I’m working on a wellness writing question and need guidance to help me learn.
As a culmination project which demonstrates comprehensive understanding and integration of the IHW curriculum, students will develop a health and wellness manual. The goal is to have an electronic resource of evidence-based strategies and materials to use in your future practice. Students are encouraged to design a well-organized manual, and use a unique/imaginative approach to design for a visually attractive product. The manual should include the following:Table of contentsCoaching philosophy statement/paragraphThorough description (which may include pictures or other visuals) of 20 evidence-based strategies, theories, or concepts the student plans to use in their future health practice. Citations are required.Utilize American Medical Association (AMA) writing style.**I HAVE ATTACHED AN EXAMPLE
Health & Wellness Manual
Please Follow all Instructions PAPER must be written professionally Due Dates Your paper uploaded to Canvas by Thursday October 22, 5 pmComment on Student Paper posted on Canvas by Sunday, October 25, midnightLength2.5-3 pages (do not including your personal information; the writing should itself should be 2.5 pages minimum. No fillers)Formatdouble-spaced, times new roman font, 1-inch margins all around. Please use word for your papers. I have a hard time opening and commenting on other formatsPercentage of GradeThis assignment is 100 points or 30% of your grade. Part I. Paper Prompt (80 points)For this short paper, think about issues we have examined in first few weeks of class (readings and films) to think about issues of women, gender and political participation and leadership in relation to the 2020 elections (both at the primary level (past) and the general election (in November)).You will identity two campaigns to follow and conduct an intersectional analysis of race, gender, sexuality, citizenship and class of the elections. You MUST do some light research and find an issue of interest to you. You can use newspaper articles, peer-reviewed academic journal articles, radio shows dedicated to the topic, TV shows, or only credible on-line publications as you do research. (please avoid random individual blog posts, wiki pages and other such writings). You MUST include either the link or the citation of the source at the end of your paper. So, for example, you may choose to look at one of the following issues:How does the topic of gender, feminism or women’s rights figure in election debates of your choice?What issues seem to matter to female candidates of color and white female candidates? Differences? Similarities? (you don’t have to contrast and compare them—it’s just an idea)What are some of the barriers and life experiences do female candidates have to overcome and how do they contrast with their opponent (if not a female candidate)how do various media sources portray female candidates compared to their male counterparts? What gendered discourse do they use?What are the key differences between feminist and conservative women in various races? What issues matter to conservative and progressive women? How does each group approach their being female candidates? Where do they converge and diverge? Does race/class/region/career/religion shape conservativism and progressivism? (again, you don’t have to do them all…these are just to get you going)What is the role of women behind the scenes of campaigns, as managers, organizers, supporters?How do women’s rights and LGBTQI issues figure in this election cycles?How do trans rights figure in this election cycle?How has Black Lives Matter shaped the way the candidates address race, gender and policing?How is reproductive rights playing out this election? Where do conservative candidates and progressive candidates fall on this issue? If they are both pro choice, is there a difference in where they draw the line? If the women are from the red states, how do they navigate the rise of anti-abortion laws in red states.Why do voters perceive female candidates?How do different candidates across racial, class and gender lines treat the Covid-19 crisis?Something else of your choice (needs approval).You can approach your topic numerous ways. For example, you can look at:Media and representation: You can conduct an intersectional comparison of one media source and its treatment of two candidates (could be male-female/conservative-feminist/cisgender-noncisgender/single-married/white-nonwhite/two different candidates of color/straight-queer etc.). You can compare two or more media sources in how they treat one female candidate (depending on the media’s political orientation, what matters or is ignored about candidates may vary).Policy: You can look closely at two candidates’ specific policies that matter to women/feminism comparing and contrasting their differences (obvious one is abortion but you can also look at policing, health care, housing, child care, family leave, the environment, job creation, militarism, immigration etc.).Voters: You can look at what matters to female voters and see how they perceive the candidates on policy, character, etc.What kind of things can you evaluate to answer your questions? Again, many things:Campaign speechesCampaign websitesInterview your friends and relativesLook at national pollsEvaluate news sources such as talk shows or news coverage or newspaper headlines or feature stories for their words, images, etc. in how they cover candidatesFollow political blogsFollow supporters’ content on Youtube or other social media“Attend” political eventsIn your paper, be sure to:have a hook for your introduction so you draw in the reader and clearly state your topic and the question you set out to answer early in the paper. In order to do be clear about your topic, you will need to spend time thinking about the most important details readers need to know, which is harder than it seems, so take your time and revise and talk to me).explain and define key terms, provide relevant background information and context about the candidates, campaigns, policies, media sources etc. that you refer to. Imagine that explaining your project to an alien visiting earth and has no idea what concepts like elections, politics, feminism, conservatism mean let alone what candidates you are talking about so be sure to cover the basics and don’t assume your reader is on the same page.have some kind of argument/thesis/claim about your topic based on your analysis, even if it is light researchdraw on at least one legitimate outside source (articles, books, in-depth magazine features) that discusses your topic and guides your analysisconnect your topic to the themes and issues in at least at least 2 relevant course materials (This could be 2 readings or 1 reading and one film) we covered in class such as feminism, oppression, power, resistance, intersectionality, reforming institutions form within or without, agency, etc. Make sure you discuss how/why this issue has some significance for women’s/gender issues in the contemporary U.S. Don’t just randomly stick in a quote that does help you build a strong analysis.Edit your papers. Editing Checklist:Use author full name the first time you mention them and then use last name (no first name in papers)Cite your sources properly, including author last, page number where you got quotes or ideas, and works cited pagelimit your direct quotes to 2-3 lines max.Organize your paragraphs clearly making sure to:use clear topic sentences that summarize the key point in the paragraphinclude supporting sentences that lend support to your topic sentencestick to one key point per paragraphlimit paragraph length to 6-7 sentences maxhave good transitioning sentences between paragraphspay special attention to run on sentences, sentence fragments, ambiguous pronoun use, passive voice sentence constructions, and spelling errorsPart II. Commenting on another student’s paper (20 points)You will be randomly assigned one student /paper to review and respond to (1/2 paragraph or so). You may comment on how your own paper to the topic that this student is writing about; what is similar to or different from the issues your paper examines. You could also relate your peer’s paper to the readings. Or, if you know nothing about the topic, pick one think that interested you and respond substantially about why it caught your attention and what larger issue it makes you think about. You don’t have to love the paper—you just need to be thoughtful about its content. You will receive student papers automatically on October 22. Please respond to your peer by midnight on Sunday October 25.Rubric
Gender in the 2020 Elections and Comments on another student paper Prompt
LU MGT And Its Impact on Organizational Efficiency Problem Statement Outline
LU MGT And Its Impact on Organizational Efficiency Problem Statement Outline.
My Research Topic is: Management and its impact on organizational efficiency.Task 1: Problem Statement OutlineUsing the White Paper titled Simple but Effective Problem Statements and Research Questions asa guide, develop a bullet point outline for the problem statement. Each bullet should be a singlesentence. Following the specific problem sentence include a short sentence describing how thisproblem is related to your cognate. Finally, add APA formatted references for the supportingreference sentences. Following the outline, you will provide an annotated bibliography for eachreference provided. You will post your submission in the assignment text window, and as a worddocument.You will post your submission in the assignment text window and as a word document. Title yourword document as follows: LastName_Task 1 Bullet Point Outline_DDMMMYY.docxYour submission will include the following:Title Block Last Name, First Name Cognate Research Track (Project or Dissertation) Research Paradigm Planned Research Design (Case Study, Correlational, etc.) Proposed TopicProblem Statement Bullet Outline General Problem Sentenceo Supporting Reference Sentence with Current Citation (< 5 years)o Supporting Reference Sentence with Current Citation (< 5 years)o Supporting Reference Sentence with Current Citation (< 5 years)o Supporting Reference Sentence with Current Citation (< 5 years, optional bridgesupporting references sentence, see problem statement white paper) Specific Problem Sentence Relationship to Cognate ReferencesAnnotated Bibliography for each ReferenceAPA formatted reference (250 words for each reference) Description of why this is a credible source (author(s), publication, date) Summary of the article Discussion of how this reference supports the existence of the general problem and theconsequences of the problem identified in the general problem sentence.
LU MGT And Its Impact on Organizational Efficiency Problem Statement Outline
Analytical And Empirical Methods For Usability Evaluation Computer Science Essay
best assignment help Usability Evaluation is evaluation on the quality of the usability of the interface design. Two common methods used for this evaluation process are Heuristic Evaluation (analytical method) and User Testing (empirical method). Both of these methods have their own strengths and limitations, depending on the objectives and the context of the usability evaluation. TASK 1: Methods Description The Heuristics Evaluation Heuristic evaluation is a usability inspection technique first developed by Jakob Nielsen and his colleagues (Sharp, 2007). According to Jakob Nielsen (1994), Heuristic evaluation is a usability engineering method for finding the usability problems in a user interface design so that they can be attended to as part of an iterative design process. It is usually conducted by a small group of evaluators presented with an interface design and are required to evaluate whether each of its elements follows a set of established usability principles or `heuristics’. The inspection of the interface is performed by each individual evaluator. Independently, the evaluators work through the interface several times, at least twice. The first round is to get the feel of the flow of the interaction, whilst the second or more, to inspect on specific various dialogue elements of the interface. All problems encountered are recorded and listed under the respective heuristics. `Only after all evaluations have been completed are the evaluators allowed to communicate and have their findings aggregated. This procedure is important in order to ensure independent and unbiased evaluations from each evaluator’ (Jakob Nielsen, 1990). The rational for grouping back the evaluators is to discover as many problems as possible, because one single evaluator would not be able to find all the problems. Different evaluator will discover different problems. The Heuristic Evaluation (developed by Jakob Nielsen and Mack (1994) consists of ten (10) general principles or “a rule of thumb.” They are Visibility of system status; Match between system and the real world; User control and freedom; Consistency and standards; Error prevention; Recognition rather than recall; Flexibility and efficiency of use; Aesthetic and minimalist design; Help users recognize, diagnose, and recover from errors; and Help and documentation. However, the evaluator may add new heuristic element or category-specific heuristics to supplement the general heuristics. Strengths of Heuristic Evaluation: Ease in Organizing Evaluation: It is easy to do it. Being independent the evaluators can inspect anytime as long as there is product to be inspected. The whole inspection process will be handled by the evaluators without any intervention from anybody, until the final part of the evaluation session whereby they come together to discuss everything that has been discovered. Before the final part, the evaluators will repeat the inspection several times, at least twice. Less Cost: Compared to user testing evaluation which needs proper laboratory, heuristics evaluation involves lesser cost and time. The number of evaluators are very much less, from 3 to 5 persons, compared to user testing method which requires many more users participating to be effective. Heuristic inspection can also be conducted anywhere, even at the office or industry premises. Effective Detection of Problems: By virtue of their experiences and knowledge, it is quite easy for the evaluators to identify major and minor problems of the interface. The evaluators discussion session will help identification of problems that are missed out or overlooked by other evaluators. Weaknesses Single Evaluator and Problem detection: Heuristic Evaluation can be done by a single individual evaluator. However, it is hard for one person to discover all the usability problems in an interface. According to Nielsen, averaging from over 6 projects , a single evaluator only found 35% of the usability problems of the interface. Not Providing Systematic Problem Fixes: `Heuristic evaluation does not provide a systematic way to generate fixes to the usability problems or a way to assess the probable quality of any design.'(J.Nielsen) The Paradox of the Less Cost: Employing a single evaluator can reduce cost. But the risk is the coverage of the problems. Thus, it is necessary to engage `multiple evaluators’ which means a higher cost. The Risk of Professional Differences: If the evaluators are not part of the development team, they may not be aware of technical limitations on the design or why certain design decisions were made. This may lead to differences between the development team and the evaluators, which may impede communication problems and correction of the usability problems identified during the usability evaluation. Capturing of one-time low priority problem: As Heuristic evaluations are loosely structured, there is a likely- hood for the evaluators to capture one-time low-priority problems which may not be important to correct. It will be a waste of time and cost if evaluators are pre-occupied with addressing this kind of problems, not only to the evaluators themselves, but also to the product developer. EMPIRICAL METHOD: User Testing User testing is a user-centred usability evaluation method that employs evaluators to observe and record the performance of user during the test session. According to Helen Sharp who quoted from Dumas and Redish(1999), `the goal is to test whether the product being developed is usable by the intended user population to achieve the tasks for which it was designed.’ Thus, it is a method of finding problem areas by engaging the persons who are similar to the target users to perform certain tasks. Administered in the user testing laboratory and in a controlled environment within the scheduled time, the users are required to perform either certain tasks, such as navigating through the menus, information searching, reading the different typefaces, or other specific tasks. During the user testing sessions, the evaluator `interpretes the user’s actions in order to infer how these actions are related to the usability issues in the design of the interface'(J. Nielsen, 1994). The evaluators record everything about what, how and when the users do. The participants’ attitude, action, behaviors, facial expression, remarks or other kind of gestures are all recorded. . Strengths of User Testing The Strength of Empirical Method: Identifying product problems by observing empirically the users interaction with the interface will give better understanding of the problems and needs of the users. It will be further enhanced when followed by the brainstorming session. The Productive Aspect of Brainstorming: The brainstorming or `think aloud’ sessions between the evaluators and the users encourages users to talk and share their experiences. This obviously helps discovery of many more problems for the correction or improvement of the product. Users Need Come First: Sometimes, evaluators or software development specialists have their own biased views of what users want or need. User tests will neutralize the situation by telling what is really needed or expected from the users perspectives. Giving priority to problems raised by the users will also cool down professional differences between the evaluators and the system developer. Weaknesses Problem in Determining The Right Number of User Testers: The problem is to decide on how many users are ideal for the test. There are different of opinions pertaining to the right numbers of users to be engaged in the lab. A research studies conducted by Virzi(1990) show that 80% of problems uncovered based on a group of 5, and 90%, from a group of 10 users. Such be the case, more user numbers implies more costs. However, practically, it is not easy to decide on the most cost-effective numbers or optimum number of users to participate in the usability testing, because results may differ if tested in different context , environment and time. Non-coverage of Functionalities: Sometimes, the test could not cover all the functionalities of the product in such constraint time and environment. Inability to Capture Minor Usability Problems: Though this method of evaluation is good in discovering major HCI problems, it is quite difficult to observe minor usability problems, such as typographic inconsistency. There is a possibility that even the same gesture observed from the users can be interpreted differently by each individual evaluator. Conclusion Judging from the strengths and weaknesses of both Heuristic Evaluation and User Testing, it is rather difficult to conclude which either method is better. It is an `evaluator-centred’ versus `user-centred’ approaches . Ideally, it is good to have both methods as both have their own advantages and can complement each other. REFERENCE Edited by Jakob Nielsen and Robert L. Mack, Usability Inspection Methods: How To Conduct Heuristic Evaluation(J.Nielsen,. 1994), John Wiley
The essay instruction are attached with the required resource material. Read that, see what this modern-day person, having all
The essay instruction are attached with the required resource material. Read that, see what this modern-day person, having all. The essay instruction are attached with the required resource material. Read that, see what this modern-day person, having all the available info thinks about JC, and then see what each ancient author thinks. They only had limited information to go on (in the case of Plutarch for example, he had just one person’s viewpoint), yet they were closer to the event. Do they have the same idea about him as Pavlac? Even if you think all 4 authors are giving us the same picture of Julius Caesar, be sure to discuss all 4 texts in the essay. Textbook source: Pavlac, B. A. (2015). A Concise Survey of Western Civilization : Supremacies and Diversities Throughout History: Vol. Second edition. RowmanThe essay instruction are attached with the required resource material. Read that, see what this modern-day person, having all
Evaluation of human resources management
Human resource management (HRM) is the strategic and coherent approach to the management of an organization’s most valued assets – the people working there who individually and collectively contribute to the achievement of the objectives of the business. The division of a company that is concentrated on activities relating to the employees. These activities by including normally conscription and fact to rent/hire new employees, orientation and fact to draw away actual employees, advantages of employee and retention A human resources department of means is a critical element of ease of employee in any business; it doesn’t really matter how small it is?. The responsibilities of HR include the register of the personnel, advantages, fact to hire and fact to improve with public and federal fiscal laws. P1.1 Identify three key HRM activities of an identified organization Planning and analysis: The planning of HR is a process to analyse and to identify the need for and the availability of human resources so that the organization can meet its objectives, therefore the managers try to expect force which will influence future reservations of and ask for the employees. Staffing: Obtaining of people with appropriate skills, abilities, knowledge and experience to fill jobs in the work organization. Pertinent practices are human resources planning, job analysis, recruitment and selection. The first step in the staffing is recruitment. Especially, before the first candidate of job is searched, the specialist HR must board on SHRP strategic human resources planning. This only region probably encouraged the most part of change in the human development of means during last fifteen years They cannot hire individuals any more anyhow. It is necessary to have well – reason defined to need individuals who have specific addresses, knowledge and capacities which are directly compared with specific jobs demanded in the organization. Critical question becomes then, how do they know that jobs are critical? The answer to this question is in the process of SHRP. More makes the Manager HR exist in complete darkness, or besides, in a reactive mode. Not before mission and strategy of the organization are being absolutely developed can of human managers of means to begin determining the human needs of means. Especially, when a company plans strategically, it determines its purposes and objectives for specific period. These purposes and objectives often follow in the structural changes being made in organizations; that is to say these changes encourage changes in requirements of job, by signalling reports, how the individuals are put together, and others of this type À this title, these new or reviewed structures bring with them a crowd of essential job. It is these jobs that they must stipulate that HRM fills. Some other requirements for staffing are Job description (highlighting the tasks and requirements of a job), Job analysis and its specification (about skills, capabilities and calibre about the job) (http://www.suite101.com/article.cfm/strategic_resource_management/70277) Employee development and Training: Providing them all kind of training to insure they can work better in their job. The aim of this activity is only to make the better performance of their individuals. These can be for future planning, upcoming targets, new tasks or anything which increases the profit of the company and their individuals don’t know. P 1.2 Justify how the objectives of these were achieved by effective management of human resource. The main purpose of these activities of the organizations is to run their business properly and to get more and more profit/ benefit. And that is why the national trust hires the employees every year and give them proper training so that all individuals can perform well and good for their business. They plan every year and forecast their targets and for their completion they do these activities, and they are getting edge every year. National trusts business runs by their potential employees and their HR department’s main activity is to select the right and competent staff and give them required training I would like to discuss the method used by the organizations for their objectives. The first objectives of services of Personnel are effective and effective personnel the system of register of the sensitive personnel to equip needs together with the system of flexible remuneration. These objectives can be attained by the implementation of different units, as the unit of budgets and beginnings, the candidate that stalks unit, the health and safety unit None the objective of less than important HR is the services of industrial relations that imply to establish effective relations between the employer and the personnel. Complete framework of political and complete one should be established for the risk direction, the problems of security and health. Equipper should well be informed problems of security and health in the work place. Human resource maintains the provision is connected closely with the political strategic one, planning and the coordination of an organization. A big variety of human strategies of aimed resource to the more flexible planning can include improved links between the execution and remuneration, the procedures of measure of improved executions for the whole personnel, improved the strategies of recruitment and retention, and the encouragement of development of competences. A more objective has for result the support of furnished counsel while basing itself on improved the news of the employer and the needs of personnel of HR and works the conditions. The objectives of HR stimulate the people development to be their better one to meet the needs of an organization. A successful system of direction of execution including the department, the team and the objectives of individual matters, the personal projects of development, the execution estimation, the career planning, etc., the objectives to improve the engagement of the personnel to develop the matters in the long term and can give challenges that will improve the personnel the personal growth. Of more, if an organization can evaluate the necessary changes of manpower by the matters, execute the necessary optimization and measure the results that use systems of technology to day, it will obtain from the data that have a role criticizes in interception and check the general execution. (http://ezinearticles.com/?HR-Activities-and-Objectives