Get help from the best in academic writing.

Support your opinions, criticisms and contributions to the discussion with updated nursing literature.Check the rubric that will be used to

Support your opinions, criticisms and contributions to the discussion with updated nursing literature.Check the rubric that will be used to evaluate your grade.

Define your Task Why are you taking 100W? Why is it required?

Define your Task
Why are you taking 100W? Why is it required? How might it help you be successful in your life? Think of a range of situations.
When you write this lit review, what kind of person do you want to sound like?

What’s at stake? How can you benefit from doing this lit review well? What are the consequences if you don’t do a good job?

Who is your lit review for?What do they know about? What do they expect?
Professional researchers in Psychology
What kind of text?
One part of defining a writing project is deciding which type of document you need to produce. A screenplay, a blog, an email, a report?
Your big project for this semester is producing a literature review. You need to have a very clear of what a literature review looks like, what parts it has, and what the goals are for each those parts before you start writing. You can find more information in the modules on What is a Lit Review? here. There are example Lit Reviews here and here, too.
We’ll talk more about this throughout the course.

Financial Reporting and Analysis Assignment

Support your opinions, criticisms and contributions to the discussion with updated nursing literature.Check the rubric that will be used to Financial Reporting and Analysis Assignment.

It is a case study based on a company “Challenger Ltd” of Australia. Kindly download the most recent

financial report of Challenger Ltd from internet and answer the below two questions. And with the

answers please provide me the downloaded financial report as well.

1. Identify potential questionable accounting numbers

2. Attempt where possible to undo distortions in the numbers provided using footnote disclosures


other information in the annual report

Essay Help “>Essay Help

Instructional materials

Instructional materials.

Purpose: To develop a set of instructional materials/teaching resources for use in your own teaching or you will write a research proposal for a project investigating an area of second language writing. The following describes the instructional material assessment. Students interested in doing a research proposal should contact the lecturer directly.
Word limit: 2000-2500
Task Description:
The focus of this assessment is on the development of a set of classroom materials for a unit on teaching writing skills in a second or foreign language setting. The materials should cover 10-12 hours of classroom instruction time. This can be concentrated in several sequential lessons or spread out over a number of lessons. The materials can be at any level you choose. You are strongly encouraged to develop activities that you can use in your own teaching now or in the future.
As part of the assessment you will be required to provide a rationale for the particular activities used. An essential element for any rationale is a statement of why you are including the activity
and what the expected learning outcome is. This rationale will be based in part on the literature we have encountered over the course of the semester but you are encouraged to go beyond that as required. The assessment is not a research paper but appropriate references are needed, especially for the rationale.
Mark weighting:
Overview 10% Rationale 25% Materials 40% Procedure 10% Evaluation 15%
1. Overview. A short description (100-200 word) of the unit of work, outlining the proposed teaching or learning writing activity and providing a basis for the rationale section. It will introduce the activities that are part of the rationale discussion. A detailed presentation of the activities is given in the Materials section.
2. Rationale. A section providing the rationale for the proposed activities. Start with a paragraph describing the teaching and learning context e.g. EFL/ESP/etc., class profile (i.e. gender, age L1, L2 proficiency, etc.), wants, needs, reasons for learning English, institutional context, and any other relevant details. You should cite references where appropriate. You are not limited to the reading list for material. Why is the activity included and what is the expected learning outcome?
3. Materials. A description of the proposed learning activities, including instructions. If relevant, you should describe the larger learning context, e.g. the type of course in which the materials are embedded. The teaching materials (what the student sees) can be in self-access format or designed for a teacher-fronted class. They should be of satisfactory visual appeal.
4. Procedure. A statement indicating where, how, and by whom the materials will be used. The procedure should be described in such a manner that the materials can be used by anyone.
5. Evaluation. A statement describing how the students’ performance on the unit will be evaluated. Part of the evaluation may be tests and quizzes, though there are many other ways in which you can evaluate the success of the materials.
Format: A paper-based set of material is the norm but you are welcome to develop and present the materials in an alternative digital media. This could be online or in PowerPoint format.
Length: 2000 words of text. Words used in the actual activities or in references do not count toward the word limit. Submit through Turnitin.
Rationale: Breadth and depth of understanding, clear analysis and reflection on the points addressed. Use Hyland (2016) as a starting point to identify relevant literature

Essay Help “>Essay Help

Quality Paper: Models that exist for quality improvement in health care, particularly at the organizational level.

Quality Paper: Models that exist for quality improvement in health care, particularly at the organizational level..

Quality is an area that most healthcare personnel are looking at in every aspect of their job and organization. There are many different models and approaches to measuring and creating a culture of improvement. Choose one aspect of the quality material you have read in the textbook or read in the module or have researched for use for your paper. This is covered in Chapter 7 of the textbook. For this paper, consider what models that exist for quality improvement in health care, particularly at the organizational level. Pick one and provide information on what evidence is available related to the usefulness, effectiveness, and potential application in a healthcare organization. Either draw solely from the research or from a combination of personal experience and research. Reminder: This is a research paper and as such requires that you identify and use additional resources to expand your knowledge on this one of areas of quality. The paper requires APA 6th ed application and includes a title page, abstract and reference page. You need at least 5 references. Please use at least three peer-reviewed resources (professional academic journals) in addition to the textbook. Use material that dated 2007 or later. The paper is to be minimum of 5 pages of text. Please note: A writing assessment rubric will be used when assessing papers. This is included in the reference tools. Please note that when submitting a paper, you are responsible for utilizing the tools introduced in the Writing Reference Tools section on the left. There are good resources available for writing support online and in person. There is an APA guide, OWL on-line, and the grading rubric.

Essay Help “>Essay Help

Policy Decision Memorandum

Policy Decision Memorandum.

Instructions for the Policy Decision Memorandum

The Public Policy-Making Process

Policy Decision Memo


Decision memos are “documents that focus decision makers on a pressing problem on which they need to take action and persuade them to take a particular action using evidence and logic” (Pennock, 2019, p.177).  Decision memos “frame the problem, discuss options for action, and make a recommendation about what to do” (Pennock, 2019, p.177).

This assignment asks you to prepare a decision memo on a pressing issue about a public policy that calls for action by decision makers.  The memorandum must be addressed to a real decision maker in a relevant organizational position that has the capacity to act on the recommendation you make.  You will do two drafts. The first will be submitted to Pearson Tutor Services in MyWritingLab Plus. You will then revise it and submit the second one along with the Pearson Tutor’s comments to the instructor in Blackboard.


  • Read Chapter 10 of Pennock, and pay attention to the examples and comments;
  • Follow the principles outlined in Chapter 7 of Pennock in creating professional quality work;
  • Write this assignment as a memorandum.  The outline for the policy decision memo is on the next page.
  • References and in-text citations:
    1. Provide at least five references from at least three different, balanced sources (such as peer-reviewed journals, books, book chapters, government publications, research reports, etc.);
    2. Make sure the in-text citations match the references;
    3. Use APA properly for the in-text citations and references.
  • The memo is approximately one to two pages long (single-spaced, excluding the references), and should be typed, edited, and proofed (using Times New Roman point-12 and with one-inch margin on all sides).
  • This assignment should be saved in MS Word.  Do not submit PDF files or iWorks documents without converting them to MS Word. 
  • Steps in completing the decision memo:
    1. Save your completed draft paper as a MS Word document and submit it to Pearson Tutor Services in MyWritingLabPlus by 11:59pm, March 19, 2019;
    2. Revise your paper based on the comments from Pearson Tutor Services;
    3. Submit the final memo and Pearson Tutor’s comments to Blackboard by 11:59pm, April 2, 2019.
  • The decision memo is 18 points (or 18% of the final grade), including
    1. 6 points for the draft memo and Pearson Tutor’s comments: You will get 6 points if you submit the Pearson Tutor’s comments on the draft memo to Blackboard by 11:59pm, April 2, 2019.  Per our class policy, one letter grade will be deducted per day for late materials.
    2. 12 points for the final memo: The final memo is due to Blackboard by 11:59pm, April 2, 2019.  I will grade your final memo using the writing (GWAR) and content (problem solving, critical thinking) rubrics. The writing rubric will represent 50% (or 6 points) of the grade and the content rubric will represent 50% (or 6 points) of the grade of the final memo.  Per our class policy, one letter grade will be deducted per day for late materials.

 Outline for the policy decision memo:

To: Name and title (of a real decision maker in a relevant organizational position)

From: Your name and title


RE: The subject should serve as the functional title of your memo.

The memorandum should include the following sections:

Executive Summary:

  • The executive summary allows decision makers to overview the memo quickly.
  • The executive summary is one paragraph. It contains all vital information and should be clear and concise.

Background and Problem Definition:

  • This section brings decision makers up to speed about the problem.
  • This section consists of two paragraphs. The first paragraph provides relevant and precise background information about the problem.  The second paragraph starts with a clear, brief statement of the problem, followed by evidence to support the problem statement and a brief discussion of its implications.


  • This section provides decision makers clear, distinct, and specific alternatives (or options) to consider in addressing the problem mentioned in the previous section.
  • Include two to three alternatives and discuss them using two to three criteria.  Have one paragraph for one alternative.


  • Based on the analysis in the previous section, you will make a recommendation to the decision maker in this section.
  • Have one paragraph for this section in which you state clearly your recommendation and provide the rationale for the recommendation.

References: List all references cited in the paper in the APA format.


Essay Help “>Essay Help

Literary Nonfiction or Drama

Literary Nonfiction or Drama.

Length: Write an essay of three to four (3-4) full pages plus a Works Cited page. Do not go over the page limit by more than half a page. Sources: This essay requires at least two (2) sources in addition to the nonfiction or dramatic work you will analyze. Formatting: Your essay must be typed using MLA formatting: Times New Roman 12- point font, double-spaced, one-inch margins, heading, header, etc. Prompt: Select one of the works of literature that we read for our study of literary nonfiction or drama, and write a literary analysis. Consider the theme of the work, the literary devices (figurative language), or stage directions (for a drama) that the author or playwright uses to convey that theme, as well as how your idea deepens our understanding of the work. You may write about any of the following: • Compare/contrast a literary nonfiction work with a journalistic work (news story) on the same topic • Symbolism or other literary devices in a literary nonfiction or dramatic work • A critical approach to a literary nonfiction or dramatic work (Feminism, Ethnic Studies, Biographical Criticism, Psychoanalytical Criticism, etc.) • Compare/contrast two characters in a dramatic work • The role of the elements of drama in a dramatic work (staging, props, gestures, etc.) • Situational, verbal, or dramatic irony in a dramatic work • Compare/contrast a written dramatic work to a film version Consider the following when writing a literary analysis: 1) Choose one or two works to write about, and identify a particular aspect you want to analyze. 2) Analyze the theme by breaking it into pieces to determine how the author, poet, or playwright develops the theme using literary devices or story/dramatic elements (see suggestions above). 3) Identify specific examples within work or works that illustrate your idea about how the writer uses the devices or elements to develop the theme. 4) Locate a minimum of two (2) sources related to the work or works you selected for your essay. 5) Identify specific examples in the sources that support youridea. 6) Convey the significance of the theme to your audience. Remember these points about essay structure: 1) Use a prewriting strategy to generate ideas. 2) Choose three to six points to develop into paragraphs. 3) Capture your audience’s attention at the start of your essay. 4) Create a thesis that includes your points at the end of yourintroduction. 5) Create topic sentences to begin each body paragraph, and be sure they relate back tothe thesis. 6) Include quotes or paraphrases from the work(s) that illustrate or give examplesof your points. 7) Include quotes or paraphrases from your sources that help support yourpoints. 8) Use transitions to connect your ideas and paragraphs. 9) Restate your thesis in different words in your conclusion. 10) Leave your reader with a parting thought related to your overall topic. Locating Sources: I recommend visiting the SPC Center for Learning Resources (CLR), also known as the library, or the San Antonio Public Library to receive assistance from a librarian, especially if you have never previously searched for sources for a paper. You may also use the online databases from our library. Some of the most useful databases for our purposes include the following: • Literature Criticism Online • Literary Research • Literary Reference Center • Literature Databases • Literature Resource Center • Literature Resources • JSTOR • Academic Search Complete • Google Scholar Do not use Wikipedia, Spark Notes, Cliff Notes, Shmoop,, or similar Web sites as your sources. However, those may be places you can use to locate possible sources and ideas. ^^^ that is the literary work given to me it sis called ” how it is to be colored me” by Zora Neale Hurston

Essay Help “>Essay Help

New Century and KPMG Fraud 2008

New Century and KPMG Fraud 2008.

Description Subject Matter: Description, discussion, and analysis of any fraud related matter that encompasses an accounting, auditing, and/or financial related issue. The matter needs to have a forensic posture (some type of fraud examination by an interested party or authority) so that the suggested discussion areas below can be addressed. Your research will not likely undercover all of the steps and issues which occurred during an internal, regulatory, civil and/or criminal investigation. To the extent your research does not reveal all of the logical steps that likely occurred, identify what the steps you believe might have occurred and how you would have addressed them. Be sure to explicitly delineate between what your research reveals and what your own thoughts and recommendations might be. The purpose of this research is to describe a fraud related matter; understand the forensic accountants and/or other professionals with an investigative interest and the parties they represent; dissect the fraud; discuss the investigative steps; describe the resolution of the issues; and be able to communicate preventive measures.  Every case is different. You may want to emphasize some topics in greater detail than others. You may also want to add topics that are not listed below. Do address each topic in the Roman Numeral categories. Some alpha subcategories might not apply. Regardless, do address Roman Number VII, B&C. Do write your paper in outline form. Clearly label each section of your paper as shown below. I. Facts: Description of the Fraud II. Classify the fraud using the ACFE’s Fraud Tree. III. How was the fraud detected? Copyright 2019 Victor E. Hartman A. Whistleblower B. Internal / External Audit C. Regulatory body D. Self-reporting E. Law enforcement F. Lawsuit G. Other IV. Forensic Posture: What facts, analysis, opinion, and conclusions are being sought and by whom? A. Internal Proceedings B. Regulatory C. Civil D. Criminal E. Other V. Analysis of the fraud: A. How was the fraud perpetrated? Explain in detail. B. What was the motivation of the subject? C. Were controls overridden? D. Economic impact, if any, on the entity. E. Economic gain, if any, to the subject. VI. Internal Investigation: A. Who comprised the internal investigation, if known and if there was one? B. If an internal investigation is merited, who would be the best party to lead? 1. Internal component 2. External component 3. Let the Civil / Criminal Authorities resolve 4. Other 5. Provide your opinion here VII. Investigative Steps: A. Strategy and sequencing of investigative steps. B. Information obtained from individuals. 1. Interviews of critical witnesses or subjects 2. Depositions C. Documents Needed: 1. Internal 2. External 3. Public records Copyright 2019 Victor E. Hartman D. Computer forensics. E. Undisclosed Participation or Undercover Technique Possible VIII. Conclusions and resolutions reached by interested parties, lawsuits, etc. IX. Recommendations: A. Can this be prevented in the future? B. Internal controls C. Fraud prevention recommendations X. Other A. Unusual issue presented B. Ethical issue presented

Essay Help “>Essay Help

should corporations have social responsibility

should corporations have social responsibility.

 Intro – answer thesis: Corporations do have a responsibility beyond profits… agreement with Glasbeek, rejection of Freeman and Garrett (Mr. Galt) P1: Present Freidman and his ideas… (can find more sources here if you want) P2: In Garrett’s book, Mr. Galt does what Friedman agrees with…. P3: Glasbeek counter argument P4: Why I agree with Glasbeek (case study can go here to prove point and other research) P5: Conclusion..

Essay Help “>Essay Help

500 years of Chicano history by Elizabeth Martinez

500 years of Chicano history by Elizabeth Martinez.

What is the essence/spirit of the book? How does it disrupt the mainstream/dominant western lens of how Chicanos/Latinos are viewed? Note: Must use quotes from the text. What is the difference between corruption in U.S. versus corruption in Latin America? How can you tell a Chicano/Latino author wrote this book? Note: Must use quotes from the text.

Essay Help “>Essay Help

Consultancy Report + Presentation

Consultancy Report + Presentation.

Rationale to the assignment

The Consultancy Report contributes 55% to the unit mark. This mark comprises of the report (45%) and a presentation (10%) to the clients (with staff present to assess you) and supporting materials where appropriate or needed.


Before any data collection, you (one per group) must fill in an ethics checklist which can be found here: and this must be signed off by your academic supervisor prior to any data collection.

Learning Outcomes

  1. Critically analyse the body of knowledge appropriate to the project brief to synthesise potential solutions to meet client requirements appropriate to the context within which this knowledge will be applied.
  1. Produce a consultancy intervention, which is appropriately analytical, professional in style and presentation and meets the needs of the client’s brief
  1. Conduct a professional presentation of findings to the client, listening to and dealing with questions in a responsive and sensitive manner
  1. Engage in a process of critical reflection on the role of self and other group members
  1. Work effectively as part of a team, recognising and supporting the needs of the group, taking a lead role if appropriate and managing conflict.

Assignment Brief

The report (45%) is based on the brief that you have been set. It has no set length as every brief is different, but you should look to be submitting around 5000 words.

The report and presentation slides are to be submitted online, if there is a reason why your project does not suit this (e.g. A DVD and small report), please see Andy and let him know to arrange an alternative submission method ASAP.

Because there is a wide range of projects, you have the ability to decide the weighting for each of the assessed areas:

  • Subject Knowledge and Understanding
  • Intellectual Skills including analysis evaluation and critical judgement
  • Subject-specific skills including applications and problem solving
  • Transferable skills including communication and presentation

This allows a greater flexibility for the variety of projects we generally receive. Pay particular attention to this if you are producing multiple items, i.e. a small report and a DVD.

In deciding on the allocation of marks for the Consultancy Report you will need to refer to the Generic Assessment Criteria for Level 6 (end of this document). The only restriction is that there must be a minimum of 10% for any criteria. You need to discuss and inform your supervisor before submission.

Your presentation (10%) is a repetition of some of your report in a new format for the clients. You are assessed on:

  • Appropriate use of visual materials
  • Presentation skills
  • Answers to questions

Memorandum of Understanding

A MoU form must be produced by ALL research teams (1 per team). This tripartite should include:

  • Finalised project brief
  • Agreed time plan including negotiated time and location of presentation (Date and location of presentation)
  • Spending plan for any monies
  • Agreed assessment criteria for the research report (or equivalent product)
  • Signed off ethics checklist
  • Risk assessment(s) if applicable

It is the research team’s responsibility to get the tripartite signed by:

  • All members of the research team
  • Academic Supervisor
  • The Industrial Contact

You should finalise the project brief as soon as possible to avoid any unexpected expansions in the project specification. The MoU will be covered in the first set of lectures.

Essay Help “>Essay Help