Get help from the best in academic writing.

The Theme of “A Worn Path” “essay help” site:edu Political Science

Instructor Abby Forster In the short story “A Worn Path”, the author Eudora Welty, created a strong theme of undying love with an old woman and her grandson. The main character in this story is called Phoenix; she is an old woman that is narrated from the author trying to make a long journey down a worn path to bring her sick grandson medicine. She will not let anything get in her way from completing her mission and will not give up even though she is not a young puppy anymore.

She is the last living relative to her young grandson and she keeps strong to fulfill his needs and keep him happy. The author uses great symbolism in the short story throughout the entire story. Religion, racism, and true love all play a key role in the theme of “A Worn Path”; it has strong literary elements that take this story to higher limits. The story does not tell us where the mother is, however shows us how strong Phoenix is in her journey with characters making us know how bad racism is and how God is strong with her in her mission.

Anyone that has children would not stop at anything to save them; Phoenix’s journey down a worn path proves it. This story is about a grandmother, Phoenix, walking through treacherous woods to get some medicine for her grandson that is sick that may or may not help him. The story is told in the third-person, “Third-person point of view which occurs when the speaker is not a participant in the story. It has two forms: omniscient point of view and objective point of view. ” (Cited in Clugston, 2010) The author uses a narrative approach with the main character; it shows her thoughts and feelings throughout the entire story.

She speaks to herself with a single purpose, devotion to her grandson in the doctor’s clinic. She must get to him at no cost since she is poor. The story’s theme is about undying love for a grandmother and grandson; it explains her struggles against aging since she has walked this path since the civil war. The narrative story expresses a lot of symbolic characters, first it starts with the name Phoenix which stands for the mythical creature that rises from its own ashes. “The use of symbolic characters throughout the story is explained.

The author provides a critical interpretation and offers different meaning behind several elements. ” (Cited in Clugston, 2010) Phoenix is faced with getting old and losing her mind, she is very afraid of it, but still carries on with the strength of God with her. Religion plays a key role to keeping her mind and strength strong and even beat racism with the characters she met along the way and interacts with. It starts with a cold month in December for the setting that makes you feel compassion for the main character and brings a thought of stagnation and sleeep.

The story’s author sets a picture in your head first, “The setting is rural, a cold, early morning in December in the South. ” (Cited in Clugston, 2010) The main character is a Negro woman that is an old lady and has been through many life situations. The story uses settings to establish many points for the theme and details of wagon tracks used to tell us she is following a familiar path. “On she went. The woods were deep and still. The sun made the pine needles almost too bright to look at, up where the wind rocked. The cones dropped as light as feathers.

Down in the hollow was morning dove- it was not too late for him. ” )Cited in Clugston, 2010, “A Worn Path”, para. 3) This is the “easy part” of her new journey since she will face a hunter and a nurse along the way. She meets a white hunter with a dog; they represent external conflicts that she must deal with. The hunter helps her out of a ditch that she has fallen in, however irony is used since he puts a gun in her face that also resembles racism. She compares her bones to weeds springy enough not to have been broken by the fall into the ditch.

Besides the medicine she has for him, she wanted to make him know he was loved and wanted to give a present. In the end the author made me feel the undying love that a grandmother can have for her grandson. She took a hard path in spite of her old age to make her grandson get what he needed, medicine, and a smile. Her journey faced racism, religion, and death that she overcame with the love she had in her soul, it would not die even if she got hurt. The medicine did not work in the past for her sick grandson, however she thought it might help to cure him with love.

Analyze paper

Analyze paper.

At this point in our examination of ethical theory, we have encountered many arguments. For this paper, I ask you to choose just one of these arguments, analyze it, and evaluate it in significant depth. You do not have to use one of the arguments I have presented in the lectures or in class. If there is an argument in a text we’ve read that we haven’t covered, you are free to reconstruct that argument and select it as the topic of your paper. The prompt asks you to do two distinct things: analyze the argument, and evaluate the argument. Analyzing the argument involves (i) laying out the argument as clearly and concisely as possible,

(ii) explaining how the premises work together logically to support the conclusion, and (iii) discussing every premise of the argument, which may involve explaining the argument (or at least the rationale) for the premise itself if the premise is not a self-evident or obvious statement. In general, the point here is to show that you understand the argument and that you’re interpreting it in a charitable way. Evaluating the argument involves making judgments about the quality of the argument—whether it is a good argument or not. There are, as we’ve discussed, multiple ways in which an argument can be “good” and “bad.” Minimally, for an argument to be good it must prove its conclusion. This, in turn, means that it is valid and sound. But in addition, although a circular or equivocal argument might be valid and sound, they fail to truly support their conclusions. It’s possible to question virtually any interesting argument’s soundness, because interesting premises are never obviously true. So, I expect you to discuss objections to some premise of the argument you choose even if you’ve ultimately decided that the argument is sound.

Essay Help “>Essay Help