Get help from the best in academic writing.

Stepping Forward in Stakeholder Satisfaction

Stepping Forward in Stakeholder Satisfaction. I’m studying for my Management class and need an explanation.

Read the “Zappos: Stepping Forward in Stakeholder Satisfaction” case, located on page 475 of the textbook.
Write a four to six (4-6) page paper in which you:

Analyze the manner in which Zappos’ leadership has fostered a culture of ethicalness in the company. Suggest two (2) actions that other companies can take in order to mimic this culture.
Determine the major impacts that Zappos’ leadership and ethical practices philosophy have had on its stakeholders.
Examine three (3) of the ethical challenges that Zappos faces. Recommend three (3) actions that Zappos’ leadership should take in order to address these ethical challenges.
Evaluate the effectiveness of the core values in relation to developing a culture of ethicalness. Determine the manner in which the core values support the stakeholder’s perspective.
Analyze the major ethical challenges that Zappos has faced. Determine whether or not you would have resolved these challenges differently than Zappos’ management. Provide a rationale for your response.
locate at least three (3) quality academic resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and other similar Websites do not qualify as academic resources.

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

Be typed, double-spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA format.
Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

Stepping Forward in Stakeholder Satisfaction

Share this: Facebook Twitter Reddit LinkedIn WhatsApp Abstract Medical ethics is are an exceedingly complex topic and with today’s advancements in technology the debate only gets more intricate and weightier. This paper addresses the current problem of organ trafficking that the world faces today and has faced for several decades. Medical ethics are also discussed in this paper, in the light of changing values within our society and the medical fields. Organ distribution is a practice that has become common in the medical field but finding enough organs to distribute can become a hitch in the process. Finding people who are willing or able to give up an organ is an extremely hard task. Organ trafficking clearly contradicts several medical ethics, such as autonomy, non-maleficence, justice, and informed consent. This why organ trafficking has become such a concerning problem, because doctors must try their best to help people who are in need of organ transplantation but doing so may be killing or worsening another patient’s life. Middle Eastern and Asian countries continue to traffick poor people or even prisoners for their organs, and this situation must be rectified. Organ trafficking oppresses certain demographics and only benefits the few that can afford it. There are countries trying to find solutions to this dilemma, but none have been set into motion. The goal of this paper is to educate people about organ trafficking, and in raising awareness motivate today’s society to continue to work to find a solution to this ethical and medical problem. International Illegal Organ Trafficking Medical Ethics Personally, I believe medical ethics are the collection of moral beliefs and values that all medical practitioners try their best to follow, in respect to the patient and their work. Medical ethics shape the way doctors, nurses, and others involved in the medical field interact and take care of patients. Proverbs 31:8 says “Open your mouth, judge righteously, and defend the rights of the poor and needy,” and doctors must take that into consideration when they take care of their patients, who are, at their core, human beings. In the traditional Hippocratic Oath it states “I will use those … which will benefit my patients according to my greatest ability and judgement, and I will do no harm or injustice to them,” this line especially sums up my belief of medical ethics: that whatever a practitioner may face they must rely on these foundational statements of morality to shape everything they do. II. Medical ethics are moral criterion that are based upon four values: autonomy, non-maleficence, beneficence, and justice. Autonomy is belief that every human has dignity and is respected (Varelius, 2006). Non-maleficence insinuates that the doctor must do as little harm as possible (do no harm) in the process of treatment. Beneficence is the value that all medical professionals uphold, that you are to do good to others and that treating a patient in their best interest is your goal (Beauchamp, 2007). Lastly, justice is universally known as jus treatment of others. In the medical field justice is the idea that the burdens and benefits of treatments must be distributed equally. Within the value of justice comes many debates but the main factors of judgement are fair distribution of scarce resources, competing needs, and rights (Johnson, n.d.). III. Ethical Dilemmas Numerous ethical dilemmas are within the topic of organ trafficking. Namely, that it heavily rests upon the disadvantage of the weakest in society, preying upon their social and financial status to lure them into the trafficking (Harris, 2002). Organ trafficking insinuates the trade of human bodies, based on their worth. Ethically, this issue enforces oppression to lesser classes which exploits the value of justice (Danovitch, 2013). The medical ethical principles addressed in this paper and how they relate to the topic. WORDS: Autonomy, non-maleficence, justice, informed consent. The principle of autonomy is fundamentally rejected in the act of organ trafficking, because it strips any respect for an individual other than the worth of their organs. Non-maleficence is clearly disregarded particularly because the balance between the risks and benefits is very unreliable, specific to each case. Justice is challenged since the poorer/weaker people are targeted by this market. They are manipulated into this market because of their circumstances and in most cases only the wealthy are recipients of organs. Informed consent is contradicted since the people who are coerced into selling their organs aren’t informed of the risks of the procedure. The Medical Dilemma Organ trafficking is an international problem and in the recent decades it has been uncovered in Israel, China, Kosovo, and even in the United States (Rogers, 2019). Israel has long been a hotbed for trafficking, reaching its peak in the 90s and early 2000s. In 2007 there were several trafficking rings exposed, and in 2008 the Knesset law banned purchase and sale of human organs (Klein, 2018). In the past three years, reports from CNN, the WSJ, Forbes, Washington Post and more unveiled China’s practice of mass harvesting prisoners on death row. Kosovo’s Lutfi Dervishi and Sokol Hajdini were convicted again in 2016 (originally in 2013) for illegal transplanting organs in their unlicensed clinic. Dervishi was found to be part of an international criminal organization and using his position as a surgeon to remove patient’s organs (Morina, 2018). An ethically defensible market in organs (Defense vs. Prosecution) DEFENSE: American health officials believe that establishing a monopsony, where only one buyer exists for the products of multiple sellers, could reduce the unfair distribution of organs. That purchaser must take on responsibility for ensuring equitable distribution of all organs and tissues purchased. This marketing method would hopefully curb the rich from using their financial advantage to exploit the market at the expense of the poor (Harris, 2002). Prosecution: In the case of a monopsony, only one buyer (most likely being a national corporation) decides on the distribution and worth of the organs. This automatically raises the uncertainty that purchaser being fair and equitable distribution of all materials. Placing any monetary value on the body quickly negatehuman dignity by placing it at the same level as an economic market. The human body should never be degraded to only a product on the market for profit (Marino, 2002). It is wrong to prey upon people lesser than us for our own benefit (Proverbs 31:8-9, ESV). Personal and Biblical Application I believe that creating a monopsony is a risky way to take on organ distribution. In discordance to my personal definition of medical ethics, the monopsonic structure is something that can be easily corrupted and be used against patients. It is great that the proposed structure is able to free the poor from being the main oppressed demographic, but if the distributor (or people within that work force) become corrupt or manipulative (which is easy in our fallen nature). That is clearly against taking care of the patient and doing their best to help them. I don’t believe that any trafficking is good. In the case of organ trafficking, it places a worth simply on someone’s organs, but in 1 Corinthians 6:19-20 (ESV) it says, “Do you not know that your bodies are temples of the Holy Spirit, who is in you, whom you have received from God? … Therefore, honor God with your bodies.” In that verse we are clearly told that we were worth more than the price of any organ. Organ distribution is an, and it unfortunately is what fuels the trafficking since people become desperate to acquire organs. Organ transplantation is something that has become a norm in our society and crucial to many, but we must work to find a steady income of them without relying on trafficking individuals for parts of their bodies. References Abbud-Filho, Mario
University of Southern California Platos Republic Discussion Questions.

I’m working on a philosophy discussion question and need support to help me study.

Please read the handout attached and respond to TWO of the four below. Both responses should be separate and based off the pdf attached. EACH response should be at least 1-2 can choose any two from the options below. feel free to refer back to the text of platos republicDiscussion Questions for Session 13Deleuze1.What is the simulacrum? How does it exist in Platonic thought, and what does it become for Deleuze?2.What does it mean to “overthrow Platonism,” according to Deleuze? Do you find value and agree with this project?3.Do we see the presence of the simulacrum anywhere in the Republic, and, if so, where?4.What are some contemporary examples of simulacra?need by tomorrow night
University of Southern California Platos Republic Discussion Questions

525 Case Study 2 Success with Agile Project Management in General Dynamics.

Case Study 2: Success with Agile Project Management in General
DynamicsRead the case study on General Dynamics.
The Combat Identification Server (CIdS) Technology Demonstrator Project
(TDP) has been delivered on time, with quality and budget parameters using the
Dynamic Systems Development Method (DSDM). CIdS is a complex system and software
project. The objective is to help clear “the fog of war” by providing a picture
in the cockpit of an aircraft of the position of nearby friendly forces on the
ground. The selection of DSDM for the CIdS TDP was motivated by the Tactical
Datalinks Delivery Team’s (TDL DT) objective to demonstrate that complex
military technologies could be delivered without delay or cost overrun. The use
of DSDM was a bold move, but the CIdS project delivered successful outcomes for
all involved. In the current economic environment, delivering acceptable
solutions on time and at a fixed cost is surely a priority for the Ministry of
Defense (MoD). The success of the CIdS project has provided a good example for
the project management in the defense sector.Write a five to six (5-6)
page paper in which you:
Identify and analyze the reasons why the agile framework has been selected
to use in this project. 
Identify the business problems the project team tried to solve and analyze
how they applied the agile project management techniques to ensure the project
was delivered on time, on budget with good quality. 
Give your opinion if you agree with the approach identified in Question 2.
Justify your response. 
Analyze how the project teams and coaches master the agile methodology to
solve business problems. Highlight the one that you believe is the most
effective and support your answer.
Give your opinion if the agile approach produced more business benefits than
a traditional project management approach.
Give your opinion on the roles of an agile coach in this case and if the
coach is critical to the success of the project. Support your answer.
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch
margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or
school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional
Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s
name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and
the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length. Use the following template APA_Template_With_Advice_(6th_Ed) .docCase Study CIS525_Week6CaseStudy2_General-Dynamics_February-2011.pdf
525 Case Study 2 Success with Agile Project Management in General Dynamics

Using the Reflective Process

Using the Reflective Process. I don’t know how to handle this Nursing question and need guidance.

In a4 to 5-page paper, using APA format and college-level grammar skills, complete the following:

Describe a professional experience that you found challenging and discuss your response to the situation. Provide anonymity to all participants you include in the experience.

Why did you respond as described?
What are your thoughts and feelings associated with the experience?
How did others in the situation feel?

Describe the consequences of your response:

What was the impact on the patient, others, and/or yourself?
What might have happened if you had responded differently?
Explain how your response did or did not support your beliefs.

Identify the knowledge you had or should have had in this situation, and if your response was or was not related to previous experiences.
Discuss what you learned from the experience and explain how this experience was transformed into learning. Discuss if this experience affected or changed your:

Responses in your practice environment; and
Level of competence in nursing practice.

Using the Reflective Process

ENTD321 American Military Computer Aided Software Engineering Tools for Application Development Paper

i need help writing an essay ENTD321 American Military Computer Aided Software Engineering Tools for Application Development Paper.

Assignment InstructionsAssignment 8 Research EssayPurposeThe purpose of this assignment is to explore further topics in object oriented concepts and UML modeling. You will create a short essay on one of the topics listed.Prepare a 3 page (excluding title, abstract, and reference pages) essay using APA formatting techniques on one of the following topics:Using CASE tools for application developmentHistory of UML (standardized by OMG)Future directions for UML and object technologyUnified ProcessAgile DevelopmentDirections1. Create an essay on one of the above topics in a 3 page (excluding title, abstract, and reference pages) essay in a Word file following APA format.2. Include your name and course as part of the word file.Submission1. When you submit your Word file, use your name as part of the file name, e.g., ENTD321Assignment8_FirstNameLastNameYour assignment will be graded with the following rubric:Rubric for AssignmentsPointsContent & Development 50%50/50Organization 20%20/20Format 10%10/10Grammar, Punctuation, & Spelling 15%15/15Readability & Style 5%5/5Timeliness (late deduction 10 points) Optional Total100/100 Powered by Sakai(Opens in a new window)Copyright 2003-2019 The Apereo Foundation. All rights reserved. Portions of Sakai are copyrighted by other parties as described in the Acknowledgments screen.Build Info:Server Time:Users present begins hereToggle users present panelNumber of users present:
ENTD321 American Military Computer Aided Software Engineering Tools for Application Development Paper

Benchmark – Capstone Executive Summary Report and Leadership Portfolio Assessment Description This assignment will consist of two parts: an executive summary of the completed capstone project, as well

Executive Summary Write a 500-750-word executive summary of the capstone project. Include your approach to the capstone project, including design, purpose, goals, and results of your pre- and post-assessment evaluations. The executive summary should be the first entry in your Leadership Portfolio. Leadership Portfolio The portfolio should contain components from at least four previous courses in the Master of Science in Leadership program, such as MGT-605, LDR-600, LDR-630, LDR-640, LDR-612, or LDR-615. Each of the four components should include a 250-500-word summary of how you approached the assignment, the lessons you learned from completing your work, and how these lessons helped shape you as a leader. Please note that it is not required to submit the four course artifacts you are referencing; a well-written synopsis that clearly identifies the course and includes the required elements will be sufficient for the purposes of this portfolio. You may also include an artifact that is not course-related, but may be an additional level of support for the portfolio. Conclude the portfolio with a brief personal call to action. In 250-500 words, describe your professional development plan after you graduate. How will you continue to grow as a leader? Also, identify specific resources, such as professional organizations, mentors, and professional development opportunities that will help you accomplish your plan. While APA format is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

Select all of the best practices for just after an interview.11

Select all of the best practices for just after an interview.11.

Take all the time you need to get a complete interview     Thank the subject for taking the time to come meet you     Send the person a copy of the finished presentation Send a thank you noteTell the person you enjoyed getting to know him or her
Select all of the best practices for just after an interview.11

Essay Writing at Online Custom Essay

5.0 rating based on 10,001 ratings

Rated 4.9/5
10001 review

Review This Service