Get help from the best in academic writing.

UN American History Indians the Native Northern Americans Discussion

UN American History Indians the Native Northern Americans Discussion.

Discussion Journal- 25% of your total gradeDue before class on WednesdayYou are responsible for ALL of the assigned readings.Your responses should be no longer than three paragraphs in length.In the first paragraph, describe the point of the reading. What is the thesis? Did the author prove the thesis? Why or why not?In the second paragraph, show how the reading expanded upon or altered your perception of something you learned about in the textbook or lecture.In the third paragraph, write any questions you had about the reading or something you did not understand.
UN American History Indians the Native Northern Americans Discussion

University of Maryland University College Uniform Commercial Code Discussion.

I’m working on a law Discussion and need support to help me understand better.

Assignment Ch. 12The UCCDescriptionThe Uniform Commercial Code, or UCC, helped to streamline contract law for merchants. As a paralegal, many of the contracts you will be dealing with are governed by the UCC so it is important to understand what this Code is and what it does. In this assignment, you’ll explore the UCC to consider how and why it was created and how it will impact your understanding of contracts.Instructions1. Review the unit’s required readings.2. In a new post, answer the following questions: • Why was the UCC created? Specifically, what are the objectives that the UCC is intended to meet? • Do you think it is valuable for states? For merchants? Why or why not? • As a paralegal, how will knowing the objectives of the UCC be valuable in your practice?Assignment Ch. 14DescriptionEven when clients don’t have a lot of money, or children, or even a spouse, they can still benefit from the help of a paralegal and the estate-planning team in getting advance directives in place. Most clients, however, are not familiar with the different types of directives and look to the legal team for explanation. For this assignment, you will discuss how to explain to a client the different types of advance directives.ScenarioJason and Willow have been a couple for 22 years, but they never married. Jason has just learned that he has a heart problem that will require surgery and long-term follow-up care. He has come to your firm to have a will prepared. He also thinks he might need other documents that will help give Willow authority to take care of his finances and make medical decisions for him if needed.Instructions1. Review the scenario.2. Your supervising attorney has asked you to explain to the client a little about advanced directives. Since you are just giving some preliminary information and the attorney will be the one to give the client legal advice, this is not the unlawful practice of law. • Discuss what types of advance directives Jason might need. • What would you tell him might happen if he becomes incapacitated and doesn’t have an advanced directive.
University of Maryland University College Uniform Commercial Code Discussion

In the writings of Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics’ and the Book X, he discusses the idea of contemplative life how happiness can be established through virtue. In this paper, I will argue the reasons Aristotle has provided in establishing his theory that a contemplative life is the best life to live, and provide reasons as to why I believe his arguments are compelling enough to be considered truthful. To establish an understanding on Aristotle’s ideas about contemplative life, we must first recognize the relations he makes between pleasure and virtue. Aristotle refers to the ences to virtue are in relation to virtues linked to the soul instead of the body. He divides the soul into three parts, the nutritive soul, the desiring soul and the reasoning soul. Of the three parts of the soul, only the reasoning soul is unique to humans and thus sets us apart. Reasoning is what sets us apart from all other animals, which leads Aristotle to conclude that reasoning is the function of human life. He goes on to state that “…evidently happiness must be placed among those desirable in themselves, not among those desirable for the sake of something else; for happiness does not lack anything, but is self-sufficient… And of this nature virtuous actions are thought to be” (Aristotle, p.46). Aristotle begins by stating that pleasure “… is thought to be most intimately connected with our human nature … it is thought, too, that to enjoy the things we ought and to hate the things we ought has the greatest bearing on virtue of character” (Aristotle, p.43). Aristotle starts to discuss what would be accepted as a good pleasure and a bad pleasure, and believes that there are certain lives we would reject because they are bad no matter how much pleasure it may bring. He continues to conclude that pleasure is due to activity and since “no one is continuously pleased… human beings are incapable of continuous activity” (Aristotle, p. 45). Aristotle comes to the conclusion that “If happiness is activity in accordance with virtue … it should be in accordance with the highest virtue” (Aristotle, p. 47), this brings about the question of what the highest virtue is. Based on his earlier conclusions, pleasure is related to activity and virtue, so the highest virtue must produce the most pleasure; Aristotle believes that the function of man is reasoning and thus continues to conclude that the greatest virtue would be to fulfill the function of man. This concludes that the highest virtue would be reasoning and thus a life of contemplation would be the best life. Aristotle continues to support this conclusion, “firstly, this activity is the best (since not only is reason the best thing in us, but the object of reason are the best of knowable objects); and secondly, it is the most continuous, since we can contemplate truth more continuously that we can do anything. And we think happiness has pleasure mingled with it, but the activity of philosophic wisdom is admittedly the pleasantest of virtuous activities” (Aristotle, p.47). He believes that contemplation is not only the highest virtue but it is self-sufficient, which he believes is another reason why contemplation is the best type of life, it does not rely solely on intrinsic values that other lives depend on. “And the self-sufficiency that is spoken of must belong most to the contemplative activity. For while a philosopher. As well as a just man or one possessing any other virtue, needs the necessaries of life, when they are sufficiently equipped with things of that sort the just man needs people towards whom and with whom he shall act justly, and the temperate man, the brave man and each of the others is in the same case, but the philosopher, even when by himself, can contemplate truth, and the better the wiser he is; he can perhaps do so better if has fellow-workers, but still he is the most self-sufficient. And this activity alone would seem to be loved for its own sake; for nothing arises from it apart form the contemplating, while from practical activities we gain more or less apart from the action” (Aristotle, p.47). Aristotle switches focus to the life of the Gods’. He states, “We assume the gods to be above all other beings blessed and happy” (Aristotle, p.48). Aristotle continues in saying that the gods have no need for the things humans fuss about. He sees these actions as “trivial and unworthy of the gods” (Aristotle, p.48). Still the gods live and must do something to occupy the time, he does not believe that they sleep, and such if they do no worry about human worries and are not in a state of constant sleep Aristotle concludes that they must be in a state of contemplation. “…if you take away from a living being action, and still more production, what is left but contemplation?” (Aristotle, p.48). Aristotle argues that the life of reason and contemplation will be the happiest, since the Gods are the happiest of us all, and they a life of contemplation. “Therefore the activity of God, which surpasses all others in blessedness, must be contemplative; and of human activities, therefore, that which is most akin to this must be most of the nature of happiness” (Aristotle, p.48). When examining Aristotle’s reasoning behind his belief that the contemplative life is the best life, his explanation for the belief that pleasure is linking to the fulfillment of the function of humans – reasoning – and thus contemplation is very well thought out and the ideas are very plausible. Aristotle’s belief is further strengthened by his explanation of the gods and their way of life. Aristotle’s explanation of mankind and the life of contemplation are very convincing. He’s idea that the functional character of humans is reason, seems to be true, since it is indeed what separates us from all other animals (as far as we know). If that is the difference in which separates humans from animals, and that pleasures are drawn from virtues, then Aristotle’s link between the function of humans and the highest virtue leads to a contemplative life. It would seem only logical that best life for a human to live would be a contemplative life that is self-sustaining. Aristotle believes that since the gods live a contemplative life that we should as well. He explains that the gods have no need for things that humans worry about, “will not the gods seem absurd if they make contracts and return deposits, and so on? Acts of brave men, then confronting dangers and running risks because it is noble to do so? …the circumstances of action would be found trivial and unworthy of the gods” (Aristotle, p.48). Aristotle continues to point out that since they do not part-take in these actions that they would only be lift with the action of contemplation. This action would be most worthy of the gods since contemplation is seen as acquiring wisdom, and since the gods are wise and powerful, it would only make sense that the wise are continuously contemplating. Since humans fear gods, we push ourselves to please them, use the gods as an example of how to live one’s own life. Therefore it would only be logical that if the gods lived a life of contemplation, that as the followers of god one would try to live a life of contemplation as well.

introduction to sport

introduction to sport.

I have another assignment for a class named “Introduction to Sports”. Attached please find the details of the assignment and the grading rubric. Please make sure you cover all the items listed in the rubric. The muminun wording is 2,700 words for this assignment on topic (Athletic in Australia and compared to Athletics in USA), which needs to cover the items listed in the Evaluation rubric of the assessment attached.In this regard, please note that the item number 6 of the grading rubric which is ” structure and Flow” means that the structure and flow of this assignment. Also, please note for each item in the attached file (details of the assignment), you need to consider and compare the item for each country (USA and Australia in Athletics ).Also, item number 2 which is “NGB obj” means the national governor body of the sport in both countries and their objectives. In addition, please make sure you mention the Australian vision 2030 of sports and write about it as it is their objective in their support industry and also in item 4, you can see it is about the effectiveness so you can write about how they are doing with their objective? are they on a good track or to achieve their objective or not?For the item number 5 “conclusion and recommendation”, you can analyse the strengths and weaknesses for both countries in basketball organization and management and how they can maintain the strengths and develop the weaknesses. For example, if the USA is doing good in something and the same is a weakness in Australia, they can learn from the USA experience and apply it to improve their system.In addition, regarding item number 3 “membership and participation”, please note that membership means the amount of people which they have membership they paid for while participation means that the amount of people which have participated to play the sport (not necessary to be member), general people which participated depending on the interest and the culture popularity of the sport.FInally, please make sure you cite the information and the date for each information you take from any academic article and all the reference lists should be in the same style of citations.Please let me know if you have any questions.Requirements: The muminun wording is 2,700 words
introduction to sport

Emory University Social Structure Conflict Theory and Response to Covid 19 Discussion

essay helper free Emory University Social Structure Conflict Theory and Response to Covid 19 Discussion.

Please read the bullet points below regarding COVID-19 and then provide a digital copy of a typed two-page, double-spaced, thorough and detailed response to both parts of the following prompt (Please be sure to include your name, your instructor’s name, the class name and section on the paper):Prompt: Identify the two major components of social structure (status and roles) and explain how the United States’s response to the COVID-19 threat has modified each one. Then, use Conflict Theory to explain how race and ethnicity relate to the threat. Use examples from the reading below to support and illustrate each part of your explanations. Examples:COVID 19 Coronavirus (COVID-19) is an illness caused by a virus that is spread through face-to- face interaction. The symptoms can range from none to severe illness. Persons who have serious underlying medical conditions are at higher risk for more severe illness. It is a new coronavirus that has already spread throughout the world; the United States is one of the countries with the most cases. Some state governments have chosen to open public schools in the fall and some governments have chosen not to. Within the United States, there has been great change in the day-to-day, social routine (i.e. social distancing, face-masking, home isolation, etc.)Public K-12 school districts around the country have chosen to deal with the pandemic in different ways. Some have chosen to return children back to their school in the fall and some have chosen to go online using distance-learning practices.According to the Center for Disease Control:a non-Hispanic American Indian or Alaska Native persons have a hospitalization rate approximately 5 times that of non-Hispanic white persons,b non-Hispanic black persons have a hospitalization rate approximately 5 times that of non-Hispanic white persons,c Hispanic or Latino persons have a hospitalization rate approximately 4 times that of non-Hispanic white persons.Center for Disease Control Corona Virus Factsheet 2020. “Coronavirus.” Atlanta, Georgia. Retrieved July 18, 2020 (http:// https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/download… ).
Emory University Social Structure Conflict Theory and Response to Covid 19 Discussion

Role of Government in Context of Globalization of Innovation

Kuldeep Changia Abstract Section II: Role of Government in promotion of Innovation The innovation system in India has been predominantly grown under the umbrella of state support and leadership. The state has been both the creator and promoter of innovation in the country, gradually broadening and deepening their support for innovation in the private sector and to the economy as a whole. This fact is further corroborated when the surfeit of legal, tax and fiscal considerations provided along with the numerous government run institutions and policies are taken into consideration. Infact, in the last few years the Indian government has been on a policy splurge and has churned several policy documents to promote innovation in the country. These policy measures articulated in the form of Science, Technology and Innovation policy of 2013 which visions positioning India among the top five global scientific powers by 2020 and also aims at increasing the Gross expenditure on Research and Development (GERD) to 2% of GDP in the next five years (Ministry of Science and Technology, 2013). This section provides the necessary backdrop to place the current innovation ecosystem within the Indian context and also elucidates efforts made by the government towards the promotion of innovation in the country. In order to analyze the various manifestations of state intervention to promote innovative activities in the country we divide the policy instruments into two broad categories: i) Financial instruments which include instruments like R

Who is to blame for the Deepwater Horizon rig incident?

On the 20th of April 2011 explosion at Deepwater Horizon rig in the Gulf of Mexico killed 11 workers and led to the largest oil spill in the petroleum industry’s history. Apportionment of blame is likely to be contested in the law courts for years to come. Who – i.e. which stakeholders – do you consider has to share some responsibility for the accident – or do you consider it an ultimately unpreventable accident, in today’s global economy? Trying to get out of the PR wars on the oil spill, 4 month after the tragedy on September 8th, 2010, BP issued its own internal 234-page report. BP cited at least eight errors of judgment and equipment failures that caused the explosion that sank the rig. BP concluded that “a complex and interlinked series of mechanical failures, human judgments, engineering design, operational implementation and team interfaces” contributed to the incident. The company accepted only shared responsibility for the explosion and pointed fingers at its contractors – Halliburton, which provided cement for the blown-up Macondo well, and Transocean, the owner of the Deepwater Horizon. Transocean assailed the BP report as “self-serving,” contending that BP’s “fatally flawed well design” set the stage for the rig explosion 50 miles off the Louisiana coast. Halliburton, which did the well cementing, said it found a “number of substantial omissions and inaccuracies” in the report and “remains confident that all the work it performed was completed in accordance with BP’s specifications.” BP’s internal investigation report was met with criticism by watchdog groups who questioned the company’s motives. Wenonah Hauter, executive director of non-for-profit organization Food