Get help from the best in academic writing.

University of Phoenix Decisions Discretion and Accountability Presentation

University of Phoenix Decisions Discretion and Accountability Presentation.

A decision tree is a great way to determine a course of action and possible outcomes associated with an officer’s decision. Today everyone has a camera and decisions are reviewed, questioned, and judged by those who have no idea what happened. In Ch. 5 you learned about tactical decision-making and scenario-based training for new officers. Discretion is a major part of a police officer’s role and the decision he or she makes in a split second can create many different outcomes and consequences.
Watch the Decision Tree video located in the University Library.
Read the Sidebar 11-1, “Police Discretion in an Unfolding Disturbance Call” in the “New Perspectives on Police Discretion” section of Ch. 11, “Police Discretion,” of The Police in America.
Consider the different stages the officer is faced with in the scenario.
Select stage four, five, or six and review the officer response provided.
Create a 10- to 12-slide PowerPoint® presentation in which you:

Describe possible decision points that the officer may have faced.
Explain how one decision the officer could have made modeled abuse of discretion or modeled positive use of discretion.
Describe factors that may limit the officer’s discretion.
Explain at least three internal and external mechanisms police departments use for accountability.

Incorporate at least two academic references outside of your textbook in your presentation.
Include detailed speaker notes, the notes should be equivalent to you presenting to a group.
University of Phoenix Decisions Discretion and Accountability Presentation

UOM Coca Cola Business Ethics & Organizational Ethical Analysis Research Paper.

Each student will write a research paper on an organization of his or her choice (5-7 pages). The organizational analysis will utilize a minimum of five external, peer-reviewed academic sources and contain the following sections:What is the organization and how would you describe it?Who are the leaders of the organization?Is the organization successful?How do you determine whether an organization is ethical or not?Based on your assessment and research, is the organization ethical?What would you change about the organization to make it better, without sacrificing ethical standards?Requirements:Your assignment should be written in APA style format.Double spaced with 12-point Times New Roman font and make sure to use headings.Please answer all the questions (5-7 Pages).Separate page for title and reference.
UOM Coca Cola Business Ethics & Organizational Ethical Analysis Research Paper

Grand Canyon Univ GCU What Is Sodium Chloride and How Is It Used Biology Questions

Grand Canyon Univ GCU What Is Sodium Chloride and How Is It Used Biology Questions.

3. Everything is made from chemicals. In blogs or news articles, you might hear about chemicals being a concern, but this is too vague. For example you can say water is a problem because it is a chemical, but this is still not saying why. Find an example of a chemical you want to learn about. Question worth 5 points
a. What is this chemical made from?
b. How can it be helpful?
c. What it is likely to pollute (air, water, or land)?
d. How can the problem be lessened?
e. Provide a full reference for your authoritative source you used to answer this question
4. Ozone is a complex chemical. In the1980’s a big concern was the hole in the ozone. What is the current status of the ozone hole? Now, you might hear more about ozone warning while driving. What causes this and why is it is problem? What references did you use to answer this question? (minimum of 50 words; question worth 5 points)
Completing Research (5 points each- 3 for correct example, 2 for reason) 20 pts total
In science a research paper needs to have authoritative sources and all facts need to be cited. This does not mean you want to have lots of quotes, but instead paraphrase your material and cite the source
Many times if it tempting to use popular media as a source. However, this means it could be biased.
Go to: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/
1. Find one source that could be considered Left biased and explain why (minimum of 20 words; question worth 5 points).
2. Find one source that could be considered right biased and explain why (minimum of 20 words; question worth 5 points).
3. Find a source that is considered conspiracy-pseudoscience and explain why with an example of pseudoscience (minimum of 20 words; question worth 5 points).
4. Find a pro-science source that might be ok for a research paper to get more current information then a peer reviewed source. (minimum of 20 words; question worth 5 points)
Citing and referencing help (each topic 10 pts) 30pts total
Using the library, find 3 separate articles to help you write about 3 of the following topics below (remember to choose 3 topics, not just 1). Please pick 3 topics from this list: endangered species, environmental toxin, farming, sustainable building materials, or water pollution to answering the following questions:
1. Why would you use this article? (3 pts)
2. Create a full reference for this source (2 pts)
3. Paraphrase a fact from this source and insert an in-text citation (2.5pts)
4. Find a quote Create an intext citation (2.5pts)

Grand Canyon Univ GCU What Is Sodium Chloride and How Is It Used Biology Questions

Efficiency of Window Systems

best assignment help Review of Window Shopping: A Study of Desktop Window Switching. ORIGINAL ARTICLE: Warr, A., Chi, Ed H. , Harris, H., Kuscher, A., Chen, J., Flack, R. and Jitkoff. N. (2016) Window Shopping: A Study of Desktop Window Switching. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’16). ACM, New York, NY, USA. pp 3335-3338. ABSTRACT This is a review of a research article by Warr et al (2016), of Google Inc, Window shopping: A Study of Desktop Window Switching, which is an investigation into the efficiency of window systems. Having multiple windows open is commonplace but users often have problems switching between windows. This report presents an experiment used to evaluate window switching interfaces that are being considered for a new operating system. Its focus is an understanding of the effects of switching on user performances in terms of time to switch and errors in selection. The experiment compares three different styles of window switching interfaces and their effects on user performances. The interfaces chosen were the Cards interface, the Exposé interface and the Mosaic interface. The results from the experiment suggest that the Mosaic interface allows faster selection than the Cards interface and is less erroneous than the Exposé interface. SUMMARY OF ARTICLE The report outlines some windows research since the 1980’s to the present time. Early research (Bly el al. 1986) showed that even though tiled window systems were faster than overlapping windows, users still preferred overlapping windows. Their conclusion being that it is imperative to create window systems that are both efficient and meet their user preferences. Research by Card and Henderson (1987) argued for designs that reduce the time and cognitive load of switching tasks. Hutchings et al’s (2004) study showed that users often have 8 or more windows open at any time with a median activation time of 3.8 seconds. Other research looked at arranging and grouping windows. These research works inspired Warr et al to investigate three window switching interfaces. The chosen interfaces were The Cards Interface: These resemble playing cards with small conceptual representation of the window and small amounts of information. They are spread like a stack of cards with the most recent window showing at the front. The Exposé interface: This arranges the windows in a map, based on their size and original position. The Mosaic Interface: In this interface the windows are paced in order of most recent left to right in a grid form with the windows scaled to size of grid cell. The report details the design and procedures used in the experiment. They used a 3X3 mixed factorial design for the experiment. This being the three user interface types by three different number of windows open at a time namely 3, 6 and 9 windows. The experiment was carried out to prove two hypothesises about window switching. Hypothesis 1: That the Mosaic interface allows windows to be selected faster than the Cards and Exposé interfaces Hypothesis 2: The Mosaic interface would have less errors in selection than the Cards and Exposé interfaces. The experiment was carried out in a lab using 42 participants (27 female and 15 male) ranging in age from 18-60. The participants were volunteers and were selected on the basis that they used laptops as their main computing device, hadn’t used any of the selected interfaces previously and on average had more than one window open at any one time. They developed an application which prototyped the interfaces and allowed them to control and gather the data. Trials were carried out using each of the interfaces and selected number of windows. The participant were instructed to switch to predefined windows and the time taken to select the correct window and any errors in selections were recorded. The details of the conditions used are defined. The article displays the results for selection time and errors and shows them in table and graphical format for each interface and number of windows. Using a number of statistical tests the results allowed for partial acceptance of both hypothesis. They suggested that the Mosaic interface allows quicker window selection than the Cards interface that the Mosaic interface has fewer selection errors than the Exposé interface. In the discussion they imply that the Mosaic interface was faster because the need to scroll in the card selection made it inefficient especially as the number of windows increases. Also in the Exposé interface as the number of open windows increases the size of the thumbnails in the Exposé interface decreases making them more difficult to distinguish. There wasn’t much difference in number of erroneous selections between the interfaces except the Exposé interface at the greater number of open windows. They surmise that was due to the fact the thumbnails were small and hard to distinguish. The limitations applied in conducting the experiment makes this a worst case scenario. They conclude that the Mosaic interface enables fast, less error prone window selection. DISCUSSION The article is well laid out. It summarises some similar research previously carried out in window switching although they say that this is the first comparative study of these specific window overview schemes (p 3336). Their reference material is fairly old. The most recent being a study of their own presented at the CHI conference in 2011. The aim of the experiment, investigating the efficiency of three window interfaces, and the reason for it are well defined. It presents the experiment in distinct sections outlining the design of the experiment, how the participants were chosen, the materials used, the procedures, their interpretation of the results and conclusion. They conclude that the Mosaic interface is the faster and the least error prone of the three chosen interfaces. This is internally valid as it was in a controlled environment however how transferable this is in the real world where prior knowledge and familiarity may affect the results is not measured. It also ignores user preferences that Bly et al considered important. There is no measure of the user experience in this experiment. Purposive sampling of participants appears to have been used. They did not include a group with prior knowledge of the interfaces and were careful throughout the experiment to alleviate any learning effects. This may have been for quick and economic reasons even though participants received a gift card. The sample size may be small because of the criteria used to select the participants and there is no explanation as to why there are almost twice as many women. The data collected from this group can’t really be used to generalise about the interfaces. The results may be biased towards non experienced users. They could however be used as a control reference for any future research to externally validate these interfaces with other users. The authors of the article are affiliated to Google inc and Warr, Chi and Harris have published many articles in areas relating to computer interface design. Their previous works has been cited many times. This paper was presented to the CHI 16 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. This is a top conference for HCI where the future of how people interact with technology is discussed. It is a conference for top researchers, designers and corporations. This was an ideal place to present this research paper and may prompt further research in this area. A good knowledge of statistics is required to understand the results as presented in the article. The researchers appear to be confident in their methods and choice of statistical tests but without a knowledge of statistics it is difficult to know whether their choice of statistical tests are biased. In their discussion they explore the reasons why the Mosaic interface may have been faster than the Cards interface. The put forward three credible explanations for this. These factors could be explored in any future studies. They acknowledge the fact that the experiment may not reflect real life scenarios. CONCLUSION Warr, Chi, Harris, Kuscher, Chen, Flack, and Jitkoff presented a detailed experiment in window switching interfaces that were being considered for a new operating system. They suggest that the Mosaic interface allows faster selection than the Cards interface and less erroneous than the Exposé interface from the results they obtained. The results may not transfer to the general population and does not study the ergonomics of the interfaces and ignores user preferences. However they may inspire further research in the area of window switching. BIBLIOGRAPHY Bly, S. A. and Rosenberg, J. K. 1986. A comparison of tiled and overlapping windows. Proc. CHI’86, ACM Press, 101-106. Card S. K. and Henderson, A. 1987. A Multiple, Virtual-Workspace Interface to Support User Task Switching. Proc CHI’87, ACM Press, 53-59. Hutchings, D. R., Smith, G., Meyers, B., Czerwinski, M., Robertson, G. 2004. Display space usage and window management operation comparisons between single monitor and multiple monitor users. Proc. AVI’04, ACM Press, 32-39.

SNHU Wk 7 Case Collaboration Meeting Plan & Strength Wrist Injury Red Flags Case Study

SNHU Wk 7 Case Collaboration Meeting Plan & Strength Wrist Injury Red Flags Case Study.

Assignment: Case Collaboration Meeting
Collaboration is a key part of social work practice. Most MSW professionals engage in these processes during the postgraduate practice years that each state requires before their licensing moves from supervised to independent status. Even beyond those requirements, peer consultation and collaboration are key aspects of most social work practice settings.
For this Assignment, your Instructor has paired you with a consultation colleague. Imagine that you and your colleague are working with the client featured in the case study your Instructor assigned. Your task is to provide a diagnosis and present your findings in the Week 7 Discussion.
Your diagnosis can come from any part of the DSM-5, so frequent communication and research with your colleague may be needed. Your colleague is there to help you think out, consult on, challenge, research, and polish your process before you record and post your own final analysis of this case in Week 7.
The collaboration that begins in this Assignment is intended to provide a safe venue for developing your differential diagnosis and case discussion skills with your colleague. This week you meet with your assigned partner at least once via Collaborate Ultra and begin considering the assigned case. You are asked to meet in Collaborate Ultra this week in order to practice this technology, which will be required as part of next week’s Assignment. In this week’s Assignment, you describe that meeting and any initial analysis of the case.
SNHU Wk 7 Case Collaboration Meeting Plan & Strength Wrist Injury Red Flags Case Study

Pleasantville essay

Pleasantville essay. I’m studying for my Management class and don’t understand how to answer this. Can you help me study?

Essay #1: A Freudian Analysis of Pleasantville
The Assignment:
Create an essay of no less than five pages and no more than seven pages in length that is analysis of Pleasantville based on the ideas Freud presents in his essay and the ones I present in my lecture. This essay will be submitted to anti-plagiarism software. Please use only the assigned readings for this essay. Avoid material gathered from external internet sources.
AS WITH THE VIDEO ASSIGNMENT, THIS ESSAY SHOULD NOT BE A SUMMARY OF THE FILM OR FREUD’S IDEAS OR YOUR REVIEW OF THE FILM. IT IS AN ANALYSIS BASED ON THE IDEAS BELOW.
This topic will build on the one for your video response to Pleasantville.
Overview:In many ways the film is a comment of the values, good and bad, of the world today, which we would consider “civilized.” The film and Freud’s ideas on civilization and instincts are a lens through which we can analyze the nature of civilization. This is accomplished by allowing us to see an ideal of fantasy represented in the movie. In comparing a television version of America in the 1950’s to the world of two teenagers from the 1990’s we can draw conclusions upon how “civilized” we have become.
What I would like you to do is to describe three worlds in the film: 1. The black and white world that Bud and Mary Sue find when they first enter the TV show. 2. A second world: Pleasantville in full color at the end of the film. 3. The modern world from where Bud and Mary Sue come from as David and Jennifer, and where David returns at the end.
The following are questions to think about for the essay. The questions are not a list for which answers must be provided. They are there to get you thinking in a certain direction. This is an essay and should have that form with an introduction, body and conclusion. HOWEVER, PLEASE NOTE THE THE ORDER OF THE QUESTIONS BELOW. THEY ARE IN THAT ORDER TO PROVIDE YOU WITH A STRUCTURE FOR YOUR ESSAY, WHICH SHOULD HAVE THREE SECTIONS. PLEASE FOLLOW THAT STRUCTURE.

Consider Freud’s comments about civilization: “Civilized man has exchanged a portion of his possibilities of happiness for a portion of security.” For the black and white world of Pleasantville – is it very civilized? Yes? No? In what ways? Provide examples from the film to support your answer. Secondly, What do Bud and Mary Sue do that unleashes and disrupts and changes Pleasantville, and what are the effects of that disruption?

For the world in full color in Pleasantville: what does color symbolize in the film? Why do characters become in color, what do they do to cause them to bloom into color, and lastly, how do they change after they are in color? Secondly, what would Freud say? How does this change in color correspond to to his ideas on libido? Give specific examples of characters.

Finally look at the modern world of David and Jennifer that begins and ends the film. 1. In light of what Freud is saying in Civilization and Its Discontents, is the colored modern world better or worse than the black and white world of Pleasantville that starts the film? In other words, is the modern world in color better or worse than Pleasantville in full color at the end of the movie? Consider Freud and the instincts of sex and aggression and libido.

The Essay:This paper should be five to seven pages in length, double-spaced, 12pt font. PLEASE DO NOT USE THE IDEAS OF OTHERS FROM EXTERNAL INTERNET SOURCES. Your own thoughts and ideas will bring a much higher grade than anything you find online. If you start researching the Internet, you will spend more time than you would writing the essay. Of course you must have read Freud, my lecture and seen the film. The essay will pass through anti-plagiarism software. Please don’t go there; your own thoughts, whatever they may be, will earn you the higher grade.

You need one source for this essay. It is the excerpt from Freud I provide you in the module. Quote it three times. If you fail to do this, it will mean a deduction in points from your final grade.
Here is the citation for the reference page.
Freud, Sigmund. (29 Nov. 2007). Civilization & Its Discontents. [Excerpt] Trans. Joan Riviere. Retrieved from www.writing.upenn.edu/~afilreis/50s/freud-civ.html (Links to an external site.)

You may quote from the film as well. You would use the producer of the film – Ross – and the year, 1998, it came out. Use these for in-text citations. If you Google: How to cite a film in APA – you will see what is necessary for the citation for the References page.
Download to your computer from the library’s website the template for APA for Word. Use this to format your essay, and not the one provided by Word. This is easier. The essay must use APA format and the correctness of the form is part of your grade for the essay. Ask the librarians to help you for the correct form for the in-text citations, the reference page, and the correct format of the entire essay.Do not lose points needlessly because the essay is not in APA.
Pleasantville essay