Get help from the best in academic writing.

War Games Assignment

War Games Assignment.

DescriptionResearch a sport, which originated as a war game and describe where, how and why it evolved over time, as the society from which it spawned transitioned from wartime to peacetime. Analyze and discuss the similarities and differences between the game as it is now and how it originated, by examining the materials used, the number of players involved, the field of play, to any changes in the rule set, along with any social/political/cultural reasons as to why these changes occur.Your essay should be clearly organized into paragraphs, with an introduction that contains a statement sentence, body paragraphs with cohesive ideas, and a clear conclusion summarizing your main points. Your topic should maintain a strong focus throughout your paper, be thoroughly researched and well presented. Please cite your sources in a bibliography with a minimum of 3 sources, using MLA conventions.http://elmo.academyart.edu/reference-help/mla_citation_guide.htmlDeliverables:One paper: 500-750 word essay. Organization and presentation are counted, as well as spelling and grammar.PurposeTo understand how and why games evolve by researching and analyzing the evolution of a sport from its origins as a war game.
War Games Assignment

Civil rights act of 1964. Paper details The primary goal of your final assignment is to critically analyze the specific topic you have chosen regarding American national government. You have been preparing for this final assignment each week by constructing an Annotated Bibliography (Week 2) and a detailed outline of the Final Paper’s main points (Week 3) in which you focused on the following: Historical and constitutional basis for the American Government’s structure The system of checks and balances The various roles (e., public opinion, media, special interest groups, etc.) concerning public policy and elections The voting system and election process. In addition, you have read the course text and course readings, reviewed videos, and researched additional material for each week’s assignments and this paper. This week, you will put all of those outlines, readings, reviews, and research together to evaluate policymaking and government program administration into one Final Paper. As we wrap up our course, reflect on what you have learned about the key structures, systems, roles, and processes that embody our national government. Think about the strengths and weaknesses, advantages and disadvantages, and positive and negative impacts of these aspects of our democracy. Use what you have learned so far to evaluate a specific policy of our national government and recommend ways to enhance what works and repair what is not working well. It is important that your Final Paper utilizes your previous research and assignments, including the feedback that you received from the =Writing Center in Week 4. The assignment should also showcase what you have learned in the course. While your previous assignments will serve as a strong base for this assignment, it is very important that you implement feedback from your instructor and the =Writing Center, as well as further expand on the material. Appropriate transitions and headings are needed to ensure a cohesive Final Paper. The Final Paper should utilize the POL201 Final Paper template downloadand be at least six pages in length (not including title page and references) and based on your previously submitted assignments. It is important to utilize APA Style Elements (https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/apa-style-elements) headings for major sections of your paper in order to ensure that the paper is easy to follow. Scaffold your paper around the following outline: Title page (see Introduction to APA (https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/introduction-apa)) Introduction (half page) (see IntroductionsCivil rights act of 1964
Art, Music, and Creative Writing homework help. Research SynthesisÿThe student will select a question of interest and respond to the question using the appropriate reading in no more than 2-3 pages, double spaced.Scoring Rubric/CriteriaClarity of response to question ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿClearly articulated a response to the question posed, concise and to the point; (5)ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿMostly well articulated, answered parts of the question, not written concisely; (3)ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿA bit vague, with little response to the question, poorly written (1)ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿNo response to the question or clarity as to the meaning of the response; (0)Flow of PaperÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿPaper has good structure, with an opening and a closure. Paragraphs have topic sentencesthat flow clearly from one paragraph to the next telling a ?story? in answering the questions; (5)ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿPaper has good structure, with an opening and a closure. Paragraphs have topic sentencesthat mostly flow from one paragraph to the next. Major messages are clear from the paper (3) ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿPaper does not have good structure, with either an opening or closure missing.ÿÿÿÿÿÿParagraphs are jumbled and the storyline from one paragraph to the next is lost; (1)ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿPaper no organization and structure, with neither an opening or closure. Paragraphs areÿÿÿÿÿÿvery jumbled and the storyline is unclear (0). Scientific scope of the response to the question (e.g., conceptual, theoretical, scientifically grounded, practical)ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿWell developed, with empirically grounded responses, theoretical or practical constructs, and well organized (5)ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿWell developed and well organized with some scientific content (3)ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿVague and at times unclear with little or no scientific grounding (1)ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿVague, underdeveloped and/or limited in scope (0)Rationales ? making your point ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿProvided a through, focused and well articulated rationale for your position (5)ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿProvided a through, but less focused articulated rationale for your position (3)ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿProvided an incomplete rationale (1)ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿProvided an incomplete, vague, or no rationale for your positions (0)Professional ProductivityÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿWithin page limit, spell checked, proof read, and error free within 1-2 errors (5)ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿWithin page limit, 3-5 errors in spelling, grammar, and other editorials (3)ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿNot within page limit, more than 5 errors in spelling, grammar, and other editorials (1)ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿNot within page limit and several errors in spelling, grammar, and other editorials (0)Total (25) _______________ / 5 = __________________________ Points Received1. During our discussion, we talked about parents perceptions of their child’s fundamental motor skill competence. It seemed as though we thought there were some variables regarding the parents that were missing, such as parent motor skill competence or physical activity levels. Usingÿthe extant research base, explain and describe a (or several) parent related variables that may impact the physical activity or motor skill competence of their child.1. Useÿresearchÿto explain at what point in life gender differences occur pertaining to motor skill development.Art, Music, and Creative Writing homework help
Evaluation of Compensation. The purpose of this paper is to analyse and evaluate the best practices in compensation and benefits adopted by organisations in the high tech industry. High technology companies incur a high cost due to retention and recruitment of human resources and thus design of suitable compensation programs are important to their bottom lines. We studied literature to understand the view of academia on the best compensation and benefit strategies in high technology industry. To understand the application of these strategies we selected three ‘fortune 1000’ firms Microsoft, IBM and Netflix and compared their current compensation strategies with the recommended best practises. It was observed that best practices in high technology firms are primarily based on performance priorities to encourage key contributors. However each firm had a customised approach in developing a compensation strategy keeping in view employee needs, business goals and organisation environment. Firms with aggressive performance goals, followed exclusive incentive based compensation plans, while some firms chose to adopt a more holistic reward system. In conclusion this paper highlights that compensation strategies should be built with a ‘best-fit strategy’ rather than ‘best practice strategy’ in mind. There is no one – size – fits all strategy which should be applied to an organisation. Introduction “Compensation refers to all forms of the financial returns and tangible services and benefits employees receive as part of an employment relationship.” (Milkovich, Newman and Gerhart, 2010). As per the 2007 Emerging Workforce Study by Spherion Corp. (HR Trendbook, 2008), both monetary compensation and non-financial benefits comprise the key factors of compensation which lead to retention. Compensation programs are measured in terms of general pay effectiveness, contribution to organizational goals and are used as recruitment tools and finally used as a motivational and retention tool (Balkin and Gomez-Mejia, 1987). Meiyu Fang (2004) states that since the high technology industry has higher investments and higher returns than contemporary traditional manufacturing firms. These high technology companies were selected for the study because human resources costs are a major expenditure in such firms and thus design of compensation programs important to their bottom lines. This essay endeavours to understand the best compensation and benefits strategies that high performing organisations in the high technology industry have undertaken. Summary and Analysis of literature Key Elements of a compensation plan Milkovich, Newman and Gerhart (2010) suggest a four step strategy for development of a compensation strategy. HR professionals should begin by assessing total compensation implications on business strategy, competitive dynamics, employee and union needs, organisation culture and values. The next step would involve mapping a total compensation strategy keeping in mind the firms’ external competitiveness, internal alignment and employee contributions. Only then should the final implementation of strategy be done and followed by a continuous re assessment of strategy. The challenge is to find a compensation plan which is the best fit with the business strategy in the given environment. The literature (Milkovich, Newman and Gerhart, 2010, p. 53) goes on to recognise that some organisations however would prefer a ‘best practise’ strategy than a ‘best-fit’ strategy. Compensation in High technology Industry High technology firms are characterized by (i) a high proportion of scientists and engineers (ii) geographic concentration (iii) high expenditures on research and development aimed at products which are at the cutting edge of technology; (iv) rapid technical innovation; (v) a very small/specialized labour market for scientists and engineers, resulting in high attrition rates (vi) entrepreneurship, since several of these firms are led by entrepreneurs who get financial support from venture capitalists. (Balkin and Gomez-Mejia, 1985) It is imperative for high technology companies to focus on productivity, high quality and profit performance. A study done by Sibson and Company in the year 1982-1983 on different compensation program designs adapted by 66 high technology firms to understand whether financial rewards help an organisation perform better had divided the companies into two groups ; 24 companies that designed their compensation plans based on performance priorities and 42 that did not. It was seen that companies who designed their compensation programs based on performance priorities did significantly better. These were categorised as the ‘best performing ‘ companies while the others as ‘poor performing companies’. These performance priorities may include profit performance, employee contributionEvaluation of Compensation

Harvard University Concept Map of Solar System Weith Label Each Planet

Harvard University Concept Map of Solar System Weith Label Each Planet.

We’re going to do a concept map of the solar system here’s how you do that. 1. First, get an 11×17 piece of paper. If you don’t have a piece that
big you can make one by taping two 8.5×11 (that’s normal size) pieces
together.2. Draw the Sun, the 8 planets and the asteroid belt as much to scale
as possible (in terms of size and distance from the Sun) on the piece
of paper.Note: you CANNOT draw
the solar system to scale and still expect it to be visible. But as you
draw think about which planets are larger, which are smaller, which are
tightly spaced and which are far from each other. And draw so that those
relationships are visible.3. Now labeling, label everything you can possibly think of about
each planet. We want this concept map to include everything any
reasonable person could want to know about the solar system. Some things
to think about.NamePeriod of rotationPeriod of revolutionJovian or terrestrial?Distance from the sunAtmosphere?SizeMoons?Rings?4. Anything interesting about that particular planetLarge volcanoesBig red spotsOrbits on its sideRunaway greenhouse atmosphereI’m not saying label it with these things, I’m saying label it with
every possible thing you can think of. This should help you see and make
sense of patterns in the solar system. Feel free to be creative, get
some colored pencils and do it in color if you want. Draw little
spaceships and aliens if you want. Have all the fun you want with it.
The important thing is to get the information on there so you’ve worked
with it, you can see it and your brain can assimilate it. (resistance is
futile)Once you’ve finished your concept map photograph it (Note: it might
take more than one picture to do it justice) and submit your photos to
the drop box. THEN hang the concept map on your wall in all its glory
for everyone to see and admire and for you to study from.
Harvard University Concept Map of Solar System Weith Label Each Planet

Film analysis essay

custom essay Film analysis essay. I don’t understand this Writing question and need help to study.

You have to watch two film:
1. Reassemblage, Trinh Minh Ha
2. Cannibal Tours, Dennis O’Rourke
6-8 pages, not including film stills. Double-spaced, Times New Roman 12pt font, 1”margins.
Here’s the main three things you will do in your paper:
1. You will break down some of the characteristic formal elements of the films
you select and describe how they work to accomplish the director’s purpose
and create the intended effect. You don’t need to cover everything, and in fact
focusing down on particular formal elements or even a single element is
often most effective.
2. You will compare and contrast one film with the other in terms of their form.
Again keep it focused on what serves your argument, not everything is
possible to compare and contrast.
3. The comparison/contrast is in order to create your own an argument that
takes a critical stand, positive, negative, or both, on your chosen films. To the
extent that this paper is a “test,” the test is of your ability to come up with an
argument and to support it with #2 and #3 above. The “test” is not about
whether you can make an argument if you are already told what to say. The
“test” is on whether you can come up with a position yourself. Although it is
your job to come up with an argument, see further advice below.
The following readings concern film form. You should reference one or more.
“The Ontology of the Photographic Image,” Andre Bazin
“Cinematographic Principle and the Ideogram,” Sergei Eisenstein
“The Significance of Form in Film,” David Bordwell
“Unprivileged Camera Style,” David MacDougall
“Mechanical Eye, Electronic Ear and the Lure of Authenticity,” Trinh Minh-Ha
Note that you may, in addition to the above, use any course readings at any time in
your essay, but be sure to use at least one from the above list.
Include “film stills” to help illustrate your point and identify specific parts of the film
you are writing about, using the lecture recordings as source material.
If you don’t know how to make and handle screenshots on your computer, look it up on the Google.
Organization and Writing:
Open the essay with some example from one of the films that raises the issue of
representational politics or exemplifies representational quality. Explain why this is
important and interesting. Briefly explain what you will consider as you look into
this, particularly what films you will consider. State what you ultimately have to say
about this (your argument or thesis), which has something to do with film form and
is mostly likely comparative about the two films. Most likely the argument is about
convincing the reader that one of the films is better than the other on the chosen
criteria.
The body is where you convince the reader to believe your statement of comparison.
It might be best to take your “lesser” film first and describe the film form. Use
description and film stills. Then connect that film form to your critical analysis and
argument. Whenever it seems like a good time, cite one of the readings on film form.
Then, take your “greater” film and do the same. Whenever it seems like a good time,
cite one of the readings on film form.
Finally, re-present your argument now that many things have already been
explained. If you have a tight structure at this point, you might do some focused
“free-writes” with a timer to see what comes up when you reflect on upon your
thesis, almost kind of randomly. Whether that yields anything useful, or just served
as a warm up to get you ready to write, you can then proceed to think through some
meaningful implications about your statement, which may or may not go beyond the
specific films, but would stay on the specific issue or criteria you always had in mind
for this paper.
Quotations/citations:
At the end of a sentence or quote, put in parentheses (Last Name, page #), like: (Eisenstein, page 5) or (Minh-ha, page 2).
For a film citation at end of sentence or under film still put (Title, Director last name) like (Reassemblage, Minh-ha)
You are not allowed to use any outside sources, even if they are very interesting.
The grading rubric is as follows:
6 points: The inclusion of the required “ingredients” as defined in the original paper
assignment. None are missing.
6 points: The connections drawn between these ingredient items are clear, logical,
and persuasive.
6 points: Coherency and grammar on a sentence-by-sentence level. This is simply
raw language ability and logical flow, so be sure to get the help you need, if you need
it, before turning your essay in.
There are an additional 2 of the 20 points available for organic unity, or the overall
way in which the paper makes a coherent impression and all the pieces line up with
that impression.
Film analysis essay

Writer’s Choice

Writer’s Choice. Paper details Post an explanation of your choice of a nursing specialty within the program. Describe any difficulties you had (or are having) in making your choice, and the factors that drove/are driving your decision. Identify at least one professional organization affiliated with your chosen specialty and provide details on becoming a member. Support main post with 3 of more current, credible sources and cite source within content of posting and on a reference list in proper APA. 2.Respond to at least two of your colleagues’ posts by sharing your thoughts on their specialty, supporting their choice or offering suggestions if they have yet to choose. Be sure to offer support from at least 2 current, credible sources in each required response to classmates’ main post and cite per APA. Examining Nursing Specialties You have probably seen one or more of the many inspirational posters about decisions. A visual such as a forked road or a street sign is typically pictured, along with a quote designed to inspire. Often decisions are not so easily inspired. Perhaps you discovered this when choosing a specialty within the MSN program. This decision is a critical part of your plan for success, and you no doubt want to get it right. This is yet another area where your network can help, as well as other sources of information that can help you make an informed choice. To Prepare: Reflect on your decision to pursue a specialty within the MSN program, including your professional and academic goals as they relate to your program/specialization. By Day 3 Post an explanation of your choice of a nursing specialty within the program. Describe any difficulties you had (or are having) in making your choice, and the factors that drove/are driving your decision. Identify at least one professional organization affiliated with your chosen specialty and provide details on becoming a member. Support main post with 3 of more current, credible sources and cite source within content of posting and on a reference list in proper APA. By Day 6 Respond to at least two of your colleagues’ posts by sharing your thoughts on their specialty, supporting their choice or offering suggestions if they have yet to choose. Be sure to offer support from at least 2 current, credible sources in each required response to classmates’ main post and cite per APA.Writer’s Choice

Complete Assignment for Criminal Justice Assignment

Complete Assignment for Criminal Justice Assignment.

Resources: Internet, University LibraryFind a recent media or news article on the Internet concerning budget issues a police or other public sector agency is currently facing.Write a 700- to 1,050-word paper where you:
Give a summary of the article
Outline the type of operating budget utilized by the chosen agency
Discuss challenges faced by leaders in the article in working through the budget issues
Summarize how you as a criminal justice leader would work through the specified budgetary issue you outlined
Include at least two academic sources in your paper, including one from the University Library.Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines.
Complete Assignment for Criminal Justice Assignment