Get help from the best in academic writing.

Week 2 Discussion: Is Social Engineering Ethical? (Required/Graded)

After reading the article “Don’t Include Social Engineering in Penetration Tests,” discuss whether social engineering should be included as part of a penetration test. Knowing that the human is the weakest link in the cybersecurity chain, is it ethical as part of the pen test to engage in behavior that the author describes as a “grey area: compromising staff members’ personal devices or personal email accounts (as opposed to work accounts); breaking into office buildings to steal equipment or plant network monitoring devices; compromising social media accounts to perform recon; etc.”? (Kaplan-Moss, 2017)

Review several of your fellow learners’ posts and respond to at least two of your peers by end of Day 7 of the week. In your response to your classmates’ posts:

Do you agree with your fellow learners’ assessments of social engineering as part of penetration testing?

Try to expand on your rationale by asking your classmates questions and provide additional resources and evidence to support your claims and extending their thoughts on their point of view.


Kaplan-Moss, J. (2017, June 27). Don’t include social engineering in penetration tests [Blog post]. Retrieved from

example: I agree with you to some degree. I do believe that we must walk a fine line as penetration testers to deliver to our clients the results they are asking for because that is our job. But not including social engineering in a pen test? I don’t know about that. Social engineering is just as harmful to a company as malware, denial-of-service (DOS) attacks, password attacks, etc. So why not test for it? Just because a group of pen-testers went too far with their test doesn’t mean they shouldn’t try for it. Should they tone it down or stay within the limits of their job and the law? Yes. But eradicate it? No. How do you think a group of pen testers can effectively perform social engeergining attacks without stepping over the “legal” line?


Explain the theory of Symbolic Interactionism in 150-200 words. Make sure the 3 basic premises of this theory, as described in both O’Brien’s “Shared Meaning as the Basis of Humanness” and the video lecture on Symbolic Interactionism, are a part of your explanation. 
Use and reference O’Brien.
Now consider Huston’s article “The Power of the Hoodie-Wearing C.E.O.” In 150-200 words, answer these three questions, using and referencing Huston’s article:What does a hoodie typically symbolize?
Does the meaning of a hoodie change depending on the apparent race of the person wearing it?
Does the meaning of a hoodie change depending on the apparent social class of the person wearing it?

Now think about your own clothing choices. In about 100 words, describe how an article of clothing—something you own (or have owned) and wear, that is (or was) really in your wardrobe—has changed how you were perceived. How did you know that you were being perceived differently? Were you treated differently? Did the other person/people act differently towards you? How?

Using the 3 premises of Symbolic Interactionism, in about 200 words, explain what this article of clothing symbolizes (in general, to other people, and to yourself), and why it changed how you were treated. For example:Premise 1: People respond to something based on what it means to them. The meaning of my (shirt, jacket, hat, jeans, etc.) is (X), so that is why that person responded to me (like Y).
Premise 2: Meaning comes from culture; our culture teaches us what things mean. My (shirt, jacket, hat, jeans, etc.) means (Z) because culture tells us that (X).
Premise 3: This meaning can change depending on our own individual thought-driven interpretations. Thus, not everyone interprets my (shirt, jacket, hat, jeans, etc.) in exactly the same way; it depends on their own individual interpretations, based to some extent in their own experiences and circumstances, which are (Y)

classical sociological theorists

Week 2 Discussion: Is Social Engineering Ethical? (Required/Graded) classical sociological theorists.

The past two weeks we talked about classical sociological theorists and their ideas. For this essay, I want you to consider the following scenario: Karl Marx, Max Weber, Emile Durkheim, and Georg Simmel walk into a cafeteria. They each sit at separate tables. Whose table do you join? Why? That is what I want you to write about this week. Which theorist’s table do you join, and why? Your written responses must be between 400-500 words.

Essay Help “>Essay Help

English Question

Write a five-paragraph essay that responds to the following prompt. This response should follow the guidelines set out in the Essay Expectations and MLA Format modules.
Prompt: At the end of The Big Sleep, Philip Marlowe succeeds in his quest to discover the fate of Rusty Regan. Do Marlowe’s actions at the end of the book make him a “good guy” or a “bad guy?” Ideas to consider include:
How does Marlowe define success?
Does Marlowe live up to the knightly code of honor that he describes in the book?
How is that code defined?
Why does Marlowe take the actions he does at the end of the book?
The essay will begin with an introductory paragraph that introduces the topic. The paragraph will end with a thesis statement that includes an arguable claim and a roadmap that gives a hint of how the claim will be proven.
The body paragraphs will include detailed and accurate analysis of the book. There are no “wrong” answers, but there are inaccurate responses that are not supported by evidence from the text.
The essay will include at least two quotes from the book that are used as evidence to support the thesis.
The essay will end with a concluding paragraph that restates the thesis and sums up the arguments that have been proven in the body paragraphs.
Third person only
below is a how to thesis if needed.
here are the essay expectations as well:
Here are expectations for essays and Reading Responses that are submitted in English 101:
Each essay should have at least five paragraphs, including an introduction and a conclusion.
Each essay should include a one-sentence thesis statement in the introduction that contains a subject, a claim and a roadmap.
The SUBJECT identifies the main topic of the paper.
The CLAIM outlines the writer’s opinion about the topic.
The ROADMAP offers a brief introduction of the evidence that will be used to prove the claim.
More information about how to construct a thesis can be found here:
Writing at GCC: Thesis
The thesis sentence should appear as the final sentence of the introductory paragraph.
Each body paragraph should begin with a clear topic sentence that identifies the main point to be developed or argued in the paragraph.
A paragraph is 5-7 sentences long.
A formal writing voice should be used in each essay.
This means the writer should avoid use of first-person pronouns (“I,” “me”), avoid the use of contractions (“can’t,” “won’t,” etc.), and avoid the use of slang or informal expressions (colloquialisms).
Readers will know that they are reading your thoughts, beliefs, or opinions, so you do not need to state, “I think that,” “I believe that,” or “in my opinion.” Simply delete these expressions from sentences, and you will be left with stronger sentences.