Get help from the best in academic writing.

Successful Negotiation paper

Successful Negotiation paper. I’m stuck on a English question and need an explanation.

Successful Negotiation Using Good Communication Skills

Think of a time when you had a successful negotiation. If you do not have experience negotiating in professional situations, you can draw on your experience negotiating with friends, family, and others. Using terminology and knowledge from this module and the assigned readings, discuss how you used two communication techniques to bring the negotiation to a successful close.
Your paper should be 2-3 pages in length and conform to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements (Links to an external site.). Include at least two scholarly references in addition to the course readings. The CSU-Global Library is a good place to find these resources.
Successful Negotiation paper

BUS 402 University of Arizona Global Campus Week 3 Walmart Mission Statements.

Prior to completing this assignment, review Chapter 2, section 2.1 in your Constellation textbook and read the article Answer 4 Questions to Get a Great Mission Statement (Links to an external site.) (Hull, 2013), being sure to review this Fortune 500 Mission Statements (Links to an external site.) Now, turning to the company you selected, research and find the company’s mission statement. Then,State how the mission statement provides guidance for the company’s organizational activities.Evaluate the company’s mission statement per each of the four questions posed in the Hull article as well as your assigned readings for the week.Rate the company according to the 5 star rating system used in the Fortune 500 list, stating how many stars would you rate the mission statement. Explain your rationale.Rewrite the mission statement so that it better addresses the four questions and forms a complete mission statement.
BUS 402 University of Arizona Global Campus Week 3 Walmart Mission Statements

Sullivan College of Technology and Design Understanding Ethics Discussion

Sullivan College of Technology and Design Understanding Ethics Discussion.

I’m working on a law multi-part question and need support to help me learn.

DISCUSSION QUESTIONIdentify the similarities and differences of Aristotle’s virtues theory with Josephson’s core values model. In either case, are the behaviors they outline duties to the self or duties to others? If to others, which others? To what degree do these mimic or reinforce existing law? To what degree might these conflict with existing law? Illustrate these last two with examples.DIRECTIONS: RESPOND TO 5 CLASSMATES Your responses to other’s posts clearly seek to expand, clarify, or question the original post and are not repetitive of others’ responses. More than the minimum number of responses are made with enough time for others to take note of your comments and reply. 150 WORDSMY ANSWER:Aristotle’s virtue ethics and Josephson’s core values are similar in certain ways but different in others. The primary similarity between these two is that they are both based upon virtues and ethical standards. Additionally, Aristotle’s fourteen virtues, including truthfulness, courage, friendliness, and justice are similar to Josephson’s core values of respect, responsibility, care, and trustworthiness (Mayer, et al.,2014). Also, the virtues theory and the core values model are both applicable to different organizational issues. Despite these similarities, the two were invented at different times in history for unique purposes. One difference between the two is that virtue ethics constitutes one list of dependent values. However, Josephson’s core values constitute two lists that are independent of each other.In both Aristotle’s virtue ethics and Josephson’s core values, the behaviors outline duties to others. For instance, one should be respectful, caring, friendly, and be fair to others (Mayer, et al.,2014). The others in both refer to the other individuals around someone. In an organizational setting, it means co-workers, management, customers, and other third parties. In a societal setting, it refers to fellow members of the society such as family members, neighbors, friends, and strangers. Essentially, it describes people, the people who one’s behavior can affect directly or indirectly. Some of Aristotle’s values also outline behaviors that demonstrate duty to self, such as temperance and modesty.It is critical to note that the law is separate from ethics. Moral ethics and law are two different concepts. In certain cases, something that is legal may be unethical in a specific society and vice versa. Josephson’s core values significantly reinforce the existing laws. For instance, it enforces truthfulness and trustworthiness. It encourages people to tell the truth just as the law does when it comes to court proceedings. It also encourages people to play by the rules, obeying the law, and generally acting as good citizens. Essentially, it helps reinforce the law by creating a sense of ethics where people feel it is their responsibility to behave in a particular manner and follow the law. The core values may conflict with existing laws in one way. Under trustworthiness, it encourages demonstrative integrity where people should stand up for what they believe in (Mayer, et al.,2014). Standing up for what one believes in is not wrong. However, if the beliefs are misguided and wrong, then people may end up committing crimes. For instance, if one believes that murder is right then this core value encourages the person to commit murder.Virtue ethics also partially reinforce the law. It does so by encouraging justice and truthfulness (Mayer, et al.,2014). Justice is the basis of the law, and as such, the law constantly advocates for justice and seeks to promote it. While it is not illegal to tell lies, the law sometimes requires that one tells the truth. For instance, when someone is a witness to a crime, truthfulness is critical to promote justice. Justice is also vital to the law. One value that may conflict with the existing law is high-mindedness. The law encourages that all people receive equal treatment. For instance, dismissing specific individuals in an organization may give rise to discrimination that is illegal and against the Fair Labor Standards Act.Nicole,I believe the main similarity between Aristotle’s virtues theory and Josephson’s core values model is that they both advocate and encourage for individuals to have and apply ethical behavior both in their personal being and in their workplace. I believe the main difference between Aristotle’s virtues theory and Josephson’s core values model is that Aristotle’s main purpose of virtues is to reach an end result or a goal. Josephson’s core values model essentially means that individuals have core values that apply both to their personal life and corporate life. I actually believe that both Aristotle’s virtues theory and Josephson’s core values model outline duties to the self and duties to others. I believe Aristotle’s virtues theory can be a duty to other’s because a certain goal that someone could have to make themselves happy, may have to do with someone else’s happiness or attention. I believe Josephson’s core values model can be a duty to other’s as well because people’s qualities and characteristics can make an impact on the way people view them. To an extent, I believe that both Aristotle’s virtues theory and Josephson’s core values model mimic or reinforce existing law. Aristotle’s virtues theory can mimic or reinforce existing laws because his theory is based on the ethical value of certain qualities, or virtues, in a person’s character (Mayer et al., 2014). Aristotle’s virtues theory may conflict with existing laws because of the end results that make some people happy, or some goals that people set, can be completely unethical and illegal. I believe those are rarer cases, but they’re still relevant. A thought that comes to mind is the Columbine High School massacre. I watched a documentary on it from the viewpoint of Dylan Klebold’s, one of the shooters, mother. In the documentary it was explained that these horrible, incredibly negative and dark thoughts were his happiness. Dylan felt most confident and “happy” when he was in a dark state of mind, and hence the result in the shooting. As I mentioned, I believe these cases are, thankfully, rarer, but nonetheless still cases. Josephson’s core values model can mimic or reinforce existing laws because his theory is based on individual’s core values and their decision processes based on their core values. Josephson’s core value model may conflict with existing laws because there are times when people feel as though their core values are being violated with certain laws and their rights. A thought that comes to mind, and was also mentioned in the text, are political figures. The text lists Eliot Spitzer and Bill Clinton as examples, but I (sadly) believe all political figures have to bend some ways and go through secret loops in order to “maintain” their status-quo.Stephanie,Identify the similarities and differences of Aristotle’s virtues theory with Josephson’s core values model. In either case, are the behaviors they outline duties to the self or duties to others? If to others, which others? When reviewing the list of theories amongst both Aristotle and Josephson’s, some of the similarities that I notice between the two would be acting fair. Along with Josephson’s core values, according to Aristotle one of his theories includes righteous indignation, and this is maintaining a balance of your emotions” (Mayer 2012). Those who remain fair typically have emotion or passion behind what they are discussing but also are able to maintain an open mind and make decisions not just based on emotion or over-reaction. Same holds true as Aristotle mentions moderation between consuming food and beverages, moderation ensures others have opportunity to consume, this is also another layer of fair treatment. All but a few of Aristotle’s theories are characteristics of a good leader, but I still find them to be more self-involved than the ones of Josephson’s. Josephson’s are more focused on those who are the followers of that individual but also core values of the company people would want to work for. The text talks about organizations having to clearly define such competencies in order to maintain them and be successful. Clearly defining these values, also helps to ensure that the organization is hiring those who are like minded and share the same values.To what degree do these mimic or reinforce existing law? These mimic law in that each person is expected to maintain at least some level of respect not just to their peers but also to law enforcement and other governmental officials. This also pertains to law since employers are able to be put into litigation for the wrongdoings or mistreatment of employees. Having these core values mapped out and also implemented into company policy can help to ensure that they remain compliant with the ever changing rule and regulations set forth by labor officials. For instance if the company is consistent with enforcing the policies and being fair to all employees, typically they can show the disciplinary succession which led to termination. Just like law, a written record is required to move forward with the consequences.To what degree might these conflict with existing law? Illustrate these last two with examples. One instance of these values conflicting with current law would be justice. How is that clearly defined? As the text states, not everyone’s perception of justice is the same. Crimes that are committed may not warrant an equal punishment for everyone and certain facts may chance the length of the punishment. This may seem like it is injustice, and it’s possible that it is. Another conflicting example would be magnificence. There are laws regarding paying taxes on the funds that you work for. This deduction from wages could limit one’s ability to live comfortably.Eric,1. Courage 2. Moderation 3. Spend Money Well 4. Live Well 5. Pride 6. High-Mindedness 7. Unamed Vitrue 8. Concern for Others 9. Truthfullness 10. Wit 11. Friendliness 12. Pleasure in Personal Conduct 13. Righteous Indignation 14. JusticeundefinedJosephesons Six Core Values:1. Trustworthiness 2. respect 3. Responsibility 4. Fairness 5. Caring 6. CitizenshipundefinedI think that Aristotles virtues were geared more toward a personal improvement. Our in more of his words, goals. Whereas Josephsons (this is a wierd name to say and spell!) are more geared towards an ethical treatment projected towards others. The text utilized an explanation that some folks approved of being good-looking as a core value but that really isnt an ethic. After all the studies were conducted, the six permanent values remained as purely ethical without question. undefinedIt cannot be denied that Aristotle also had outward projecting motivations here as #8 is about a concern for others. Quite frankly, so is truthfullness, friendliness and numerous others. This is a similarity between the two schools of thought. Additionally, are these not ALL aspirations? Are these not ALL self-improvement? Are these not ALL aspects that would make anybody a better person? Both thoughts are an excellent blueprint in how to improve ones self. And as silly as it sounds Michael Jackson said it best. Start with the Man in the Mirror and the rest of the world will follow suite. undefinedTo progress through the question, I think there are some oppurtunities to reinforce law. If a judge is deciding a child custody battle and gives the kid primarily to the mother simply because shes the female, that isnt coinciding with fairness. Or what about an example of charging a white man with a hate crime if he beats up a black man, but not the other way around? That would violate true justice. Sometimes these schools of thought could conflict with existing law. Illegal immigration is a hot topic issue right now. Without doubt, there are more than enough examples of illegals being able to reside in the USA and thereby breaking its own laws and the 6th Core Value.Lauren D, Virtues and values play a big role in our day to day lives; they can shape how people view us, what companies want to hire us and the relationships that we build. While Aristotle’s virtues theory may seem a bit outdated now (because courage in battle is something only soldiers can claim, and magnificence is reserved for royalty) but he had a sound idea that virtuous qualities shape who a person is instead of rules or results. Similar to this, Josephson identifies 6 qualities that seem to be universally recognized as desirable in ourselves, coworkers, friends, and companions. Their virtues are what define them, not the rules or results. Another similarity between Aristotle and Josephson is that they both highlight ethical and moral qualities over more ego-centrical, selfish qualities. Josephson’s values all revolve around duties to others. Aristotle’s virtues of truthfulness, gentleness, wit, friendliness and justice all focus on how to act around other and treat other people. While Aristolte’s other virtues, such as liberality, temperance, and high-mindedness outline duties to the self, they are still deemed ethical. For example, a people who is liberal with their money is deemed more responsible and not a frivolous person. While this value focuses on the self, it is still a moral virtue to possess.Josephson and Aristotle’s theories are applied very differently to the business world because of their differences in focusing on the self versus on others. Josephson’s ideas can more easily be applied to the business world and corporations more than Aristotle’s can. While interviewing for jobs, I have heard many times that companies are looking for trustworthy, responsible, caring employees. Not once have I heard that a company is looking for a magnificent, high-minded, and gentle employee.Our laws revolve around doing encouraging what is moral and virtuous while discouraging what is immoral and lacking virtue. Though the virtues described by Josephson and Aristotle may not perfectly mirror our laws, they do describe a person/corporation that would not violate our laws. Murder is an example of this. While “will not murder” is not a virtue described by either ethicist, murderers do not exhibit gentleness or respect (for human life). Another example is drinking while driving; a person who is found guilty of a DUI does not display the virtues of temperance or trustworthiness.On the other hand, a lack of temperance did not cause the DUI, but instead a lack of forethought and clear thinking did. Many people can enjoy an excessive amount of alcohol without also driving, so the lack of the virtue of temperance is not the main driver for breaking the law. Lisa, Aristotle’s virtue theory outlined fourteen virtues focused on a person’s character, with the goal being happiness. Josephson’s core values model comprises six core values that can be applied using five questions when an ethical decision must be made. A person or a corporation can make this decision. The main difference between the two (besides the number) is that Aristotle’s virtue theory was solely focused on the individual and not what the impact of their actions might be on others.Josephson was primarily focused on how decisions or actions made by either the individual or an organization could impact stakeholders. These stakeholders could be any person or group of people who could gain or lose something from the decision. Additionally, Josephson’s core values model is only applicable when an ethical decision needs to be made, while Aristotle’s virtue theory was to be applied constantly and live a virtuous life.Although these theories differ on the person(nel) impacted by actions or decisions, there are some similarities. For example, both are tied to ethics. Both ideas outline truthfulness – Aristotle in virtue nine and Josephson in core value one. This similarity can also be seen in virtue eight (gentleness) and core value five (caring). While Aristotle’s values may be outdated for today’s society, there is still some applicability and crossover into Josephson’s core values.A portion of Aristotle’s virtue theory and all of Josephson’s core values reinforce existing law. In Aristotle’s list of virtues, justice is the obvious answer in supporting law, along with truthfulness and gentleness. All of Josephson’s core values can be applied to reinforce existing law. For example, trustworthiness and responsibility can be used when following the law. Respect, fairness, and caring can all be examples of supporting anti-discrimination acts. The following Aristotle virtues could be seen as conflicting with existing law: liberality, magnificence, and righteous indignation. These could all be conflicting because the virtues are focused on the self and not the impact on others. For example, for someone to obtain liberality (spending money well) or magnificence (living well), they could steal from others or conduct other illegal acts to meet the intent of those virtues.
Sullivan College of Technology and Design Understanding Ethics Discussion

Purdue University Ford Motors Management Policy and Strategy Essay

cheap assignment writing service Purdue University Ford Motors Management Policy and Strategy Essay.

Companies: To Use For ThisMotorsTesla MotorsCase #16.MotorsFord MotorsCase #18MT460-3: Formulate strategic business decisions from a management, leadership and organizational design perspective. Strategy is often a complex puzzle that requires both leadership and management oriented decision-making, critical thinking and problem-solving abilities. Strategic thinking, in general, requires the understanding of intricate design structures and networks within an organization. Choosing the appropriate strategic approach can be a daunting task, requiring business acumen and professional competencies that leaders and managers possess, such as professional communication (verbal, written, body language), planning, organization, analysis, reasoning skills, persistence, time management, perseverance, and much more. To meet the challenges in this Assignment, you must be ready to use a combination of such professional competencies and business acumen to formulate strategic business decisions from a leadership, management and organizational design perspective. Essentially, you are analyzing a business to construct a business case. To complete this Assignment, your professor will provide a list of industries and companies. You will choose two companies from the list that operate within one of the industries provided. You will assume the role of Chief Operating Officer (CEO) for one of your chosen companies, and the other company will be a major competitor. In a narrated PowerPoint presentation, your goal is to make strategic decisions from a management, leadership, and organizational design perspective by meeting the following criteria:Identify two companies that operate within the same industry from the list of industries and companies that your Professor has provided. You will assume the role of CEO for one of your chosen companies, and the other company will be a competitor that operates in the same industry with similar products. As the CEO, you will make strategic decisions from a leadership or a management perspective. Your audience is the executive management team of your organization.As the CEO, provide a thorough synopsis of your chosen company by introducing the brand, industry, products, target market, etc. Be sure to use leadership abilities to inspire your audience through your communication of this information.From a management perspective, provide a high-level synopsis of the organizational design of your chosen company.From a management perspective, provide a thorough environmental analysis on the state of your chosen industry and your company’s market position within the industry.From a management perspective, analyze the financial condition of your chosen company.From a management perspective, conduct a thorough analysis on your competitor to explain its market position and competitive advantages within your chosen industry.Using strategic decision-making abilities, decide on which of the five generic strategies your company employs, and why this strategy works better than others for your company.From a leadership perspective, explain how your chosen generic strategy positions your company within the market by building competitive advantages against your chosen competitor company.From a management perspective, provide reasoning on the potential for your company to achieve competitive advantage in the market based on lower costs. If your company is not positioned as a low cost leader, explain why not. If it is positioned as a low cost leader, explain why it leads to sustainable competitive advantage.From a management perspective, provide reasoning on the potential for your company to achieve competitive advantage in the market based on differentiating the company’s products from the offerings of rivals. If your company is not positioned as a differentiator, explain why not. If it is positioned as a differentiator, explain why it leads to sustainable competitive advantage.From a management perspective, provide reasoning on the potential for your company to achieve competitive advantage in the market based on being a best-cost provider. If your company is not positioned as a best-cost provider, explain why not. If it is positioned as a best-cost provider, explain why it leads to sustainable competitive advantage.From a management perspective, formulate and explain your company’s offensive or defensive strategy to improve its market position in the next year.From a leadership perspective, design a plan to position your chosen company to be a first mover, a fast follower, or a late mover to ensure competitive advantage.From a management perspective, compare and contrast the advantages and disadvantages of extending your company’s scope of operations via vertical integration.From a management perspective, determine the conditions that favor outsourcing certain value chain activities to outside parties for your company.Use a minimum of three peer-reviewed research resources (including your textbook) to substantiate your thoughts, opinions, ideas, etc.
Purdue University Ford Motors Management Policy and Strategy Essay

Moll’s Name and clothing as a disguise in Moll Flanders Research Paper

What is the reason for the people’s disguise behind the false names and striking clothes which do not reflect the peculiarities of their personalities? Daniel Defoe is a master of depicting the events close to the reality in his books. That is why his characters often try to hide behind false names in order to present their ‘true’ stories of life. The female protagonist of Daniel Defoe’s Moll Flanders can use the masks better than anyone else because she is used to live in false reality using the false name and changing different clothes which do not help to emphasize her identity, but only hide her real nature. Can the false name help to change the destiny? Can different clothes help to become the part of the other social class? The disguise of Moll Flanders’s individuality is her way to the recognition in the society. To understand the meaning of the name for the person’s identity and the meaning of the appearance and clothes for being recognized and accepted in society, it is necessary to analyze the relationship between Moll Flanders’ name, her clothing, and her role in the society. In his novel, Daniel Defoe presents the story of Moll Flanders as the story of a real woman whose actual name is too common for the public to be reminded once more. Moreover, Moll Flanders also does not want to focus on her real name because people gave her another name. Now she is known as Moll Flanders. However, what significance for Moll is hidden in this name? Why does she prefer to hide her individuality behind this common name and a number of others which she takes during her life? It is possible to notice that Moll Flanders uses aliases in order to hide her real origin as she hides her real appearance under different clothes. Moll Flanders understands that to be accepted in society, it is important to look like the representatives of this society and to present oneself as the part of this or that social class. This ‘masquerade’ is complicated with the fact that to gain the definite recognition, it is more significant to be associated with the name of the expensive fabric than to reveal the real name which is known to the lowest social classes.

DeVry University Justice and Equality Creative Representation Discussion

DeVry University Justice and Equality Creative Representation Discussion.

** This is just a simple discussion post/response to the Creative Representation attached.Please post your final creative projects (in a universally readable file format, such as a PDF) along with a statement of your vision for this creative expression and how you seek for it to represent a key issue or aspect of women and/or gender in contemporary society.** For background on how the attachment came about this was the original assignment on how the representation was created: This course’s final project invites students to respond critically and creatively to the National Women’s Studies Association’s national conference theme from 2018: JUST IMAGINE. IMAGINING JUSTICE.The conference was held in Atlanta, Georgia in November 2018. The NWSA Conference travels from city to city each year to host keynote speeches, scholars’ panels, book talks, art events, and teach-ins in different regions across North America. In recent years, the NWSA conference has been in Baltimore, Maryland in 2017, Montreal, Canada in 2016, San Juan, Puerto Rico in 2015, and will be in San Francisco, California in November of 2019.The 2018 theme was unique in that beyond the usual scholarship in history and culture and focus on teaching issues related to women’s studies, the conference more directly engaged the role of art, media, and the imagination broadly in order to investigate the creative potential of looking forward to what could become the future of justice and more just human relations.For your final project in this course: Create a single artistic representation of your vision for the future of justice, with at least some awareness of an intersectional and/or global perspective. You may create this artistic representation “old school” by drawing or collaging on a sheet of paper or poster board a vision of what justice in our world might look or sound like in the near or distant future or you may use various digital technologies to create a digital poster or flyer or GIF or you may create a short (no more than 2 minutes) multi-media piece such as a video or a podcast.Whatever methods you use to express and represent your vision for the future of justice please remember that we all want to see and appreciate it, so save it in a universally readable file format such as PDF, JPG, MP3 or MP4.You may not simply borrow an existing meme or other pre-made image and call it your own. The idea is that you have something unique and original to express, even simply (you are not being evaluated as an artist here but as a thinking, creative human which we all can be!).For example, I absolutely love this GIF created by Libby VanderPloeg (maybe you’ve seen it in the last year as it has made the rounds); however, it would not respect her artistic property nor my own creative and critical vision to simply copy it, or copy it and add a caption or something like that. If I wanted to represent a vision of justice that expressed a similar sentiment, I could (old school) create a poster with construction paper or magazine clippings, or (new school) make a short video where a few friends and I show ourselves supporting each other and literally having each other’s back in turn.The first step in completing this project would be to identify a concept or idea for the future of justice. This could include many common movements or cultural ideas such as:”equal pay for equal work” (a kind of economic justice for women and men across class backgrounds), or#metoo ideals of respecting the voices of sexual assault survivors (the original movement honored all ages and ethnicities and the founders have since made it clear men should be included, too), or”families against mandatory minimums” (a prison reform movement that argues sentencing practices often impact women and ethnic minorities disproportionately), or”there is no planet B” (a common phrase in recent environmental movements that often expresses how environmental justice = justice for everyone)These are only sample concepts. Trust yourself and your vision for the future of justice, and try to enjoy and back yourself in creating something that doesn’t have to meet anyone else’s high artistic standards. Think of it as folk art or craft even if you find that helpful, and be willing to be surprised at what you are able to do.One of the main reasons behind the NWSA 2018 conference theme was to address how beyond looking back and critiquing the past or dissecting current issues that impact women and others around the world, we also need to spend time creating and looking forward to what else is possible in order to bring into reality the circumstances necessary for justice.This project also addresses how we each can create media, not simply be influenced by it.Let’s see what we each imagine our futures could be and how they could be more just.Other sample justice posters, courtesy of public domain art/design project by https://amplifier.org/
DeVry University Justice and Equality Creative Representation Discussion