Get help from the best in academic writing.

University of West Georgia Medicaid Helping or Hurting US Question

University of West Georgia Medicaid Helping or Hurting US Question.

I’m working on a business report and need support to help me study.

I have attached my paper outline in order to help, I just became overloaded on work this week and need help writing the paper. I will also attach the guidelines:- The final paper should be 8-10 pages (typed, double spaced, 12 point Times New Roman font, 1 inch margins) A bibliography must be attached to the final paper. – In your paper you should apply economic theory to analyze an important aspect or aspects of your chosen public finance issue. The paper should contain a description of the issues surrounding the topic and an economic analysis of those issues using some of the tools developed in the class. Public finance issues by their nature tend to be controversial. In your analysis you must give balanced and fair coverage to all sides of the issue, although it is OK to argue in favor of one side in your conclusion as long as you provide evidence to justify your arguments.One of the works cited attachments is the book for this class.
University of West Georgia Medicaid Helping or Hurting US Question

Week 6 Discussion. I need an explanation for this Business question to help me study.

DISSCUSSION 1:
“Valuation” Please respond to the following:

Entrepreneurs want to value their companies as low as they can for stock option purposes, but as high as they can when they are attempting to raise capital. Analyze how often this statement may be true. Provide an example to support your response.
Estimate the time and money needed to complete an early-stage evaluation on your business venture from Assignment 1. Then, indicate how the needs analysis may impact decisions made by the owner. Provide a rationale with your response.

DISCUSSION 2:

“Early-Stage Valuation” Please respond to the following:

From the e-Activity, building your business venture from Assignment 1 will take time and cash. Identify the one to four (1-4) levels (seed, Series A, Series B, and Series C) of financing that you expect your company will need. Then, outline a strategy for obtaining each level for your business venture.
Take a position on the following statement: When evaluating a small start-up company, valuation becomes more art than science. Support your position with evidence or examples.

DISCUSSION 3:
“Venture Capital Valuation Methods” Please respond to the following:

Determine the most likely valuation method a venture capitalist would use to value your business venture from Assignment 1. Provide a rationale for your response.
From the e-Activity, assess the effectiveness of ESOPs to incentivize key employees and whether or not this would be a viable option for your venture. Provide an example to support your response.

DISCUSSION 4:
“Professional Venture Capital” Please respond to the following:

Imagine you are a venture capitalist reviewing the business venture you have developed over this course. From this perspective, describe how you (as the venture capitalist) would conduct the due diligence for the business venture. Then, assess what you may learn from this process.
Of the steps in the venture capital process, indicate which step may be the most crucial to the majority of entrepreneurs. Assess how entrepreneurs can be prepared to handle this step successfully.

Week 6 Discussion

Ethics of War Essay

In the study of philosophy, looking back at past events allows applying philosophical concepts and questions to them, thus assisting in the analysis. While learning more about the just war theory, it is essential to consider its application to the events of the past. The Peloponnesian War was a significant period in the history of the Mediterranean region, which caused the deterioration of the power of Athens and made Sparta the key city-state in the area. Thucydides’ text provides a complete detailed account of the war, which enables scholars to analyze its causes, course, and effects in great depth. While the book is handy to historians due to its scope and particularity, it is also beneficial for philosophical studies because it provides an overview of different viewpoints regarding the war. The concept of the just war is believed to represent realistic views on international relations and military activities. According to realism, it is incorrect to apply moral principles to the behavior of states because states will and should always be concerned with power and national security and thus act based on their self-interest. Descriptive realism differs from prescriptive realism in the view of states’ actions and responsibilities. The former claims that the pursuit of power, security, and national interest is characteristic of all shapes, whereas the latter posits that states must pursue national interests to keep citizens safe and prosperous. These interpretations make war seem inevitable and can be used to justify almost any actions taken by military powers during the war. For this reason, the just war theory posits that in order to be considered just, the war must have a just and proportionate cause, the right intention and authority, and reasonable chances of success (Carter). As explained by Carter, just wars are also considered the last resort, and this concept should thus apply to cases where the war started after diplomacy had failed. Based on these premises, just war theory appears to offer a good view on war, which does not negate the necessity to avoid war while still allowing it in certain circumstances. Personally, I agree with the idea that wars are inevitable at times and that they can be the preferred option when protecting national security. Although wars are associated with poverty, hunger, and death, these threats can be far more significant if invaders meet no opposition. The realistic view on war contrasts pacifism, according to which the war is considered ultimately wrong because of all the hardship and damage that it brings to nations. Contrary to realism, absolute pacifism extends moral rules that apply to individuals to entire countries, arguing that no state should ever engage in a war despite the circumstances. However, this perspective on war appears illogical and unrealistic in cases where a country is attacked, and military response is the only option to ensure national security. Both views on war can be observed in Thucydides’ account of the events leading to the Peloponnesian War. Book I contains the speeches made by Corinthians, Athenians, and Lacedaemonians on the subject of war. The group that presents a realistic perspective on the war is Corinthians. Corinthians argue that the war against Athens is inevitable and just because of the city’s increasing power in the region and the fact that it threatens other states, including Sparta and Corinth. Corinthians state that the actions of Athenians are unjust and war is the only option to restore peace in the region: “And yet, Lacedaemonians, you still delay, and fail to see that peace stays longest with those, who are not more careful to use their power justly than to show their determination not to submit to injustice” (Thucydides). The view of Corinthians is that Athens threatens their regional power and national interest, and thus defending against them with the support from Sparta would be engaging in a just war. Interestingly, another realist viewpoint on the ethics of war is presented by Athenians. Based on the information included by Thucydides, Athenians argued against breaking the treaty and acted in the protection of their national interest. For instance, when they are accused of beginning a war by preventing Peloponnesians from attacking Corcyraeans, they respond by stating, “neither are we beginning war, Peloponnesians, nor are we breaking the treaty; but these Corcyraeans are our allies, and we are come to help them” (Thucydides). Given the critical importance of alliances in the Mediterranean region at the time, the defeat of Corcyraeans would threaten the national security of Athens. Thus, the Athenians’ actions prior to the outbreak of the war were in accordance with the requirements for protecting citizens. Athenians were also among those who voiced their opinion during the hearing before the Lacedaemonian government. Their key argument is that they did not use violence and war to build the Empire, and thus, the territory is rightfully theirs, and they need to protect it (Thucydides). Athenians also explain that their political and military activity is what any state has to do to maintain security and grow: “it was not we who set the example, for it has always been the law that the weaker should be subject to the stronger” (Thucydides). The statements made by Athenians are in line with a realistic perspective on national security and war. Hence, both Athenians and Corinthians argue from a realism standpoint, but since the two states are rivals, they have opposing views on the treaty and the war. Get your 100% original paper on any topic done in as little as 3 hours Learn More The person who makes a moral argument against the war is Archidamus, who was the king of Sparta at the time. On the one hand, he refuses the notion that the war would be just because Sparta does not have sufficient resources to win easily and its territory is not threatened by Athenians yet: “What can justify us in rashly beginning such a struggle?” (Thucydides). On the other hand, he shows the damage that the war would inflict on Sparta and its people for years to come, arguing that breaking the treaty would be dangerous and dishonorable: “I fear rather that we may leave it as a legacy to our children; so improbable is it that the Athenian spirit will be the slave of their land, or Athenian experience be cowed by war” (Thucydides). Archidamus cannot be considered an absolute pacifist; instead, he argues that the war would be wrong from a moral viewpoint because it would endanger the people of Sparta. All in all, the reading allows us to identify how different views and theories on war were used in politics in ancient times. It is particularly curious to study the just war theory in the context of Sparta and Athens since both city-states had military solid history. The analysis shows that both Corinthians and Athenians viewed the war from a realism standpoint, but their views on breaking the treaty differed because of opposing interests. The king of Sparta, however, presented a moral argument that Sparta was not ready for war and thus it would bring the state more harm than good. Works Cited Carter, Joe. “A Brief Introduction to the Just War Tradition: Jus Ad Bellum.” The Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission. 2017, Web. Thucydides. The History of the Peloponnesian War. n. d., Web.

Grossmont Cuyamaca Community College District Speaking Self Reflection Essay

custom writing service Grossmont Cuyamaca Community College District Speaking Self Reflection Essay.

I’m working on a writing presentation and need support to help me learn.

In this 2-3 page paper, you will reflect on your experiences in this class in chronological order (meaning from your first speaking assignment to your last). Please discuss your strengths and weaknesses as a speaker. Also included in the paper should be an analysis of the goals you set for yourself at the beginning of the semester (did you meet the goals? How/why-why not)? You may wish to incorporate experiences you will take away from this class and how you might use them in the future
Grossmont Cuyamaca Community College District Speaking Self Reflection Essay

CHEM 120 Grossmont Community College Estimating Avogadros Number Chemistry Ques

CHEM 120 Grossmont Community College Estimating Avogadros Number Chemistry Ques.

I’m working on a chemistry exercise and need guidance to help me understand better.

Background In this experiment you will estimate the number of stearic acid molecules in a mole of stearic acidbased on an assumption about a thin film of stearic acid on a water surface. A monolayer of stearicacid can be created in which we can estimate the number of molecules. To do this we make assump-tions of the size and shape of the stearic acid molecule.In the International System (SI) of units, the fundamental measure of quantity is the mole. A moleof carbon is 12.0000 grams of carbon-12, and Avogadro’s number, NA, is the number of carbonatoms in this mass. A mole of any substance contains Avogadro’s number of particles.In this experiment you will estimate Avogadro’s number by calculating the amount of stearic acidnecessary to form a single layer on the surface of water. This single layer is called a monolayer. Wewill be making some assumptions about how stearic acid molecules arrange themselves to form themonolayer. From these assumptions we can determine the thickness of the layer, and from thethickness we can estimate the number of the stearic acid molecules. If we know the volume occu-pied by a mole of stearic acid molecules we can use the volume of one stearic acid molecule to esti-mate Avogadro’s number. We simply divide the volume of a mole of stearic acid by the volume ofone stearic acid molecule. Note – the number calculated will not be accurate, but should be within a power of 10 of the accepted value of 6.02214 x 1023 particles/mol.
CHEM 120 Grossmont Community College Estimating Avogadros Number Chemistry Ques

Park University Why The Tempest is Relevant Today Discussion

Park University Why The Tempest is Relevant Today Discussion.

Objective: To develop a focused position explaining the relevance of a literary work we’ve read for our own time based on close reading and thoughtful research. Why is it important to be read now?Format: 4 Double-spaced pages, paginated, stapled; 12-point font, Times; standard Word margins. Please give your essay a title indicating the central focus of your argument.Expectations: Include an introduction and conclusion, a Works Cited list, a thesis that takes a specific position on the whole question, at least one secondary source, a thorough discussion of specific details and a sense of the rationale for selecting them (using both brief direct quotations and textual references, correctly cited in MLA format), and a strong focus that connects your thesis and all the details you choose to analyze. Use identifying tags. If the author of your chosen text(s) is unknown, you may refer to them as the poet. Avoid plot summary, unsupported historical assertions, and unexplained description. Revise and proofread carefully.Main source: See file attached from page 327Examples: (these are the kinds of articles that could also be secondary sources)https://theconversation.com/in-todays-anti-immigrant-rhetoric-echoes-of-virgils-aeneid-74738 (Links to an external site.)https://www.theguardian.com/books/2015/jun/20/classics-for-the-people-ancient-greeks (Links to an external site.)https://www.futurity.org/dante-divine-comedy-hell-1299902-2/ (Links to an external site.)https://www.huffpost.com/entry/why-dante-is-relevant-tod_b_4790634 (Links to an external site.)https://readdurhamenglish.wordpress.com/2017/09/26/four-ways-dante-still-matters-today/ (Links to an external site.)https://www.bbc.com/culture/article/20180604-dante-and-the-divine-comedy-he-took-us-on-a-tour-of-hell (Links to an external site.)https://digitalcommons.linfield.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://www.google.com/&httpsredir=1&article=1619&context=linfield_magazine
Park University Why The Tempest is Relevant Today Discussion