Get help from the best in academic writing.

University of Amsterdam Wk 2 C Programming Computer Coding Task

University of Amsterdam Wk 2 C Programming Computer Coding Task.

I’m working on a c programming question and need support to help me study.

Better see the pdf only post the first question.Input: The first line contains the integers n and m, separated by a space. n is the total
number of assignments in the collection, and m is the number of assignments you must
output. The next n lines each contain two integers separated by a space, representing the
identifier and difficulty level of an assignment. Both the identifier and difficulty level are
Output: m lines, each containing an assignment of top difficulty levels – the identifier and
difficulty level of the assignment. The assignments should be sorted by difficulty level, from
highest to lowest.
University of Amsterdam Wk 2 C Programming Computer Coding Task

APUS Wk 3 Transportation Improvement Plan of American Express Case Study.

I’m working on a case studies Research Paper and need guidance to help me understand better.

Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) Deliverables: Develop a Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) Paper for a supply chain of an organization of your choice from any time period: past, present or future. This is a three-part submission which will be delivered on separate weeks (uploaded to Assignments). Do not include any secure, confidential or private information in your plan. Your TIP should include background about the organization, its products and services, markets, and supply chain strategies (e.g., green chain). Also describe its current freight flows and future freight flows after implementation of one or more of your recommended transportation improvement projects would be executed. Use a multi-year (more than one year) planning horizon. Support your Plan with theories, concepts, and best practices from the course resources and scholarly resources available from the APUS Library.· -Week 3-Part 1 is the topic of your plan. This should be a minimum of 300 words. Also include title page, reference page, and use APA Style.
APUS Wk 3 Transportation Improvement Plan of American Express Case Study

Selection Methods – 3 Paragraphs.

Discussion 2: The Legal Implications of Selection MethodsAlthough reading the legal decisions in this week’s Learning Resources at first may appear cumbersome, you should now realize that they could provide good insight into the world of personnel psychology. You now may have a better understanding about the areas concerning disparate impact and intentional discrimination. There certainly have been many challenges to organizations’ selection methods. For example, in Connecticut v Teal, the Supreme Court decided that an organization is liable for discrimination when any part of its selection process is not shown to be valid and has an adverse impact, even if the final hiring outcome is racially balanced (The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, n.d.). The Supreme Court made clear that the fair employment laws protect the individual and not the overall group. After Connecticut v Teal, do you agree with the Supreme Court’s decision? Whether you agree or not, the Supreme Court decision is the law of the land. How do you think it may help you as a future consultant?For this Discussion, select a litigated employment case from the Learning Resources or another court case of your interest. Please do not use Connecticut v Teal. Consider whether you agree or disagree with the court’s decision in the case.References:The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (n.d.). Selected Supreme Court decisions. Retrieved February 15, 2012, from these thoughts in mind:Post by Day 5 a brief summary of the court case you selected, including the employee selection method and the selection issue. Summarize the opposing positions and explain whether you agree with the court decision and justify your position. Support your response with the Learning Resources and current literature.Your post should be three paragraphs. Be sure to support your postings and responses with specific references to the Learning Resources. APA format.
Selection Methods – 3 Paragraphs

Introduction Food consumption is the most integral part of physical and mental survival and health. Religious teachings include that consumption is a part of spiritual survival and health as well. Jewish teachings claim that Yahweh puts a restriction on what is to be eaten and who is to prepare them. Christian teachings claim that Jesus puts no restrictions on what is to be eaten, however food put out for idols should not be consumed. Muslim teachings claim that Muhammad distinguishes food that are permissible (halal) and non-permissible (haram). All three religions – Judaism, Christianity, and Islam – demonstrate these similarities and differences in the preparation and consumption; sacrifice; and meaning and ethics of the food. Preparation and Consumption In the Hebrew bible, there were clear indications that it was Yahweh who provided humankind food for preparation and consumption. In the priestly source, the first creation story claimed that Yahweh had provided food such as ‘grains and fruits’ (Genesis 1:29), and the second creation story claimed that Yahweh had created an orchard – Garden of Eden – so that people can take charge and take food from ‘every tree’ (2:8-9) except for the ‘tree of knowledge.’ Before the ‘Great Flood’ (9:2-3) of Abraham’s time, all people and animals were vegetarians. However, after the flood, Yahweh extended the diet to include all meat except for pork (Leviticus 11:1-8). Seafood was also allowed for consumption, although it was limited to fish that had ‘fins and scales’ (Leviticus 11:9; Deuteronomy 14:9-10). This type of food discrimination was not due to any other reason than to not perturb the harmonious nature of all species. For consumption, people had to slaughter these animals. Jewish law made sure that the slaughterer was Jewish, and the meat was ritually salted to remove traces of blood. Observant Jewish people only ate meat that was certified ‘kosher’ meaning ‘fit’ for consumption. In the New Testament, Christians did not seem to have any dietary restrictions. This was most clearly indicated when Peter had three visions where he was instructed by a voice, presumably God, to ‘kill and eat … all kinds of four-footed creatures and reptiles and birds of the air’ (Acts 10:12; 11:6). Peter first refused due to the dominant Jewish belief that there were dietary restrictions. However, the voice claimed again that ‘what God has called clean, you must not call profane’ (Acts 10:15). If Christians had one consumption restriction, it was a restriction made for the benefit of other Christians who thought that consumption of food that was ‘offered to an idol’ would ‘defile themselves’ (1 Corinthians 8:7). For Christians who were aware that idols did not ‘really exist,’ they refused consumption of idol food as they could cause their ‘weaker brothers and sisters’ to fall (8:13). In terms of slaughtering animals for consumption, in lands that had a dominant Christian population, Christians were given priority. Christian butchers were allowed to sell meat to both Jews and Christians, which benefited them but had negative consequences for Jewish people who needed kosher meat. Christians were also forbidden to consume meat from Jewish or Muslim butchers, as it supported Jewish and Muslim rejection of Christ. In the Qur’an and the Islamic law (Shari’ah), there was a clear-cut differentiation of lawful (halal) and unlawful (haram) food. The consumption law was set in place by jurists and medical doctors for the ‘preservation of health’ by safeguarding people from spiritual and physical harm. When people consumed unlawful foods, they were seen as transgressing against Allah’s words: ‘…forbid not (yourselves) the good things which Allah hath made lawful for you and transgress not. Surely Allah loveth not the transgressors.’ (Al-Ma’idah 5:87). Allah also claimed: ‘O you who believe! Eat of the good things wherewith We have supplied you, and render thanks to Allah if you are (indeed) His worshippers.’ (Al-Baqarah 2:172). He seemed to have prohibited foods not for his own sake, but for the sake of His people whose bodies, judgements, and development could be harmed in the consumption. The Qur’an classified four types of forbidden food: ‘Forbidden unto you (for good) are death-meat, and blood and flesh of the swine, and that over which is invoked the name of other than Allah, and the strangled, and the dead through beating, and the dead through falling from a height, and that which has been killed by (the goring of) horns, and the devoured of wild beasts, unless you have cleansed (by slaughtering) it in the proper, lawful way, while yet there is life in it, and that which has been immolated unto idols…’ (Al Ma’idah 5:3). As said above, slaughtering had to be lawful, ex. cutting throat from beneath, at the part next to the head. The way the Islam people slaughter was seen as most ethical, as the animal was not caused as much pain when being killed for consumption. Seafood was also seen as halal: ‘Lawful to you is the pursuit of water-game (sayd al-bahr) and its use for food, for the benefit of yourselves and those who travel.’ (Al-Ma’idah 5: 96). On the other hand, consumption of blood was seen as haram as Muslim physicians claimed that blood was a medium for carriers of disease. Also, the physicians believed that drinking blood was ‘repugnant to human decency.’ Pork was considered haram as it was impure in its nature, even if it was fed wholesome food and was adequately cooked. Only Allah knew why pork was unclean but one main reason was that He wanted to protect His people from having impure meat. Muslim people were also meant to say Allah’s name when slaughtering and sacrificing animals. This helped distinguish true believers of Allah with non-believers. For those who were in desperate need of food, and only had prohibited meat that was edible, there were 3 conditions that had to be met: the man had to be driven by absolute necessity to save his life and the people who depended on him, there were absolutely no intention to break the law of Allah but was driven by necessity, and if they had to eat the unlawful food out of necessity they should not take more than necessary. All three of the religions placed an importance on people not being gluttonous. The Hebrew Bible introduced greed in the story of manna. When Moses commanded people to not gather any manna on the seventh day, the Sabbath, people decided to go against his words. However, when they went out, they discovered that there was nothing to gather as a consequence for their actions (Exodus 16:1-30). The New Testament also introduced greed when Paul claimed that ‘…Fornicators, idolaters, adulterers, male prostitutes, sodomites, thieves, the greedy, drunkards, revilers, robbers—none of these will inherit the kingdom of God” (1 Cor 6:9–10). He included ‘the greedy and the drunkards’ as not being people of God, as Paul believed that ‘the body is meant for the Lord’ (6:13). Lastly, the Islam faith introduced greed when they claimed that it was haram to eat and drink in excess as it could lead to illness. They also claimed that a little room should be left for food to be digested comfortably. Sacrifice Both Jewish people and Muslim people made sacrifices in what could and could not be eaten. In the Hebrew Bible, prohibition was made on eating pork, as stated above. Additionally, people were not allowed to consume blood, as blood represented the life that Yahweh created, and represented ‘making atonement for your lives on the alter’ as it is blood that makes atonement (Lev 17:11). Thus, abstaining from consumption acknowledged God as the owner of all animals and He atoned for all human sins. If people ate the forbidden foods, they were rendered unclean and were ultimately ousted from the community. In the Qur’an, prohibition was made on consumption of animals that were killed unlawfully, blood was not allowed to be consumed due to it being prone to disease, and pork was not allowed due to their impurity. Sacrifices of food to the poor was also emphasized for Jewish and Christian people. In the Hebrew Bible, Sabbatical year regulation requires farmers to let their fields lie fallow ‘so the poor of your people may eat’ (Exod 23:10-11); those who have no crop have a share in crop of others and ‘eat their fill’ (Exod 14:29). The gospel traditions support feeding the hungry to the point of self-sacrifice – Jesus’ feeding miracles recounted 6 times. Few loaves and fishes are given to Jesus who blesses them, and he feeds 5 thousand people and gather the remnants. Jesus doesn’t take the excess of what they have and distributes it (Matt 14:16). Jesus describes a rich man ‘who was dressed in purple and fine linen and who feasted sumptuously every day” (Luke 16:16–31). Outside his gate lay poor Lazarus, who ate the crumbs from the rich man’s table—his excess. Both men die. The rich man in Hades first unsuccessfully begs Abraham to send Lazarus from heaven to give him a drink, then he asks Abraham to “warn his brothers.” But Abraham replies that they have already been warned and did not listen. Jesus teaches people to feed those who wil not be able to repay (Luke 14:12-14). This new community does not include just family but extend to wider community of those who are unable to contribute to it. Some people have food that they could eat at home so that there will be enough for the communal gathering (1 Cor 11:22), but instead, they start to eat before everyone is present and eat and drink to excess (11:21; cf. 5:11; 6:10). Other people receive nothing and are humiliated. He urges them, “Wait for one another. If you are hungry, eat at home, so that when you come together, it will not be for your condemnation” (11:34). Sacrifices may be intended as food for Yahweh, but Yahweh is not dependent upon the food. The sacrifices were primarily intended for Yahweh in order to establish and maintain a mutually beneficial relationship between god and man. There are 2 different locations of the divine: the smoke from the altar goes up to the sky, but all rituals are performed in front of Yahweh. Tamid offering, is sacrificed in the morning and the evening, and is made up of a whole lamb burnt on the alter. There are 5 main types of burnt offerings: the Whole Burnt offering, the Grain offering, the Sacrifice of Well-being, Sin offering, and Guilt offering; the most important being the first 3. Whole Burnt offering includes entire burning of the sacrificial animal on the altar as offering to Yahweh; Grain offering includes burning of a token portion mixed with frankincense and salt on the altar to create smoke as fire offering to Yahweh, whereas the rest of the grain/flour is given to the priests; Sacrifice of Well-being includes burning of only the fat and kidneys for Yahweh, whereas the breast and one thigh of the animal are given to the priest and the rest of the animal is eaten by the donor and the household as part of sacrificial meal. These three sacrifices share similarities in that they are turned into smoke as Yahweh ‘eats’ the smoke of the offering unlike humans who would have eaten the meat/grain. This creates a difference in the way that Egyptian or Mesopotamian people have presentation sacrifices to their deities. Ethics and Meaning Food is most essential component of God’s blessing, gift of God as creator to all creatures. Saying blessing on meal invokes God’s blessing on food, which overlooks that fact that food is God’s blessing. God ‘blesses’ us with food, and we ask God to feed us when we pray ‘Give us this day our daily bread’ (Matt 6:11). We should not worry about what we will eat because God feeds the birds of the air and people are more valuable (Matt 6:26). Enjoying food is most primitive form of gratitude and worship; ‘rejoice’ when offering first fruits (Ecclesiastes 10:19). First fruits sacrament represents God’s historical involvement with Israel from time when God ‘brought us into this place and gave us this land (Deut 26:9). Festival of unleavened bread (Exod 23:15; 34:18) and Passover (Deut 16:1-8; Exod 12-13). Unleavened bread memorialized the haste in which Israelite slaves had to leave Egypt Passover lamb memorialized death of firstborn of Egypt. When Jesus is sent to die, he dies at the house when Passover lambs were slaughtered (John 19:14). In this sense, Jesus become the Passover meal. ‘The bread that I will give for the life of the world is my flesh… my my flesh is true food and my blood is true drink’ (John 6:51,54). There can be loss of land by disloyalty to God. Just as God can provide, God can take away the blessing, and drought and hunger will replace rain and crops (Deuteronomy 11:13-17). If Israel repents, God will restore food that he had taken away – they will ‘eat in plenty and be satisfied’ (Psalms 126:4-6). In order to ensure one’s health, one should consume food with full ethics (adab) of eating. People must recite the basmalah before eating and drinking. It is undesirable to eat with the left hand as the left is reserved for unclean duties associated with toilet. People should take food only when they are hungry as this can ensure easy digestion. They must not delay and interrupt food from one time to another time. References De Hemmer Gudme, Anne Katrine. 2014. ““If I Were Hungry, I Would Not Tell You” (Ps 50, 12): Perspectives On The Care And Feeding Of The Gods In The Hebrew Bible”. Scandinavian Journal Of The Old Testament 28 (2): 172-184. doi:10.1080/09018328.2014.932559. Deuraseh, Nurdeng. 2009. “Lawful and Unlawful Foods in Islamic Law Focus on Islamic Medical and Ethical Aspects”. International Food Research Journal 16: 469-478. Freidenreich, David M. 2013. “Food-Related Interaction Among Christians, Muslims, And Jews In High And Late Medieval Latin Christendom”. History Compass 11 (11): 957-966. doi:10.1111/hic3.12101. Mann, Thomas W. 2013. “Not By Word Alone: Food In The Hebrew Bible”. Interpretation: A Journal Of Bible And Theology 67 (4): 351-362. doi:10.1177/0020964313495515. Webster, Jane S. 2013. “That One Might Not Fall: A New Testament Theology Of Food”. Interpretation: A Journal Of Bible And Theology 67 (4): 363-373. doi:10.1177/0020964313495520.

MATH 160 Cuyamaca College Rats Running Ability on Music Influence Discussion

MATH 160 Cuyamaca College Rats Running Ability on Music Influence Discussion.

PromptMerrell claims that he randomly assigned rats to treatment groups. Does the data shown in the dotplots above support his claim? Why or why not?ContextA high school student named David Merrell did an experiment to examine if music affects the ability of rats to run a maze. The explanatory variable was exposure to music. He had three treatment groups: one group listened to heavy metal music by the group Anthrax. A second group listened to Mozart. The third group never heard music. This last group is the control group.The response variable was the average time (in seconds) to complete three runs. Every week the rats ran the maze three times. Merrell recorded each rat’s average time for the week.Direct controls of potential confounding variables:Merrell trained all of the rats to run the same maze.He gave all mice the same amount of food and light.All mice had the same approximate age and weights.During the treatment phase, the rats were exposed to the treatment for the same amount of time, e.g. rats heard music at 70 decibels for 10 hours a day for a month.Results:By the end of the month the Anthrax group was much slower at running the maze. The Mozart group was much faster. The dotplots below show average run times for the first and last week of the experiment. Each dot represents one rat. The X-value is the rat’s average run time for the week. (Each rat ran the maze 3 times each week.) The blue line is the mean run time for each treatment group.
MATH 160 Cuyamaca College Rats Running Ability on Music Influence Discussion

Can anyone help with Financial Accounting homework?

essay help online 2022- 2021 Assets Current Assets$9,630$8,710 Property, plant, and equipment (net)2,000/1,850 Other assets1,530/1,600 Total assets$13,160/$12,160 Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity Current Liabilities$3,240/$3,330 Long-term liabilities1,290/1,350 Stockholders’ equity8,6307,540 Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity$13,160/$12,160 (a) Prepare a horizontal analysis of the balance sheet data for Nike, using 2021 as a base. (b) Prepare a vertical analysis of the balance sheet data for Nike for 2022.

CSULA Jet Blue Revenue Case Study

CSULA Jet Blue Revenue Case Study.

MLA, 7-10 PAGESJet Blue Revenue Recognition Case Explain in your own words the steps Jet Blue Should apply in recognizing revenue? Provide citation from the codification 606.What are Jet Blue’s sources of revenue?Explain in your own words what we mean by a performance obligation. Provide citation from the codification.What are Jet Blue’s performance obligation in the case?Are these performance obligations “distinct?” Explain in your won words and provide citation from the codificationExplain in your own words what difference it makes if performance obligations are distinct?How should Jet Blue allocate total revenue to the various performance obligations mentioned in the case? Explain in your own words and provide citation from the codificationHow should Jet Blue account for “upfront ticket purchases and payments?” Explain in your own words and provide citation from the codification. Provide journal entries to record payment and revenue recognition.For each performance obligation in the case, should Jet Blue account for the revenue over time or at a point in time? Explain in your own words and provide citation from the codification.How should Jet Blue account for revenue from its frequent flyer program? Explain in your own words and provide citation from the codification. Provide journal entries.Explain in your own words how Jet blue should account for total fees and fees received from chaining flight reservations? Provide citation from the codification.
CSULA Jet Blue Revenue Case Study

The Consumer Behavior Project Pepsi

The Consumer Behavior Project Pepsi. 1.1 Background of the study Carbonated soft drink Pepsi was first manufactured in 1890 by Caleb Davis Bradham in US. Since then there had been a significant alteration that has been brought out in the product in order to cope up with the changing external scenario. In 1898 it was named as Brad’s Drink, which was changed to Pepsi-Cola in 1903 and finally to Pepsi in 1961. It has a vital product line that includes Dr Pepper, 7 Up, Irn Bru, Cola Turka, Big Cola, etc. One of the most influencing people associated with Pepsi was Nickolas Dias who made vital contribution in defining the marketing strategy of the product that finally made high end influence over the consumer behavior. One of its prime competitors is ‘Coca-Cola’. Heating up of this rivalry was first observed during 1970s that made Pepsi to conduct tests like ‘Pepsi Challenge’, which could also be stated as blind taste test in order to retain its identity in the competition. In response coca-cola also changed its strategy by launching modified version of their classic drink. Such activities had always been there since then by both sides so that better share of consumer market could be attained without any discrepancy. (A Brief Pepsi History) Although coca-cola was way ahead in this race Pepsi, but the difference is shrinking on a monotonous basis without any second opinion. This is due to the fact that Pepsi has now started realizing consumer behavior in an improved manner. If we talk about consumer behavior, it has always been tilted towards coca-cola at all points of time. One of the prime changes that had always been there in this product is its tagline which had been continuously altered as it is one of the basic entities that makes a deep impact over consumer behavior. One of the milestones encountered in the history was when coca-cola announced that it has changed its formula to render the better and improved product to its customer, which was termed as Coke. This step was initiated for negating the initiation taken by Pepsi referred to as Pepsi Challenge. In a survey conducted in 2008, market share of Pepsi Co in US was found to be about 30.8% as compared to that of 42.7% of Coca-Cola. In most of the regions of US, coca-cola outperforms Pepsi, but the regions where reverse happen include New York, Buffalo, etc. Consumer behavior in Asian region could be understood from the fact that market share of Coca-Cola in this region was about 50% according to a survey conducted in 2005. A major proportion of world’s population was leaned towards coca-cola in earlier times, but now a new side of the coin has been stumbled upon. 1.2 Statement of the Problem This project needs to explain the consumer behavior towards Pepsi, i.e. whether they are satisfied from its current product line or is there any need to bring out the changed to make it more acceptable. 1.3 Aim and Objective 1.3.1 The Aim of the Study Aim of this study is to explore consumer behavior based over various factors towards Pepsi in order to better understand the customer needs and provide certain recommendations for changes if necessary to gain desired competitive advantage over its rival company. 1.3.2 Objective Objective of the study is to analyze several strengths and weaknesses of the company to better understand its consumer behavior. 1.4 Scope of the Project Area of research is basically focused over youth as this segment is the largest consumer of Pepsi’s or this particular product line. In order to perform this activity successfully and in a hazel-free manner, Abu Dhabi University was chosen as the section over which this research would be based upon. In this research, both male and female lying in the category of 18 to 30 years are included so as to make an inclusion of all the facts and facets into account. This will also help in better understanding of the limits and constraints of Pepsi due to which it is always considered to as a follower of coca-cola and not as a market leader. In order to conduct the research in an overall manner factors like Price, AdvertisingThe Consumer Behavior Project Pepsi