This idea of propaganda had helped manipulate fellow Russians to believe that Stalin was somehow god-like due to his superior rank. Education and censorship were strictly controlled and played an important role in part of Stalin’s key features of control. Books were rewritten, censored and introduced to teach everyone the ideas of Stalin in schools. Stalin had also had all the history of the old communists erased from education books and reprinted to modified version that gave him more of an elevated role in the textbooks.
Political youth groups were also introduced to train children in socialism along with various activities such as sports and camps. This ultimately gave Stalin control over the young generation of the Soviet Union, as they were lead to believe in what was taught to them. Another method that was carried out was based around the arts and the sciences. Writers and artists were regarded dangerous to Stalin and so they were forced to produce work that suited Stalin and the soviet workers. This method was known as ‘socialist realists’.
However, any other work that was produced in which criticized soviet rule, painters or writers would find them selves in harsh labor camps. The sciences was particularly paid much attention to by Stalin for he felt improvements in technology and production in nuclear weapons would help industrialize Russia and grow as a nation. This time period hence was named ‘ the golden ages’ for Russia. On a larger scale Stalin had introduced two major methods that enabled him with complete control over the Soviet Union.
These aspects were focused around industry and agriculture of Russia. In 1929, collectivization was introduced to increase agriculture over a 5-year plan. It was appointed to the peasants in whom they were encouraged to group strips of land together and form a collective farm where they would work together and share everything from food to clothing. This form of collective farms was called ‘ Kolkhoz’ and it helped the peasants to farm efficiently as well live better, make Russia more modern and promote communist ideas.
However, there were disputes against the idea of collectivization from the peasants as they felt rationing food will cause starvation for themselves. In later cases, this did lead to famine when harvest was bad in 1932. But the real purpose of this 5-year policy was to gather grains and food so that workers could be fed within the industrializing cities and factories but also gain money for industrialization. Even though this policy gave Stalin ultimate power over agriculture and the working class, millions had died and starved in result. Fear was also part of this method.
Fear from dekulakisation was commonplace as Stalin blamed Kulaks for everything that has gone wrong. These kulaks were often known as rich peasants that would not agree to the term of collectivization and were found either dead, sent to labor camps or deported. In all, collectivization had caused tremendous damage to the lives of peasants and farmers but gave Stalin more power and control over the Soviet Union even though it was not a completely finished method. Industrialization was another method introduced however this was directed towards the industry.
This plan consisted of 5 year plans that were basically targets to increase production in industry over the given time period. The reasons for the introduction of this method was firstly to provide enough machinery to mechanize farming and agriculture, enable Stalin to control the production of goods, to have a strong industry that can produce armament, independence as a nation and have the government to control state planning. However the conditions for peasant during this 5-year plan were astronomically bad.
Working conditions were very harsh as it consisted of little resources, poor hygiene, long working hours and heavy punishment if any of the workers were unable to complete tasks. The Gulag was also a feature part of industrialization, however workers were expected to live less than 2 years in the forced labor camp. Following on, this method did involve propaganda to encourage potential workers to join in the plan through a propaganda story of Stakhanov; a hard working employee. Stalin had run this plan 3 times all of which did not meet all of its aims and targets but he did gain a developed control over the work force.
In overall, Stalin had created and introduced numbers of methods, whether they were forced or ideas to catapult him to more control over the Soviet Union. He had also targeted different groups from children to farmers in order to build power nation wide through propaganda and fear. This in summary had made him more superior for he controlled what was produced and how it could be used within the country so Russia could develop into an independent country. Even though some methods were unsuccessful they were very effective in favor of Stalin and his rule of power.
This is an assignment, no more than 3000 words but it is acceptable to be 2750 words.
Please comment on the current status of the evidence–base for the accountability and effectiveness
of humanitarian actions, particularly through the lens of ALNAP, and suggest strategies which could
be utilised to increase accountability of interventions in responding to international disasters and
The topic has to argue and analyses two significant words which are (the accountability and
effectiveness) of humanitarian actions.
In the first part you have to do a search and reporting from the literature about the studies have the
evidence–base for the accountability and effectiveness of humanitarian actions: (you can choose
ALNAP as a starting point and continue to others)
1=AMOUNT OF EVIDENCE to measure the accountability and effectiveness of humanitarian actions.
2=QUALITY OF EVIDENCE to measure the accountability and effectiveness of humanitarian actions.
Almost of the study just describe what had done in the crisis and measure the impact without
measure the effectiveness of humanitarian standards. The accountability of humanitarian action (it is
important to beneficial) such as some donors who providing money in crises did not measure the
beneficial outcomes in order to improve financial part.
The second part of this topic is suggested strategies which could be utilised to increase accountability
of interventions in responding to international disasters and humanitarian crises
That to improve evidence, improve quality and improve the effectiveness of the evidence which could
be by training, develop experience, focusing on studies. you could choose an issue and develop
strategies to improve that.
Headings of the assignment should be as following:
1= Introduction (start with identifying the important and impact of evidence to the humanitarian
crises and then identify the paper’s contents and what you are going to discuss). 300 words.
2= Background (You can choose one to three headings in this section, however, you have to identify
the meaning of the accountability and effectiveness in humanitarian actions and why it is important
to measure that) 500 words.
3=Body (should not less than 5 headings and it is possible to use subheadings as well, however, in
this part you have to make arguments and analyses of evidence as mentioned in the above
(Some suggested headings and subheadings:
1.Evidence–base for the accountability of humanitarian actions
1.1.Amount and quality of the evidence
2.Evidence–base for the effectiveness of humanitarian actions
2.1.Amount and quality of the evidence
3.Strategies to increase accountability of humanitarian actions
4.Strategies to increase effectiveness of humanitarian actions)
5= Conclusion (conclude what had done in this paper). 200 words
Please don’t use books at all in the references list and in the text, you have to use any types of
published articles and the PDF files of any guidelines and official website.
25 references required in the reference list and please be attention to doesn’t write any sentence
Essay Help “>Essay Help