Get help from the best in academic writing.

Self-Reliance: The Communal Past as a Model for the Future Essay (Article)

“Self-Reliance: The Communal Past as a Model for the Future” is the eighth chapter in the book by Gilbert Rist The History of Development: From Western Origins to Global Faith. This chapter is a collection of captivating thoughts about the theory of self-reliance, its peculiar features, and paradox that attracts that attention of many people in the sphere of business and market relations. The author chooses a powerful way to introduce and disclose the essence of self-reliance by means of a clear evaluation of experiences and the analysis of the achievements that are characterized by self-reliance. The main idea of the chapter is to prove that “the history of development merges with the history of the progressive destruction of self-reliance” (Rist 125). In order to comprehend the essence of this phrase it is not only necessary to comprehend how development happened and to evaluate self-reliance as a theory but also unite these concepts together and find out their strengths and weaknesses. Summary of the Chapter and Ideas To improve the general situation in many countries of the South, the discourses concerning obligatory modernization and independence were used during the 1960s. People had a hope to change the situation and achieve the necessary improvement, but those times created many difficulties for people. In the chapter under consideration, the example of the Tanzanian President, Julius Nyerere, is used to demonstrate how the theory of self-reliance was applied into practice and what outcomes of this attempt were. From the very beginning, certain points deserve reader’s attention because the application of this theory “tries to formalize, coherently and exhaustively, the mode of life that has prevailed on earth since the dawn of humanity, but at the same time presents this as a discovery bringing an indubitably new element to debate on ‘development’” (Rist 125). In 1961, Tanganyika gained its independence, and, as a new country on the world arena, faced considerable challenges on internal and external levels. Export and important of good underwent certain changes, and the government needed to takes the steps to re-evaluate the situation and be able to cope with challenges. However, what the country did not want to accept is different kinds of foreign aid because “independence means self-reliance” (Rist 128), and an independent country should find another ways to achieve prosperity but not accept the gifts of the others. With the help of this example, the author of the chapter represents a perfect list of ideas, which describe what self-reliance should never be and what main bases of self-reliance theory are. Writer’s points of view about the subject In this chapter, the writer’s views are perfectly identified. He does not want to accept the idea of self-reliance as something purely bad or purely good. This is why the analysis of the ideas and experience take place at first. Gilbert Rist admits that self-reliance is one of the theories that is able to stimulate creativity and value confidence, to promote people to accept the existing factors and environment, and finally, to involve different forms of development that is so obligatory to society. Get your 100% original paper on any topic done in as little as 3 hours Learn More However, the idea that someone may practice self-reliance and someone fails to practice it put this theory under a doubt. This is why the future of this theory is not clear, and the author underlines that much still depends on the way of how society can accept the idea of self-reliance and the conditions, under which it may develop to its full extent. Works Cited Rist, Gilbert. “Self-Reliance: The Communal Past as a Model for the Future.” In The History of Development: From Western Origins to Global Faith. New York: Zed Books, 2002.
Students will create a 2-3 page reflective essay on their current philosophy of technology in the classroom. They will also implement their research of a device from their prezi. Paper rubric will be attached shortly. The following are requirements for this assignment: 1. 2-3 pages in length (references do not count as a page) 2. 12 point font (Calibri or Times New Roman) 3. Double-spaced in MLA or APA format 4. 3 references 5. Should include how you plan to implement ISTE standards into your lesson design (see ISTE standards:
Significant Writing Challenge N Know About PBS Frontline Video Discussion.

Part one1.What is your most significant writing challenge?2.Adapt a text to reflect current conditions and reflect on the impact of the changes on the theme: Time can now be divided neatly, almost, between pre-COVID-19 and post-COVID-19. Films, series, and texts, produced prior to the outbreak, remind us of this. Any story we read or watch can be a painful reminder of how much is changing. Characters are dancing, hugging or shaking hands, and talking to each other in public places; characters are having children, weddings, funerals, parties, and other gatherings surrounded by family and friends. Some people find it comforting to be immersed in that world, while others find these moments upsetting, a reminder of the way things used to be and may never be again. How do you feel? So, here’s your task:1.Select a text: film, series, game, novel, play, or short story. Provide the title and link to information about it.2.Rewrite one scene from the selected text, considering what needs to change for it to be realistic in our current situation (that is, the viral pandemic and the lockdown) but try to retain the original essential themes and meaning.1.Note: Here is a short article about writing scenes. You do NOT need to read the article closely, but it contains examples of how you might approach presenting your scene, if you need help with this.3.Then, write two or so paragraphs about:1.How making the changes made you feel about your choices/options.2.How the changes you made impacted the flow or narrative of the story, film, or series.Part 2Please select a documentary from the following site: PBS Frontline Films. Or, access the link via must select a documentary that is longer than 50 minutes.2.**No one may select the same documentary film–so, select early and post the title of and link to your documentary in the “Title” field ASAP–you can always come back and edit/complete your post by the deadline.In one discussion post, respond to the questions and prompts below. Please also make sure to provide the title of and link to your selected film.1.What is the central topic or set of related topics of the PBS Frontline video?2.What is the central question or set of questions asked by the narrators/interviewers/creators of the PBS Frontline video?3.What is the thesis or central claim of the PBS Frontline video?4.What specific visual elements of the PBS Frontline video contribute to your understanding of the thesis or central claim? 5.What evidence is used by the PBS Frontline video to support its thesis or central claim?6.Is the PBS Frontline video convincing? Why?7.Is the PBS Frontline video compelling or interesting? Why?8.How does the information contained in the video relate to or impact your community (however you define it)?Note: Respond to two of your peers’ analyses by the deadline. Make sure to note shared interests and communities as well as comment on the information your peers provide about the documentary film they’ve selected, i.e., Do you see and understand what they have seen/understood? What might you add to their analyses? How are their films and analyses similar and dissimilar to your own?============I am expecting two different documents for each part.
Significant Writing Challenge N Know About PBS Frontline Video Discussion

Concepts of Abnormality and Mental Health

Sevgi Gulbahce Psychology Access to Nursing Definition Example Abnormality It is behaving in ways which the majority of people do not behave in, or not acting in the ways the majority of people behave in. It can be anything that is not considered as normal. Abnormal behaviour can be affected by numerous factors e.g. social norm, the ambiguity of the break point between abnormal/normal and bias and fundamental attribution errors. And one thing that may be abnormal in the UK maybe seen as normal in another country etc. An individual can be said to be abnormal if they are unable to cope with the demands of everyday life e.g. interact with others, self-care and make themselves understood to others. Rosenhan

Allen County Community College Nuclear Power Post Discussion

best essay writers Allen County Community College Nuclear Power Post Discussion.

Within the discussion you will find two threads posted by me. Your task is to post responses to each of them. The first thread is my thoughts about the TedTalk and my opinion on nuclear power, the second is my opinion of how Mark Jacobson (the same guy from the TedTalk) responded to the White Roofs proposal. I want to stress here that these are my opinions; I don’t require people to agree. Some of the stuff I say many people would disagree with, but it is my honest opinion. below are my opinions.Nuclear power Let me be up front about my biases. I love windmills. Not so much because I want to save the earth, but because I like having my own little power unit on my own land, off the grid, and independent of everyone else. It makes me feel independent and more secure knowing that when the zombies come, my little compound will still have power. Still, I don’t believe that wind and solar are the answer to our future. I suspect that humanity will continue to grow, and that with the prudent application of technology, the earth can comfortably support 10 times the people it has now. That means at least 10 times the power consumption, probably more. In Dr. Jacobson’s TedTalk, he states that there is 5 to 10 times more wind power than we need right now. That means there simply won’t be enough to meet the demands caused by future population growth. I also believe that as part of humanity’s growth, we will colonize space, and once you leave earth, wind is useless. As you move away from the sun, solar becomes less useful too. On mars, a solar panel will generate about 25% the power that it would on earth, and the sandstorms on mars will shorten solar panel lifetimes considerably. As Stewart Brand said in the TedTalk, I’d love for there to be another option, but there isn’t. Leaving earth will require going nuclear. As far as Dr. Jacobson’s arguments in the TedTalk, I don’t find his arguments convincing. He makes a big deal about the footprint of a windmill only being the size of the post in the ground, but the slide he uses shows a dirt parking pad for maintenance trucks that is 40 times larger than the windmill post. That is also part of the footprint! Teaching in Kansas, I have students from farms who say the usable land they lose to the truck access costs them more money than the windmill brings in. That means wind energy makes them poorer, or it needs to be more expensive to justify putting up windmills. In other arguments, he states:that windmills can be built offshore, so they would use no land. That applies to nuclear power as well. nuclear proliferation would be an issue. That sounds like a scare tactic because he never links how building a nuclear power plant in the US leads to Iran getting a nuclear bomb. Maybe we don’t want Iran building a nuclear power plant, but is that a reason for us not to build them?nuclear power plants take too long to build. By the time they’re done, the earth is cooked. Nuclear power plants take that long only because people opposed to it constantly file lawsuits and slow them down. It only take 4-6 years to build a nuclear aircraft carrier. You could probably get that down to 3-4 years if you don’t build the carrier part.White Roofs response:Science with an agenda? Dr. Jacobson concluded that white roofs really could affect the climate, but in a harmful way, and he leaves it at that. However, in science, effects are neither good nor bad. They just ‘are’. Gravity just is. Radiation just is. Most people would not want to be exposed to radiation because of the effect it has on our health. However the effects of radiation, when properly managed, make it an invaluable medical tool, giving us radiation therapy and radio isotope tracing. Likewise, after realizing that white roofs really can have an effect on climate, an honestly motivated scientist would next seek out how to apply that effect to our benefit; maybe dark roofs near the equator and white roofs near the poles? Dr. Jacobson doesn’t do that. It is enough for him to create a scenario where the effect is bad, then popularize his point of view. That behavior suggests to me that he wasn’t honestly looking at the potential application of white roofs, but was instead simply looking to discredit them. The biggest public motivator for windmills is climate change, and if climate change is made less scary, then windmills suffer.Media driven ‘science’. Dr. Jacobson’s work is also a good lesson in how the media can manipulate our perceptions of science. During the course of the white roofs discussion, the class submitted many articles in support of its essays. If one looks at the articles however, one sees that over half of them were summaries and reviews of Dr. Jacobson’s single article. He wrote a single article, and ended up having a dominant impact on the discussion. How did this one man end up looming so large in our class? The answer is promotion; the media liked his message discrediting white roofs and amplified it, popularized it. Various popular magazines wrote about his article. He was on every TV show and in every journal, so when you searched for information on this topic, even when you deliberately looked for several different resources, most of the content you found ultimately came from him. If the media decide to flood the industry with their message, it can create the appearance of uniformity in views which does not actually exist. (In plain text, they can be deceptive.) In reality, white roofs belongs in the disciplines of solar radiation management (SRM) and climate engineering, fields of science which research ways to mitigate climate change by modifying the earth. These are people who believe in climate change and probably love windmills, but also think that by re-engineering the earth a little bit, we might be able to buy ourselves a little bit more time to make more fundamental transitions in society. Even the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has a study group on this topic, and described it in 2013 as “Modeling indicates that SRM methods, if realizable, have the potential to substantially offset global temperature rise…”.
Allen County Community College Nuclear Power Post Discussion

Ashford University Week 1 Introducing Myself Discussion

Ashford University Week 1 Introducing Myself Discussion.

I’m working on a business writing question and need a sample draft to help me study.

Post a 3 paragraph introducing yourself to your colleagues. Be sure to include:A description of your current position or a position you hope to attain in the future.An explanation of the leadership role you currently play within your organization or within your community.A discussion of what type of leader you are and an explanation of why you believe your self-evaluation is correctCite at lease one reference YOU CAN MAKE ANYTHING UP OR BASE IT OFF REALITY.
Ashford University Week 1 Introducing Myself Discussion

West LA College Kufic Calligraphic Style Muslim Handwritting Discussion

West LA College Kufic Calligraphic Style Muslim Handwritting Discussion.

Choose one of the calligraphic styles and find an object online that incorporates that style. Make sure you post a picture of the object and identify it. Identification means title of the piece, date when it was created, place and medium. This can be a folio (page) of a manuscript, a piece of architecture, and or a vessel. Select one of these styles only, Kufic, Thuluth, Nasta’liq, Muhaqqaq. Refer to the section on Books in Islam in the module.Part of your grade is the correct identification of the calligraphic style.
West LA College Kufic Calligraphic Style Muslim Handwritting Discussion