stats hw help

PJM 440 CSUGC W3 Quality Management and Small Cell Infrastructure Design Report

PJM 440 CSUGC W3 Quality Management and Small Cell Infrastructure Design Report.

I’m working on a management case study and need support to help me understand better.

Option #1: Quality Management and Small Cell Infrastructure DesignGo to Module 8 and read the expectations for Option 1, then return here for your Module 3 Milestone effort.In Module 3, you are asked as a first step, to familiarize yourself with the Small Cell Infrastructure Design Guidelines. Note that two contract firms were instrumental in the development of the guidelines: Clanton Associates, Inc. and Jacobs Engineering Group. After your review of the guidelines, you are asked to provide your input to the following:Are the current Small Cell Infrastructure Design Guidelines (SCIDG) ones that promote high quality? If yes, how? If no, why not and what should change to promote quality? Support your position with specific references to the SCIDG or current scholarly documentation.What do you interpret to be meant by “quality” from the perspective of the public works personnel, communications companies deploying small cell infrastructure, the contract companies involved, and the public both now and in the future? What support do you have for your position with specific references to the SCIDG or current scholarly documentation?What are the drivers for change, and the barriers to change from the perspective of the public works personnel and the public? Are there competing drivers for change that may impact quality from the public’s perspective? Support your position with specific references to the SCIDG or current scholarly documentation.Submission:Write a paper addressing the Module 3 Milestone questions for the case of The Department of Public Works, Engineering Division for the City and County of regarding the Small Cell Infrastructure Design Guidelines and quality management. Your paper should be 3-4 pages in length, not including the required title and references pages and any appendix if required. For more information see “How do I do an Appendix in APA style?” (Links to an external site.)Support the Milestone paper with a minimum of three current (published in the most recent five years) scholarly sources from the CSU Global Library. This is in addition to any course textbooks, lecture material you decide to use, or the case itself. Of course, you may always exceed the minimum number of sources.Format the paper according to the CSU Global Writing Center (Links to an external site.).Be clear, concise, and focused.Option #2: Total quality management and the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) on Federal RetirementsGo to Module 8 and read the expectations for Option 2, then return here for your Module 3 Milestone effort.In Module 3, you are asked as a first step, to familiarize yourself with the Government Accounting Office (GAO), Office of Personnel Management (OPM) May of 2019, publication of the Federal Retirement: OPM Actions Needed to Improve Application Processing Times. After your review of the guidelines, you are asked to provide your input to the following:Is the current Federal Retirement: OPM Actions Needed to Improve Application Processing Times document one that promotes high quality? If yes, how? If no, why not and what should change to promote quality? Support your position with specific references to the GAO report or current scholarly documentation.What do you interpret to be meant by “quality” from the perspective of the GAO OPM, retirees, Congressional leaders, and the public both now and in the future? What support do you have for your position with specific references to the GAO report or current scholarly documentation?What are the drivers for change, and the barriers to change from the perspective of the GAO OPM, retirees, Congressional leaders, and the public? Are there competing drivers for change that may impact quality from the public’s perspective? Support your position with specific references to the GAO report or current scholarly documentation.Submission:Write a paper addressing the Module 3 Milestone questions for the case of federal employee retirement situation and quality management. Your paper should be 3-4 pages in length, not including the required title and references pages and any appendix if required. For more information see “How do I do an Appendix in APA style?” (Links to an external site.)Support the Milestone paper with a minimum of three current (published in the most recent five years) scholarly sources from the CSU Global Library. This is in addition to any course textbooks, lecture material you decide to use, the GAO report or the case itself. Of course, you may always exceed the minimum number of sources.Format the paper according to the CSU Global Writing Center (Links to an external site.).Be clear, concise, and focused.
PJM 440 CSUGC W3 Quality Management and Small Cell Infrastructure Design Report

Ethics, Law and Cybersecurity

programming assignment help Ethics, Law and Cybersecurity. I need an explanation for this Computer Science question to help me study.

Instructions: There are four (4) topic areas listed below that are designed to measure your knowledge level specific to the social issues of equity and access relative to class, race and gender. You must respond to #2 and select any other two of these topic areas providing appropriate responses in essay form. In most cases the topic area has several components. Each must be addressed to properly satisfy requirements.
State-wide and in most professional industries, there has been a mandate that college students be more proficient in their writing. While this is not a writing class, all writing assignments will be graded for grammar, syntax and typographical correctness to help address this mandate.
Pay attention to what you are being asked to do (see Grading Rubric below). For example, to describe does not mean to list, but to tell about or illustrate in more than two or three sentences, providing appropriate arguments for your responses using theories discussed in our text. Be sure to address all parts of the topic question as most have multiple parts. A verifiable current event (less than 4 years old) relevant to at least one of the topics you respond to is a fundamental component of your quiz as well. You cannot use information from the text book or any book/article by the author of the text book as a current event. Make sure that your reference has a date of publication. For each chapter quiz and final quiz you are required to find and include at least one reference and reference citation to a current event less than 4 years old (a reference with no date (n.d.) is not acceptable) in answer to at least one question. This requires a reference citation in the text of your answer and a reference at the end of the question to which the reference applies. You must include some information obtained from the reference in your answer. The references must be found on the internet and you must include a URL in your reference so that the reference can be verified.
You should type your responses directly under the appropriate question. Be sure to include your name on your quiz. Only the first three (3) questions with answers will be graded. Include your name in the document filename. Your completed quiz must be placed in the appropriate eCollege Dropbox, no later than 11:59pm on the due date. Do well.

(a) Do we, as a society, have a special obligation to disabled persons to ensure that they have full Internet access? (b) Is the argument that by providing improved access and services for disabled persons, non-disabled users will benefit as well, a reasonable argument? Consider that it can be dangerous to reason along this line; for example, suppose that non-disabled persons did not benefit from software applications designed for the disabled. (c) Would that be a reason for not investing in software for disabled people? Defend your answer. Please elaborate (beyond a yes or no answer) and provide your “theoretical” rationale in support of your responses. (comprehension)
Theismeyer described racist/hate Web sites in this chapter. (a) Should Web sites that promote racist speech be allowed to thrive on the Internet? (b) Has the proliferation of these sites increased the incidence of racism on a global scale? Or is the Internet, as some have suggested, a force that can help to reduce racism? Please elaborate (beyond a yes or no answer) and provide your “theoretical” rationale in support of your responses. (comprehension)
The increased use of expert systems (ES) technology in many professional fields has generated some ethical and social concerns. Some ethical controversies surrounding ESs have to do with critical decisions, including life and death decisions; for example, (a) should “expert doctors” be allowed to make decisions that could directly result in the death of, or cause serious harm to a patient? If so, (b) who is ultimately responsible for the ES’s decision? (c) Is the hospital that owns the particular ES responsible? (d) Should the knowledge engineer who designed the ES be held responsible? Or is the ES itself responsible? In answering these questions, you may want to take a look back in chapter 4, specifically the case involving Therac-25. Please elaborate (beyond a yes or no answer) and provide your “theoretical” rationale in support of your responses. (comprehension)
(a) What obligations does the United States have, as a democratic nation concerned with guaranteeing equal opportunities for all its citizens, to ensure that all its citizens have full access to the Internet? (b) Does the United States also have obligations to developing countries to ensure that they have global access to the Internet? If so, (c) What is the extent of those obligations? If not, (d) Why? For example, (e) Should engineers working in the United States and other developed countries design applications to ensure that people living in remote areas with low connectivity and poor bandwidth have reasonable Internet access? If so, (f) Who should pay for the development of these software applications? If not, (g) Why? Please elaborate (beyond a yes or no answer) and provide your “theoretical” rationale in support of your responses. (comprehension)

Ethics, Law and Cybersecurity

Rasmussen College Conditions of Women During the Gestation Period Discussion

Rasmussen College Conditions of Women During the Gestation Period Discussion.

I’m working on a nursing discussion question and need support to help me learn.

Initial Post:Choose one of the research questions listed below.Does telelmonitoring blood pressure in urban African Americans with hypertension improve blood pressure control within the six months of initiation of the medication?How pregnant women newly diagnosed with diabetes (I) experience reporting their blood sugar levels to their healthcare providers?How effective is acupuncture in improving mobility in elderly male stroke patients in comparison to standard stroke therapy?Design a strategy for a review of the literature.Describe the type of articles you want to locate to examine what is known and not known about this research topicSearch for the types of articles you identified relevant to the research question you chose.Save the search history you created and attach to the initial postDescribe at least one strategy you learned during this query process including how this new knowledge will help you with future searches of the literatureSelect one article from your query you believe is most relevant to the research question you selected.Summarize why you believe this article is relevant to the PICOSummarize why this research article is credible and attach the critical appraisal worksheet to this post
Rasmussen College Conditions of Women During the Gestation Period Discussion

Florida State University Cyber Intelligence and Contemporary World Thesis Paper

Florida State University Cyber Intelligence and Contemporary World Thesis Paper.

Phase 1- Identification and Preparation: This is the initial phase of the proposed forensic process and its purpose is to understand how the SCADA/ICS operates. Phase 2- Identifying data sources: This phase is one of the most important phases of the process because it deals with identifying controllers of the system, the type of data can be collected, and where the data can be collected. Data sources need to be identified when any type of attack performed to the system. Needless to say, documentation of the actions taken during this phase is critical and essential for a forensically sound investigation.Phase 3- Preservation, Prioritizing, and Collection: In this phase, the identified data is collected from the known locations, and it is preserved and prioritized for the purpose of repeatability and presentation. In this phase, it is also critical to collect volatile data as it might be destroyed easily. For instance, data can be collected from databases, computer workstation(s), PLC, etc.3 pages APA format
Florida State University Cyber Intelligence and Contemporary World Thesis Paper