First of all, this question is assuming I’m going to get into some college somewhere, so thank you. That’s a nice reassurance in this big, insecure world of college applications. Interestingly enough, no one has ever asked me why I’m going to college. Or even if I’m going to college. Answering this question required a lot of thought. That’s good, I’ve heard thinking is good. I guess I could say that I’m going to college because I don’t want to work in a gas station. But that’s not what you want to hear. I could say that I want a good job that makes me money. But that’s also not at all what you want to hear. Both of those things are nice perks of going to college, but they’re not the Big Reason. I don’t think my Big Reason is what you had in mind either, but I’m not prepared to fit a mold yet. I’ll wait until I’m wearing pantsuits and blowing out my hair. Without further ado, I present to you the Big Reason: I’m scared. I’m scared to go into the real world, naive as I am. I simply don’t know enough to pretend I’m a functional member of society (pretend is all anyone does. What’s a functional member of society anyway?). My brain is a green tomato. I’m not ready for the world. No one eats green tomatoes. There’s too much left to learn, about the world and… (WARNING: cheesiness ahead) myself. Blah Blah I have to discover myself and determine my true destiny and awaken my passions YAY. If I thought I was knowledgeable enough to be an adult in society, I probably wouldn’t be going to college. Well, maybe I would, so I don’t have to work in a gas station.
Recap: I’m being scared into going to college. You may be thinking, “well she was right, that’s not really what we wanted/expected to hear.” But I have recognized that I have so much more to learn (and I am eager to learn it), so because I said “learn” twice in this sentence you should like my response. Is that how it works? I wouldn’t know because my brain is a green tomato.
Explain and critically analyse the origins and structural design of the Internet insofar as it relates to cybercrime
Explain and critically analyse the origins and structural design of the Internet insofar as it relates to cybercrime.
Assessment 2b | Interpretation, Critique and Feedback Overview This assessment aligns to Subject Intended Learning Outcomes : 1.Explain and critically analyse the origins and structural design of the Internet insofar as it relates to cybercrime. 4.Interpret the legal, law enforcement and regulatory challenges around dealing with cybercrime. 5.Develop and participate in critical discussions on current cybercrime issues and threats. Instructions NOTE that your responses MUST be taken from this subject only. You are allowed to discuss legal solutions (i.e. reference to case law, legislation and policy) from THIS subject only. You will not receive marks for solutions that are purely technical or that are from outside this subject (e.g. international treaties/conventions/law/police not discussed and/or do not feature in the lecture or reading materials). To begin, read through a range of your student peers’ discussion forum posts that respond to the Assessment 2a questions. Critically reflect on their posts. Then, use this as an opportunity to provide useful feedback to one post and to discuss issues relevant to cyber law. You must include a component of interpretation in your responses, in regards to interpreting the legal, law enforcement and regulatory challenges around dealing with the cybercrime issue under discussion. NOTE – please provide ONE post only for 2b. If you write multiple posts, you will only be graded for your first post. Ensure that you read the other students’ posts in the Assessment 2 discussion forums FOR THE QUESTION YOU ANSWERED IN 2(a). Participate by responding to ONE student’s post for the discussion question. Don’t automatically gravitate to the busiest discussion. Keep in mind that your responses should be word limited, so please be brief and choose your words carefully. Be respectful of others’ views. Any offensive, derogatory, disrespectful or hurtful language will not be tolerated. While critically reflecting on your peers’ posts, aim to achieve: 1. Overall feedback and contribute to others’ posts on current cybercrime issues and threats. 2. Specific critical reflection on others’ posts and contribute to interpreting the legal, law enforcement and regulatory challenges of cybercrime. 3. Support your responses with theory/ evidence/ examples and appropriate use of language. Please see the Assessment 2b Rubric for further Overall feedback and contribution to others’ posts on current cybercrime issues and threats (40% of mark) Overall provides comprehensive critiques of and specific contributions and feedback to two peers’ discussion posts for each question, which significantly further develops discussions on current cybercrime issues and threats. Specific critical reflection on others’ posts to contribute to interpreting legal, law enforcement and regulatory challenges of cybercrime (50% of Total mark) Consistently demonstrates deep critical reflection on peers’ discussion posts to significantly further engage in specific, targeted conversations to interpret the legal, law enforcement and regulatory challenges around dealing with cybercrime. Responses supported by theory/ evidence/ examples and appropriate language use (10% of mark) Demonstrates excellent examples of supporting discussion with references and examples on current cybercrime types, issues and threats. Consistently uses clear, appropriate and respectful language when providing feedback; presents replies and feedback in a constructive and very helpful manner. Formatting requirements for your discussion interpretation, critique and feedback: • write in a discussion style, that is, not too formal and aiming to by understood by your peers • 500-1,000 words (maximum) • evidence/reference your discussion using the Australian Guide to Legal Citation in-text referencing (a brief reference list can be outside the word count) • clear, appropriate and respectful use of language • convey a sense of sharing within your class community, to benefit others in your peer group with your contribution. Referencing requirements Please use the Australian Guide to Legal Citation referencing where appropriate. If you are ready to begin your discussion activity, please go back to the links to the discussion forums you used on the previous page and access the same forum you contributed to for Assessment 2a. You will click on the ‘reply’ button in the forum and post your comment in the same way that you did for Assessment 2a, except this time you will be responding to a comment/post by one of your peers.
Essay Help “>Essay Help