Get help from the best in academic writing.

simple question1

simple question1. I’m trying to learn for my Writing class and I’m stuck. Can you help?

We can all perhaps recall a poster, flyer, billboard, or other document that is poorly designed. These documents are memorable for all the wrong reasons. But what about the documents that are really well designed? In this discussion, you will do a few things. First, find 2-3 examples of business proposals or grant (both share similar genre and design conventions) that you believe to be well designed. These documents might be ones you find online, but you might also encounter them in your life–a proposal at your work place or internship, for example. Include the examples you find in your response as either a link or file upload. Discuss what you like about these documents (Why do you believe they represent good design?) using the principles of design terminology from Chapter 11.
Next, share a (working) draft of your proposal for this week’s assignment. In what ways are you applying the principles of design in your proposal draft?
Lastly, solicit feedback from your classmates. Pose two questions about the design of your proposal draft that you would appreciate feedback from your classmates.
simple question1

Rough Draft of Final Paper: Professional Philosophy of Education, writing homework help.

Before you read, keep in mind that my future career is an elementary (preferably 1st grade) teacher in a public school. I love children and I interact with kids well. Purpose of education: (see attachment).The reference of the book you will be referring to (attachments) is: Hall, G.E., Quinn, L.F., & Gollnick, D.M. (2014).  Introduction to teaching: Making a difference in student learning.  Los Angeles: Sage PublishingRough Draft of Final Paper: Professional Philosophy of EducationYou will submit your first draft of the final project and receive feedback from your instructor in the gradebook and also from your classmates in the Week Four discussion one forum.  Based on this feedback and your own further research, you will be able to make corrections and add that information to the Final Project in Week Five.  In this 3-page paper, be sure to address all three parts of the assignment in your rough draft to earn more points.Part 1:  What is your future career? Identify what position in education you would like to have and at what type of organization you will work.  Is it private, public, proprietary, non-profit, online, children, adults, families, etc?  (Refer to the Week 1 journal).After investigating this career, why do you feel this is a good fit for you?Part 2:  Professional philosophy What is your theoretical perspective on teaching and learning?  Address the following items in this part of your paper.What is the purpose of education?  (Refer to the Week 2 journal)How do students learn and how will you assist in learning in your future career?What professional development will you need – certificates, on-going continuing education credits, graduate degree(s), etc?Part 3:  Investigate the standards in your chosen field Utilizing the first Discussion forum this week as a guide, discuss the standards in your chosen professional field.  This may depend on the type of school or professional organization to which you will belong.  Share/Discuss three to four standards that are expected of professionals in your field.  Why are these standards important to your professional philosophy of education?This 3-page paper should address each part of this assignment.  Your reference page should consist of at least three outside scholarly sources, in addition to the textbook, all in APA formatting. To improve your APA skills in style, formatting, citing, and referencing please visit the APA Lecture in the Learning Resources tab in the left side of the course shell.  To check and improve your college level writing please use the Ashford Writing Center resources at: the following list of professional organizations websites to assist your search.Professional Association WebsitesAmerican Association of School Librarians  ( Mental Health Counselors Association  ( for Supervision and Curriculum Development  ( Science Society  ( Board of Standards for Training, Performance and Instruction  ( Society for Technology in Education  ( Association of Child Development  ( Association of the Education of Young Children  ( Education Association  ( of English to Speakers of Other Languages  (
Rough Draft of Final Paper: Professional Philosophy of Education, writing homework help

ACCT 301 Saudi Electronic University Activity Based Costing System Questions.

The Assignment must be submitted on Blackboard (WORD format only) via allocated folder.Assignments submitted through email will not be accepted.Students are advised to make their work clear and well presented, marks may be reduced for poor presentation. This includes filling your information on the cover page.Students must mention question number clearly in their answer.Late submission will NOT be accepted.Avoid plagiarism, the work should be in your own words, copying from students or other resources without proper referencing will result in ZERO marks. No exceptions. All answered must be typed using Times New Roman (size 12, double-spaced) font. No pictures containing text will be accepted and will be considered plagiarism).Submissions without this cover page will NOT be accepted.
ACCT 301 Saudi Electronic University Activity Based Costing System Questions

American Intercontinental University Challenges Developing an Outline Discussion.

Challenges Developing an OutlineIn this week’s Assignment, you will be developing the outline of your literature review based on the themes you have determined. This Discussion will serve as a sounding board to share challenges you may be facing as you create your outline. Take this opportunity to get feedback from your peers and to “test” your outline.To prepare for this Discussion:Review Chapter 8, “Synthesizing Literature Prior to Writing a Review” (pp. 73–80), in the Galvan text.Review Chapter 5, “Prospectus” (pp. 40–41), in the Stadtlander text.Review the following web resources:“Writing a Paper: Outlining”“Making an Outline”“How to Make an Outline”Reflect on some of the challenges you face developing an outline and possible ways to overcome these.Post by Day 3 a response to the following:What challenges are you experiencing as you work on your outline?What strategies have you used to address these challenges?Required ResourcesReadingsGalvan, J. L. (2015). Writing literature reviews: A guide for students of the social and behavioral sciences (6th ed). Glendale, CA: Pyrczak.Chapter 8, “Synthesizing Literature Prior to Writing a Review” (pp. 73–80)Stadtlander, L. M. (2015). Finding your way to a Ph.D.: Advice from the dissertation mentor. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.Chapter 5, “Prospectus” (pp. 40–41)Cambridge Rindge and Latin School. (2004). Making an outline. Retrieved from of Washington Psychology Writing Center. (1997). How to make an outline. Retrieved from University Writing Center. (2015j). Writing a paper: Outlining. Retrieved from
American Intercontinental University Challenges Developing an Outline Discussion

University of Wisconsin Oshkosh Leadership and Financial Management Summary

University of Wisconsin Oshkosh Leadership and Financial Management Summary.

The Synthesis you will submit should be about three pages, with half devoted to a summary of what you have read and the other half evaluating what you think about it and connections to management concepts. Please offer your own opinions of the article in the critique.For this assignment, you will write about this artical “What Leaders Really Do;” Kotter; HBR December,2001″, and another article(something that is related to Finance ).So you are working with 2 articles :1- “What Leaders Really Do;” Kotter; HBR December,2001″2- An article that is related to Finance. Make sure the source is well known source
University of Wisconsin Oshkosh Leadership and Financial Management Summary

BUS 499 UMES E-commerce and External Environment Discussion

assignment writing services BUS 499 UMES E-commerce and External Environment Discussion.

Respond to the following:Can any firm beat Amazon in the marketplace? If not, why not? If so, how can they best do so? How formidable a competitor is Google for Amazon? Please explain. What are Amazon’s major strengths? Does it have any weaknesses? Please explain. Is a potential concern for Amazon? Why or why not?Given the importance of understanding the external environment, why do some firms fail to do so? Provide examples of firms that did not understand their external environment. What were the implications of the firm’s failure to understand that environment?
BUS 499 UMES E-commerce and External Environment Discussion

GED 150 Mathematics 13th edition, 2019 challenge exam

GED 150 Mathematics 13th edition, 2019 challenge exam. I’m stuck on a Mathematics question and need an explanation.

100 question challenge exam please see attached. Challenge Examination925 North Spurgeon Street, Santa Ana, CA 92701 Text: Author(s):Publisher:www.calcoast.eduPhone: 714-547-9625 Fax: 714-547-5777Basic College MathematicsSeventh Edition, 2012ISBN-13: 9780321747594John S. Tobey, Jr., Jeffrey L. Slater, Jamie Blair and Jennifer CrawfordPearson
Completing Your Challenge ExaminationWhen you enrolled, the admissions committee reviewed the materials you submitted and determined that based on your experience, you are eligible to challenge this course.Challenge Examination ComponentsThe ExaminationThe challenge examination is comparable to the final examination for the course. Questions may be multiple choice or true/false statements.The Answer SheetThe answer sheet for this challenge examination contains a bar code with your name, identification number and course number. The answer sheet may only be used for this examination. You may also complete your examination online using the Coast Connection student portal. The TextbookThe examination is based on the contents of the textbook listed on the cover of this booklet. Although you are being given an opportunity to challenge this course based on academic competencies identified in your occupational or life experiences, we suggest you review the textbook prior to attempting the examination.Before Beginning Your ExaminationIn order to successfully complete this course, we recommend that you do the following before beginning:???tBe sure that you have the correct edition of the course textbook.???tBecome familiar with the contents of the textbook, beginning with the table of contents. Authors often include supplementary material at the end of the text, such as a glossary and/or reference section, that will help you as you complete your examination.Many textbook publishers have developed excellent websites to accompany their textbooks. The site’s address is generally printed on the introductory pages of the textbook or is sometimes found on the back cover. We recommend that you visit the website for your text. These sites can enrich your understanding of the course material.
GED 150 Mathematics 13th edition, 2019 challenge exam

The Relationship Between Leaders And Their Employees Management Essay

The previous chapter demonstrated this Study foundation. The chapter in hand aims to study the relationship between leaders and their employees and discuss its effect on employees’ performance through critically reviewing some academic researches in the relational leadership area. This chapter will put the current research aim and objectives into context. This will be reached through first illustrating the leadership definition. Later on, the leader-employee relationship will be studied through reviewing its nature, antecedents, stages and characteristics. Finally, the impact of the leader-employee relationship on employees’ performance will be distinguished. Leadership Definition One of the main factors that affect organisation’s competitive advantage and its market share is employee’s performance, because combination of each individual performance within the company directly influences the whole organisational performance (Graen and Uhl-Bien, 1995). Thus it’s imperative to always develop the employees’ job performance in order to improve the organisational productivity, profit, competitive advantage and its value within the market. From this point of view, the necessity of leadership occur (Smircich and Morgan, 1982 and Hogan and Kaiser 2005). According to Huges et al. (2009) leadership is not a position it’s a process that end with the organisational needs and objectives through an interaction between the leader and the follower within a certain situation. While, Kort (2008) argued that there is no problem to talk about leadership as a position or a title since the whole organisations organised in hierarchal ways that divide all the members according to their experiences and capabilities. However, most scholars agreed with Huges et al. (2009) that leadership is not a position, the bellow literature will clarify this finding. Leadership is a process that produces the company’s goals through subordinates by elucidating the company’s needs to the whole team (Thomas and Schmidt, 1976). Likewise, Smircich and Morgan (1982) and Kotter (2001) proposed that leadership is about performing the routine responsibilities and surviving with the recent rapid changes in the market place through steering and controlling the employees. Moreover, Dansereau et al. (1995) argued that leadership is a process of manipulating the followers to facilitate accomplishing particular tasks in order to achieve the organisation’s objectives. In addition, Yukl (2006) supported Dansereau et al. (1995) and added that leadership is about clarifying the tasks that should be done and concurring about the methods of performing them; also it’s about providing employees with their needs to achieve the organisation’s goal. Furthermore, Goffee and Jones (2007) emphasised that leadership is an influence process where the leader direct his/her self and his/her employees using ethical ways to work together in order to attain their shared goals. Thus, according to the above description leadership is an influence process that leads individuals to achieve the whole organisation’s objective. Besides, scholars suggested some techniques to prosper the influence process. For instance, Yukl (2006) suggested that this process will only succeed if the leader has knowledgeable and likable power which will motivate the subordinates to work sufficiently. Additionally, Dansereau et al. (1995) concluded that without valuing employees’ work and empowering them the leadership process will never accomplish. Also Goffee and Jones (2007) and Kort (2008) emphasised that so as to influence the followers correctly the leader needs to be honest, ethical and expert in his/her field. Therefore, leaders need to sustain their correlation with their employees to influence them easily. On the other hand, other scholars focused on the leader-employee relationship side in defining leadership as they believe that there should be a good relationship between the leader and his/her followers to succeed together and enhance the whole company’s performance (Hughes et al., 2009). Dasborough and Ashkanasy (2002) found that leadership is a social and emotional process where the leader has emotions to deliver to his/her followers so as to produce an interaction between them. While, Locke (2003) argued that leadership is a relationship between the leader and the follower thus it’s important to concentrate on both of them when studying leadership. Add to that, McCallum and O’Connell (2009) suggested that leadership is about producing a sustainable relationship between the leader and his/her subordinates that encourage each other to work in an effective and innovational way. According to the above definitions, whether leadership is an influence or relationship process supervisors must have an excellent relationship with their subordinates with the intention of boosting their performance and the organisation competitive advantage (Graen and Uhl-Bien, 1995 and Leskiw and Singh, 2007). From this point of view, the chapter in hand will carry on its shoulder the study of the leader-follower relationship and its effect on the follower’s performance through critically reviewing different literatures. Leader-Employee Relationship Nowadays, one of the most popular and important approaches to successful leadership is the social exchange model which focuses on the relationship between the leader and his/her followers (Boyd and Taylor, 1998, Zaccaro and Klimoski, 2001, Zoccaro and Hotn, 2003, and Glaso and Einarsen, 2006). Scandura and Lankau (1996) argued that according to today’s rapid change which require flat organisational structure and more motivate and encourage employees; supervisors must sustain their relation with their followers to enhance the company’s productivity. Furthermore, good correlation between the leader and his/her subordinates increases the leader’s ability to motivate his/her followers to the right direction (Yukl, 2006). Add to that, if the quality of the relationship is high the leader and his/her followers exchange will develop which will lead them to improve their performance (Brower et al., 2000). Hence it’s vital to understand the nature of this relationship, its antecedents, its development stages and its characteristics. This will be carried out through the coming sub-sections. Leader-employee relationship nature The Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) theory has clarified that the nature of the relationship between the supervisor and his/her employees within the group are not equal (Sparrowe and Liden, 1997 and Bahal and Ansari, 2007). Similarly, Bass (1990) and Scandura (1999) argued that informal roles occur between the leader and his/her follower since their first meeting and these roles differ from one employee to another which produces different relationship quality between the leader and each member of the team. Furthermore, Danserea et al. (1995) concluded that leaders and their employees create an informal agreement depending on the leaders’ support of self-worth from the employees’ perspective (which vary from one employee to another) and the satisfying performance from the superior point of view (which also differ from one subordinate to another), as a result of that leader’s relationship with each follower within the group will definitely vary. Moreover, as the leader constructs better relationships with some of his/her employees than others two groups of employees will result (in-group and out-group), the in-group members have better interaction with their leader whereas the out-group members have low quality relation with their leader (Kang and Stewart, 2007 cited Dansereau et al., 1975). This shows that according to the nature of the human being behaviour, leaders have no ability to deal with their followers in equilibrium way. However, according to Tyler

Essay Writing at Online Custom Essay

5.0 rating based on 10,001 ratings

Rated 4.9/5
10001 review

Review This Service