Get help from the best in academic writing.

what are supply chain vulnerabilities?, homework help

what are supply chain vulnerabilities?, homework help.

i am uploading a few lecture slides and pdf of the text book that i am using for the course.I have a bunch of questions which i need you to write from the text book or power point slides.You can also search the internet for answers but i dont want the exact answers copied from the internet.There will be a plagiarism check because this is a final report.Questions are given below:Submit a report on the Following questions:
(25 Points) Question 2) what are supply chain vulnerabilities? Discuss different security and privacy threats at
different levels and suggest counter measures. (50 points)
Question 3) we discussed in detail the delay based PUFs in class, do a survey on bistable PUFs. You
may want to include following points in your discussion.
a) Names of PUFs, and when they were proposed
b) Discuss whether the covered PUFs are strong or Weak PUF.
c) Implementation details
d) Security analysis against threats.
e) Effects of environment and aging on these PUFs. (25 Points)
Question 4) Discuss the different types of non-volatile memory storage for keys used in the past.
Write the threat models with the possible attacks. Discuss how PUFs are a suitable candidate to
protect keys from those attacks.
(25 Points)
Question 5) Do a survey on FPGA based designs security threats and counter measures. Please give me an individual report for each question….
what are supply chain vulnerabilities?, homework help

BUS3382 Voicemail

BUS3382 Voicemail. Help me study for my Business class. I’m stuck and don’t understand.

You are responsible for a major report at work. The deadline is fast approaching and you realize you will not be able to meet the deadline your supervisor gave you. You really need to discuss the situation with your supervisor. When you call to set a time to meet, you find that your supervisor is not in.
Call 870-403-2142 and leave a voicemail message that would be appropriate for the situation. (Since this is my cell phone, send a text before you call to let me know I shouldn’t answer the call.)You may also complete this assignment by recording a message and texting it to me or emailing it to me.
In the submission section, submit a short statement of completion, i.e. I left a voicemail on (date) at (time).
Just write out what you should have said over the phone as a message.

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction

4.0 ptsFull Marks
0.0 ptsNo Marks

4.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization of Thoughts

4.0 ptsFull Marks
0.0 ptsNo Marks

4.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClear spoken message

4.0 ptsFull Marks
0.0 ptsNo Marks

4.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReview of critical information

4.0 ptsFull Marks
0.0 ptsNo Marks

4.0 pts

Total Points: 16.0

BUS3382 Voicemail

The Principles Of Personalisation Processes

assignment writer Personalisation is considered as a process that involves the usage of technology to accommodate the differences between the individuals. It is becoming an increasingly popular area within health and education sectors (Department of Health, 2008). When discussed in terms of Health care, Personalisation involves thinking in relation to care and support services in a completely different way, building care provisions around the person in a way as an individual with preferences, strengths and aspirations and combining them towards the center of the process of recognizing their needs and making choices about their living (Department of Health, 2008). It demands a significant transformation of social care so that all the processes, systems, staff and services are combined to put the people first. In addition, personalisation is indicated as offering people with much more choice and control over their lives within all social care settings. However, it is much of a wider concept than simply providing personal budgets to the people who are eligible for council funding. It also involves ensuring access to the universally determined services (transport, leisure, education, housing, health) and employment opportunities regardless of their age and disability characteristics (Department of Health, 2008). In a very short span of time, the personalisation concept has occupied its central place within the field of social work and adult care discourses in United Kingdom (Department of Health, 2008). A study involving a consultation process was carried out by Department of Health (2006), it was observed that people showed much interest in accessing personalised approach and they demanded for its need and they expected it to be made available to them easily and quickly. In order to make better provisions relative to personalisation, various people who participated in this consultation process questioned their need about the availability of social care providers and their services (Department of Health, 2006). But in order to make it possible, the health care sector needs a clear vision with a direction to make personalisation a strategic shift towards the initial prevention and interventions of dreadful diseases (Department of Health, 2008). However, this seems to be a challenging agenda that cannot be possible by social work alone and it requires effective working away from the boundaries pertaining to social care like housing, benefits, leisure, health and transport. On the other hand, demographic variations show a significant impact upon the number of people who care and support the family members and this in turn influence the available care provisions (Department of Health, 2010). Although personalisation is the corner stone of public service modernisation, in terms of social care it can be meant that everyone who is receiving care (regardless of their need level, statutory services) should possess an equal choice and control over the way through which the support is delivered. Social care providers (involved in carrying out social work) will be potentially able to direct the use of resources, building on the technological support, family and the wider community in order to enable them in enjoying their role as citizens in their communities (Department of Health, 2008). The document released by the Department of Health in 2010 on “Putting People First” offers a clear insight regarding personalisation along with the potential ways of its development when investments were made within the following aspects of support (in relation to the individual carers): Universal Services: support that can be made available to everyone in the community in addition to transport, leisure, education, information and advice (Department of Health 2010). Early interventions and preventions: helping people to live independently as long as possible and designing future cost efficiency systems. Choice and control: helping people in understanding about the way of spending in relation to care and support and thus allowing them to choose in accordance to their needs. Social capital: creating supportive communities that enable in determining the value of each and every contribution made by the citizens (Department of Health 2010). Personalisation by Effective Participation Personalisation through effective participation helps us in creating a better connection between the individuals and the group in a way by allowing users a direct, informed and creative rewriting in the script through which the service used can be designed, planned and evaluated (Houston 2010). This approach involves the following steps: Expanded Choice: enables users in providing a greater choice over the various ways of mix through which the needs might be met and to combine the possible solutions around the user instead of limiting the provisions in relation to any institution in question like hospital, social service department to which the user seems to be much closer (Leadbeater, 2004; Lymbery 2010). Intimate consultation: Here professionals work in an intimate relationship with the clients to help in opening up their needs, aspirations and preferences through an extended dialogue system (Houston 2010). Enhanced voice: This is very difficult to follow through a white paper agenda and it involves the use of expanded choice in opening up the user’s voice. Making comparisons through the various possible alternatives can help in articulating the preferences. Provision of Partnership: Generally, it can be possible to combine the solutions which are personalised to the individual if the services work in partnership. In instance, any organization – a secondary school can form a gateway for the learning services provided not only by the school but also to various other companies, colleges and distance learning programs (Houston 2010). Advocacy: In this section, the professionals act as advocates to the users and help them to move their way through the system. This process can enable the clients in attaining a continual relationship with the professionals (Houston 2010). Co-Production: Professionals who were found to be involved in shaping the service were expected to be more active and responsible in offering their help in relation to the service delivery. However, Personalisation aids in involving service users, creating more efficient, and responsible package of care services. Funding: Within this, authorities need to follow the options or the choices made by the users and in certain cases-offering direct payments to the physically disabled people to assemble and obtain their own care packages. Funds should be left with the users for purchasing any good or commodity and this should be done with the advice of the professionals (Houston 2010). Role of Personalisation When considering the role of personalisation as an organizing principle with relation to the public service reforms, certain comparative studies need to be definitely performed with a broader emphasis on contracted services. Nevertheless, other public services do exist where in which personalisation fail in making a sensible approach (Duffy 2005). This can be exemplified by: Someone who is entering in to an accident or emergency service department do not need a dialogue but instead he needs a quick and competent action (Leadbeater, 2004; Lymbery 2010). Although in a public sector, defense is another area where in which personalisation principles cannot be applied and the people play a pivotal role in fighting against terrorism. Thus it can be understood that, personalisation can be used only in certain public services which can be of face-face (like education, social services and non-emergency health care departments), those depending to establish a long term relationships (disease management) and the services involving a direct engagement between users and professionals through which the users can play a significant role in shaping the service (Leadbeater, 2004; Lymbery 2010). Personalization- A Reality in 21st century Making personalisation, a reality for the 21st century definitely requires huge cultural and transactional transformations within all the parts of the system (not only in social care but also in public sector, whole local government). Over the past ten years, direct payment option helped some people by providing an ability to design the services they need, but the potential impact was found to be very less. But in the recent years, figures indicated that about 54,000 people out of a million received help through direct payment (Department of Health 2010). Since personalisation describes the change within the whole system it needs the presence of strong leadership to communicate and convey its potential vision and values. To achieve a significant shift towards its cultural side and to construct a delivery model (Department of Health 2008), it demands all the stake holders to work in partnership with others. Nevertheless, in future social care system allows individuals in undertaking their own choices with an appropriate support at the level they needed. It should be understood that personalisation need to be delivered in a cost effective manner. In addition, it must be recognized that personalisation with its early intervention and efficiency are not contrary and need to be strongly aligned in future to obtain better results (Department of Health 2010). Personalisation in relation to the Mental Health Residential Care Homes Personalisation in relation to the mental health can be defined as understanding and meeting the needs of the individuals in various ways that can seem to work best for them (Carr, 2009). Principles of personalisation can be applied in early interventions, prevention and other self directed approaches where in which the users are involved in maintaining and managing their own social support services (Lymbery 2004). However, it accommodates mental health promotion and its maintenance with a wider choice and control and thereby contributing to the improvement in well-being and quality of life. The above mentioned principles pertaining to personalisation can be applied in Mental Health Residencies to direct payments and other internal budgets (Mc Donald, Postle, Dawson, 2008). Direct payments: are in general, cash payments that are paid to the individual during which they can design and control the tailored support in order to meet the social care needs. Funding for this direct payments arrive from the respective local authorities (Fernandez et al., 2007). Though these were available from 1996, they are now-a-days considered to be as the only option for the people who are provided with the personal budget. Statistics indicate that direct payments users were found to be increased at a steady rate ranging from 50 in 2001 to 3373 in 2008 (Care Service improvement partnership, 2008). From the year of 2007 and 2008, the percentage of people using this option in order to meet their mental needs increased by 62% which was found to be one of the largest among all the care groups (Carmichael, Brown 2002; Ridley, Jones 2002; Spandler, 2004; Spandler, Vick 2004; Cestari et al, 2006; Taylor, 2008). But, when compared with the other impairment groups, the percentage of direct payment users in mental health is relatively low as a result of poor level of mental capacity, lack of awareness and non proactive attitude of managers towards the implementation of direct payment. This has been evidently noticed in my placement setting. Research studies indicate that, when offered with sufficient support people with the mental health condition will start to use direct payment option effectively and imaginatively (Carmichael, Brown 2002; Ridley, Jones 2002; Spandler, 2004; Spandler, Vick 2004; Cestari et al, 2006; Taylor, 2008). In a National Pilot Study of direct payments in mental health (2001 to 2003), around more than half of the people used a personal assistant in obtaining social, personal and mental support and they assisted the impaired ones in carrying out their daily activities and helping them in accessing community and leisure facilities (Spander, Vick 2004; 2006). Many barriers do exist for these direct payments in all the impairment groups and out of which many of them also apply within the mental field. They include lack of awareness, risk aversion and protectionism (Pearson, 2004; Fernandez et al, 2007; Hasler, Stewart 2004; Spandler, Vick 2005), potential difficulties in undertaking decisions pertaining to social care needs and other eligibility issues for the people whose condition changes within less time (Carmichael, Brown 2002; Ridley, Jones 2002; Spandler, 2004; Spandler, Vick 2004; Cestari et al, 2006; Taylor, 2008). Personal Budgets: The cornerstone of the Government’s approach in creating transformations within social care especially mental health residential home care and relative support through personalisation is the allocation of Personal Budget (PB). My placement setting is a mental health residential home accommodating people with enduring mental health problems. I think individuals should be supported and assessed in conjunction with other agencies in order to meet users own needs, and by doing so a care provider can ultimately determine whether they are eligible for providing any social care funding. If individuals were found to be eligible, care providers can explain the amount of money they expected to receive in order to meet the needs (Department of Health 2006; Duffy, 2007). Individual Budgets: On the other hand, individual budgets are quite similar to the Personal Budgets and these incorporate various other funding schemes along with social care funding (Glendinning et al., 2008). The funding schemes include: access to work, supporting people, living independently, disabled facilities and grants as well as integrated community equipment services. A National Pilot Study on Individual Budgets took place in the year of 2007- 2008, it was observed that around 14% of the people were found to be with mental health condition (Glendinning et al., 2008). The pilot study concluded that people who receive individual budgets experienced much higher levels of independence and were more likely to commission their valuable support from the main stream community services instead of specialist ones (Bamber, Flanagan 2008). This application offered a better mental health support need along with the flexibility in comparison to other conventional services or direct payments (Glendining et al., 2008; Manthrope et al., 2008). Many barriers were observed with Personal and Individual budgets in relation to the mental health field. The difference between the funding in relation to health and social care can also form a major barrier to the developing individual budgets in mental health (Glendinning et al., 2008). In addition, the following points need to be implemented within Residential care Homes in offering a personalised approach: Person and relationship centered care and support at the heart of the service offered. As the care home setting is considered to be as a community, the residents or the staff actively searches the various available opportunities to develop an effective relationship (Carey 2003; Bradley 2005). The managers working in care homes need to be sure that the existing services respond to the needs and should look for the opportunities to diversify the offered services. Staff should ensure that people has a live and breathe culture which is actively involved in promoting personalised services in a way by offering maximum choice and control for the people who are living in care homes (Cestari et al., 2006). Residents need to possess the accessibility to all the information and advices as they need to make certain informed decisions including those pertaining to advocacy matters (Cestari et al., 2006).Team work and effective communication is needed with the people in care homes. Staff development programs and the quality assurance systems must be introduced as they are considered to be crucial in offering a positive outcome. Care home managers should be nicely placed in order to understand the potential needs of the local communities. Effective leadership work should be carried out in a collaborative manner with the people who are using these services along with their families and carers involved in design and delivery of services (Spandler 2004). Assessing self directed approaches along with allocation of budgets (Cestari et al., 2006). If a disabled person lacks capacity in choosing a direct payment or any other option, the local authorities must help them in undertaking a best interested solution and decisions (Ridley, Jones 2002). Conclusion The applications of principles of personalisation with the mental care residential homes share a lot of core values (Carmichael, Brown 2002; Ridley, Jones 2002; Spandler, 2004; Spandler, Vick 2004; Cestari et al, 2006; Taylor, 2008) The Mental Capacity Act (MCA) laid down in 2005 supports the practices and principles of personalisation by empowering many people in undertaking their own decisions. It also helps the mentally disabled people in taking their own decisions as much as possible (Spandler, Vick 2004). But in principle, this may not seem to be possible as the people lack mental ability and the individuals need play a very big role in decision making processes that can only directly detect them. The first research study underpinning this approach was carried out by Norah Fry Research Centre at the Bristol University in 2008-2009 (Philips, Waterson 2002). The study suggested that people experiencing mental health problems and distress need to possess a better choice and control over their care (Carey 2003; Bradley 2005). The Personalisation Agenda in United Kingdom has more to offer in the field of mental health as it challenges the way through which health condition is perceived (Payne 2000). To implement the principles, the country need to support a social model in understanding the mental health condition and must recognize the important social factors that play a key role in contributing to that condition (Beresford, Wallcraft, 1997; Brewis, 2007). Thus effective and proactive leadership from the managers in senior position along with the direct payment support agencies could help in creating awareness within the general public and thereby aid in developing expertise (Newbigging, Lowe 2005). Therefore, in the context of mental health, it can be understood that a move towards the direction of personalisation indicates a move towards a feeling of independent living philosophy (Vick, Spandler 2006). Various projects need to be developed to support that move and various practical tools must be designed to effectively meet the challenges associated to the mental health field. In particular we need to aim in developing strategies that encourage champions amongst various other service users, forums for discussions and networking in a way that progress can be made in overcoming the challenges to personalisation in mental health field. In addition issues of negligence pertaining to poverty and inequality, its weak conception regarding individuals utilizing social care work services, its view on welfare dependency and its potential for promotion as an alternative of challenging the depersonalisation in relation to social work, need to be tackled effectively in order to meet its future aims and objectives.

GCU Difference Between Nursing Practice Problem & Medical Practice Problem Discussion

GCU Difference Between Nursing Practice Problem & Medical Practice Problem Discussion.

1-PICOT is utilized by the health care community to identify and study a nursing or medical practice problem. Consequently, PICOT examples that may provide insight into the use of the PICOT process, may not be relevant to nursing practice as they are based on a medical practice problem.Describe the difference between a nursing practice problem and a medical practice problem. Provide one example of each. Discuss why is it important to ensure your PICOT is based on a nursing practice problem.References below the answer of this question 2-Nursing research is used to study a dilemma or a problem in nursing. Examine a problem you have seen in nursing. Provide an overview of the problem and discuss why the problem should be studied. Provide rational and support for your answer.References below the answer of this question
GCU Difference Between Nursing Practice Problem & Medical Practice Problem Discussion

Study About Business Process Reengineering Business Essay

Business process reengineering concepts comes from management theories and introduce in 18th century. The purpose of business process reengineering is to make the business in best condition. Frederick Taylor says in (1880s) the companies use the reengineering process to make the business in best position and to achieve the company goals. Business process reengineering means not only change but structural change. What kind of structural change in the organization, managing system, employee responsibilities, reward system, and information technology. Many organizations want to change the management of the organization but they not identified which part of work is to be changed. But the business process of reengineering (BPR) is the concept of management and that has been formed by practical experience. (BPR) is not only impact inside the organization but also the external supplier and customer as well. (BPR) is help to increase the organization financial report and customer satisfaction and also find out the way how to create the high productivity with the short amount [Radhakrishnan.R, 2008]. The key driver of the (BPR) is cost reduction, high speed, and quality. Information technology is a technology which use to store, determine and process the data which use in the specific organizations to examine the data and processed the data. And through the information we improve our knowledge and know how to do the work. The information system develops a strategic approach to change the process. For example through reengineering process we provide a wide range of company product online the customers are buying our product with the help of information system. So that is not possible without information system. Information technology is the component of the (BPR) and promotes the companies process. [Hammer and Champy (1993)] say reengineering about innovation. It is help to solve the company entire objectives. ROLE OF IS/IT IN BUSINESS PROCESS REENGINEERING: BPR is the much biggest issue for IS executive in 1990s (Moad, 1994). BPR shows the power of the information system and information technology to the decision making because through the information system and information technology the BPR reach the effective position. So the BPR success is based on information system and information technology. The role of IS in the organization is to make the effective strategy according to the business requirement. No other systems change the business such as the information system because the information system put right system on right place. The information is the key of an organization (Byrne, 1992) the IS measure the process and performance of an organization. The good information makes the better position of an organization. By using the customer strategy the IS gets the information out of the organization how the product of the company is running through the market and implement the IS to reduce the time to market. The information system has must be able to vision the information technology in the organization future. BPR is not adopting the new system but also create those system they effect the whole organization (Teer et al, 1994 Moad, 1993). Firstly focus on the business process not on information and then apply the IT tools on those processes. To adopting these steps the IS expert provide the understanding of the information and technology in the business processes. The IS professional have play an important role in the business process reengineering. For example when the California state affiliate of American Automobile Association (CASS) stated the reengineering process the internal IS system was very bad in initial stage they cannot deliver company product on time. The information technology system is good but the IS system is not good. So the CASS identified the problem and solved it. When they removed the IS department error the company come on boom stage. So the result is that when your IS/IT fulfill the requirement then the company comes to upward. The IS/IT are the key of business process reengineering. When the IS and IT department are work effectively then the BPR make the better company position. The relationship between IS/IT in the BPR is to change the process and identifying, evaluating, and implementing the business strategies. If the business is in dog situation the role of BPR is to remove the barrier. The BPR has overcome on these barrier through IS/IT because if the IS system is working bad than the business goes to downwards so the IS system is effective than the business in good position. How we can make the IS/IT system better. The delivery system of the company is based on the IS system so when the company collect the information form there customer what they want and than the company makes the strategy according to the customer requirement. So the company does all the process under the IS system we can say these are all the component of the IS system. IS system are supporting to regenerate the business process and also analyze the existing assets. A large number of manager are adopt the business process reengineering under the IS/IT system to getting the competitive advantages and also provide effective service to their customers. Willcocks says the IS/IT is the most critical factors of the business process reengineering. These systems are cross the different stages and than identifying the problem and how the previous system works with the project and also collect the information for the reengineering process. IMPLEMENTAION OF IS/IT ON TOYOTA UNDER THE BPR: The information system of the Toyota company is been evaluated by SOWT analysis. The Toyota Company achieved the goals globally by using the information system. The Toyota company reach to there customer by using the different website worldwide. These are website based on IS system the IS system work effectively that why Toyota is the world biggest company. For example Toyota reach to there customer through the website there are many website and system in each world regions, north America, Europe etc. The IS department firstly gather the information from there customer what type of the goods they needed than according to the customer requirement the Toyota produce the goods. The Toyota company has develop new opportunity which is transport system and the company develop this system through the IS system because the information system is one of the best key to develop that system. Toyota collect the information from there customer and the other companies as well. That is the marvelous opportunity for the Toyota Company because the Toyota increase there customer on the base of previous customer. The IS system and networking is the key which helps the Toyota Company success. The Toyota Company have no off competitors like as Honda, Ford, Chevrolet, etc. In this competition the Toyota Company is on boom stage because effective IS system. One of the best of the IS system is the Toyota new Hybrid Synergy drive. When the automotive industry is fall in high gasoline crude oil costs, the Toyota develop a new computerized engine system which is HSD. The Toyota introduce that system in there new models cars like Camry, prius which is available in the market. Toyota makes that possible by using the Porters models for the threat of same product. Some other companies copied the Toyota HSD and entered in the market like Nissan, Honda introduce similar technology in there sedan model but the Toyota is super hot in the market because the Nissan and Honda have not good impact in the market yet. So the Toyota has highest impact in the market through IS system. Toyota Company has got profit on he behalf of Porters five forces because the companies share increase through the porter’s model. By using the HSD the company gets competitive advantages. Toyota HSD has sufficiently maintained their advantages and covers the market. These are all factor makes the Toyota success and gain the competitive advantages by using the information system. Because the information system is major key of the success so the Toyota maintains his information system and get the success. In 2008 the Toyota introduce service the name of that is TOYOTA METAPOLIS, on that service the Toyota created 3-d cars to inspire the people. In 2002 the Toyota introduce a new service in Japan the name of G-BOOK telematics service and in August 2005 Toyota introduce G-Link service for Lexus. And also introduce the theft detection service, tracking service for the G-BOOK and G-link user that are using there vehicles. So the Toyota has done all these step with the help of information technology when the IT system is doing excellent job than the company did not went to downward. In 2007 Toyota bring the mX system in the market for there user and that service is use for getting direction that is the world first technology for auto update the map. In March 2004 the Toyota introduce the CRM (customer relationship management) the information technology develop service to their customer such as provide the information of new vehicles, time for the maintain the vehicle, etc. when the company provide these services to their customer the customer touch with the company gets the more customer on the behalf of previous customers satisfaction. So that is possible when the information technology work effectively. Toyota IT system play very important role in the success of the company. Toyota currently builds up CRM in countries including China, Thailand and Australia where the company want to increase the market share. In 1980s the carmaker was introduce aided design system for designing the part on computer not on paper. Toyota adopt that system the designer of new CAD system firstly asked where we use that particular system where we need that and also what are the requirement, what are the options the designer ask such question for the effective use of the information technology. For example when they analyze the die stamp that is out of parts the die stamp not fulfills the model requirement and than they design best dies on the computer. When the die design completes the Toyota use simple solution take the basic point which is shown on the color diagram. The die designer worked on experience based examined the diagram and made the particular parts. As their competitors adopt that CAD system Toyota maintain it through their engineers and suppliers. Toyota updates that system day by day and its work effectively. After two year the Toyota shifts that system into the CATIA (Computer-Aided Three Dimensional Interactive Application) a world class system. Toyota was very slow implementing that system into the development process, because at the time when the Toyota implement that system the Ford automaker quickly adopt that system and introduced into the market but Ford industry have not effective CATIA system and spending million to adopt that system and confuse the people. After the Ford system failure that the Toyota introduces the CATIA system in the market and gets boots sale from the market, because Toyota put lot of attention to make that system. So the result is that the Toyota information technology system works very well if Toyota has not effective IT system than the company could not come to that point or stage. Toyota Company continuously work on CATIA system by using the effective software and effective engineers when the Toyota introduced the first CAS software in 1980s and within the next 12 months Toyota developed new vehicle. That are all possible when your have advance IT system by using the IT Toyota been successful form 1980s. For example the instruments are done digitally in three dimensions. Toyota used this method in the vehicle design because the engineers kept the list of good and bad characteristics of design and these aspects saved electronically. There is also keeping the data in the assembly plant for the designing purpose. Through these design the engineers check the past problem and assembled the perfect car. So the IT helps to assemble the actual auto vehicle without the errors. So the result is that the Toyota did not adopt the weak and poor development process and also use the most effective IT system. Toyota will take the effective development system which is based on trained engineers and leaders and surgically inserted information technology. Today Toyota is alive on the behalf of IS/IT system because these are the basic keys of the Toyota company success. RECOMMENDATION: Toyota auto vehicle share the information with the other companies such as Ford, Nissan etc. That’s not good for Toyota company success when companies share the information with the other companies the companies has to use that information and developed new vehicle and introduced into the market. So that is the drawback of the Toyota Company to share the information with the others. This is the most difficult process to collect the information form the customer or other people what they want. After that the company put that information into the process and creates something new for the customer and also increases the company’s goodwill. When Toyota kept their information secrete than the company get more benefit from the customers because when they introduce something individually the customers attracted to the companies product and buy it. So through the secrete information system the Toyota run long time their product in the market.

Essay Writing at Online Custom Essay

5.0 rating based on 10,001 ratings

Rated 4.9/5
10001 review

Review This Service




Rating: