You are admitting a 19-year old female college student to the hospital for fevers. Using the patient information provided, choose a culture unfamiliar to you and describe what would be important to remember while you interview this patient. Discuss the health care support systems available in your community for someone of this culture. If no support systems are available in your community, identify a national resource. scholarly resources needed and apa format.
Update the previously completed sections based on instructor feedback. New Content for Week 3:3. Research Methodology 3.1 Research Matters Define everything including terminology, testing metrics, assumptions, system set up, or lab environment, etc. that may help the readers to understand the experiments that you are designing in order to collect data to answer the research question.3.2 Experiment Design3.2.1 Experiment RequirementsDefine all the requirements and constraints the experiments must follow. Also explain the rationale of each requirement or constraint.3.2.2 Experiment ProceduresDefine the detailed working procedures of the experiments. Using some graphic presentation such as some of UML Diagrams is highly recommended.Be sure to update your table of contents before submission.
CS 698 Colorado Technical University Facebook Artificial Intelligence Capstone
RWS 305W San Diego State University Social Media Effects on Teens Presentation
RWS 305W San Diego State University Social Media Effects on Teens Presentation.
I’m working on a writing presentation and need support to help me understand better.
hello, I would like a presentation about my research paper social media effects on teens, use the draft that you wrote for me, Here is the instructions from my professor Plan Your Presentation and Practice:Just like we plan out the essay, you need to plan out a presentation. What do you want to say? What evidence will you tell them about? What visuals will you use? That’s right, because this is a different medium, you can use more devices to convince your audience. You can inflect your voice, make faces, wave your hands, and (probably more importantly) include pictures and videos. With a presentation, you’re not only being judged on your words, but on how you deliver them. Think about and practice the way you’ll give this presentation. You’re going to want to give the main points from your essay, and reference the sources from your essay, but you don’t want to just read from a piece of paper (we’ve all had that professor, and we’ll never get those three hours back). Shorten your paper to the key points you want to deliver. Give them in a 5-10 minute speech, and keep the audience engaged in what your saying.I would like it 8-12 slides. Also a separate paper explaining the presentation slides and the main keys that I have to talk about.
RWS 305W San Diego State University Social Media Effects on Teens Presentation
assignment helper Sole proprietorship. Sole Proprietorship: A sole proprietorship is a business owned by a single person. Advantages of the Sole Proprietorship: A. Simplicity B. Autonomy C. Sole Gain D. Single Tax E. Shelter Income Disadvantages of the Sole Proprietorship: A. Limited resources B. Unlimited and Unshared Liability Key Characteristics: A. Liability-Liability is totally the sole proprietor’s. Meaning that there is no difference between the sole proprietor business and personal assets they are one and if the business fails or the sole proprietor is sued the creditors and litigants can come after both as if they are one. B. Income Taxes-The sole proprietor and the business are taxed as one. C. Longevity or Continuity of the Organization-If the sole proprietor dies the business goes with him. D. Control-The sole proprietor controls everything in the business. He and/or she can do it all their own of hire someone else to do it. E. Profit Retention-The sole proprietor keeps all of the profits F. Convenience of Burden-There are only a few instances when you have to have a register with the state or federal government. When you run a business under a different name then your own or you supply certain things that require licensure. General Partnership: By definition, is when two or more people come together to run a business. Advantages: A. Partners keep all the profit. B. The partnership is free from Federal income tax. C. Partnerships profits or losses pass directly to the partners as personal income for federal tax purposes. D. Partnerships permit pooling of capital, talent and a sharing of risk. Disadvantages: A. The death of a partner may automatically end the partnership-with serious consequences to all concerned. B. Unlimited personal liability of all the partners. Key Characteristics: A. Liability-The partnership has unlimited personal liability. B. Income Taxes-There is no Federal tax for the partnership, but they can claim their profits and their losses on their personal taxes. C. Longevity -The longevity of the business is based on the contract they had drawn up before the business was started in case of buyout and/or Death. D. Control-The control of the business is based on what the partners agree on. E. Profit Retention-All the profits go to the partners. F. Convenience or Burden-The partnership should have a contract drawn up that describes exactly what each partner has contributited to the business, what share of the profits each partner will receive, duration of the partnership and the breaking up and closing of the business in case circumstances arise. If this is done then a partnership would be a good venture. Limited Partnerships: By definition, the limited partnership is at least one limited partner and at least one general partner. Advantages: A. The limited partner can make a profit without much effort. B. If the company fails, the limited partner only losses the amount they had invested. Disadvantages: A. The limited partner has a very limited control in the running of the business. B. It is very hard for the limited partner to get there investment out of a limited partnership. Key Characteristics: A. Liability-The majority of the liability is taken on by the general partners not the limited partners. B. Income Taxes-If the partnership has two or more of the following things then it will be taxed as a corporation; Freely transferable ownership papers Continuing of life Participation of limited partners in management of the business Very limited liability of the limited partner in the debt of the business if it goes bankrupt (All Business, 2010) (All Business, 2010) C. Longevity-The longevity of the limited partnership is based solely on the contracts drawn up. D. Profit retention-The limited partner gets a percentage of the profits. E. Convenience or Burden-The limited partnership is best for the limited partner if they want to use it as an investment tool. C – Corporation: By definition, the C – corporation means closely held corporation. They are small none traded corporations, usually but not always limited to no more than 30 shareholders. Advantages: A. The closely held corporation is its own legal entity, as long as all the rules and bylaws are followed at the local, state, and/or federal level then there is limited liability. B. Closely held corporations can have benefit health plans, which will be better retirement and health insurance plans then those of non-corporation businesses. C. The health insurance is fully deductible and up to a certain amount of group term life insurance benefits per employee. D. Should a shareholder die or wish to cash out his or her shares, the corporation will still continue. E. It is a lot easier to get investment capital in a corporation then it is in other businesses. F. Employees can be offered stock option plans. Disadvantages: A. Double taxed. Which means after the corporation pays its taxes on the income the corporation makes, the shareholder will be taxed again on the profits they receive from their profits on their shares. B. You must follow the local, state and/or federal laws when it comes to incorporating to the letter. If they are not followed then the shareholders may be held liable for any situation that comes along. C. It costs more to have a corporation than any non-corporation business. D. It takes more time and effort to maintain a corporation then a non-corporation. Key Characteristics: A. Liability -As long as all the local, state and/or federal laws are followed then there is very limited liability. B. Income Taxes-A C-corporation is what is called double taxed. Meaning once the corporation pays the business tax then any profits the shareholders make are then taxed again. C. Longevity -The only way a C-corporation can be dissolved is if it is voted on and agreed to by the shareholders and very careful set of rules are followed. It doesn’t matter if a shareholder dies or cash’s in their shares the corporation continues. D. Control-A c – corporation usually has a president, vice president and secretary-treasurer. Anyone or all of those people control the corporation. E. Profit retention-The closely held corporation’s profit depends on what percentage of stock each shareholder holds. F. Convenience or Burden-In order to form a c-corporation there has to be different local, state and/or federal law that must be followed and certain things that must be done to incorporate the business. S Corporation: By definition, the S Corporation means Subchapter S – Corporation, it comes from the tax code from which it is taxed. An s-corporation is limited to no more than one hundred shareholders. Advantages: A. Since the corporate losses are passed thru to the shareholders, they are able to take is as a loss on their taxes. B. You will have limited personal liability without having to pay high corporate taxes. C. It is a lot easier to get investment capital in a corporation then it is in other businesses. Disadvantages: A. There are a lot of rules to follow and the amount of shareholders is limited. B. It will be costly to set up and follow the rigid set of corporate rules and laws. C. There will be close scrutiny by the I.R.S. D. All shareholders must be U.S. citizens. E. All shareholders must vote for the S corp. F. The corporation can’t deduct the benefits like health and or accident insurance. Key Characteristics: A. Liability-the shareholder is only liable for the debts the corporation has up to how much they have invested. Exceptions Include: 1. If the shareholder guarantees a business loan. 2. If it is ruled by the courts that the business is a scam. B. Income Tax-S corporations are corporations that elect to pass corporate income, losses, deductions and credit through to their shareholders for federal tax purposes. Shareholders of S corporations report the flow-through of income and losses on their personal tax returns and are assessed tax at their individual income tax rates. This allows S corporations to avoid double taxation on the corporate income. S corporations are responsible for tax on certain built-in gains and passive income. C. Longevity-The S corporation is a perpetual entity and is not affected by the death of a shareholder. D. Control-The shareholders, the board of directors and the officers of the corporation all control the corporation. E. Profit Retention-In an S corporation all Officers, the Board of Directors and shareholder-employees must be paid a reasonable salary from the corporate earnings. F. Convenience or burden-Many rules and regulations must by follow the corporation, including the number of shareholders. Also, it can be costly to set and follow corporate formalities. LLC By definition, an LLC means Limited Liability Company. It is a business that brings a partnership and a corporation together. Advantages: A. LLC’s offer pass-through tax statues similar to that of a partnership. B. Corporations are required to hold meetings and record minutes on those meetings each year; LLCs are not. The amount of paperwork needed to purchase assets, open bank accounts or make changes within the company is also significantly reduced in an LLC. C. LLC’s provide owners with a degree of liability protection, such as also provided by a C corporation. Owners of both C Corporations and LLC’s are typically not responsible for the debts and liabilities of the business. Disadvantages: A. Many investors will not invest in LLC’s, because it’s a business structure that is not understood. B. LLC’s don’t have employee stock option plans. C. You can’t switch from an LLC to a C or S corporation like you can switch from a C to S corporation. D. Some states don’t allow single-member LLC’s. Key Characteristics: A. Liability-LLC’s are not personally responsible for debts of the business. B. Income tax-LLC’s are taxed at the personal level. C. Longevity or continuity of the organization-Operating agreement can require a number to obtain interest beyond transferring interest. D. Control-persons and other legal entities composed of persons (such as trusts and other corporations can have the right to vote or receive dividends once declared by the board of directors. In case of for-profit corporations, these voters hold shares or stock and are thus called shareholders or stockholders. When no stockholders exist, a corporation has members who have the right to vote on its operations. Voting members are not the only members of a “corporation”. The members of a non-stock corporation are identified in the Articles of incorporation and the titles of the member classes may include “Trustee,” ”Active,” ”Associate,” and /or “Honorary.” However, each of these listed in the Articles of Incorporation are members or the corporation. E. Profit retention-Members share in the profit are proportion to how they invested in the business. F. Convenience or burden-LLC’s don’t allow single member companies, LLC’s aren’t conducive to employee stock option plans and Investors will not invest in LLC’s. (Haus, 2011) (All Business, 2010) (All Business, 2010) (All Business, 2010) (All Business, 2010) Sole proprietorship
Stanford University Ethical Issues In Business and Accounting Questions
Stanford University Ethical Issues In Business and Accounting Questions.
These Assignments will help you to apply the concepts you have learned from the Reading and prepare you for similar ethical scenarios you may face in the real world. Your responses should include knowledge gained from the readings.Assignment 1: Textbook Ethics CasesRead the ethics cases listed below and answer the questions associated with each.Ethics case 1: “Jail and a German Subcontractor”Read the Ethics Case, “Jail and a German Subcontractor”, on pp. 571-571 of your text and answer the following questions (approximately 1 paragraph per answer):Is this a fair law?If you were the Vice President, how would you ensure that the
company executives and the company itself would not find themselves open
to such problems again?Ethics case 2: “KPMG’s Questionable Tax Shelters” Read the ethics case, “KPMG’s Questionable Tax Shelters”, on pp. 487–488 of your text and answer the following questions (approximately 1 paragraph per answer):Are tax accountants promoting the public interest when they design,
promote, and sell tax shelters that reduce or eliminate paying taxes by
the wealthiest members of society?Is there a difference between tax planning strategies that use
legally sanctioned shelters, such as retirement savings accounts,
different from tax planning strategies that use questionable offshore
tax havens? Explain your answer.Brooks, L., Dunn, Paul. (2017) Business and Professional Ethics for Directors, Executives, and Accountants. (8thEdition). Boston, MA. Cengage Learning.Please see attached file for the instruction
Stanford University Ethical Issues In Business and Accounting Questions
UCLA Hume Mackie and the Problem of Evil Discussion
UCLA Hume Mackie and the Problem of Evil Discussion.
I’m working on a philosophy exercise and need an explanation to help me study.
1- FIRST DISCUSSION. Question : State whether you think the free will defense survives Mackie’s criticism of the free will defense, explaining your reason why or why not.Discussion Board: Hume, Mackie, and the Problem of Evil4040 unread replies.4747 replies.Earlier, we discussed the most popular and intuitive argument for thinking there is a god: the design argument. That argument appealed to our ordinary observations of the intricacy and orderliness of the universe as evidence of a divine Designer. The present argument is the “evil twin” of the design argument: the problem of evil. It’s the most popular and intuitive argument for thinking there is no god. Like the design argument, it appeals to our ordinary observations, but in this case, the observations are of disorder of various sorts – in particular, evils.There are two broad kinds of evil the argument appeals to as evidence of the non-existence of a god: moral evil and natural evil. Moral evil is “person-on-person evil” – evil committed by persons against other persons (or by a person against themselves). Moral evils run the gamut from such horrendous wickedness as genocide, slavery, torture, murder, and rape to the more mundane occurrences of “small” lies and petty theft. By contrast, natural evils are bad things that are caused by impersonal forces, such as hurricanes, tornadoes, tsunamis, plagues, the law of predation (i.e., the fact that the only way for carnivores to stay alive is to kill and eat other conscious creatures), diseases, depression, etc.The basic idea is then that the world is full of moral and natural evil, but a god who is all-knowing, all-powerful, and perfectly good wouldn’t allow such evil; therefore, there is no god – or at least, no god like that. The argument can stated more carefully as follows:1. If an all-knowing, all-powerful, perfectly good god exists, then evil does not exist.2. It’s not the case that evil does not exist.————————————————————–3. Therefore, it’s not the case that an all-powerful, all-knowing, perfectly good god exists.The argument is valid (be sure you can demonstrate this via symbolic logic); so, the only way to rationally resist the conclusion is to show that at least one of the premises is false or otherwise unjustified. Well, why are we supposed to accept the premises?The support for (1) goes back to at least Epicurus (Hume quotes Epicurus in his Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion): “Is he [God] willing but unable to prevent evil? Then he is impotent. Is he unwilling but able? Then he is malevolent. Is he both willing and able? Whence then is evil?” The logic of the reasoning here can be unpacked and stated more rigorously:1.1 If God is all-knowing and all-powerful, then God is able to prevent evil.1.2 If God is perfectly good, then God is willing to prevent evil.1.3 If God is both able and willing to prevent evil, then evil does not exist.————————————————————————————————–1.4 Therefore, if God is all-knowing, all powerful, and perfectly good, then evil does not exist.Premise 2 is supported by observation of and testimony about the evil in the world: we observe, and hear news of, the moral evils of genocide, slavery, torture, murder, rape, kidnappings, etc., and of the natural evils of hurricanes, tornadoes, tsunamis, famine, drought, diseases, depression, etc.undefinedVirtually everyone accepts premise 2 (viz., that evil — i.e., suffering caused by people and by nature) exists. Only the most radical skeptic would deny it. It all comes down, then, to premise 1. To undercut the premise, it would require showing that all the moral and natural evil in the world is necessary to achieve a greater good. Now here we must be careful. Humans are excused for allowing evil because of ignorance, or because of limitations of power. However, there are no limits to God’s knowledge and power. He’s not even constrained by the laws of nature (since he is supposed to have created them, and can suspend them to perform miracles if he so wishes). The standards are much stricter for God than for humans, then: For God to allow evil, it must be absolutely impossible for any being — even God — to get the goods he wants without also allowing for the possibility of evil. Therefore, answering the problem of evil requires showing that for every evil in the world, there is a greater good, such that (i) the good outweighs the evil, and (ii) it’s logically impossible to get the good without allowing for the evil. In other words, answering the problem of evil would require showing that every evil is outweighed by a greater good, and no matter how God could’ve designed the world (different creatures, different laws of nature, different history, etc.), he couldn’t have gotten the greater goods without allowing evil. This is the problem of evil as it is discussed in our readings by David Hume, J.L. Mackie, and Richard Swinburne. Hume and Mackie defend the argument, and Swinburne critiques it. Swinburne argues for a version of the free will defense. According to the free will defense, free will is the great good that God can’t create without the possibility of evil. That is, there is no possible world God could’ve created that contains free creatures that never do evil. However, Mackie is famous for arguing that the free will defense doesn’t work, on that grounds that if people are really free, then there are possible worlds — i.e., ways the world could be or could’ve been — where free people always freely do right. After all, if there aren’t, then that means it’s *impossible* for people to freely do right, in which case they aren’t morally free after all. But since an all-powerful, all-knowing God can do anything that’s possible — i.e., he can create any possible world — and there are possible worlds in which free people always freely do right, then God (with his foreknowledge) knows how to create such worlds (For example, God knows what each possible person he can create would freely do in every possible circumstance. Given this knowledge, he can providentially order history so that people are always in the circumstances in which they would freely choose the morally right thing to do). Therefore (argues Mackie), it was within God’s power to create a world with the great good of free will, and yet without evil, in which case the free will defense fails to deflect the problem of evil. Call this Mackie’s criticism of the free will defense.2- SECOND DISCUSSION. Question : (ii) Explain/define at least one aspect of either signifcant freedom, significant responsibility, or useful life as Swinburne defines them, and at least one way in which this feature makes it unlikely that God can’t prevent creatures with such a feature from doing evil. (If lots of other students pick one particular feature, pick another).(iii) Explain why you think Swinburne is/isn’t right that worlds with creatures like this are better than any world without them. Discussion Board: Swinburne on Why God Allows Evil2323 unread replies.2323 replies.In our previous discussion, we saw that Mackie believes the free will defense against the problem of evil fails, on the grounds that God could’ve actualized one of the many possible worlds at which all free creatures always happen to freely choose to do what is morally right. However, as you’ve now read, Swinburne replies that while this may or may not be true, God can’t actualize the most valuable worlds of this sort. For such worlds contain creatures that have what he dubs significant freedom, significant responsibility, and useful lives. Given how he defines these three terms, it’s supposed to follow that God cannot guarantee that beings of this sort will always freely do what is right, and thus that Mackie’s criticism of the free will defense fails.
UCLA Hume Mackie and the Problem of Evil Discussion