Get help from the best in academic writing.

University of Maryland U College Fluctuations in Stock Market Discussion

University of Maryland U College Fluctuations in Stock Market Discussion.

I’m working on a finance discussion question and need an explanation to help me learn.

Go to the internet and find a news article(s) published within the last six monthsthat discusses the reasons for the dramatic ups and downs of the stock market indexes, like S&P 500, DJIA, and NASDAQ Composite, during March 2020, summarize key points of the article using finance terminology, and post your response in the Discussions area.Please note that the goal of this discussion is to read, understand, and discuss recent news using finance terminology. The article should be from an on-line newspaper or magazine. Materials posted on educational websites, like www.thebalance.com,www.khanacademy.org , www.fool.com, and so on, are not considered news articles even if they were recently updated and contain material related to the discussion topic.Reflection – the students also should include a paragraph in the initial response in their own words, using finance terminology, reflecting on specifically what they learned from the assignment and how they think they could apply what they learned in the workplace or in everyday life.
University of Maryland U College Fluctuations in Stock Market Discussion

Corporate Welfare in the US Essay

Origin of corporate welfare in the US The corporate welfare in the US came about during the beginnings of the first congress established in 1794 when farmers in the state of Pennsylvania ganged up and complained about the unfair taxes that they were paying to the government. This led to a situation where the government started manipulating tariffs as a way of offering subsides to manufacturers. The government also made a move to partner with private banks in order to come up with a national bank (Federal Bank) which was to serve the government and the economy in general. This therefore means that corporate welfare in terms of government handouts began a long time ago the only change is the fact that the amount keeps getting bigger with time. It is important to note that these handouts are taken from the treasury and is funded by taxpayer money (Huff

SOWK 135 Strayer Social Work and Religious Diversity Journal Article Review

essay help online free SOWK 135 Strayer Social Work and Religious Diversity Journal Article Review.

Journal Article Reviews InstructionsFor each review, you must identify 1 peer-reviewed journal article that reflects research applicable to the practice setting covered in the assigned module/week’s Reading & Study( Garland, D. S. R. (2015). Why I am a social worker: 25 Christians tell their life stories. Botsford, CT: North American Association of Christians in Social Work.) material and use this article as the basis of a 2-page review. In each review, you must briefly summarize the purpose of the article, including the research question(s), and methods used to examine the research question(s), and 1–2 key findings. You must also describe 2 concepts you learned from the article and ask at least 1 knowledge-informed question about the practice setting. Each review must follow current APA format and include a title page and a reference page. The title page and reference page do not count towards the length requirement. Peer reviewed journal articles can be found under additional information in course content for week 0. You can also select peer reviewed articles from the library social work related data bases. Those will need to be sent to your professor for approival.
SOWK 135 Strayer Social Work and Religious Diversity Journal Article Review

Garan Reflection Critical Essay

Garan Reflection Critical Essay. Reflection Paper After a careful reading of the article by Garan (2001) it is clear to me that the required and set down rules where never followed in the research. The research in itself has so many flaws as indicated by the writer and I strongly agree with the criticism on it. These are among them: Publication of two reports Publication of two reports one of which is a later version of the other did not follow rules of citation. This is a flaw which has reduced the credibility of the report. If revision is has to be done in a research paper to correct errors in the first publication, it should be indicated as a second volume. In addition, the changes should be stated clearly. Limitation of the research A research report should also entail limitations of the research, which evidently lacked in this report as stated by the writer. The wrong methodology is another issue. It was not appropriate leading to the misleading results. Limited data amount and research administration The small number of studies used added to the many flaws on the results of the research, 38 in number according to the writer and the NPR terming it as unfortunate, throwing the question of how credible are the results?. Administration of uniform research questions matters a lot in research for uniformity, which did not meet the standards. Some tests were conducted to some of the respondents and others were accepted, which is wrong and will skew the results. NRP also did not touch on normally developing readers above grade 1. Any normal school has all categories of students from high performing to those having problems in English. This is also wrong as it does not provide enough data for greater variability hence better results. The data taken from the control group about a decade ago will definitely differ from the sample being studied when the number of the sample changes. The writer points out that in some years, a sample of 22 only was used. This throws the question of consistency and reliability that NRP tries to put across that it used it in coming up with the results of the study, yet they did not follow at all. This makes the results wanting. Contradiction and Inconsistency “The meta-analysis revealed that systematic phonics instruction produces significant benefits for students in kindergarten through sixth grade and for children having difficulty learning to read”.(Garan, 2001, p. 506). This is a contradiction to the statement; “there were insufficient data to draw any conclusions about the effects of phonics instruction with normally developing readers above first grade” (Garan, 2001, p. 506). This is unacceptable and it is a major flaw in this paper. You have to get the data in order to get the findings after analysis t Critic’s opinion and my counter to the same The issue of acceptable error limits in research has been experienced in the research paper but in research no errors are tolerated. We should try as much as possible to avert them but the report did not try to. In conclusion, there should be no bias. Researchers should take their job professionally and follow the laid down rules Reference Garan, E. M. (2001). Beyond the smoke and mirrors: a critique of the reading panel on phonics. Phi Delta Kappan, 82(7): 500-506. Garan Reflection Critical Essay

MANN 1491 The University of Tampa Week 6 Ancient and Colonial Empires Discussion

MANN 1491 The University of Tampa Week 6 Ancient and Colonial Empires Discussion.

Latin American History: Ancient and Colonial Empires Week 6 Write-up Reading: Mann, 1491 Directions: 1) Write down two (2)good discussion question for Thursday. Your first question is to come from pp. 74-93. Your second question is to come from pp. 93-109. 2) Then, answer both your questions. As usual, the write-up is to be cited, a minimum of one full page, (excluding your name, course title, date, etc etc) and is due to me before class on Thursday Hints: Good discussion questions 1) invite analysis and interpretation; 2) pertain to many pages (not just a few) and 3) needs to be answered with a variety of concrete examples from different places in the reading.NOTE: I ATTACHET THE REFERNCE ON A PDF. FILE
MANN 1491 The University of Tampa Week 6 Ancient and Colonial Empires Discussion