Get help from the best in academic writing.

Why Did the Japanese Attack Pearl Harbor? Research Paper

Custom Paper Help / By
Why Did the Japanese Attack Pearl Harbor? Research Paper. Despite the great industrialization of the Japan, it has never had any natural resources such as petroleum and Ores. Therefore, it had always depended on importation of ores and petroleum in order to supply its industries with the needed raw materials. Before 1939, the United States of America was Japan’s major supply of ores and petroleum. Nevertheless, the situation changed when Japan continued its hostility towards China. In an effort to stop the hostility of Japan towards China, the president of United States of America president Roosevelt and the Secretary of States Cordell Hull exerted pressure on Japan. When Japan refused to yield up to their demand, the United States of America stopped supplying Japan with the raw materials that were needed to run their industries. Japan’s refusal to heed to the demand of the American government was highly attributed to the fact that Japan was not willing to give up the control of the Manchuria region in China that acted as a very strategic location, where it could get unlimited supply of raw materials for its industries as well as a strategic market for its manufactured products. Japan had always coveted the rich resources that were present in British and Dutch colonies of Southeast Asia. Thus, with the shutdown of U.S.A. supply, Japan increasingly looked southwards for the supply of raw materials for its industries. Japan considered the U.S. as its only hindrance in its effort of obtaining raw materials from the Southeast and especially its naval base at Pearl Harbor (U.S. Army Center for Military History par. 2-4) The United States of America Pacific Fleet at Pearl Harbor was the only existing power that could negate Japan’s navy. From a long time association of Americans and Japanese as they transacted business along the Pacific, the Japanese knew that the American had established a very strong naval base at Pearl Harbor. Therefore, they knew that by bombing the Pearl Harbor which held Americans naval force, they will be able to completely destroy the American military force in Pacific region. Subsequently, the bombing of the Pearl Harbor surely enabled the Japanese to completely cripple down any American immediate retaliation effort. The Japanese also understood that the American military bases at Philippines could also interfere with their effective communications between Japan home Island and the East Indies. Therefore, after bombing the Pearl Harbor, Japan proceeded with an immediate attack of the American military bases that were located in Philippines in order to negate any immediate Americans retaliation force (Answers. Com par. 3). Every oil tanker that was heading to Japan had to pass through the Pearl Harbor that was heavily manned by the American troops. Consequently, the Japanese did not have another option, but to attack the Pearl Harbor in order to weaken the U.S. fleet that was based there. The Japanese organized a surprise attack on the U.S. fleet at Pearl Harbor in order neutralize the American fleet at the Harbor. Consecutively, Japan had planned to destroy American central pacific bases at Guam and Wake Island as well as those located in Philippines. Japan believed that by crippling the American naval power at Pearl Harbor, Japan will be better placed to conquer Malaya, Singapore, Burma as well as Dutch East Indies. Through this process, Japan had anticipated to establish a defensive ring around its conquered areas by fortifying island in the south and Central Pacific. The attack of the Pearl Harbor was meant to convince the Americans to participate in World War II, which Japan anticipated was a strategic move that will force America to accept a negotiation of peace in the Pacific region (Christie 85). The Pearl Harbor was preferred as the best Japanese striking spot because of its strategic location. The Japanese had other options where they had planned to strike the Americans. San Francisco as well as the large costal cities were among the other options that Japan had anticipated to strike. They opted for Pearl Harbor due to its proximity to Japan than other alternatives they had considered. Those Islands that comprised of Philippines and Pearl Harbor were located 8,000 miles from the American west cost, but only 200 miles away from Japan. Therefore, Japan troops had had considered that they had lesser distance to travel compared to the American troops. Japan knew that the closer they came to American coasts, the higher their risks of being detected was. They also realized that they could not attack Americans from the mainland because they had to pass the Hawaii on their way back which will make the Americans retaliation force catch up with them. Therefore, by Japan considering all those factors, they opted for the Pearl Harbor as the most strategic location for striking. Japan had anticipated that by striking the U.S Pacific Fleet that opposed its conquest of the South East Asia and the Pacific Island, they would be successful to conquer all the territory they had desired to conquer. They believed that even if the American will be able to rebuild their Fleet back, they will not be in a position to dislodge the Japanese from their conquered territories. America had established an international movement to isolate Japan economically in order to force it to withdraw its control over Manchuria in China. Subsequently, the USA had already taken some appropriate measures by cutting off credit to Japan that was tailored to make Japan economically unstable to afford to purchase petroleum which was a vital resource for its industries and military. Japan petroleum mainly originated from USA, Dutch East Indies and Burma with the last two being British colonies. Japan knew that by destroying the USA naval forces in the Pacific region, Japan navy will then be the strongest in the pacific region which will help Japan to overcome the economical consequences of the USA ultimatum. By defeating the USA navy, Japan had anticipated to conquer the Dutch East Indies as well as Burma and control the oil that was produced there in order to use it in their industries and military. The striking of the Pearl Harbor was as anticipated by Japan. Japan was successful in crippling the American Fleet. Consecutively, Japan was successful in defeating the Dutch East Indies and Burma. The British navy under the instructions from Churchill tried to intervene and contain the Japan naval, but was not successful to fight the Japan strong navy. Therefore, Japan eventually succeeded to control all the oil producing areas in Southeast Asia (Marshall 216). In addition, Japan opted to attack the Pearl Harbor because they believed that since America was a nation that was comprised of diverse races of people that Americans could not act as a united singular force. This was a mistake for the Japan, because when Japan continued with their attacks on US navy and Air forces in order to extend their territory to include China; the United States of America was successful in negating Japan’s efforts and thus defeated Japan when it bombed Hiroshima and Nagasaki towns in Japan that led Japan to surrender (Rosenberg par. 3). Works Cited Answers. Com. “Why did the Japanese attack Pearl Harbor?” 2011. Christie, Clive.Southeast Asia in the twentieth century. New York: Tauris Publishers. Marshall, Jonathan. To Have and Have Not: Southeast Asian Raw Materials and Source of Pacific War. California: University of California Press, 1995 Rosenberg, Jennifer. Hiroshima and Nagasaki. 2011. U.S. Army Center for Military History. “A Brief History of WWII: Japan on the Offensive.”2011. Why Did the Japanese Attack Pearl Harbor? Research Paper

HCA 460 Grand Canyon University Birth Centers A Health Care Organization Essay

HCA 460 Grand Canyon University Birth Centers A Health Care Organization Essay.

Regulatory agencies are the physical manifestation of health care legislation. Each agency has a specific mission that is carried out under the authority of Congress.Choose a health care organization of interest to you. Write a 1,000-1,250 word paper that addresses the following:Describe the purpose, mission, and goals of this health care organization. Provide an overview of the type of health care organization and the community it serves.Identify the regulating agencies that oversee the organization. What are the specific responsibilities assigned to regulating agencies? How do regulating agencies support heath care and the stakeholders in health care?Identify a health care issue/topic relevant for this organization (workplace safety, patient safety, quality, fraud and abuse, injury, etc.). Discuss the relevance of this issue or topic for the organization.Describe the role of the organization or administrator in compliance. What are the actions a health care administrator takes to comply with health care legislation?Support your essay by including three to five scholarly sources, including your textbook.
HCA 460 Grand Canyon University Birth Centers A Health Care Organization Essay

St Thomas University Nursing Training New Information System & Evaluation Discussion

write my term paper St Thomas University Nursing Training New Information System & Evaluation Discussion.

Training, New Information System, & Evaluation What training is provided when a new information system is implemented in your organization? Are nurses involved in evaluating the systems?Submission Instructions:Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources. Your initial post is worth 8 points.You should respond to at least two of your peers by extending, refuting/correcting, or adding additional nuance to their posts. Your reply posts are worth 2 points (1 point per response.) All replies must be constructive and use literature where possible.
St Thomas University Nursing Training New Information System & Evaluation Discussion

ECON 157 Economic Development Chapters Questions

ECON 157 Economic Development Chapters Questions.

Total 11 question, I will provide teacher’s standard answer, you need to write in your own words, no copy. I also will provide a 93/100 student hw answer. So this will make sure u can provide a perfect answer.Homework IIn defining development to include more than just the growth of per capita income, there is an implicit assumption that the growth of per capita income alone is not sufficient to guarantee the reduction of poverty and the growth of self-esteem. Is it possible that there could be growth of per capita income without the achievement of these other objectives?Make a case that development economics might be merely a combination of all the other subfields of economics, only applied to low-income countries.Explain how low levels of living can turn into a vicious cycle in developing countries.Explain why purchasing power parity measures of income levels tend to show a smaller difference between poor and rich countries.If countries are first ranked by level of real GDP per capita, and then by the value of the Human Development Index, would you expect the ranking of countries to be similar or different? Explain.What are the main differences between the linear stages and international dependency modelsof development?Describe one important criticism of Rostow’s stages of economic growth theory.Why have poor nations invested so much money in education and health? Evaluate the soundness of these reasons.Explain some of the reasons why developing countries have not realized a greater positive development impact from their higher education programs.Is child labor a problem in developing countries? Explain.How can an increase in human capital lead to an increase in GDP? Why might it not lead to an increase in GDP?
ECON 157 Economic Development Chapters Questions

Flag Desecration Amendment Essay

Flag Desecration Amendment Essay.

In each Commentary, the student is to discuss one of the readings found at Module 3 at the Canvas site, Model Essays (either one of the General Interest Essays or one of the Model Student Essays).The ProcessTo prepare for writing the Commentary, the student should read and review the subject essay as many times as needed to fully understand the essay. The student should then develop the thesis statement for this Commentary and an outline for the Commentary. The student should apply appropriate critical thinking skills and offer a personal interpretation of, explication for, criticism of, or observation about the selected essay.For example, the student may respond to the essay, indicating what the student did or did not like about the essay, or the student may agree with or disagree with the subject matter of the selected essay writer’s conclusion. The student may evaluate the subject essay, commenting on whether or not the student accepts the premises or conclusions in the selected essay; whether or not the author of the selected essay made a sound case and proved the position taken in the selected essay; whether or not the selected essay has any merit, or any similar evaluation; whether or not the student relates her or his personal experience to that of the author of the selected essay, such as exploring the reaction to the subject essay or interpreting the meaning perceived in the subject essay. These are among the kinds of approaches that the student can take in the Commentary on the selected subject essay.Critical ThinkingThe Foundation for Critical Thinking, in its booklet “Student Guide to Historical Thinking,” describes critical thinking as thinking about any subject or content or topic such that theIn-Class Writing 1 Updated May 12, 2019In-Class Writing 2 Updated May 12, 2019understanding of the subject or content or topic is improved through analysis and assessment, an expansion of the information about the subject, content, or topic..Put more simply, critical thinking is analysis—the desire to seek, the patience to doubt, and the willingness to consider what you know or think you know about a topic—and assessment—a slowness to assert and a carefulness about what is accepted or disposed of what you know or think you know.Further, critical thinking is the same analysis and assessment about what you do not know or about what is new to you—an openness and willingness to seek, and to doubt, and to consider alternatives to what you know or think you know—because learning something new will allow you to grow in knowledge and understanding.Argumentation is primarily logical argument: thesis, main points, evidence to prove the main points, and organization (and outlining) of the main points and evidence. As you go through this intellectual process, you are applying, or should be applying, the skills of critical thinking. Consider this proposition. As you listen to the television (or cable) or radio news or to talk radio, or while you read your favorite newspaper or news magazine, identify and discuss a good argument taken by an influential person in the news and ask yourself to explain how the person used sound argumentation or persuasion while convincing you that his or her argument is sound or valid.For this assignment, in place of a radio or cable or television news program or a newspaper or news magazine, the student is reading and responding to one of the Model Essays at Module 3. Consider the argumentation and the evidentiary support in the selected essay and develop the assessment and conclusion reached. To complete this task and arrive at an informed conclusion requires applying the skills of critical thinking. Completing the exercise of critical thinking is the function of the Commentary assignment.The LayoutThe first page of the essay and all subsequent pages will follow the MLA Documentation and Format. All writings are double-spaced; if the submission is not double-spaced, it will not be accepted. Most software programs are pre-set with Calibri, but your instructor prefers Arial or Times New Roman; the type must be either 11 or 12 point type, to make reading the writings more “comfortable.” Some software programs on some computers, personal and in the HCC labs, are not pre-set to double-space nor to indent an automatic 1⁄2“ (0.5) at the beginning of each new paragraph; many do not have a 1” margin top, bottom, left, and right. (I will not accept a submission that is not set-up align left – and do not use “justify.”) These requirements may have to be individually set to have the correct essay format.The Identification is prescribed by the MLA and modeled in your textbook, Chapter 24.1, p 376. All pages must be identified with the writer’s last name and a page number in a header (1⁄2“ from the top) in the upper right-hand corner of the page. There is no cover page. The Commentary does not require a Works Cited page, but it is important to be familiar with the formatting for a Works Cited page; if the student uses secondary source documentation in the Commentary, however, a Works Cited page is then mandatory.The Commentary should be at least one-plus pages long, with a minimum of three (3) paragraphs (an introduction, at least one body paragraph, although it could be longer, and a conclusion). Any other questions, ask.
Flag Desecration Amendment Essay