This view is shared in a number of accounts (Cold War Warriors, 2010; Le Nouvel Observateur, 1998; The American Peace Award, 2009). At the other end of the ideological spectrum, Leonid Brezhnev became the leader of communist Soviet Union after seizing power from his mentor, Nikita Khrushchev, following Soviet defeat in the Cuban Missile Crisis (Kris, 2004). Brezhnev’s and Carter’s ideologies were to clash at the end of the detente period. The detente period refers to the easing of tensions and competition between powers (The Free Dictionary, 2008).
The fall of the detente is generally attributed to Zbigniew Brzezinski; National Security Advisor under the Carter administration (Le Nouvel Observateur, 1998; Washington University, 1997; Coll, 2005). In his 1997 interview with George Washington University, Brzezinski defended the reintensification of the Cold War by claiming “[it was] either detente across the board, or competition across the board, but not detente in some areas and competition in those areas in which we were vulnerable” (George Washington University, 1997).
The philosopher, Aesop, claimed, “No one can be a friend if you know not whether to trust or distrust them” (Pangyre, No Date). The tenacious personalities of the US and Russian leaders during the Soviet-Afghan conflict dominated the world stage in a masquerade of manipulation and shrewdness, hidden by the age old ideals of ideology. The implementation of realpolitick, puppet presidents and sheer determination to win conflicts during the Cold War still resonates within modern society.
The poor ideological excuses used during the Soviet-Afghan war are continuously being recycled, whilst true ideology has retreated to become the stories of a bygone era. Though the role of individuals in history is generally the product of complex processes and patterns, the instigators of most, if not all of humanity’s greatest blunders are people; however, cuique fortunam in manu ducitur:(each is led by the hand of fate). Appendix Appendix 1. [Brezhnev adorned with his many self awarded medals and honours.
Types of ethical issues in telecommunications from concerns about harmful content
Types of ethical issues in telecommunications from concerns about harmful content.
Technology section and ONE article from the Content section. Please read carefully and follow the instructions that i provided. There are many types of ethical issues in telecommunications from concerns about harmful content (sex, violence, nudity, stereotypes, unrealistic body image, consumerism, etc.) to biased political coverage to privacy issues, network neutrality, anticompetitive business practices, unintended consequences of technology, and more. As Professor Plaisance noted in his guest lecture, the goal of ethics is to anticipate ethical issues before they arise, consider the various stakeholders and your duty to each, and reduce the harm as much as possible. Anticipate ethical issues: For example, what are the possible outcomes and side effects of the decision to create and distribute a TV show about vaccinations? A video game about school shootings? A song that celebrates sexual assault? Facial recognition software? A traffic app that can indicate sobriety checkpoints?
A social media platform that allows advertising targeted to religion or political beliefs? How likely is each possible outcome? Consider the stakeholders: Audience, clients, investors, coworkers, boss, community, colleagues in your profession, customers/clients who rely on your technology, society, etc. What is your duty to each group? How big is the potential harm to each group? Reduce the harm: The goal is to eliminate all harm, but that is rarely possible. For example, a show about suicide might encourage some viewers to seek help but cause other viewers to attempt suicide. An encryption app might help dissidents avoid jail but also help criminals escape justice. Are there ways you can reduce the harm as much as possible? When should the public’s “right to know” outweigh an individual’s “right to privacy?” For this assignment, you will choose two articles to discuss from Ethics Module. Choose ONE article from the Technology section and ONE article from the Content section. Imagine that you are the CEO of the company at the center of the controversy. For EACH article answer the following (1-3 paragraphs per question). Please NUMBER your answers and proofread for grammar and spelling mistakes before you submit! What are the harms or concerns related to the controversy? How serious is the harm? Should the company have anticipated this problem or was it unexpected and difficult to foresee? Do the benefits of the technology/content outweigh the harm? (If there are no benefits, then it would be hard to ethically justify a decision that causes harm!) Who are the primary stakeholders that are affected? Does the company have a special obligation or duty to any of these stakeholders? What are at least TWO different actions you could take to reduce the harm? Would either of these actions potentially cause harm to any of your other stakeholders? What action would you recommend? Assuming there would be trade-offs (reduced harm to one group but increased harm or cost for another stakeholder), explain and justify your decision. Note: There is not one “correct” answer to this assignment. The focus of the assignment is your analysis and how thoughtfully you approach the issue, regardless of your ultimate recommendation.
Essay Help “>Essay Help
Essay Writing at Online Custom Essay
Review This Service