Please read the Forum Instruction carefully. Thank UHere is my Access to https://amu.apus.eduStudent ID: 5562183Password: Royals1964**Go to Lesson, Forum in Course.Class: Introduction to Chemistry with Lab.Instructions: Your initial post over the material outlined above for Topic should be at least 200 words (these must be words that are typed text within the text box of the Rich Text Editor, thus words on any attached documents will not count towards the total).To make your posts, click on START A NEW CONVERSATION above:State your name and Problem Numbers in the title (Title: Jane Doe, Problems 3.1 and 14.25).In addition to your initial posts to the topics in this Week’s Forum, you are required to also reply to at least two classmates’ original posts, and each reply must be a minimum of 100 words and include direct questions. Your replies can add additional insight to your classmates’ opinions, suggest other alternative approaches, or anything similar. Be sure to read the follow-up posts to your own posts and reply to everyone who comments on your post.For this topic, you will select two problems from the Chemistry: Atoms First, OpenStax text (in the link there is a book), one problem from each of the following two problem sets:For Problem 1: You MUST select a problem from the end of the chapter “Exercises” from Chapter 3: Problems 1-15; 46-86. For Problem 2: You MUST select a problem from the end of the chapter “Exercises” from Chapter 14: Problems 1-25.These problems and their discussions will be included together in one post. After you decide which problems you would like to discuss, start a thread in the Topic Forum. You need not fill in the content—only begin a thread with a subject line that includes your name and the problems you will be discussing. When you are ready to fill in the details of the post, you can simply go back into your post and click “Edit” and put the information into your post. By starting your post, you are claiming your problems and no other student is allowed to choose the same problems. Notice! The first person to post a thread on the Forum with his/her problems in the subject line will be the only one to receive credit for the assignment should their be duplicate choices. Therefore, you should be sure no one has already chosen the problems you wish to investigate.You need to:*show work to find solution (you can use an embedded image or the fx button on the Rich Text Editor if appropriate)*explain in the text how you approached and worked through the problemIdeally, you will choose problems that you had a hard time solving until something clicked (which you would then explain–what you figured out that you did wrong, etc.). Either way, you should lead a discussion about the problem. This will help everyone go through the thought process of these problems, see different ways that students set them up, compare approaches, maybe learn new strategies and hints, recognize mistakes, etc. If you cannot solve the problem at first, no worries, your classmates and myself will give you help you along and you can edit your problem until it is due. If you are having trouble, show your work and explain where you are getting stuck. Remember, you are not getting graded on whether you solve the problems correctly, but rather the attempt you make and the discussion you have with us related to it. So it will likely be more beneficial to you to select challenging problems with which you need help as opposed to easy ones that you can already solve.Initial Post Due: Thursday of Week 7, by 11:55pm ETResponses Due: Sunday of Week 7, by 11:55pm ET
SCIN131 American Military Week 7 Chemistry Atoms First Problem Solving
Walden University Vicarious Trauma Affects Psychologists Discussion
Walden University Vicarious Trauma Affects Psychologists Discussion.
Once you have identified several topics for your dissertation, you may narrow your selection by considering a variety of factors including how long the topic is likely to sustain your interest, whether the study is likely to present significant ethical barriers, and whether your study can be original and significant.For this Discussion, you select a dissertation topic and then develop a dissertation premise. Refer to the Walden Dissertation Premise document (available in this week’s Learning Resources and via the Prospectus Draft and Oral Presentation area) as you complete your premise this week. Note that the dissertation premise is a document that identifies and explains a preliminary topic for your dissertation. This topic should be the product of an initial investigation on your part, but will be subject to refinement as you develop your prospectus and then your proposal.After posting your premise, you consider the ethical issues related to your proposed study and evaluate whether it is likely to receive IRB approval. Please refer to the Learning Resources on ethics in research to help you in your evaluation.By Day 4Post by Day 4:Part 1:A dissertation premise (1–2 paragraphs) for your selected dissertation topic including a title, a brief problem statement, and tentative research method (quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods)Part 2:A brief evaluation of the likelihood that the Walden IRB committee will approve your study. Be specific and cite references from the Learning Resources on ethics in research.
Walden University Vicarious Trauma Affects Psychologists Discussion
The Relationship between Police, the Courts and Corrections
research paper help The Relationship between Police, the Courts and Corrections The Criminal Justice components create a system when they apply their functions together looking for the same objective; to enforce justice into society. Even when the components of the Criminal Justice system are working to accomplish the same objective they work in different fields and the job of each component is very different from the others. The Criminal Justice System refers to a collection of federal, state, and local public agencies that are created to deal with criminals (The Structure of Criminal Justice. 2013). There is a distance inside the relationship of the three components and this distance brings benefits and failures into the process. There are certain benefits that are created due to the distance between each component of the Criminal Justice system. The nature of the courts and the job they perform in the process of enforcing justice into society makes the courts an authority to regulate the work of police officers and correctional officers. Crime looks very different from the perserpective of a police officer, a judge will have to see the entire situation from a different point of view (Peak, 2012. p9). This is very helpful to guarantee police officers and correctional officers are going to perform their job according to what the law dictates. The distance is created naturally because the three components have to deal with different issues in order to accomplish their goal. Even when they do not perform the same activities they need each other because they are connected following the same purpose. The police needs the courts to process and take care of the suspects once they are taken into custody, the same way the courts need the corrections to deal with the inmates once they have been sentenced. It is also said that the Criminal Justice “agencies often fail to coordinate their activities and, thereby, ignore the impact that their decisions will have on other agencies” (The Structure of Criminal Justice. 2013). The relationship between the three components is not always fluent and this can cause mistakes and make the entire process more slow than what it should be. As a matter of fact, this failure can affect society at many different levels because every single component has it’s own process and this bureaucracy existing inside the components and between them forces every step to have a procedure. Some critics believe the distance existing in the relationship between police, the courts and corrections is necessary. Because Criminal justice agencies set their own policies they can affect the timing and the procedures of the other components. The existence of a different process within each component forces every single one of them to make sure and to guarantee they are performing their job correctly. The courts will not accept a case where the police officers acted illegally in order to obtain the evidence and they will not make use of the corrections to sentence these individuals. At the same time, the courts need to guarantee the entire court session is done as required by the law in order to sentence the suspect. The Criminal Justice system nature is to work with three different components connected by the same purpose, and at the same time each component is divided because they all have to deal with crime and the task of reducing crime rates in different ways. This might be the reason why the system has evolved into what it is today and this could be the best way police, the courts and corrections are supposed to work with each other. Police officers need to be restricted by the law and all the possible legal challenges their cases could face in a court room. The same legal restrictions apply to the correctional officers to guarantee they are protecting the integrity of the inmates and they are doing the best to help them in the rehabilitation process. THE POLICE The police is the force that has the authority and liability to protect the community. Every police department is organized and every single individual who makes part of it has his own function and area of expertise. The police departments are divided in many different units to deal with every possible way of breaking the law. “The organization of these agencies includes a number of specialized units (patrol, traffic, records)” (Peak, 2012. p58). Since every single unit is working on the same purpose there is a system within the police component. The police departments are organized as a military institution with a chain of command that takes decisions and give orders and subordinates who are responsible of following every order. The role of this chain of command “is to ensure that these units work together to reach a common goal” (Peak, 2012. p58). This division of labor allows every unit to specialize in their own field and to improve the way they do their job because they will become experts in that area. Once the specialized units apprehended a suspect and they gather the necessary evidence to judge him they are required to transfer this suspect into a court room. In the court room a judge will analyze and study all the evidence gathered in the case and this is when the relationship between the police and the courts is created. Both components exist to make sure justice is enforced in the community, they will share all the information (such as evidence, criminal background) necessary in order to guarantee the process has been done correctly from the moment the suspect was arrested until the judge or the jury make a decision on what the sentence should be or if the suspect is found innocent. This is the part when the police depends on the courts to fulfill their mission. THE COURTS The Courts are the place where justice is made. “The purposes of the courts are to seek justice and to discover the truth” (The Structure of Criminal Justice. 2013). Once the truth has been discovered thanks to the evidence presented by the police the court will sentence the suspect to pay his debt with society for breaking the laws created to make sure individuals live respecting everybody else. The courts are the place where “judges, court reporters, clerks, bailiffs, witnesses, plaintiffs, defendants, attorneys, juries, and spectators, as well as police officers, social workers, probation officers, guardians, interpreters and the press” (Peak, 2012. p135) get together to study and witness a case and analyze the ways an individual broke the law and the sentence that should be given in order to guarantee justice is done the right way. Depending on the case the judge or the jury will analyze the evidence presented by the police and the criminal investigators. At the court every possible legal challenge will be analyzed as well. The mistakes in acquiring evidence are called legal challenges and they are taken very seriously, sometimes they could end up in the release of a criminal because some mistake was committed in the investigation process. A legal challenge could appear in anything involved with the handling and gathering of the evidence presented by the investigators. Once the case has been properly studied, the courts will send the criminal to a correctional facility where correctional officers will make sure the inmate is rehabilitated. This relationship between the courts and the corrections is the last step of the Criminal Justice system. The fact that everything started with the police arresting the suspect and ended with the courts sending the inmate to a correctional creates a relationship between the three components. CORRECTIONS The main objective of sending citizens who broke the law to a correctional facility is “to protect society from crime by safely and securely handling criminal offenders while providing offenders some opportunities for self-improvement and increasing the chance that they will become productive and law-abiding citizens” (Peak, 2012. p205). Some critics tend to believe corrections are not the right answer to deal with criminals due to the fact that not every criminal achieves rehabilitation in a correctional facility. Prisons are organized institutions, the same as the police and the courts who are organized in different sectors to divide all their responsibilities. These sectors could be seen as the specialized units created by the police to deal with every possible crime, the only difference is that in the prisons every office has one responsibility like human resource management division, health care or medical division, administration division and many others created to guarantee every single step of the process is done accurately and according to the law. (Peak, 2012. p205). Having an inmate locked up after committing a crime offers different benefits to society. The danger of having people who break the law on the streets could be very high and making sure they are secured under the supervision of professionals makes everybody feel safer. This is the last step of the Criminal Justice system and it is also where the relationship between the police, the courts and the prisons ends. This step could also be seen as the accomplishment of the entire mission of enforcing justice in society. This relationship and all the connections and procedures where the Criminal Justice system components have to deal and complement each other can be affected by certain rules created by each component and the independence they all have from each other. Why are the three components independent from each other? The three components of the Criminal Justice are independent because they fight crime in different ways. “Each system component—police, courts, and corrections—has varying degrees of responsibility and discretion for dealing with crime” (Peak, 2012. p6). These degrees of responsibility separates the police officers, the judges and the correctional officers to the point where every institution creates their own procedures to deal with crime and to perform the function they are given in the entire Criminal Justice System. This independence between every single component offers a benefit that could be the same reason why the independence exists. In democracy the government needs to make sure no individual and no institution has total control over any matter. Even the president of the United States powers are regulated by other politicians within the same government. If the three components were put together as one the society could face a big problem because the Criminal Justice system will not be under control. The police officers, the judges and the correctional officers will all be co workers and with this they could lose objectivity by acting guided by other reasons different than justice itself. The fact that the three components are independent from each other protects society from corruption, police abuse, unfair sentences and bad treatment in the correctional facilities. “Relations among and between these components are often characterized by friction, conflict, and deficient communication” (Peak, 2012. p5). This friction and conflict could be the reason why the entire Criminal Justice system works the way it does. Every single component wants to perform it’s job correctly in order to keep up with the others, if one of them fails to do this the process of enforcing the law will be affected. On the other side the deficient communication is an issue that needs to be solved. “Prosecutors often complain that police provide case reports of poor quality.” (Peak, 2012. p5). At the same time Prosecutors and Public defendants are judged by their success in making the court sentence an individual or to drop the charges (Peak, 2012. p5). Corrections are seen by many as institutions where the inmates are not really well influenced. This could be caused due to the independence of all the components or simply because society has not found a better way to deal with crime. The way these components critic and interact with each other creates a competence and a challenge that can be very useful or very bad for everyone. “In the process of that interaction, conflicts arise. Although conflicts can serve positive ends, many of those In criminal justice tend to defeat the achievement of goals of the total system” (O’Leary, V.,
Clayton State University Americans with Disability Act Case Study
Clayton State University Americans with Disability Act Case Study.
Analyze the case and opinion in Keith v. County of Oakland, 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 595 (6th Cir.) located in your textbook on pp. 337-342. SCREE SHOTS FOR CASE ATTACHEDWrite a case study review of Judge Griffin’s opinion that answers the questions below. Support your review with analysis and evidence from the unit reading and outside sources.What are the legal issues presented in this case? Did the plaintiff establish a valid claim of failure to reasonably accommodate? What did the appeals court decide?What accommodations was Keith requesting? Was it reasonable? Support your opinion with an argument based on the course concepts and existing legal evidence or precedents.Did the county follow the interactive process required by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)? What did they do well? What could they have done differently?Your paper should be a minimum of two pages, not including the title and reference pages. You are required to use a minimum of three sources, one of which may be your textbook as reference material for your case study. Adhere to APA Style when constructing this assignment, including in-text citations and references for all sources that are used. Please note that no abstract is needed.Book citation: Walsh, D. J. (2018). Employment Law for Human Resource Practice. [VitalSource Bookshelf]. Retrieved from https://online.vitalsource.com/#/books/97813376706…
Clayton State University Americans with Disability Act Case Study
University of Central Florida Rent Rock Musical Film Analytical Review
University of Central Florida Rent Rock Musical Film Analytical Review.
Instructions:THE PAPER SHOULD BE THREE TO FOUR PAGES LONG AND SHOULD BE DOUBLE SPACED.YOU MUST USE WORDPLEASE USE TIMES ROMAN 12 FONT. THIS ASSIGNMENT IS A MAJOR ASSIGNMENT AND IS WORTH 300PTS.YOU SHOULD SUBMIT YOUR PAPER TO THE WEBCOURSES ASSIGNMENT ON OR BEFORE (WHEN OPENED) THE DUE DATE OF THIS ASSIGNMENT. I HAVE MANAGED TO MERGE THE WEBCOURSE WITH TURNITIN.COM. WHEN YOU TURN IN YOUR SHOW PAPER, IT WILL AUTOMATICALLY BE CHECKED FOR PLAGIARISM. YOU WILL NOT NEED CREATE A SEPARATE TURNITIN.COM ACCOUNT. I WAS DISAPPOINTED TO DISCOVER A PLAGIARIZED PAPER LAST TERM. PLEASE, DO NOT GO THERE.SHOW PAPER SELFIE – WHEN YOU TURN IN YOUR PAPER, YOU MUST TURN IN A PICTURE OF YOURSELF WATCHING RENT (OR, HAMILTON). HAVE THE SCREEN WITH THE SHOW ON AND VISIBLE IN THE BACKGROUND. THE ADDITION OF POPCORN IN THE PHOTO IS APPRECIATED, BUT NOT REQUIRED. ADD THE PICTURE TO YOUR WORD DOCUMENT AS A PART OF YOUR SHOW PAPER.Performance Review Content*AS YOU DISCUSS THE PRODUCTION, BE SURE TO DISCUSS ELEMENTS FROM THE BEGINNING OF THE PRODUCTION TO THE END OF THE PRODUCTION. DISLIKING A PERFORMANCE IS ALL RIGHT. JUST BE SPECIFIC ABOUT WHAT YOU DID OR DID NOT LIKE. WRITE IN CLEAR AND UNCOMPLICATED SENTENCES TO EXPRESS YOUR OPINIONS. THE LENGTH OF A SENTENCE DOES NOT ALWAYS EQUAL CLARITY.Basic InformationWHAT IS THE NAME OF THE THEATRE/ THEATRICAL VENUE AND ITS LOCATION? WHAT IS THE NAME OF THE PLAY/SHOW? WHO IS THE PLAYWRIGHT? WHAT DATE AND TIME DID YOU ATTEND?SCRIPTScript.jpgWHAT WAS THE MAJOR CONFLICT OR THEME? THE BASIC STORY LINE? WHAT WAS THE DOMINANT TONE OF THE PLAY/SHOW? SERIOUS? COMIC? IRONIC? EXPLAIN. GIVE EXAMPLES OF THE THEME OR TONE.DIRECTINGdirector-chair_cropped-300×255.jpgWHAT WAS THE DIRECTOR’S NAME? WHAT WAS THE DIRECTOR’S CONCEPT OR INTERPRETATIONAL APPROACH? WAS IT EASY TO PIN POINT? HOW WAS IT MANIFESTED IN THE PRODUCTION? IN OTHER WORDS, IF THE PLAY WAS THE MOVIE HARRY POTTER BUT THE DIRECTOR SET THE TIME PERIOD IN VICTORIAN ENGLAND OR CHANGED THE LOCATION TO AMERICA, WHAT WOULD YOU SEE OR HEAR IN THE PRODUCTION THAT WOULD SUPPORT THAT CONCEPT? A RECENTLY DIRECTED SHAKESPEARE’S PLAY TWELFTH NIGHT WAS SET DURING THE PERIOD OF THE CALIFORNIA GOLD RUSH WITH A WESTERN THEME. ALL OF THE ELEMENTS OF THE PRODUCTION MATCHED THE THEME. INSTEAD OF A SWORD FIGHT, THE CHARACTERS HAD A GUN FIGHT, INSTEAD OF A TAVERN SCENE THERE WAS A SALOON SCENE, ETC. SEE?DID ALL OF THE ELEMENTS IN THE PLAY/SHOW YOU SAW MATCH THE INTERPRETATION OR CONCEPT? GIVE SOME EXAMPLES OF HOW THE CONCEPT WAS REALIZED IN THE PRODUCTION. IF NOT, WHAT SEEMED OUT OF PLACE. WAS THE PLAY/SHOW WELL STAGED? IN OTHER WORDS, IF THERE WERE A LOT OF PEOPLE/CHARACTERS ON STAGE, DID IT SEEM BALANCED? DID THE ACTORS/CHARACTERS MOVE AROUND THE SPACE EASILY? DID THE STAGING MAKE SENSE FOR THE PERFORMANCE SPACE AND FOR THE SCENE? WAS THE OVERALL PRODUCTION SMOOTH OR DID YOU NOTICE MISTAKES OR STUMBLES?ACTINGActing.jpgCHOOSE AT LEAST TWO ACTORS (MALE OR FEMALE) TO COMMENT ON IN SOME DEPTH. WHAT WERE THEIR ROLES? DO YOU FEEL THE ACTORS FIT THE ROLE? WERE THE ACTORS BELIEVABLE AS THE CHARACTERS, IF SO WHY, IF NOT WHY? DID THEY SEEM NERVOUS, COMFORTABLE, CONFIDENT, WELL-REHEARSED? WERE YOU ABLE TO UNDERSTAND THE ACTORS? WERE THERE ANY SPECIAL SKILLS (SUCH AS DANCING, SINGING, FENCING, PLAYING A MUSICAL INSTRUMENT) REQUIRED OF ANY OF THE ACTORS? IF SO, HOW EFFECTIVELY WERE THE DEMANDS MET?Scenic DesignThumb%20Nail%20Sketch.jpgIN WHAT TYPE OF PERFORMANCE SPACE WAS THE PRODUCTION STAGED? PROSCENIUM, ARENA, THRUST? HOW DID THE SCENERY CONTRIBUTE (OR FAIL TO CONTRIBUTE) TO THE TOTAL PRODUCTION? WHAT WOULD HAVE BEEN LOST IF CERTAIN SCENIC PIECES HAD BEEN ELIMINATED?COSTUME AND/OR MAKEUP DESIGNCostume%20Rendering.jpgOVERALL, HOW DID COSTUMES AND MAKEUP CONTRIBUTE (OR FAIL TO CONTRIBUTE) TO THE TOTAL PRODUCTION? DID THE COSTUMES GET IN THE WAY AT ANY TIMES, DID THE COSTUMES FIT THE BODIES OF THE ACTORS WELL? DID THEY SEEM TO MATCH THE CHARACTERS AND CONCEPT?Lighting and/or Sound DesignLighting.jpgOverall, how did lighting and sound contribute (or fail to contribute) to the production concept and the total production?Sound – Did the sound seem to match the scene or moment? Did it seem to take away from a moment by being either too loud or too soft or not appropriate? If microphones were used, could you understand and hear the actors?LIGHTING – WAS THE ACTING USED IN A WAY TO SUPPORT A SCENE OR A MOMENT? WERE THERE TIMES WHEN YOU COULD NOT SEE THE ACTORS WHEN YOU WERE SUPPOSED TO SEE THEM?Final ThoughtsWhat was your overall impression of the performance?
University of Central Florida Rent Rock Musical Film Analytical Review