Case 2 39 year-old woman come to her physician’s office with a painful swollen and tenderness in her right leg. She informed the physician her father was diagnosed as pulmonary embolus and mother as vertebral artery graft. After physical examine, deep vein thrombosis was suspected and the coagulation tests were immediately ordered. A clotting test for APC resistance resulted in a 1.5 ratio of clotting time and an ELISA test for D-timer was positive. The patient was immediately treated with heparin and molecular test was immediately ordered.Focus on the following questionsQuestion #1: Does this patient have clotting disorder?Question #2: What are the major causes of thrombophilia?Question #3: What laboratory methods are useful for the diagnosis of this patient thrombophilia?(there are several possibilities)Question #4: Why molecular test was ordered? Lists possible molecular tests for this patient’s condition. Compare it.Question #5: What are the risk factors for this disease?Question #6: Discuss any current advances in molecular diagnostics for this disease?
Treatment and Causes of Clotting Disorder Condition Questions
I’m working on a nursing question and need support to help me learn.
Use the template attached under class assignments. Use this template to “summarize” the two research articles you are using for your EBP project. The goal is to have a brief and concise summary of your articles. This is a time when you do not want to use full sentences – but brief clear descriptions of each article using the template. If someone had not read your article – this table should be clear enough to provide an overview and general understanding of key features of the research and findings. Additional examples can be found on pages 99-107 in your text. Different templates are used, but it will provide a good overview of the process.
College of Central Florida Nursing EBP Articles Evaluation Table
Strategic Management of Tesco: PESTLE and SWOT Analysis
Tesco plc is a leading global grocery with its headquarters in Cheshunt in the United Kingdom where it is ranked second in this country in terms of revenues and third in terms of profits. This company has stores in more than 14 countries in the world and has employed more than 326000 employees globally. In the United Kingdom, the food and drink retail sector represents the largest industry offering large employment opportunities to people of the United Kingdom and the whole world in general. In the global competition and companies’ pictures, it is of great importance for a company to come up with a strategy that will evaluate its competitive advantage. In this case, PESTEL analysis is used by the Tesco plc. This analysis indicates that, Tesco plc has to monitor and respond to uncontrollable forces that are posed by six factors. These factors include; political, economic, socio-cultural, technological, environmental, and legal. In this essence, these forces influence the macro environment of the Tesco plc. The other aspect which is of great significance to consider when evaluating the competitive advantage of this company is the SWOT analysis. In this respect, the strengths, weaknesses, threats, and opportunities of this company are analyzed. From the analysis it can be learned that the company’s strengths and opportunities neutralize the weaknesses and threats. It can be learned from the analysis that this company has been able to operate a number of stores in the whole world with the major ones being in the United Kingdom. The increased advancement of technology acts as a potential basis for the company to operate online and offer its customers with products from different parts of the world. Introduction Tesco Plc. is one of the largest global groceries headquartered in Cheshunt in the United Kingdom. It is the second largest retailer in the whole world when measured in terms of profits and third largest when measured in terms of revenues. In the United Kingdom, Tesco has a market share of 30% hence becoming the market leader in this country. This company has more than 2318 stores in 14 countries across Europe, Asia, and North America. Tesco plc was founded in the year 1919 by Jack Cohen and the first store was opened in the year 1929 in Burnt Oak. Tesco plc has a flat hierarchical structure where each and every intended action has to pass through the management. There are six levels which are between checkout staff and chief executive. This company has employed more than 326000 employees across the globe where 237000 of them are in Europe where it has its largest private employer. This company has 83 Tesco stores and 447 superstores in the United Kingdom. Tesco plc has been using the strategy of pile ’em high, sell ’em cheap as a way of minimizing production costs. The mission and vision of this company are to offer superior and technical representation and add value to its products and customers by providing highly innovative solutions to their customer’s design, manufacturing requirements, and procurement. This is usually done by improving the quality, productivity, and services to a competitive edge. The grocery sector where foods and drinks are sold represents the largest industry in the United Kingdom. This sector offers employment opportunities to more than three million people in different levels such as primary production, manufacturing, and retailing. In the year 2003, the food and drink retail sector accounted for about 9% of the country’s gross domestic product. In order to increase its competitive advantage, Tesco plc has diversified its production where it supplies clothing and other non food lines. Its own label products are in three levels which include, value, normal, and finest. In addition to convenience produce, most of the company’s stores have gas suppliers hence becoming one of the largest United Kingdom autonomous petrol retailers (Porter 1980: 27). Strategy growth company PESTEL analysis In the process of evaluating the competitive advantage of this company, there are six forces that Tesco has to respond to and which influence its macro environment. These forces include; political, economical, socio-cultural, technological, environmental, and legal factors. In the process of shaping the marketing strategies for the Tesco plc, these macro-environmental factors have been evaluated in both global and domestic markets to successfully penetrate the markets and possess a higher niche in competition (Pearce
Financial Scandals: It Takes More Than One Bad Apple Forum
professional essay writers Link to Article – https://www.accounting-degree.org/scandals/ After reviewing “The 10 Worst Corporate Accounting Scandals of All Time”, in your initial post answer and discuss the following questions, particularly as they relate to your Christian or worldview view perspective: – Who were the principal actors in perpetuating earnings management scandals. Who was a common actor in several of them and why? – What would be the motivations for undertaking such activity at any organization, given the legal consequences of significant jail time and/or fines if caught? – If asked, would you participate in assisting in the earnings management activity; knowing your refusal would result in the loss of your $200,000/year position?. Link to Article – https://www.accounting-degree.org/scandals/ ***THIS IS A DISCUSSION POST SO PLEASE REFER TO 1ST PERSON. PLEASE USE AS MANY SOURCES AS NEEDED. LINK TO ARTICLE IS PASTED ABOVE***
Generalist Versus Specialist Birds
Generalist Versus Specialist Birds.
Go to the Cornell University “All About Birds” website. Once the site loads, type in the name of one of the four birds listed and click “Go”. When the “Results” page appears, click on the picture of the bird you searched. This will take you to a page specifically for that bird. Using the tabs, look at the range map and life histories of each bird. Under the life history tab, you will find information regarding habitat, food, nesting, behavior and conservation. You will need to do this for each bird.Double Crested Cormorant (Cormorants)Great Blue Heron (Herons)Wood Stork (Stork)American Robin (Thrushes)Using the information provided in the website, answer the following questions. If generalist/opportunistic species are widespread and more or less uniformly distributed, which of these species would you categorize as generalists and which might be specialists with narrow niche preferences or environmental tolerance ranges? Pay special attention to the species climate range, presence in densely populated areas, and evenness of their distribution throughout their range. You may want to look at the precipitation, biome, and climate maps across their range. Also, their diet also helps because a specialist eats only one or two things while a generalist may eat several different prey items. I would also suggest you do a Google search of each species to gather more information. Submit your paper to the appropriate folder in the Dropbox area of the course. There are right and wrong classifications on this assignment. 1-3 pages required
Generalist Versus Specialist Birds
research , Antonin Scalia (cms format)
research , Antonin Scalia (cms format).
Research Paper For your research paper, you will develop and test a theory of judicial decision making, using a single Supreme Court justice as a case study. Specifically, you will critically evaluate the justice that you selected for your biography paper and their voting behavior. You are free to develop and test any hypothesis in relation to judicial decision making. For example, you might ask: Is Justice X influenced by his or her ideology in Y cases? Is Justice X influenced by their background Z in Y cases? These questions are meant to be suggestive and are by no means exhaustive. You will be expected to integrate and connect the course readings throughout.Your paper will be structured similarly to the journal articles we will read this semester and must be 10-12 pages in length (not including title page, references, tables or figures), include a title page, 12 point Times New Roman font, standard margins (1” top-bottom, 1” left-right), double spaced, all figures and tables moved to the end of the paper after the references, include page numbers and must cite all references in CMS format. Failure to properly cite material will be deemed to be plagiarism and you will receive a zero for the assignment. Please see the following resource for any questions about CMS format:https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/717/01…Also see the following resource for differences between MLA, APA, and CMS:https://owl.english.purdue.edu/media/pdf/201109281…Papers that do not meet all of the formatting requirements will not be accepted. Papers are due at the beginning of class (within 5 minutes of class starting). Late papers will not be accepted unless accompanied with a documented medical excuse, which the instructor reserves the right to accept or not. Papers that do not meet all of the formatting requirements will not be accepted.It will consist of the following parts:a) Introduction: This should be 1 page or three paragraphs long. It should be no longer than six paragraphs, and always less than 3 pages. You should have no or few citations. Your first paragraph states the puzzle/dilemma to be solved or question to be answered. You may use a famous quote to begin with. Second paragraph summarizes the two sides in the literature about this puzzle/dilemma/question. Third paragraph summarizes your answer and gives a one sentence “map” of what you are doing in this paper.b) Literature Review and Road Map: In two pages or less you cite evidence for the puzzle or question you address. This usually involves citations from the literature, but it may involve actually building the case (in which case, give yourself 3 pages for this section). Then outline the major analogies used to address the puzzle/question, with group citations, led by the major works. This is where you make the case for your paper being an important part of the debate in the literature. There are two sides in every debate. Discuss the literature this way, divide it in two sides. You are adding to one side. Lastly, give a brief road map of what is to follow in your paper (1 paragraph as a transition).c) Theory:Your argument/explanation: State your argument/explanation, beginning with your conclusion, going through your premises and ending with a QED (although perhaps not literally). Make it as simple as possible and use as little jargon as possible. You want people to read it and get it. Use figures, models, analogies here. Indeed, the core point here is for people to understand, appreciate and believe your core analogy about how the world works. That is what we are really arguing about in science.Your hypotheses/predictions. Next derive your hypotheses from your theory above. These derivations must be deductively valid or there can be no testing of your theory.d) Data:i. Your constructs and construct validity: Next you define how you are going tomeasure some of the relationships in your theory/analogy/model. You must prove, or make very plausible, that you have very good constructs for the variables and parameters in your theory/model/analogy. This always requires the use of more analogies, to relate abstract theoretical constructs to real world observable constructs. Be explicit, be precise, and provide proof that your observable constructs can be derived from the abstract constructs in your theory.Your test/correlation/exploration: Explain what you are doing here. Tell the reader what is to follow. If you are conducting a correlation, show how your data analysis will demonstrate that if your theory is true, then this relationship must also be true, thus you have a partial test, using comparative statics, what we call a refutational challenge: that is, if you find the relationship doesn’t hold, we can reject the theory, but if we do find that it holds we can not accept the theory’s hypotheses, as it wasn’t a test. Often case studies are refutational challenges, they are almost never tests.Describe your data. Define your variables and describe where they are from. Be explicit, so that anyone could go back and redo your work. If you dropped cases, explain why. If you were limited in your data collection, or the data is truncated, or whatever, explain it.Discuss any potential methodological concerns and how you resolved them or what to make of them if you did not resolve them.e) Resultsi. Give your results, interpreting them in light of your theory/hypotheses.Remember, you are testing your analogy, in fact you are testing a string of analogies, and you need not worry, at this point, about external validity.f) Conclusion. Here is where you worry about external validity, here is where you step back and LIMIT your findings. You may anticipate criticisms here and provide counter-arguments/evidence. Always conclude with a summary paragraph extolling what you did find, however. Remember, external validity relates to your theory not your findings. Required Texts: Carp, Robert A., Ronald Stidham, Kenneth L. Manning, and Lisa M. Holmes. 2017. Judicial Process in America, 10th Edition. Washington D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press. In addition to the text, there will be cases and other supplementary material posted on Blackboard that is required reading.Attached is syllabus, supreme court databases codebook, examples for the typothesis I will also post some of the assign reading.
research , Antonin Scalia (cms format)