how to acknowledge that the paper is being done for two courses.) In general a single paper for two economics courses will not be acceptable, but exceptions are possible when it makes clear educational sense.

·    
3. If you do not want the comments to be written on your original, enclose a photocopy with it. In this case, comments and the grade will be written on the photocopy.

·    
4. Discussions about your paper with the faculty member supervising your research are encouraged throughout the research process. It is not necessary to “go it alone.” For these discussions to help they should be initiated early in the research process.

·    
5. Each professor will have his/her own rules for penalizing late papers. You are responsible for knowing the rule.

Essay Help “>Essay Help