Thesis Comparing Scarlet Letter And Guilt Essay, Research Paper
Many felons today serve their clip in prison and are so set free. Most of them go on to perpetrate other offenses, without larning the lesson their penalty was meant to learn. the worst penalty possible is anguish and to populate with 1s ain guilt.
In The Scarlet Letter, Hester Prynne is punished by holding to stnd on a scaffold for three hours and holding to have on a vermilion missive on her chest. After a piece she feels no guilt and goes on about her life. Peoples in the community forget about it excessively. Roger Chillingsworth asks, & # 8220 ; Is Hester Prynne the less suffering, believe you, for that vermilion missive on her chest? & # 8221 ; ( Hawthorne 132 ) . Dimmesdale on the other manus, has to populate with his guilt. He is mentally troubled and his guilt lasts the remainder of his life.
Peoples today have no fright about what might go on to them if they commit a offense. They serve their clip and gaol and are so set free. That is why there is so much offense where we live. For illustration many people in the Mafia are caught and travel to imprison. Most of them do non travel for their full life but for a twosome of old ages. When they do acquire out of prison they are still in the Mafia. The lone thing they learn from being in prison is to cover their paths up better. Peoples sh
ould pay for what they do and be punished decently. For illustration, if a adult male rapes a adult female he should be castrated. This manner people would hold fright and non commit offenses.
Anguish is besides a better penalty instead so decease. When a individual dies they don & # 8217 ; t wage for what they have done, they merely die. When they live with hurting, they pay for it. For illustration, a individual whose havds were cut off for stealing something would endure much more that a individual who was rapidly killed. The lone top of being sent to prison is that people are tortured at that place. Many of the work forces who are sent there are raped by other work forces. The recent film Dead Man Walking, was a true narrative about a adult male that was given the decease punishment fro ravishing a miss and killing both her and her fellow. He should non hold been killed but alternatively tortured. He could non take his guilt that subsequently he confessed in cryings.
There are many ways a individual can be punished. The manner our society punishes felons today is non effectual. We need to alter out ways of penalty to more fearful ways that really teach felons what they are making incorrect. The best manner to penalize a individual is torture and to allow them populate with there ain guilt.
Hawthorne, Nathaniel. THE SCARLETT LETTER. Penguin Books Canada Limited: Markham Ontario. 1959
Analysis of Book I of the Republic
Analysis of Book I of the Republic.
The essay (1500 words, footnotes excluded – between 1450 and 1550 is accepted) consists in an interpretive analysis of Book I of the Republic. The paper should focus on the main text: no outside sources or complementary readings allowed.
/ For this first assignment, you must choose one of the following topics: 1) Cephalus’ and Polemarchus’ definitions of justice*. Analyze the definitions of justice provided by Cephalus and Polemarchus. What are Socrates’ objections to their claims? Do you believe that Socrates’ refutation is convincing? Why, or why not? 2) The Thrasymachean Challenge. Provide a detailed analysis of the arguments that Thrasymachus gives for injustice being more profitable, and Socrates’ arguments for justice being more profitable. Do you find the arguments cogent? What is at stake in the confrontation between Thrasymachus and Socrates? Do you think Socrates is successful in his refutation? Why, or why not? Below are related reading questions to help you in your interpretive analysis (*you are not supposed to answer all – or any – of these questions; they are merely there to guide you as you reflect on the topic): 1) First topic: a. What is wrong with Cephalus’ definition? b. What is Cephalus like as a character? What does he represent? c. What is the foundation for Polemarchus’ definition of justice? d. In what ways is Polemarchus similar/different from his father? e. What is the overall lesson one learns from Socrates’ dialogue with these first two characters? Are there flaws in Socrates’ refutation of Cephalus and his son? 2) Second topic: a. What is Thrasymachus like as a character? Why does he react the way he does when he starts speaking? b. In what ways does Thrasymachus differ from the two previous interlocutors? c. Why is he Socrates’ biggest challenge in Book I? d. In what ways does Thrasymachus’ first definition of justice differ from the previous definitions we have encountered so far? e. How does Thrasymachus modify his definition after Socrates’ critique? f. What are the weaknesses in Socrates’ refutation? What are the limits of Thrasymachus’ position?
Essay Help “>Essay Help