Get help from the best in academic writing.

This Type Of Thinking (Could Do Us In) by Chevelle essay help essay writing website

We all love popping headphones into our ears and listening to all of the new songs we just downloaded. Sometimes what we hear doesn’t exactly stick to our “like” section, but Chevelle’s follow-up CD to “Wonder What’s Next” will pull you in with the song you first play. “This Type of Thinking (Could Do Us In)” starts off with a hard-core rhythm including drums and bass. The lead singer jumps in screaming a single word, “Touch!” The starting song, “The Clincher,” is like waves on the shore of a beach; it’s powerful, exciting, and calming at the same time. All of Chevelle’s songs are similar to “The Clincher” with a rhythmic tempo and the perfect blend of serenity. What completes this album is the catchiness in the lyrics.

“This Type of Thinking (Could Do Us In)” is definitely not a happy, upbeat techno album, nor is it like Paramore. Chevelle is its own composition of Alternative and Metal. The band is very unique with their vocal harmonization and solid beats. Those interested in their album cannot help but dance to every song and will find themselves singing along. Even when songs don’t follow the programmed line-up set by the producers, the playlist still blends together with ease. I would definitely suggest Chevelle to hard-core Alternative/Metal listeners or someone looking for a new music genre.

Research

Do research on the implementation of two large software systems – one that was successful and one that failed. Write at least a 7-page Word document, double-spaced, detailing each system.
Your paper MUST provide the following:
1. An Introduction paragraph describing the assignment and a short description of the two systems selected and whether each was a success or a failure.
2. A Section that describes the first Software System (with an appropriate section Heading) and a description of that Software System to include:
a. What is its purpose?
b. What operations it performs?
c. What are its inputs (resources, interfaces, when used)?
d. What are its outputs (interfaces, data)?
e. The system’s complexity/cost/feasibility.
f. Any constraints or risks found during the research.
3. Five Sections (one to address the Analysis phase, another for the Design phase, another for the Development phase, another for the Implementation phase, and another for the Evaluation phase) with details on what your research discovered (with an appropriate section Heading for each of the five sections). Include any:
a. Success or failures identified.
b. Issues or findings identified.
c. Recommendations or lessons learned.
4. Repeat #2 above for the second Software System.
5. Repeat #3 above for the second Software System.
6. Conclude with a Findings section the compares the two systems. Provide the following:
a. What made one system successful but make the other system fail.
b. What could have been done to make the failed system more successful.
c. What could have been done to make the successful system even more successful.