First, he wanted to inform and gain support from government bureaus and other agencies that were involved in the implementation of the “final solution” (which was the code word for the systematic, pre determined, plan for the physical annihilation of the European Jews). His second goal was to inform all those present that he had gotten orders from Hitler himself to take full control Of carrying out the “final solution I” Hydride also tried to ease tension between German Civil administers and AS leaders who were occupying the same areas in Poland and some other territories.Hydrides solution for this was to announce that he himself had total control over all areas, no matter whom they were occupied by. (historically. Com) prior to the conference, AS guards and the German Police had already made agreements with those in high command in the German Army to murder Jews in the spring of 1941. It is estimated that hundreds of thousands of Jews had already been murdered and hundreds of thousands of other victims had also been annihilated prior to the implementation of the “final solution”.
The main difference was after he conference there was a system put in place to optimize the number of Jews killed and to ideally have a Jewish free society at some point. As said before, 15 men attended the conference. Representing the AS at the meeting were AS General Reinhardt Hydride, the chief of the RASH and leader of the conference; AS Major General Heimlich M;leer, chief of RASH Department IV (more commonly known as the Gestapo); AS Lieutenant Colonel Doll Coachman, chief of the RASH Department IV B 4 (Jewish Affairs); AS Colonel Bernhard Such¶ingather, commander of the RASH field office for theGovernment General in Krakow, Poland; AS Major Rudolf Lange, commander of RASH Institutionalized 2, deployed in Latvia in the autumn of 1941; and AS Major General Otto Hofmann, the chief of AS Race and Settlement Main Office. Representing the German agencies were State Secretary Roland Frillier (Ministry of Justice); Ministerial Director Wilhelm Kiering (Reich Cabinet); State Secretary Alfred Meyer (Reich Ministry for the Occupied Eastern Territories-German-occupied USSR); Ministerial Director George Illiberal (Reich Ministry for the Occupied Eastern Territories);Undersecretary of State Martin Luther (Foreign Office); State Secretary Wilhelm Stuart (Ministry Of the Interior); State Secretary Erich Neumann (Office of Plenipotentiary for the Four-Year Plan); State Secretary Josef B;heeler (Office of the Government of the Governor General-German-occupied Poland); and Ministerial Director Gerhard Clocker (Nazi Party Chancellery). (sham. Org) At the conference, there were minutes taken, which allows us to read exactly what was said and decided. However, those minutes were tampered by Hydride in order to hide any wrong doings or blame on his art.
One example is that he changed the number of Jews that was listed in some of the surrounding countries. He changed the actual number of 3. 02 million Jews in the USSR to 5 million Jews and changed 1 35,000 Jews in the Netherlands to 160,800. (H. O. F. W.
C) This is probably for propaganda reasons. One shocking part of the minutes is at no point was the question of whether or not the plan of the final solution should take place. It was automatically accepted by everyone, the issues came with how it should be carried out.
[APA] Community Correlations – Health Statistics
Area: Arizona State, City of Gilbert (your data need to be retrieved from this area).
An example was provided by the professor so you can have a general idea how the work should be submitted. Use it to guide towards delivering a quality answer.
For this discussion, you are to use the following website: https://www.census.gov/acs/www/data/data-tables-and-tools/data-profiles/2017/ (Links to an external site.)
On the landing page, type in the name of your state, and then the name of your city or place.
Click on “Get Data Profile”.
On the new page, you will see links to 4 sets of information on your area: Social
Choose any two variables you think might be related and find them by using the links to the related set. In the tables, locate the variables you chose to work with. For example, you could use the number of rooms (in a house) under Housing and household incomes and benefits under Economy.
Find the values for each of your two variables for several years. For example, you might use the number of rooms and household income for the years 2012- 2017.
Use Excel to make a scatterplot and to find the correlation coefficient. You should then have 6 points on the scatterplot, one for each year.
Share your scatterplot and correlation coefficient in your post and use them to address the following in your discussion post:
Why did you think a relationship exists between the two variables you chose?
Based on the Excel scatterplot and output State what type of relationship exists: Negative, positive, or none.
Describe the relationship in words including what happens to one as the other changes. For example, as the number of rooms in a house increases, does the family income increase as well?
Does the statistical information you obtained support or refute your alternative hypothesis that a relationship exists? How?
If you did not find a relationship, why do you think that is?
What is the value to knowing there is a correlation between the variables? For example, what businesses might flourish in a wealthy area?
Would another variable better explain the relationship?
How might the city use such information to make improvements? For example, if you found a relationship between crime and poverty would it make sense to make addressing poverty a priority?
Can you conclude that one variable is causing the other? Why or why not?
Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with citations and references in APA format.