ENGL 102 Shakespeares King Lear Questions Discussion
ENGL 102 Shakespeares King Lear Questions Discussion.
This week, I’m giving you a whole series of questions to think about and to respond to. You may opt to address some or all of them, but do not just mechanically answer each one in order with a single sentence or two. Give me clear, thoughtful, well-written responses. ***Read Act I- Act III and answer the following questions. : https://www.sparknotes.com/nofear/shakespeare/lear… and also https://shakespeare.folger.edu/shakespeares-works/…In Act I, Kent advises Lear, “See better, Lear.” Consider the role of vision or “seeing” throughout the play. What does it mean to be blind, or to see?Order versus chaos. Not exactly a minor theme, is it? The play begins in order, with Lear quite literally ordering the disposition of his kingdom among his daughters, and then …Bam! Chaos. Personally, politically, even environmentally. (You didn’t think the storm was just a random weather event, did you?) Discuss order and chaos in Lear.King Lear is simultaneously about both family and politics, about individuals and nations. Considering that the play was first performed in 1606, after Queen Elizabeth’s death and the ascension of James I to the throne, what might Shakespeare be suggesting about family, politics, and the nature of political authority?There are two distinct stories in Lear, the main story and the Edgar/Edmund subplot. Both contrast grateful with ungrateful children, filial love and loyalty with betrayal and selfishness. What is the purpose of these parallel stories, and what is its effect? That is, how does it problematize or clarify our understanding of the play’s theme?I know, heavy questions, but you can do it.Remember, I am interested in your interpretation, so no secondary sources, whether credited or not!
ENGL 102 Shakespeares King Lear Questions Discussion
Santa Monica College Module 3 Thomas Hardys Channel Firing Paper
nursing essay writing service Santa Monica College Module 3 Thomas Hardys Channel Firing Paper.
I’m working on a writing Essay and need a sample draft to help me study.
Read ‘Channel Firing’ by Thomas Hardy which is on page 284-85. Here is my Loom video on the poem. (Links to an external site.) Read the criticism by Holder on the SMC database which is right here. It is also here too.ActionsDrawing upon all of the ideas and concepts that have been covered in class, (mainly in my Chapter One) along with anything you may have picked up from the Harvard Writing Center website…do some real brainstorming, generate a THESIS: and then support that THESIS in a college level paper in which you will ESSAY your ARGUMENT. The paper will obviously draw on the poem and Holder’s analysis for support and will also include a consideration of a counter-argument. No other criticism is to be used. If you need a quick refresher: look at the sample paper in the textbook again: one poem, one critic, one thesis = a paper. In this case the paper needs to be 5 pages. Use the ‘Architecture of an Essay’ActionsundefinedHere’s a video of me going over the Architecture of An Essay framework: Make sure you watch it: Architecture of an Essay video guide (Links to an external site.) The paper is a college level essay, therefore it does not a) tell the plot of the poem….b) summarise the criticism….c) talk about how much you liked/disliked the poem and/or the poet. (Clearly: I liked it/ It was boring: is not an argument, it is merely an opinion: a college paper is not an opinion, it is built from an argument which is reasoned. IF you need a refresher on Developing a Thesis : here’s Harvard. ) (Links to an external site.)Also : this is the Sheridan Baker Thesis MachineActions: you can work through the five step process to build a thesis.It will:a) use the poem to support YOUR ARGUMENTb) use the criticism to support YOUR ARGUMENT.I will be using the English Department’s Grading RubriActionsundefined12 point font etc…as always… regular margins.I don’t like to give a prompt: but to help you and to keep you focused on Hardy and Holder (instead of writing about “Life” or ‘War’ etc…) : here is a springboard for you to jump on and dive into some brainstorming to find a thesis:According to Holder, “Unless the comic undercutting of the original atmosphere of the poem is recognized, along with the irony attached to the figure of God, ‘Channel Firing’ might be read as a fairly straightforward and unrelentingly serious condemnation of humankind for continuing to make war, a judgment coming from within a Christian perspective.” Discuss.All of us are only using two things: Hardy and Holder (the critic): so at some level whatever your thesis you will probably need to understand the above quote. Ignore it at your peril!Reminders: Holder is a critic, he has written a critique. ‘Channel Firing’ gets ‘single bunny ears.’ The poem is a poem, not a story, not a novel, not a book, not a review. Good Luck
Santa Monica College Module 3 Thomas Hardys Channel Firing Paper
Cost-Benefit Analysis, Its Strengths and Weaknesses Essay
Table of Contents Introduction Strengths Weaknesses Conclusion Works Cited Introduction A cost-benefit analysis (CBA) is a key decision-making tool for many western countries. This is why nations that have adopted western political ideologies have also embraced the concept for many decades. Consequently, the CBA has infiltrated different aspects of social, political, and economic development in these jurisdictions. At its core is its ability to inform policymaking decisions (Morgan 9-11). This thinking describes a rational and analytical approach to addressing governance issues (Morgan 9-11). Many instruments are used to support this analytical tool, but they are generally quantitative in nature and rational in thought (Welch 57-59; Florio 83-86). This paper examines the strengths and weaknesses of utility maximization, which is a key tenet of the CBA, through an inclusion of different analytical perspectives, such as ethical thought and the practicality of implementing it in real-life situations. The discussion is largely defined through an understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of the CBA. Strengths One of the most notable strengths of the utility maximization concept is its unique ability to act as a social welfare protection tool. In other words, it is deemed an instrument for exploring social decisions (Welch 57-59). It has also been hailed for outlining a systematic statement of goals through its ability to provide policymakers with a wide range of options to accomplish stated goals. These areas of competencies define its appeal to public policy experts. Unlike other decision-making models, which do not have a predictive capability, the CBA is able to describe the kind of outcomes that policymakers will be facing after implementing different policy options (Hahn 105-106). This predictive capability is only an alternative that requires people to confront the trade-offs associated with each action. These trade-offs could be evaluated at two levels. The first one is the aggregate expenditure option, which allows policymakers to evaluate how many financial resources would be needed to accomplish a specific goal. The other part of the analysis is the detailed level, which allows policymakers to examine individual dimensions of their policy plans. Through this process, they are able to ascertain which option has the least desirable effects and maximum utility benefits. Another strength of the CBA is its ability to identify the advantages and disadvantages of every policy decision. These decisions are classified as either the “costs” or “benefits” of the model. In this regard, the CBA provides an objective assessment of each situation, usually within the context of maximizing social interests, as opposed to self-interests (Brent 55-57). The option with the greatest net benefit is deemed as the “best” option and the most appropriate for the society. Broadly, the CBA approach appears to be a sound model for developing policy decisions because it could help lawmakers to understand whether their choices are appropriate for certain actions, or not. Through this process, the justification for pursuing specific decisions is understood. Similarly, by doing so, it is possible to verify whether the benefits of a specific policy action outweigh the cost, and by how much. Consequently, through the quantification of decision benefits, there is a reliable basis for comparing different policy decisions by analyzing the total cost of each option against the expected benefits (Welch 57-59; Florio 83-86). Get your 100% original paper on any topic done in as little as 3 hours Learn More The strengths of the CBA model have been highlighted in public policy works that stretch back as far as the 1960s when public policy experts, such as Otto Eckstein, used it to regulate water quality in the United States (US) (Welch 57-59; Florio 83-86). It has also been used to address both the tangible and intangible benefits of developing public policies for managing psychological disorders. In this regard, it has been tested for a long time. However, those who have adopted it have identified some significant weaknesses, which are outlined below. Weaknesses One weakness of the cost-benefit analysis is its excessive reliance on the accuracy of information provided by the stakeholders. This information is central in estimating individual costs and benefits of policy decisions. Studies conducted by Florio show that such cost and benefit estimates are often inaccurate and could have a “domino effect” on other aspects of the policy implementation processes (83-86). For example, some of these studies have shown that information inaccuracy may cause inefficiencies in the policy implementation process (Welch 57-59; Florio 83-86). These problems could stem from several areas. However, the overreliance on data from past projects is commonly cited as the main cause (Florio 83-86). Similarly, the use of subjective impressions in undertaking quantitative assessments also poses a challenge to policymakers because it could mislead the in prediction of the effects of certain policy choices inaccurately. Another weakness of the CBA approach is the difficulty in assessing subjective issues considered in policymaking processes. Indeed, not every variable is quantifiable. Therefore, it is difficult to implement a model that takes into account only quantitative factors in the decision-making process because some variables are subjective in nature (Florio 83-86). In line with this reasoning, the cost-benefit analysis is not entirely objective because it ignores costs that relate to intangible benefits and disadvantages of policy actions. For example, in many government projects, the environmental and social cost of pursuing policy decisions is usually overlooked because monetary considerations take precedence (Brent 55-57). Indeed, as highlighted by Goulder and Parry, this problem has been witnessed in how governments control pollution within their jurisdictions (1-2). Lastly, another criticism of the cost-benefit analysis is its inability to merge or align with morality theories (Weimer 29-31). Particularly, theories that promote deontological concepts have been highlighted as being the most incompatible with the cost-benefit analysis because the concept could support human rights violations if they are done to promote others (Florio 83-86; Weimer 29-31). This issue elicits questions about the importance of respecting human rights, and the case when such a principle can be broken. It also explores difficult issues relating to when it is acceptable to violate some people’s rights to safeguard others. Based on these concerns, the CBA model has been cautiously adopted in “sensitive” areas of political and social governance. Conclusion This paper has shown that the CBA model is a practical framework for evaluating government decisions. Based on a review of its inner workings, it appears to follow the utilitarian reasoning. It is difficult to accept this concept as a generally accepted framework for undertaking public policy assessments because it is inapplicable in situations where subjective issues suffice. Although it is easy to dismiss it based on some of these ethical weaknesses, its ability to evaluate decisions in monetary terms means that it could still be of value to the public policy field. We will write a custom Essay on Cost-Benefit Analysis, Its Strengths and Weaknesses specifically for you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Nonetheless, many people could still resist it based on the technocratic illusion that some of its key tenets support. In this regard, the monetary or quantifiable aspects of the model should not be considered a finality in itself; instead, they should be perceived as a necessary instrument for structuring wider political and ethical discussions about public policy concepts. Works Cited Brent, Robert. Advanced Introduction to Cost-Benefit Analysis. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2017. Florio, Massimo. Applied Welfare Economics: Cost-Benefit Analysis of Projects and Policies. Routledge, 2014. Goulder, Lawrence H., and Ian W. H. Parry. “Instrument Choice in Environmental Policy.” RFF. Web. Hahn, Robert, editor. Risks, Costs, and Lives Saved: Getting better Results from Regulation. Oxford University Press, 1996. Morgan, Granger. Theory and Practice in Policy Analysis: Including Applications in Science and Technology. Cambridge University Press, 2017. Weimer, David. Behavioral Economics for Cost-Benefit Analysis: Benefit Validity When Sovereign Consumers Seem to Make Mistakes. Cambridge University Press, 2017. Welch, Don. A Guide to Ethics and Public Policy: Finding Our Way. Routledge, 2014. Not sure if you can write a paper on Cost-Benefit Analysis, Its Strengths and Weaknesses by yourself? We can help you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More
Economics homework help
Economics homework help. The is a paper that focuses on the Global Manager development plan assessment. The paper also requires analysis of skills and competencies to use.,The Global Manager development plan assessment,The Global Manager Assessment, Undertake a self-audit on to identify skills and competencies and based on audit findings, prepare a ,development plan,., PLEASE ANALYSE SKILLS AND COMPETENCIES USING THESE 5., ATTENDANCE, GROUP WORK, CRITICAL THINKING, CULTURAL SHIFT, ETHICS, 1.0 Firstly, this section, self-audit, development plan and personal reflection is limited to 3000 words (+/- 10%). It is that there will be a significant theoretical contribution, for example, if the weakest competency from the peer assessment sheets is ethics, the portfolio shall be driven by the theoretical/literature underpinning about ethics. Mark weighting, 100%, 1.1 Secondly, formatting and presentation. Use Arial or times new roman, minimum size 11 and maximum size 12, full justified. Additionally, presentation must be formal in language and style and must adhere to the structure given above., 1.2. Thirdly, please provide in text citations.,PLEASE TARGET A GRADE BETWEEN 70-79% AND 80-100%,FOR 70-79% YOU MUST HAVE: A good attempt made to undertake a self-audit to identify skills and competencies and also based on audit findings; prepare a development plan suitable for the businesses operating in global business arena. Such efforts are by using analysis of understanding from discussions, presentations or debates with clear supporting evidence of its application. Evidence of literature is present throughout., FOR 80-100% YOU MUST HAVE: A superb attempt is to undertake a self-audit to identify skills and competencies and also based on audit findings; prepare a development plan suitable for the businesses operating in global business arena. Such efforts is by using analysis of understanding from discussions, presentations or debates with clear supporting evidence of its application. Lastly, there is not only clear integration of literature but also the cross-referencing is evident to support the building up of the development plan.,Attachments,Click Here To Download,Economics homework help