Get help from the best in academic writing.

Use of Visual Storytelling in Cinematography to Subvert Narrative Analysis

Use of Visual Storytelling in Cinematography to Subvert Narrative Analysis.

How does the film make use of visual storytelling through mise en scene and cinematography to reinforce or subvert the narrative? What message or theme do you take away from the film due to this? I am more concerned with your overall argument and the analysis that you use to support it than structural elements (grammar and organization do still count though). Write for an audience who has seen the film. There is no need for summary. Cite examples including specific shots and visuals as well as direct quotes of dialogue to highlight what you find interesting about the film. Look over the textbook or the slideshows to get an idea for some of the terms you can use to describe the things you are seeing. Feel free to use comparisons to other films and incorporate external information, sources such as filmmaker interviews or critical analysis, but be sure to cite them in text if you do.
Use of Visual Storytelling in Cinematography to Subvert Narrative Analysis

Table of Contents Introduction Do we need the death penalty? Doing away with the death penalty Analysis of the arguments and personal opinion Conclusion References Introduction Every society must be guided by laws and regulations, and distinguished philosophers such as Kant have been quoted (Avaliani, n.d) to have said that no state or society can exist in the absence of laws. Violation of these laws attracts punishment. Most states and justice systems employ the death penalty as punishment for crimes that are considered to be serious. Crimes such as murder, treason and most recently terrorism attract the death penalty. Many ethical issues are raised about the death penalty (Mosser, 2010), and this paper examines and analyses the ethical arguments for and against the punishment. Do we need the death penalty? It is only the state that has a right to execute a person, and this execution must be premised on the decision of a court (O’Neil, 2012). The debate surrounding this issue is not about its legality but on whether it is ethical or not. Most people agree that a person who violates the law must be punished, even those who argue against the death penalty. Kant argues that a society that does not punish those who violate its laws becomes the offender’s accomplice (Avaliani, n.d). Every individual has a right to life. Why then, should the state sanction the willful taking away of life by its agents? Everyone who commits a crime against society puts himself in debt, and this debt must be satisfied in full (Vollum, Mallicoat,
Project 1 – Employee Handbook (IT Security).

thorough legal review by the company’s attorneys. Upon final approval by the Corporate Governance Board, the policies will be adopted and placed into the Employee Handbook. Research: Review the table of contents and relevant chapters in the Certified Information Privacy Professional textbook to find information about legal and regulatory drivers.Review the remaining course readings. Review the sample policies and procedures provided in Week 3.Find additional sources which provide information about the policy statements which should be covered in three policies for the Employee Handbook. Write: Prepare briefing package with approval drafts of the three IT related policies for the Employee Handbook. Yourbriefing package must contain the following:Use a professional format for your policy documents and briefing package. A recommended format is provided in the assignment template file (see the recommended template under Course Resources).You must include a cover page with the assignment title, your name, and the due date. Your reference list must be on a separate page at the end of your file. These pages do not count towards the assignment’s page count.Common phrases do not require citations. If there is doubt as to whether or not information requires attribution, provide a footnote with publication information or use APA format citations and references.You are expected to write grammatically correct English in every assignment that you submit for grading. Do not turn in any work without (a) using spell check, (b) using grammar check, (c) verifying that your punctuation is correct and (d) reviewing your work for correct word usage and correctly structured sentences and paragraphs. Executive Summary“Approval Drafts” forAcceptable Use Policy for Information TechnologyBring Your Own Device Policy Digital Media Sanitization, Reuse, & Destruction Policy As you write your policies, make sure that you address security issues using standard cybersecurity terminology (e.g. 5 Pillars of IA, 5 Pillars of Information Security). See the resources listed under Course Resources > Cybersecurity Concepts Review for definitions and terminology.
Project 1 – Employee Handbook (IT Security)

Table of Contents Major Principles of the Theory Differences between Gender and culture Personality Development Changes in Personality over the Lifespan Individual Psychology in the Modern World References Major Principles of the Theory In his work of developing classical Adlerian psychology, Adler emphasized seven major principles which include; utility of the individual. According to this principle things like feeling, thinking, behaviors and emotions can only be understood well if considered as being subordinates of one’s lifestyle. “People are neither divided internally nor battleground of forces that conflict each other but every concept of individuality heads in the same direction” (Shultz,

UWP writting

UWP writting.

For this final exam, you are to write a properly-formatted memo to me in which you (1) evaluate the quality of the proposal memo you submitted, and (2) evaluate the overall effectiveness of your writing process. Your memo, therefore, will consist of two parts: a project analysis, and a writing-process evaluation. What follows are the guidelines for this final exam.Project AnalysisFor your proposal memo analysis, you will reflect on and analyze the various aspects of your proposal memo from an objective perspective—e.g., how you investigated your proposal’s topic, what strategies you used in applying your research findings to writing and perhaps design decisions, what rationales you have behind your content, organization, and design decisions, and what aspects of your content, organization, and design are successful (or unsuccessful). Your discussion of successful (or unsuccessful) aspects of your proposal memo should be based on the extent to which different sections of your proposal (e.g., introduction, body, conclusions, and recommendations) meet the needs of your target audience. Please support your analysis with specific examples while referring specifically to different sections of your proposal.Writing-process EvaluationWhen evaluating your writing process, focus on what you did from the time I assigned the proposal memo to the time you submitted your finished product. Reflect on the steps you took to get your memo drafted, revised, and finalized. Did you seek feedback on your work? How did you use this feedback? Did your draft evolve over time? In what ways? What about the finished product do you think I’ll find useful in future Business Writing courses? What setbacks or challenges did you encounter, and what, specifically, did you do to overcome those? Your evaluation should be an evaluation of your writing process, not of your finished product. I’ll have read your proposal memo by the time I read your final exam, so I won’t need a summary of that document. Instead, dig deep into how you wrote rather than what you wrote. Keep in mind that he point of this portion of the exam is to give you the opportunity to once again reflect on the process you go through when writing while also giving me insight into how students work on the material for this course. Final Examination PurposesAs I’ve mentioned in my lecture videos, reflecting on your work is a good way to hone your skills. You’ve spent a lot of time working on your proposal memo this term, but how much time have you spent thinking critically about your writing process? Oftentimes, a student’s goal for a class assignment is to simply get it done and submitted on time, but in terms of education, that process is incomplete. This exam provides you with an opportunity to spend some time focusing on the aspects of your writing process that seem to work and the aspects that seem to need improvement. Ideally, the next time you do any substantial writing you’ll consider the work you did for this exam and apply the knowledge you’ve gained from this writing exercise.In addition, of course, this exam serves as one more opportunity for you to demonstrate your professional writing skills before the term ends. Do what you can to make sure what you submit for this exam is an accurate representation of your writing abilities. Remember your audience, remember your purpose, and do what you can to apply the concepts we’ve covered in this course this term.Final Exam EvaluationYour analysis and evaluation will likely run one-and-a-half to two single-spaced pages, and it should demonstrate your best professional writing and editing skills. In both your analysis and evaluation sections, you should support your points with specific examples. Your exam’s persuasiveness will largely depend on the extent to which you can show your reasons behind particular content, organization, style, and design decisions and your reasons for evaluating your writing process the way that you do. Keep in mind that you won’t have a revision opportunity on this exam, so give it the time, energy, and effort it requires. You’ll find the grading rubric for this exam below.Final Exam Grading Rubric I will use the following grading rubric to evaluate your final exam:Content 30 Introduction (clear purpose for writing) Body organization (logical and coherent)ConclusionEvidence of awareness of audienceDevelopment, support (examples to support points) CompletenessClarityConcision Professional tone Adherence to the exam prompt Application of concepts covered in classFormat 10 Correct memo formatDescriptive subject line Clear, distinct, and descriptive headings throughoutProfessional appearanceMechanics 10 No misspellings or typosGood grammarAppropriate punctuationTotal Points 50
UWP writting

FIN 442 Iowa University Working Capital Ratio & Current Liabilities Discussion

assignment writing services FIN 442 Iowa University Working Capital Ratio & Current Liabilities Discussion.

Initial Response should be between 50-150 words.DQ1The current ratio, also known as the working capital ratio, measures the business’ ability to pay off its short-term debt obligations with its current assets. So, if the current assets amount to $400,000 and current liabilities are $200,000, the current ratio is 2:1. This ratio is used to let potential investors know how well the business sits financially. A 2:1 ratio shows that the business is able to use current assets to pay off current liabilities if needed.The debt/equity rule is as follows: If the company, for example, has a debt to equity ratio of .50, it means that it uses 50 cents of debt financing for every $1 of equity financing. Firms whose ratio is greater than 1.0 use more debt in financing their operations than equity. If the ratio is less than 1.0, they use more equity than debt.Both of these are valuable tools that show bankers, investors, and financial managers how attractive a business might be. It will allow them to make an educated decision on whether or not they want to do business with this company.Carlson, R. (n.d.). The Debt-to-Equity Ratio: Measuring Financial Risk. Retrieved October 26, 2020, from…FreshBooks. (2020, July 20). What Is a Good Liquidity Ratio? Retrieved October 26, 2020, from…DQ2According to Investopedia the definition of rule-of-thumb approach is a guideline that provides simplified advice or some basic rule-set regarding a particular subject or course of action. Generally rules of thumb develop as a result of practice and experience rather than through scientific research or a theoretical foundation. So based on that definition of rule-of-thumb it would be my opinion that no, the rule-of-thumb approach to ratio analysis doesn’t offer any value to any person with interest in a financial market. The rule-of-thumb is based on results from one person’s practice and experience rather than actual facts. If I was a financial manager, I would prefer to obtain my information on investments based on the 2-1 current ratio rule since that is the calculation of actual current assets compared to actual current liabilities.This is an important ratio to know and use and it’s important that the correct ratio is followed because using a ratio that is based on an experience isn’t the best evaluation of value for an investment. Stakeholders usually have a common goal of trying to maximize the value and dollar on return so they would need to know the actual values and use that for determination of investment. Therefore, using the rule-of-thumb approach would not be my suggestion or in my opinion provide the best idea of value of any investment.Reference:, Article written by James Chen, Updated August 24, 2020DQ3I think a rule-of-thumb approach on ratio analysis offers some value to a financial manager. Different industries, and even different companies within those industries, will be found to have varying levels of debts, capital, etc. New startups may have vastly different amounts of cash flows and debts than a well-established business for example. So to generalize every company under a rule of thumb approach might not be very effective. Ratio analysis is important for a number of reasons to stakeholders. One main reason is it gives insight into the level of risk for that particular business, as compared to it’s competitors. An investor might be interested in a new business because of the low cost of stock or the possibility for large gains later on. Whereas, a banker, might be hesitant to loan money to a higher risk business, for obvious reasons. DQ4Trend analysis is a tool used to compare present with the past and evaluate progress through time. If you owned a car dealership and you sold 100 vehicles this year, this would be impressive if you had only been selling 75 per year in the past 10 years. It allows you to see your current performance compared to past performance using statistical data. This example shows a 25% increase over the past 10 year average. People play different when they are keeping score, this is a performance scorecard that shows if you are winning or losing.DQ5As we’ve learned, ratio analysis provides us with a way to compare how a company stacks up against another. This might be to compare debt ratios, profitability ratios, or many others. Trend analysis takes it another step further, by comparing the ratios to other years. This can be useful by showing patterns, or just as it’s called, trends within the business. For example, say I’m an investor looking to buy some shares of a company with proven growth over the years. I could look to certain ratios, such as price/earnings ratios. To be more certain however, trend analysis could show how this company has done in this area over a number of years, rather than just what the current financial statements are suggesting. DQ6Trend analysisIt may be defined as an analysis in which a business firm’s performance is evaluated over several years so that a particular pattern could be derived with respect to the business’s operations. This analysis is meant for forecasting various operations of the business. A business firm can track its progress in terms of its operation through trend analysis. Trend analysis helps to make a comprehensible comparison of the present performance with the performance in the past of specific business operations. Trend analysis involves several years to determine the exact pattern that is supposed to be useful in forecasting the various business operations (Brigham, 2019). A firm should also compare the trend analysis with the patterns of the industry that are changing over the period. It is to have a complete and exhaustive overview of performance with reference to the industry’s prevailing standards. Examining sales patterns to see if sales are declining because of specific customers or products or sales regions, Examing expense report claims for proof of fraudulent claims (Brigham, 2019).ReferenceBrigham, E. F., & Daves, P. R. (2019). Intermediate financial management. Cengage.
FIN 442 Iowa University Working Capital Ratio & Current Liabilities Discussion

use these words in a sentence

use these words in a sentence.

Use these list words in sentences. inventionhaughtymiraculousredemptionthroesforfeitmiddle school level sentencesThnx
use these words in a sentence


Assignment. I’m stuck on a Computer Science question and need an explanation.

Task 1
This assignment will be one of several throughout the Ph.D. program that we use to help you prepare for the dissertation process. One of the core competencies necessary to succeed in a doctoral program is the ability to identify other research that pertains to your own. This means you’ll have to identify related research, read the papers, and assimilate prior work into your research. An annotated bibliography helps you develop and hone these research skills.
Your paper must be in a correct APA format, use correct grammar, and will need to include at least five (5) resources, ALL of which must:
1) Be current. Published within the last few years.
2) Be peer-reviewed.
3) Relate directly to defense in depth in the context of protecting National Infrastructure.
Remember that an annotation is not the same as an abstract. Abstracts are descriptive. Your annotations are to be evaluative and critical. Give me enough information for me to decide if I’m interested enough to read the paper, and also how you perceive the paper. Do not go skimpy on these annotations, but DO NOT write too much here. Quality is far more critical than quantity. This exercise is for each of you to demonstrate that you can identify, categorize, and digest multiple research papers.
Every resource you choose must be peer-reviewed. That means the paper must have undergone a formal peer review before being published in a journal or presented at a conference. You must ensure that your resources have undergone rigorous reviews. In most cases, you can find out the review process for a conference or journal by visiting the appropriate web site. Do not merely assume that a resource is peer-reviewed – check it out.
Here are a few URLs with additional information: (I strongly suggest that you look at these. Really.)