Get help from the best in academic writing.

Step 1: FORMAT (CSE/Council of Science Editors/ or APA if format is not applicable) STEP2: (UPLOADED FILES): Go over

Step 1: FORMAT (CSE/Council of Science Editors/ or APA if format is not applicable) STEP2: (UPLOADED FILES): Go over analyses, collect a MINIMUM of 5 sources relevant to topic (in instructions), write about project based on analyses included in the uploaded files… STEP2: Written Portion (90% of grade for assignment) DO NOT INCLUDE FILLER SENTENCES, or your grade will be substantially deducted. You should produce a write up (5 pages or less double-spaced) of your research project that includes an introduction that includes relevant background on your topic with a minimum of five peer-reviewed sources. End the introduction with a statement of your hypothesis. You should include a section labeled Methods of Analysis that describes the type of data you have and how you chose to analyze the data. In the Results section, describe the statistical results. This is a good place to include numbers and maybe organize information into tables and figures. The last section is the Discussion and should take your specific results and place them in a broader framework. You should also mention whether your hypothesis was supported or not. Always start the discussion with your key finding and go from there. You should have a Literature Cited section with literature formatted consistently. I don’t care which format you use, just be consistent. Last, have an Appendix where you place a copy of the dataset you used. Introduction (20) • Sufficient background literature • Statement of hypothesis • Literature cited Methods of Analysis (20) • Correct analysis used • Level of statistical rigor • Justification for use of methods Results (25) • Written summary of results • Numbers are present • Tables and Figures Discussion/Conclusions (20) • Statement of key findings • Refers back hypothesis • Placed in larger context Literature Cited (5) • All sources present • Formatting is correct A minimum of 6 sources are needed, and that the significance results need to be discussed. the sources need to be from a reputable science database, either Pubmed, ScienceDirect, or Psychinfo. that’s vital
Efficiency in the Supply Chain. Help me study for my Management class. I’m stuck and don’t understand.

1,500 to 2,000 words
At least 3 references in APA format w/in text citations.
John and Michael, the owners of the Stone Horse Supply Company, are very excited about the new business opportunities their company is going to face. One of the obstacles that they are concerned about is how the business is going to support the growth in customers and locations. With that in mind, John and Michael ask that you prepare a report for them explaining stock-outs and how companies approach and resolve issues relating to growth.
For this assignment, you must submit a report consisting of 1,500 to 2,000 words in which you explain stock-outs and how companies approach and resolve issues relating to growth. For full-credit, you must address the following in your report:

Explain the purpose of using stock-outs to control inventory.
What are the costs associated with using stock-outs?
What is the demand for stock-outs?
Explain in detail the ways to measure product availability.
Explain the importance of the level of product availability.
Provide at least 3 of the factors that affect the optimal level of product availability.
Research and discuss a company that has gone through times of growth and seen the effects of stock-outs.
Provide at least 3 recommendations, to John and Michael, of how not to sustain problems with stock-outs when dealing with an expansion.

Efficiency in the Supply Chain

University of South Carolina Temecula Creek Inn Customer Experience Presentation

University of South Carolina Temecula Creek Inn Customer Experience Presentation.

I’m working on a Powerpoint question and need guidance to help me study.

This is the first assignment as part of your group project! Review the following resorts and select one that you’ll be using for your final project.Resorts:Camelback Resort (Links to an external site.) Splash Lagoon (Links to an external site.)Country Cascades (Links to an external site.)Club Med: Sandpiper Bay (Links to an external site.)Temecula Creek Inn (Links to an external site.)Desert Hot Springs Spa Hotel (Links to an external site.)Every assignment attached to the final project will have the name of the resort in the page header or footer.Using the Touchpoint Template beginning on page 163 in Designing Experiences, you and your group will design four (4) customer touchpoints within your chosen resort. Each touchpoint chart will include:TitleExperience typeDesired reactionExperience elementsDesigned interactionsDesired resultsContributorsCo-creationEnhancementsTransition to the next pointSave your work in a PDF document.Recommendations: design your template in Word or PPT so you can reuse it.Writing, spelling, and grammar matter; proofread your work before you post. Up to 10%-point reduction for writing errors.
University of South Carolina Temecula Creek Inn Customer Experience Presentation

MRU The Shaping of The United States Health Related Views and Laws Discussion

help me with my homework MRU The Shaping of The United States Health Related Views and Laws Discussion.

I’m working on a nursing discussion question and need a sample draft to help me study.

the United States’ health-related views and laws are shaped by social, political, and historical factors that are often part of the larger debate over individual rights versus the collective good.Although this debate reaches beyond the focus of this week’s topic, discuss and weigh in on some of the following issues:Should childhood immunizations be mandatory or optional?Should the government regulate workplace safety, or does this type of regulation stall the growth of companies and the economy?Should higher insurance rates or taxes be used to punish poor health choices (e.g., cigarettes, “junk” food)? Would this be unfair to individuals, or is this fair since all Americans pay a portion of the healthcare costs to care for these choices?When, if ever, does national security trump state or individual rights? In major health pandemics? In cases of bioterrorism or biologic weapons?
MRU The Shaping of The United States Health Related Views and Laws Discussion

Analysing The Hellenization Of Christianity Religion Essay

Analysing The Hellenization Of Christianity Religion Essay. At the time of the Early EkklÄ“sia there was an ongoing conflict between Hebrew Judaism and Hellenic Judaism. The Maccabean war of independence, fought through to 139 BCE, wasn’t just about foreign rule, but also about those Jews embracing Hellenism, a civil war, as it were, between Orthodox and Hellenistic Judaism. Hellenic Judaism was the fusing and harmonization of Greek philosophy and Judaism, where the practices of both Jewish exegesis and Stoic philosophy were followed. Those propagating this Hellenistic Philosophy included the Jewish philosopher Philoi of Alexandria (20 BCE – 50 CE ). Hellenistic Philosophy, as espoused by Philo, was enthusiastically received by the early Gentile Christians, some of whom saw him as a cryptic Christian. Some today believe his concept of the Logosii as God’s creative principle influenced early Christology.iii Mainstream Judaism rejecting Hellenistic currents eventually (at the Council of Jamnia in 90 CE) prohibited the use of the Septuagintiv, leaving the Masoreticv as the only authoritative Hebrew text of the Jewish Bible. Antecedent to this, the Apostolic Decree of circa 48 CE (Acts 15) allowing converts to forgo circumcision made Christianity a more attractive option for interested Pagans than Pharisaic/Rabbinic Judaism which, in response to this quickly-growing Netzarim Judaism, instituted an even more stringent circumcision procedure in response. Hellenistic Judaism continue in existence until Constantine adopted Christianity as the official State religion. Remaining currents of Hellenistic Judaism in all probability, as would be expected, merged into gnostic movements in the early centuries CE. The Hellenization of Christianity was a complex interaction between Hellenistic philosophy and early Christianity during the first four centuries of the Common Era. The initial conflict between these two modes of thought is recorded in scripture; in Paul’s encounters with Epicurean and Stoic philosophers in Acts 17:18, his diatribe against Greek philosophy in 1st Corinthians 1:18-31, and his warning against philosophy in Colossians 2:8vi. Over time, however, as Christianity spread throughout the Hellenic world, an increasing number of church leaders were educated in Greek philosophy. The dominant philosophical traditions of the Greco-Roman world at the time were Stoicism, Platonism, and Epicureanism. Of these, Stoicism and particularly Platonism were readily incorporated into Christian ethics and theology. Philo’s blend of Judaism, Platonism, and Stoicismvii strongly influenced Christian Alexandrian writers like Origen and Clement of Alexandria, as well as, in the Latin world, Ambrose of Milan. Clement of Alexandria, early Christian writer of the second and early third century, demonstrated Greek thought in writing: “Philosophy has been given to the Greeks as their own kind of Covenant, their foundation for the philosophy of Christ … the philosophy of the Greeks … contains the basic elements of that genuine and perfect knowledge which is higher than human … even upon those spiritual objects.” (Miscellanies 6. 8) The Church historian Eusebius, c. 263-339 CE, suggested, essentially, that Greek philosophy had been supplied providentially as a preparation for the Gospel. Augustine of Hippo, who ultimately systematized Christian philosophy, wrote in the 4th and early fifth century: “But when I read those books of the Platonists I was taught by them to seek incorporeal truth, so I saw your ‘invisible things, understood by the things that are made’.” (Confessions 7. 20). This Greek pagan philosophy, now deeply entrenched and mixed within Christian theology, has persisted through the centuries becoming the foundation of Western thought and culture. Many today often blindly view the founding fathers of the United States as purely Christian. One of the most common statements from the “Religious Right” is that they want this country to; “return to the Christian principles on which it was founded”. However, even a little research into American history will show that this statement is unfounded and based on a false premise. The men responsible for building the foundation of the United States had little use for Christianity, and many were strongly opposed to it. They were men of “The Enlightenment”, not men of Christianity. They were Deistsviii who did not believe the bible was inspired truth. Indubitably, the US Constitution is a masterpiece of civil law providing for, among other things, the protection of religious beliefs against Governmental intrusion – allowing “the free exercise thereof”, while at the same time wonderfully preventing the establishment of religious domination via “state sanctioned religion”. It was the latter of these two concepts that most concerned the signers of the Declaration of Independence and Framers of the Constitution, with but tolerance of the former. They wanted to ensure that no single religion could make the claim of being the official, national religion, such as was the case in England. The cultural climate of the time was one in which freedom from the religious domination of the Church of England and Catholicism was desired by the masses, which provided a perfect habitat for those of the “Enlightenment”. The 1796 treaty with Tripoli states that the United States was “in no sense founded on the Christian religion”. This was not an idle statement, meant to satisfy Muslims – they believed it and meant it. This treaty was written under the presidency of George Washington and signed under the presidency of John Adams. None of the Founding Fathers were known atheists. Most were Deists, which is to say they thought the universe had a creator, but that he does not concern himself with the daily lives of humans, and does not directly communicate with humans, either by revelation or by sacred books. They spoke often of God, (Nature’s God or the God of Nature), but this was not the God of the Bible. They did not deny that there was a person called Jesus, and praised him for his benevolent teachings, but they flatly denied his divinity. These Founders of the Constitution were students of the European Enlightenmentix. Thomas Jefferson — author of the Declaration of Independence and the Statute of Virginia for Religious Freedom, third president of the United States, historian, philosopher, plantation owner, and founder of the University of Virginia — voiced the aspirations of a new America as no other individual of his era. He also in his writings voiced his beliefs: ————————— “As you say of yourself, I too am an Epicurian. I consider the genuine (not the imputed) doctrines of Epicurus as containing everything rational in moral philosophy which Greece and Rome have left us. Epictetus indeed, has given us what was good of the stoics; … I take the liberty of observing that you are not a true disciple of our master Epicurus, in indulging the indolence to which you say you are yielding. One of his canons, you know, was that “the indulgence which prevents a greater pleasure, or produces a greater pain, is to be avoided.”” – Jefferson’s letter to William Short, from Monticello, October 31, 1819. ” But while this syllabus is meant to place the character of Jesus in its true and high light, as no impostor himself, but a great Reformer of the Hebrew code of religion, it is not to be understood that I am with Him in all His doctrines. I am a Materialist; he takes the side of Spiritualism; he preaches the efficacy of repentance towards forgiveness of sin;…” – Jefferson’s letter to William Short, from Monticello August 4, 1820. ————————— That being said, it is easy to see that the aforementioned tolerance of religious freedom, was in reality a bulwark for the benefit of “The Enlightenment”, not the “Pious”, and in this age that bulwark being no longer necessary is coming to an end. For two-hundred plus years we, in this United States of America, have enjoyed freedom of Religion so that those of the “Enlightenment” could enjoy their freedom from Religion. But figuratively speaking, the air of tolerance toward Judeo-Christian beliefs is wisping away, leaving the putrid stench of moral corruption and malicious bigotry toward anyone who identifies with Yeshua and the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. “But know this, that in the last days grievous times shall come. For men shall be lovers of self, lovers of money, boastful, haughty, railers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, without natural affection, implacable, slanderers, without self-control, fierce, no lovers of good, traitors, headstrong, puffed up, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God; holding a form of godliness, but having denied the power thereof [emphasis added]: from these also turn away.” (2Timothy 3:1-5). Like the parable of the Kingdom of Heaven of Matt 13; at the founding of the United States of America two seeds were sown. Two hundred years later in these last days the two seeds have grown to maturity. And now the tares are fully distinguishable from the wheat. For the American believers there has been a two-hundred year bastion of grace, to grow into the maturity of the Word, and to shine above the philosophies of this world. And now you see, God had afforded us a little more time in these last days to fulfill His purposes. Not waring in the flesh but; “pulling down imaginations and every high thing that exalts itself against the knowledge of God, and bringing into captivity every thought into the obedience of Christ” (2Cor. 10:5 MKJV) . “For so is the will of God, that with well doing ye may put to silence the ignorance of foolish men: As free, and not using your liberty for a cloak of maliciousness, but as the servants of God.” (1Peter 2:15-16 ASV). Analysing The Hellenization Of Christianity Religion Essay

4-6 page essay

4-6 page essay.

THIS IS THE TEXTBOOK:Title: The Bedford Introduction to Literature: Reading, Thinking, WritingISBN-13: 9781457608278ISBN-10: 1457608278Author: Michael MeyerEdition: Tenth EditionBinding: HardcoverPublisher: Bedford/St. Martin’sPublished: January 2013Assignment:Choose one short story and one play that you believe share a similar theme, and write an essay that explains how both works deal with this theme.Basic requirements:Both the play and the story must be found in our textbook, although they do not have to be ones we’ve read for class.The paper must use quotations from the primary sources (this is discussed below)The paper should contain a minimum of four full pages. That’s a minimum; to engage fully with your topic in a way that would earn an A or a B, you will need to go beyond the minimum.The paper should follow the formatting guidelines listed below.The paper must be submitted to Submit Assignment by 11 p.m. Sunday of Unit FourA note about how to use the term “theme”:It’s important to remember that while a theme can be considered a subject of a work, it’s not a subject in a literal sense. Bishop’s poem “The Fish” and Melville’s Moby Dick may both be about aquatic creatures, but “aquatic creatures” is not a theme—it’s a literal subject, not a conceptual one.What you’re looking for are two works that seem to treat the same idea, concept, or aspect of life. For example, a student might analyze “Story of an Hour” and “Trifles” by showing how both works present the theme of female oppression (now that we’ve used it as an example, please avoid using this as the topic of your paper). In doing this, however, the student wouldn’t just point out that both works address that issue; he/she would show specifically and thoroughly some things that these works have in common, and also some things that they do differently, in regard to how they present the theme. The student might go on to pose arguments or theories about why these authors approach the theme in different ways—what their differences in approach might have to do with their historical context, the limitations of their genre, their personal lives, et cetera.A note about sources and citation:For this essay, you will be expected to quote sufficiently from the primary sources, i.e. the works of literature you’ve chosen to discuss (in our example, the primary sources would be “Story of an Hour” and “Trifles). You will also be expected to follow the MLA guidelines on acceptable ways of quoting and citing sources. If you don’t know what this means, you MUST go to whatever resources are available to you, include the links on the “Further Resources” page of our course, to learn about citation. Failure to understand the mechanisms of citation can lead to plagiarism, which can lead to a zero for the course.Formatting GuidelinesDouble-space the text of your paper, use 12 point Times New Roman or 11 point CalibriLeave only one space after periods or other punctuation marks.Use standard 1-inch margins.Indent the first line of paragraphs one tab space.Put page numbers at the top right of each page except for the first one.Use italics throughout your essay for the titles of longer works like plays, novels, and epic poems. The titles of short works like lyric poems and short stories should be surrounded by quotation marks.In the upper left-hand corner of the first page, provide a proper heading by listing your name, then your instructor’s name, then the course number, then the date (in other words, the heading should contain four separate lines).Center the title over the first paragraph of your essay. Do not underline or italicize or boldface your title.Final note:As you write your paper, please refer frequently to the sections in your book that deal with critical essay writing. You also will want to make use of the writing resources mentioned elsewhere in the course shell, and you will want to familiarize yourself with the grading rubric.
4-6 page essay

Essay Writing at Online Custom Essay

5.0 rating based on 10,001 ratings

Rated 4.9/5
10001 review

Review This Service