Get help from the best in academic writing.

Saudi Electronic University Interaction of Gamma Rays with Matter Essay

Saudi Electronic University Interaction of Gamma Rays with Matter Essay.

I’m working on a physics report and need a sample draft to help me learn.

I need a report about interaction Gamma rays with matter.First start with summary then the introduction then how it works then the interaction with matter, I need follow like this structure: TitleSummary (2-3 lines)introductionMain textConclusion References And add equations and pictures at report.Requirement:1-write by your own words do not copy form websites or books.2- write the references.3- references should be scientific reference.3- The maximum number of pages are 5.4-the report should be based on physics.5- I need the report file as docx (word office).
Saudi Electronic University Interaction of Gamma Rays with Matter Essay

Legalization of Assault Rifles Debate: Personal Opinion. Nathan Eakin When faced with a situation that puts harm into the family’s life, anyone would like reliable weapon to protect them. Assault rifles are an accurate weapon and that’s why a lot of gun enthusiast collect them and build them. Coming from the standpoint of an enthusiast, a lot of people rarely get out and shoot all their guns that they have. Now the only thing everybody hears is people talking negatively about them, and about how dangerous they are. If the government banned the semi-auto assault rifle it would cause a huge wave of a black markets and a lot of fighting if they tried to come abolish already owned weapons. But still they are trying to change the Second amendment even though it declares the right to bear arms which then can be extended to semi-auto weapons that are now getting debated on the legalization (Acosta, Luis). The modern assault rifle was made back at the end of World War 2 and Vietnam. There have been several different types of assault weapons made. Back in 1963 the first AR like guns were sold to the public. There are several different types of assault weapons made. And most of these are available to the public. The M16 and M1A1 were the first modern assault rifles. They were used in the military through Vietnam. Now mainly all for sale is the AR15. The AR15 uses .223 rounds and some can shoot the 5.56 (”The Truth About Assault Weapons”). These are the main weapons that are being debated on. A lot of people don’t actually know what assault weapons are. Now there are so many types of old military weapons that are open to the public. There are lots of types of semi-auto weapons for sale. These weapons you can pretty much go anywhere and buy them. You also can obtain full automatic weapons through a long process of back ground checks and fingerprints. All of these assault weapons are getting debated now. This whole debate isn’t just on one gun either. It’s on several different weapons, magazines, ammunition amounts. They disagree on a lot of these things. The NRA is a huge group that is against the banning of all these weapons. They have several different classes you can take for safety, basics, and all hunting tutorials. The NRA is a huge group with thousands of members that all are gun enthusiasts that know all about the real use for weapons. They are a great organization to talk to about some of the information and the sides to this debate (James A. Peden and Mark Yaworski). The banning of assault rifles would cause a huge fight in the United States. Most of the people that use the assault rifle are professionals that use them for a lot of competitions. A lot of people are against it just because they have large magazines and they can be shot in a very fast manner. They think they are some kind of killing machine, even though it’s not guns that kill people, people kill people. Even though 69% of murders used with firearms are with pistols and shotguns not assault rifles. This shows that assault weapons aren’t the most dangerous thing out there. Even though all the professionals have been shooting for several years, and more than likely have their conceal carry permit and have went through so many different types of classes of safety people still worry about them. There is a lot of time and dedication to obtain this permit. First you have to get a back ground check, and then you have to get a fingerprinted. Last you have to get approved by the sheriff’s office. There are a lot of classes a lot of them take for safety and practice. This helps the person with their overall shooting ability. They all have been trained in great manners and banning this gun could hurt the professional’s careers. A lot of people use these weapons to protect them. Assault rifles are an overall great gun to use for protection around the home. They are an accurate weapon, if you need to shoot several times you can. Everybody knows the look of these guns, and the crook or robber probably would immediately run as soon as he saw it in your hands. He would more than completely second guess trying something that could possibly hurt you. It’s a great weapon to teach your kids how to shoot and how to safely operate a weapon. It’s not a terribly loud gun and it doesn’t kick much, and it’s just a .223 which is very small rifle round. They guns are very accurate up to long ranges and can be an accurate weapon at short and close shots to. The way these guns are made is to shoot several rounds at a fast past and to be able to keep the gun in the same spot. These weapons are what most of the military personal use. That kind of shows how amazing these guns are. In the long run they are a great weapon to have around the house and a great weapon to protect your family with. Even people that are doing research on this exact topic find that 69% of firearm murders happen with pistols and hunting weapons like shotguns. Pistols are such a small weapon but can sure pack a punch. They can be easily hidden anywhere, some are decently accurate depending on the shooter, and you still have 14 rounds in most magazines. And most of people against this topic always bring up the magazine capacity, even though some are 10 and some are 30. But still assault rifles aren’t too much more powerful at the same range as pistols. Assault rifles are great at long distances but still a pistol you can put in your pocket and have 15 rounds ready to go. With an assault rifle they would see you carrying a big gun into wherever you are and everybody would freak out. Assault rifles aren’t made for close range especially if you have a zoomed optic so it’s pointless to use one close. All these points really show that assault rifles aren’t meant to hurt people. They are used for long range target practice, coyote hunting, etc. Despite all the information on my side, most of the other people on the other side think about how dangerous the weapons are to them and everyone around them. They think that since they can carry several rounds and they can be shot at high rates of fire they are bad weapons for people to have. Even though you have to go through a lot of papers, back ground checks, fingerprints, etc. Some people just don’t trust other people which is understandable, but it’s not fair for most of the people that just want to shoot and hunt with. People now have to go through all these processes to just get a gun. Even some weapons that are classified in class A and B you have to go through longer processes that can take several months just to get the weapon you want. To conclude this paper, the decision they should make is assault rifles shouldn’t be debate or banned in any form. I can understand regulating the magazine size and categorize it as a class 2 type of material. From all the details and research that has been done it’s safe to say that assault rifles aren’t the most dangerous think out there. Pistols and hunting weapons still come in with the higher percentages. Not only are assault rifles very high in price, mainly gun enthusiasts are the only ones interested in these weapons. In the end it would cause several different problems for all of America. It could cause some people to attack back against the law ans government. It could cause a huge black market of assault weapons which can make everything a lot harder for people to solve murders because the gun wouldn’t be registered to anyone. All these reasons show that banning assault weapons wouldn’t be the best idea. Works Cited Acosta, Luis. “United States: Gun Ownership and the Supreme Court.” Second Amendment. N.p., n.d. Web. 17 Sept. 2014. “Everything You Need to Know about the Assault Weapons Ban, in One Post.” Washington Post. The Washington Post, n.d. Web. 17 Sept. 2014. “GUN CONTROL and THE SECOND AMENDMENT.” GUN CONTROL and THE SECOND AMENDMENT. Tntech, n.d. Web. 17 Sept. 2014. James A. Peden and Mark Yaworski. “And, You Can Join the NRA Right Here.” National Rifle Association Information Page. Vermont Friends of the NRA, n.d. Web. 29 Sept. 2014. Mathews, Jake. “For Lives and Liberty: Banning Assault Weapons in America.” The Institute of Politics at Harvard University. N.p., n.d. Sherfinski, David. “Six in 10 Favor Ban on Semi-automatic Weapons: Poll.” Washington Times. The Washington Times, n.d. Web. 17 Sept. 2014. The Truth About Assault Weapons. The Truth About Assault Weapons. N.p., n.d. Web. 25 Sept. 2014. . “United States Senator Dianne Feinstein.” Assault Weapons Ban Summary. Senator Dianne Feinstein, n.d. Web. 17 Sept. 2014. Legalization of Assault Rifles Debate: Personal Opinion
One of my primary focuses was to find out how different literatures dealt with Dyslexia and how best to support the child. Dyslexia can be described from a number of different perspectives as we see in Ball et al (2007) who explain that it can be “how one learns (Cognition), what parts of the brain are involved (neurology), what genes are involved (genetics) and behaviour (p14). Their book entitled ‘Dyslexia: An Irish perspective’ is very relevant to my research as it gives a great insight into the history of the special education sector in Ireland. It also looks into some of the key debates that are facing the educational sector today. Perhaps most importantly this book dedicates a full chapter to Dyslexia in the primary school system which is the area where I want to focus my research. Ball et al (2007) explains that at this stage there is a certain level of development expected from a child in the early stages of primary school and that it is here that we begin to see the first signs of struggle with children suffering from Dyslexia. Children will find it hard to understand or grasp “letter-sound matching, phonological analysis, handwriting, spelling, sequencing and others…” (p102). The support that can be shown by parents and teachers is also a vital aspect to the child’s development at this stage. Therefore it is crucial that if the child is indeed struggling from Dyslexia there should be additional support provided for the child in order to allow him to catch up with the rest of the class. Children with dyslexia can avail of learning support. This could be on an in-class basis or small group withdrawal from class. The school might be able to offer more than this, but this is down to whatever resources and demands on those resources that the school have. In Ball et al(2007) we see that the issues that arise in children throughout the primary school years as they point out that ” as the primary school child moves away from junior to senior classes, issues around self-esteem and motivation may arise” (p105). This may lead to the child using avoidance techniques when asked to read-aloud or complete oral tasks which would just contribute to the child’s poor-self-image. An important aspect which seems to come up in various literatures is that when Dyslexic children produce homework or assignments it should not be compared with the work of others in the class. A negative approach to mistakes will just lower the child’s self-esteem and make them become frustrated with other homework assignments. I feel that the main teacher should never become over dependant on the special needs assistant, as building a trustworthy relationship between child and teacher will greatly benefit both. The Dyslexic Association of Ireland states on its official website that teachers should “not correct every error, but instead concentrate on a small number of errors and set manageable targets, take time to correct the work and focus on content rather than presentation”. The next book that has proven very useful in my research has been ‘Understanding Dyslexia: a guide for Teachers and Parents’ by Lawrence (2009). He explains how dyslexia has always been seen as a lack of cognitive and neurological skills but we should be looking at Dyslexia as a “difference and not a deficit at all” (p16). While Dyslexic children find it hard to read without making mistakes or to follow instructions this should not mean that teachers should ignore their struggles against the mainstream approaches to teaching. Lawrence feels that the solution is to find a suitable way to engage the student and follow a teaching style that the student to learn at their pace. Before a lesson begins with a dyslexic student it is a good idea to briefly go through what areas will be covered and “break down the lesson into smaller units so that the child does not feel overwhelmed with what has to be done (p56). Lawrence further explains some important exercises that can be done at home in order to help the child’s memory capabilities, for example, ” ask their children to recall a previous event, such as what they did the previous weekend”(P60). Since all Dyslexic children differ from each other and learn differently it is crucial that parents and teachers incorporate all of their senses into the learning process as their visual or auditory processing may be impaired. Lawrence states that a child may pass a hearing or vision test quite easily, yet they may not be able to process this information into their memory. This shows how simple exercises can have a long lasting positive effect on the child in these early school years. Reinforcement is a key practise when dealing with children who suffer with dyslexia and in Townend and Turner (2000) they explain that “children with Dyslexia need many opportunities to practise the skills they have learned and to preserve them in long-term memory and Practise work must be presented in a variety of ways to maintain interest” (p19). Note taking can be difficult for Dyslexic children so a slow pace should be taken or better still to arrange for notes to be photocopied. Tasks also need to be concentrated on things like worksheets and not just the blackboard where students may become inattentive or inactive. When arranging work assignments it is also a good idea to care to have clear presentation, with large text, bold heading and as many visual aids as possible. Herold(2003) describes ways in which teachers can adapt their teaching methods in order to accommodate the dyslexic children in their classes. She feels that the most effective teaching method for all children, particularly those exhibiting signs of a learning difficulty, is a “multi-sensory approach”. Herold also explains this is imperative for dyslexic students as using a multi-sensory approach to teaching would not only alleviate anxiety from the classroom situation, but also help their brains absorb the information being conveyed to them. Some teachers express reluctance to change their ways of teaching, but just making a few changes in the classroom can be so beneficial to the students. The Inclusive School Debate Probably the most important and controversial topic in the educational sector is whether students who have learning difficulties be taught within mainstream schooling or should their education take place in special education schools. Overall it seems that there has been a shift in emphasis in regards to special education from “treating it as a marginal and problematic aspect of state-maintained, to a more central component in the wider ‘inclusion’ project” as explained in Thomas and Loxley (2007, p95). This situation is also present In Ireland today but with the recent tough budget cuts the way forward for special education is suffering from financial withdrawal. The debate on inclusion for children with learning disabilities is still at an early stage in its lifecycle yet that hasn’t stopped the clash of ideals throughout the country. Lipsky(1997) gives her insights on the inclusive school debate and is in support of keeping the children among their peers. She feels that although separate classes, with lower student to teacher ratios, controlled environments, and specially trained staff would seem to offer benefits to a child with a disability, research fails to demonstrate the effectiveness of such programs. She continues to say that there is mounting evidence that, other than smaller class size, there is little that is special about the special education system, and that the negative effects of separating children with disabilities from their peers far outweigh any benefit to smaller classes (p 96-100). The report made for the National Council for Special Education in 2009 was a very interesting read as it gave the teachers perspectives on the inclusive schooling debate. The title of the report was ‘creating inclusive learning environments in Irish schools: Teacher perspectives’ and the study aimed to “gather information on teachers’ perceptions about inclusion, current practice in creating inclusive learning environments and current constraints to inclusive practice” (p1). According to the report “all interviewees reported that support teams were central to effective inclusion in schools” (p5). Primary schools seemed to offer a more team-based approach to supporting inclusion whereas at post-primary support roles seemed to be more delineated. The majority of interviewees reported that mixed models of support involving combinations of group and individual withdrawal and in-class support or team teaching were used. The report also states what are the barriers currently stopping the implementation of an inclusive schooling system are in Ireland. These include “Inadequacies in training at undergraduate, postgraduate and on-the-job training” and on the whole-school approach it was felt that “limited dedicated time for developing inclusive practice through training days, staff meetings and in service”(p6). On the whole, interviewees believed that greater access to psychological services for assessment and support/advice on interventions would assist them in creating more inclusive learning environments in the longer term. The debate on inclusion for children with disability has just begun in this country and there is still a very long way to go. The rapid pace of development and change in special education has been problematic. Students with special educational needs may not necessarily have their needs met by appropriately qualified staff. Resource teaching time may not be sufficient, new curricula need to be developed and the physical environment of the school may present a barrier to access. The Current Situation Although many of the books concerning Dyslexia have relevant knowledge on Dyslexia in the current era I felt that an important resource would be the national newspapers as the data would be accurate and up to date. The Irish Times published an article on Wednesday, October 19, 2011 which gave an insight into the parent’s feelings about the budget cuts that have affected children with Dyslexia and other learning disabilities, while also showing the government’s response. Many parents were confused about the role of special needs assistants (SNAs) resulting in misguided fears over cuts to services and Jim Mulkerrins, principal officer of the department’s special education unit, said while he recognised parents had real fears, he believed the role of SNAs “had drifted over the years” to a situation where they are too often seen as the solution to all problems. Mr Mulkerrins also commented “…that assistants retained too long can be counterproductive and the child can become dependent on the care” and added that this year was the first time special services in the department had operated under a spending cap but that some €1.3 billion was still being spent on children with special educational needs. He said 10,575 full-time SNA posts were being provided for schools this year. The department has come under some criticism for its delay in assigning 475 of these posts, which were strategically retained in order to allocate them over the school year in cases such as emergency, appeals or new school entrants (The Irish Times, October 19, 2011). There are currently four designated ‘reading’ schools for students with specific learning disabilities nationwide. The special reading schools are full-time national schools, provided by the Dept. of Education and Science and so are free of charge. The regular school curriculum is followed, with the exception of Irish. The current Pupil-Teacher ratio is 11:1 in these classes, though it is to be reduced to 9:1 shortly. Children usually attend for one to two years only and then return to their own school. It can be difficult to secure a place in these schools ( further explains the application that must be made by the psychologist who assessed the child, supported by a recommendation from the child’s own school. The usual criterion for admission to a special reading school is average/above average intelligence, and a significant discrepancy between intellectual ability and literacy levels. The pupil should have completed 2nd class or be at least 8 years old and not more than 12 years old. These schools include Catherine McAuley N.S., Oliver Plunkett School and St. Rose’s N.S. which are all in Dublin with the only school outside the capital being St. Killian’s School in Cork. A national survey by ‘Public Agenda, When it’s Your Child: A Report on Special Education from the Families Who Use It’, revealed that a large majority (70 %) of the parents say that too many children with special needs lose out because their parents don’t know what’s available to them. More than half (55%) said that parents don’t know what’s available to them. More than half (55%) said that parents have to find out on their own what service and supports are available. This finding underscores the need to provide more training and information to parents on how the special education process works and their rights. Surveys like also show how little people take advantage of Special reading schools, or special reading units within mainstream schools, which are provided by the Department of Education and Science free of charge to students with severe dyslexic symptoms. The regular school curriculum is followed, with the exception of Irish and the pupil-teacher ratio of these schools and units has recently, according to the Department, been reduced from 11:1 to 9:1. If suitable informatiom was available nationally we would see a great uptake in parents using them. Only recently there was reports in England that Ministers have been accused of discriminating against dyslexic pupils by announcing plans to award 5% of marks in GCSE exams for spelling, punctuation and grammar as part of a drive to improve communication skills( Guardian: 4th February 2012). Hopefully this I not a sign of things to come from our own government which is currently very fair to dyslexic students by allowing them extra time on exams and where necessary, scribe to help those Dyslexic students who cannot write quickly. The literature available regarding Dyslexia fails to get into the heat of the debate on such issues as inclusive education and many of the books felt dated and did not provide the statistics that I was looking for. The lack of interest on the inclusion debate thus far is a representation of where the government is at the moment in regards to implementing their plans. Perhaps in a few years’ time as we see more special education schools being developed around the country we will begin to see more surveys, statistics and books that can fully explain the situation we are experiencing now. At the moment it seems as though Dyslexia and specific learning difficulties are just in their infancy.

US How Covid19 has Affected Different Aspects of Microeconomics Research Paper

US How Covid19 has Affected Different Aspects of Microeconomics Research Paper.

I’m working on a economics project and need an explanation to help me study.

1- Submission: Tuesday April 20, 2021
2- Students will give a presentation and the following criteria must be met to obtain optimum
a. Knowledge, application and evaluation of the content
b. Soft skills
3- AVOID PLAGIARIMS. Please be informed that a plagiarism software “Turnitin” will be
used (10% is accepted).
4- This project will be done in groups. Based on groups allocation by your Instructor in
advance of your group members. Date of presentation will be Wednesday, April 21, and
Monday April 26, 2021.
5- Project document: Length discussed is 10-12 pages (including: Cover page, Table of
Content, List of Figure, Reference List)
6- This project is a combination of practical and academic requirements
7- Presentation Duration in class for each group: 15 minutes
8- Please submit a soft copy (word/pdf) of the project.
Please note that the project will make up 20% of your final mark.
Project and Presentation
The Microeconomics exposes students to the meaning, nature, and methods of studying Microeconomics. The
concepts of supply, demand, and elasticity are used to analyse the behaviours of consumers and firms in
different types of markets. Main topics covered include: consumer behaviour, firm production costs, Pure
Competition, Monopolistic Competition, Monopoly, and Oligopoly.
COVID-19 has changed that way in which business is being done. Write a project report on how COVID-19
has affected different aspects of microeconomics (at different levels: company, industry, economic, globally.
Etc). Apply the microeconomic concepts, theories, tools, and methodologies included as part of this course
and how they have been affected. It is preferred to show the effect on different industry sectors and do the
analysis on it, this topic is very broad and open-ended, however ensure to link your project to Microeconomics
(demand and supply, production and cost, different types of competitive environments, ethics, legal and social
issues, etc).
The report should be designed as follow: Introduction on the topic , Background and definitions of the
topic, The impact of COVID 19 on the topic and suggested solutions if any, conclusion, and References.
You need to apply concepts from all chapters covered in class as well as concepts outside these chapters that
could be relevant to your project.
Each student/group will turn in one report that should be approximately 10-12 pages, double-spaced.
Plagiarism policy of the University will be applied.
Grade will be allocated as outlined below:
1: Writing and readability of the report
2: Each team will be allocated 15 minutes for their presentation. Grades will vary depending on the presentation
which will take place towards the end of the semester. 50% of grade on Project submitted and 50% on
presentation. All members of a given team will be rewarded the same grade for the written report. Each student
will be assigned a specific grade for his/her presentation. This will be determined by the answers provided by
each student to questions posed by the instructor and other students.
US How Covid19 has Affected Different Aspects of Microeconomics Research Paper

Enrique Pena Nieto’s Approval Rating

nursing essay writing service Why has Enrique Pena Nieto’s, the president of Mexico, approval rating been on steady decline since 2013? Introduction: Since the beginning of the 20th century, there has been a constant in Mexico, the Partido Revolucionario Industrial (PRI) has been at the helm of Mexican politics. They held the presidency, in a somewhat authoritarian ruling, for 71 years until finally a new political party, Partido Accion Nacional (PAN), took office in 2000 and held it for 12 years, where afterwards Mexico sunk back to their old habits and elected a new PRI president by the name of Enrique Pena Nieto (EPN for short). EPN has been in office for a little less than 5 years of the 6 year term, and while he showed promise in his opening days, he has now fallen to become one of the most disliked and disapproved presidents in the history of Mexico. While there are many factors that go into his disapproval rating and his general “hate” among the Mexican population, he still manages to be kept in power. While Mexico broke the seal of being labeled as an authoritarian regime in 2000, the fact that they elected a president with many, many, scandals, controversies and questionable friendships, goes to show how perhaps the real leader of Mexico is corruption. Before Vicente Fox Quesada was elected president of Mexico in 2000, as the candidate of PAN, the presidency of Mexico was often handed down like a monarchy. What this meant was, the current president would hand pick his successor in a process called “Dedazo”[1]. Due to the lack of competition and the media control of PRI, the elections would always favor PRI with often margins of 90% voting. However, as people grew tired of the constant control PRI had on the country, other political parties began to emerge, like PAN in 1939, Partido de la Revolucion Democratica (PRD) in 1989, and most recently Movimiento Regeneracion Nacional (MORENA) in 2014. While PAN came to fruition earlier than the other 2, they were drowned out by the media control PRI had in Mexico. However, when EPN came into power in 2012, the 3 main political parties, in a known three party system, were PAN, PRD and PRI. While some argue that 3 party systems are often better than a simple 2 party system, in some cases it came seem bad as in theory the votes would be split 30-30-30. However, there are cases where 2 candidates are stronger and 1 gets above 40% while the other one gets above 35%[2], and in these cases a three party system tends to merge towards becoming a 2 party system. However, the three party system is flawed and it often leads to mistakes being done in democracy and not really showing the true election of the people. However, when EPN took office, after winning the election between 3 strong candidates, it wasn’t just his policies that were disliked, but his previous scandals and controversies as well. EPN is near the end of his presidential term, and most of the things he has to show for are negative. While he did do some positive things, he will most likely be remembered by the things he did to hurt the country, his party and himself. So why exactly was EPN seen as a disgrace from the beginning? His past as the governor of the State of Mexico (Edo. Mex), made him come to power with a stigma, and a stigma of being part of PRI, so he was never given a complete chance to prove his worth. His inability to be a successful president, in many ways, can bring trouble in the future. So why exactly has EPN been disliked or disapproved so much? Given the three party system in Mexico, a president who takes office usually does not have the support of more than half of the country, alongside a plethora of human right violations, suspected business with the drug cartels, bad policies and failure to correctly communicate with the public, have made Pena Nieto one of the most disapproved presidents in recent memory. Evidence: EPN as governor of Edo. Mex: Enrique Pena Nieto was born in 1966 in Atlacomulco, a small city in Edo. Mex, where he grew up under a fairly political family. Since he was little it is said he was looking forward to one day becoming the governor of his home state. He furthered his education in Mexico City, getting his bachelor of arts degree in law from Universidad Panamericana (UP) in 1989 and completing his thesis in 1991 and then went on to get his M.BA from Instituto Tecnologico y de Estudio Superiores de Monterrey (ITESM). Both these universities are well recognized in Mexico and ITESM is a very well respected school on the international level as well. However, one of the scandals he has faced is that his thesis from UP was plagiarized and that due to his unoriginality he was not actually a viable graduate from this specific university, more on this scandal later. EPN became affiliated with PRI in 1984, at the young age of 18, after enrolling in UP to study law. However, this was not his first exposure to politics, in fact he is the nephew of two former governors of Edo. Mex (Arturo Montiel and Alfredo del Mazo Gonzalez) so he would often attend rallies for his family members and be exposed to political events. However, as he often tells, he became introduced to politics at the age of 15, in 1981, when he would help his uncle del Mazo Gonzalez spread his campaign ideas through literature. This is said to be the time where EPN decided he would want to pursue a political career. It wasn’t until 2005, when he was elected governor of Edo. Mex, where he really became a powerful and recognized politician in Edo. Mex and in Mexico overall. When the elections for the governor of Edo. Mex occurred, EPN was the least favorite to win. However due to being the nephew of the previous governor (Arturo Montiel) and a historically PRI favored state, it could be said, this was a sort of “Dedazo” once again even though that seemed to have disappeared once Fox took office in 2000, breaking the PRI regime. However, it would seem EPN took office due to this. The election was fairly one sided, PRI got 47.45% of the vote, PAN got 24.79% and PRD got 24.17%, with a voter turnout of 48%[3]. This election came with some controversy, not only PRI, but PRD and PAN. The candidate for PAN, Ruben Mendoza, was said to have made many mistakes in his campaign and at time even showing drunk to events. Mendoza would often make crude remarks and was caught on tape giving his followers “soccer balls out of a PRI vehicle”[4] instead of from his own campaign. Mendoza was the original favorite to win over this crucial state, but due to his campaign mistakes, he lost the governorship. The PRD candidate, Yeidckol Polevnsky, was a candidate with no political experience making him unappealing to the public. With the mistakes Mendoza made, it would’ve been assumed that Polevnsky would have gotten his votes, but they went to EPN instead. PRI has a stigma of being corrupt and often buying elections to help further their agenda, and as Pamela Starr (an academic) put it eloquently “In a way it was a typical election with the PRI buying victory. But that said, the PRI didn’t win…”[5] she argues that the PRD and PAN lost it instead, due to their mistakes on the campaign trail and on backing a candidate with no experience. EPN won the election though, and his term served from 2005-2011 and, like everything following his win, came scandals that would seem to hurt, but not enough to make him an unelectable candidate. Once he took office, it did not take much time for the first scandal to erupt. On the 3rd day of May 2006, State and Federal forces marched into San Salvador Atenco and a violent stand-off occurred which led to “200 arrested, 50 injured, 2 dead and 26 women raped”[6], a very controversial and, in the eyes of many, a very unnecessary action ordered by EPN. This whole thing began in 2002 under the administration of Fox, when he wanted to build a new international airport that served Mexico City in the land surrounding San Salvador Atenco (Atenco for short). The people became mad and would often protest against their removal of their own land, the FPDT[7] was a strong opposition of this new planned airport. The main protestors were flower vendors and other vendors of agricultural products. Once the police forces entered Atenco and violently starting arresting and beating the citizens, a 10-hour long violence infested protest began. EPN having ordered this raid was seen as the one culprit, and while he did assume the responsibility years later, he was still called a “murderer” by many citizens of Atenco and Mexico in general. When asked about the incident, instead of blatantly saying it was a terrible and disgraceful action he ordered, he would often try to blame the media for the way it was portrayed or blame the citizens of Atenco for not welcoming the police with open arms, and instead inciting the violence that followed, something that infuriated many people in Mexico and around the world. Of the 26 women that were raped, 4 were not Mexican and they were “2 españolas, una chilena y una alemana”[8] which also caused international stir. EPN, being the one who ordered this raid is seen as the only culprit in this horrendous act of human rights violations, and while one would hope none of these would ever happen again, unfortunately for EPN he still has 2 more of these scandals coming up. While this was the only big scandal he had as governor of Edo. Mex, it is one that should not be taken lightly. In many countries that are truly democratic, this would automatically disqualify a candidate from ever seeking a higher office, especially the office of president. However, when the time came to select candidates for the 3 main parties, EPN was at the top of the list for PRI, something that didn’t sit well with the country. Even before he was president, and due to his actions as governor, he was disliked by the Mexican public, due mostly to his role in the raid of Atenco. In 2012 during his campaign a protest group formed known today as Yo soy 132[9] after a campaign event in Universidad Iberoamericana in Mexico City. This group began due to EPN’s response to a question regarding his action to raid the town of Atenco and commit several human right infractions. Even before his presidency started, he was disliked and not due to his policy proposals but for his actions. He came into the campaign trail in a disadvantage but then managed to pull up and influence the voters to his favor. Campaign and 2012 election: EPN was pegged to represent PRI in the elections in 2012. This was first hinted at in several announcements and spots on TV in 2011 when he was still governor of Edo. Mex. However, when it came time for el PRI to nominate a candidate to lead them to retake back the presidency it was EPN who took this opportunity, and eventually came out victorious. While on campaign, EPN had some questionable and, while some were hilarious, lamentable moments. One of the most important ones came in May of 2012, under 2 months from the general election. When the Department of Justice of the USA, alongside the DEA, identified a close personal friend of EPN with ties to narcotics trafficking. This person was none other than the ex-governor of the northern state of Tamaulipas, Tomas Yarrington. The DEA took back 2 properties owned by Yarrington worth over US$9million. This was an important accusation as it in some way “proved” the long assumed relationship between EPN and the narcotics trafficking. Other blunders included the inability to name 3 of the books he’s read[10] at an international book fair, failure to respond to a question regarding the price of “tortillas” and saying she was not the lady of the house so he did not know, or in an interview when asked what his ex-wife died from, he seemed to not particularly know exactly what it was (this made people angry and it started conspiracy theories that EPN killed his wife because after all he was a murderer as seen in Atenco) and seemed nervous to respond. These all minor things caused the public to really dislike him, but his lead in the polls was still by a big margin. EPN has also been said to have received “el respaldo de diversos medios de comunicación, destacadamente Televisa… la de mayor audiencia en México”[11] help in building his image due to many television spots, and also negative spots on his opponents, especially Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador. This was further denied by Televisa and by the candidate himself, but anyone who actually watched the spots and knows about the history of Televisa knows that, EPN was their candidate of choice. This shows how el PRI has in reality not changed, and they still in some way control the flow of information and the media. Leading up to the election, EPN was held in a very attractive way, physically and politically, compared to his opponents. The election of 2012 was between 3 major candidates, EPN for PRI, Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador (AMLO) for PRD and Josefina Vazquez Mota (JVM) for PAN. With EPN being the favorite to win, the result came as expected, EPN won the presidency after earning 38.2% of the votes, AMLO came in second with a 31.6% and JVM came in third with 25.4%, showing how more than 60% of the voters[12] do not wish to see EPN as president, a flaw with a three party system and an already hard hole to climb out of if one wishes to have his approval ratings kept high. So after a 12 year hiatus of PRI rule, in 2012 Mexico once again welcomed into office a PRI president, yet even the election was subject to controversy. The elections of 2012, came with 2 controversies, one fairly irrelevant compared to one that is huge. When poor people went out to vote in 2012, PRI “officials” or supporters, would offer a pre-paid card to a grocery store if they would vote for EPN. Since the poor people in Mexico often don’t have enough disposable money to afford many groceries, these cards came as life savers and they would then vote for PRI. This type of vote buying, or bribes, is an electoral fraud fueled by corruption, something the PRI has been historically linked with in previous elections when they controlled the political scope of Mexico. Women who were indecisive on who to vote, would often vote for EPN due to his good looks, “Pena Nieto proved an effective campaigner who appealed especially to women”[13]. The second and bigger controversy came to light in 2016, when it was reported that a Colombian hacker named Andres Sepulveda told Bloomberg Businessweek that he was hired by EPN to hack an election and help him secure victory. While EPN and his team denied these allegations, Sepulveda has had a nearly decade long experience hacking and influence other elections in Latin America. However, his previous hacking jobs did not include hacking and tapping phones of political opponents, but simply defacing candidates’ websites and pages. When he was approached by a middle man to work for PRI and their money resources, “$600,000, the Peña Nieto job was by far his most complex” and it came costly at the expense of not only PRI but Mexico. This hacking job was mainly to get the upper hand on the opponents of EPN, AMLO and JVM and he did so by “tap[ping] the phones and computers of anyone using the network, including the candidate” allowing him to see everything the candidate and their team were doing in real time[14]. This story broke out in 2016, 4 years removed from the election, and during a time where EPN was already suffering in the approval polls due to his policies and other scandals that came to light. What goes to show during this election and the events leading up the election of EPN is that Mexico is not a complete democracy and corruption will always have the upper hand. The election, while EPN did win by a large enough margin, is plagued to be invalid or tampered with, making it in a sense a pseudo-democracy. While the public did vote EPN into power, there are many other factors and evidence that could prove that the election was illegitimate, making EPN an illegitimate president. EPN as president and relevance today: Scandals as president that have brought his approval rating down: Right now the approval rating of EPN is at a historically low 12%[15] which is something that is very unheard of in democratic countries. This can be attributed to the numerous scandals and controversies that have occurred during his first 5 years in office, and also some of the policies he has implemented. Some of the controversies are smaller and the details are not too many and are scarce so their description and analysis will not be as complete as the previous section of this paper. However, these scandals and controversies have led to a historically unpopular president and the potential rise of an extreme president which could be worse for Mexico. Tracking approval ratings, might seem like a useless statistic, but they go to show many things about a country. A disapproved president will often lead to a rising of a politically dangerous character which threatens to go to the extreme to fix the country in a way the current president is unable to do so. The approval ratings can also go to show how democratic a country is, a president with an approval rating of less than 50% or less than what he won the election by (38.2%) goes to show how flawed a country might be democratically. EPN has never been a very popular candidate, yet he won the presidency, he has been surrounded by multiple scandals, yet he has not been removed or investigated. Once in power in Latin America, and Mexico, it is hard to remove said power and this often leads to crises, as one can see with the Venezuelan economic crisis as well as Argentina with Christina Kirchner. Latin America, Mexico and PRI in particular are often characterized with corruption and it can be one of the factors why EPN is still in power even after many of the scandals presented below. The most damaging scandal by EPN and his administration is without a doubt the case of Ayotzinapa and the 43 missing students. This scandal is a huge human rights violation and it has negatively grappled the administration of EPN. On 26 September 2014, students from Ayotzinapa were on their way to Mexico City for a commemoration of the events of October 2, 1968[16] on many buses. They were intercepted and attacked by police, army and a militia group known as Guerreros Unidos[17] in the community of Iguala in the state of Guerrero. During the shootout, 8 people were killed, 25 of them were injured and 43 remain missing to this day. One of the suspects in this is the mayor of Iguala, Jose Luis Abarca, and his wife Maria de los Angeles. Maria de los Angeles is relative of many members of the drug cartel Beltran-Leyva, so the evidence is against them. Right after this shootout, they escaped from Iguala and went to Mexico City to hide, furthering their guilty stigma. EPN is also said to have played a part in this, similar to the Atenco case, and EPN also left the country on a visit to China when this happened. A crisis of this magnitude would normally keep the president in the country and try and solve it. Not only did he “flee” to China, but he did not even acknowledge the event until after a few weeks, “hasta el día 11 que Peña por primera vez hablaría del caso”[18]. His failure to appreciate the magnitude of this crisis alongside, how he spoke about the event itself made the public angry and they blamed him for doing this, which is not the first time he would’ve approved a police/military intervention on protests. When he spoke about the crisis, instead of showing a strong, sad, and ashamed tone, he would often just say “superemos esta etapa” which means “let’s move on from this phase”. This whole speech and his way of expressing it made people curious as to whether or not he actually cared about the disappearing of 43 students, and the death of 8. After this horrific event, it would be the first time people would disapprove EPN more than they would approve of him, and with good reason. This event still has no solid culprits and it is still a very sore subject for the administration of EPN. This killing and kidnapping of innocent protesters also comes on the heels of a different massacre that occurred on June 30, 2014. June 30, 2014 is another day that the administration of EPN has wanting to ignore or forget, known as the Tlataya Massacre. This came in the very early morning of said day when a group of military men saw an armed person protecting a warehouse. The military decided to check it out and a stand-off occurred with the military shooting first to draw the people inside the warehouse out. The people inside the warehouse came out and surrendered. However, the military did not stop there and they executed the people in the warehouse one by one. This is a gross violation of human rights and it ultimately caused the death of 22 people. While the executed people were doing illegal activities by having women kidnapped in the warehouse, and some other criminal activity, the fact that the military executed them goes to show the lack of control the president has on his own military force. As of now 8 of the military members involved in this shooting were put on trial, with only 1 of them sentenced for a minimum sentence of 1 year in prison. Another interesting fact of this massacre was that the crime scene was tampered with to make it seem the deaths of the executed people was due to a standoff, but multiple witnesses and a report from the CNDH[19] shows it was in fact an execution of the Mexican military, in control by EPN. This massacre and Ayotzinapa are two terrible events that the president has not addressed or seemed to care too much about. These have made him look like a murderer or complicit with the murderers of the innocent people, which is why his approval rating have sunk since these 2 events at a drastic pace. One of the most pathetic things to ever happen to EPN was when Joaquin “El Chapo” Guzman escaped in 2015 from a maximum security prison. EPN and his administration did manage to capture him twice, once in 2014 and the other in 2016, but the simple fact he managed to escape in the first place is one of the things that EPN whished he would’ve done more to avoid. The escape of “El Chapo” is seen as a lack of security around, arguably, the most wanted man on earth, and the escape came at a time when EPN was already on “thin ice” in regards to his approval rating. This was seen as a laughing stock on the global scene and EPN suffered from it. While this was not his fault, the fact that it happened caused EPN to become very disliked by the Mexican community and the global community. Other smaller, yet relevant, scandals and controversies have plagued EPN and in turn made him a very disapproved president. The most recent scandal was the capture of the ex-governor of Veracruz and close friend of EPN, Javier Duarte for money laundering and embezzlement. This comes as no shock, as there are many ties between EPN and criminal activities and corruption. In 2016 it was found that EPN’s thesis from school showed that of his 200 page written document “28.9 percent, [was] found to be plagiarized”[20] which may be shown that he is in fact not a real graduate or a real lawyer. A scandal known as La Casa Blanca[21] shows that TV star Angelica Rivera, and wife to EPN, purchased a house valued at $US7.5million from Grupo Higa, a construction group which was a favorite of EPN. This house was purchased at preferential price by Rivera, and this is shady as Grupo Higa had just won the rights to build a train from Mexico City-Queretaro. This came just weeks after the Ayotzinapa scandal in 2014. The visit by Donald Trump in October 2016 was also seen as a weak move by the president. His coffin, in terms of approval ratings, comes at the beginning of 2017 with a scandal known as “gazolinazo”, when to attract investment and save government funds, the government got rid of the subsidies it has on fuel and it eventually led to a 20% increase in gasoline prices. The country revolted and protested this. This is the backlash of the energy reform EPN passed in 2013 that allowed international competition in a monopolistic market of gasoline controlled by PEMEX (Petroleos Mexicanos). This energy reform was a great thing and it was received with many applauses and approval by almost everyone. The “gasolinazo” is part of the energy reform and it was part of the backlash, this is what drove EPN to have an approval rating of 12%. EPN has seen a steady decline in his approval ratings since 2013, and most of it is related to the scandals he has surrounded himself in, most of which would damage any president. EPN in some ways brought these scandals upon himself and it is no shock that he is a very disliked president. This tracking of approval ratings is relevant, in the eyes of society, to see how exactly a person that has committed so many violations and scandals could’ve possibly been elected to office, and even kept in office after discovering. This disapproval has given rise to the extreme-left in Mexico with a possible president like AMLO (now a candidate for MORENA), and he might be more dangerous than EPN could ever be. Disapproved and disliked presidents usually lead to extremes rising out, and in the previous years Latin America has been bound by a “Left-turn” causing countries to go towards more left leaning candidates. Conclusion: Mexico is far from being a perfect democracy, and it could be argued that no country is. The case of EPN is a very interesting and clear one, his approval ratings were down since he took office due to his previous entanglements with social unrest, and the fact that over 60% of the voters did not want him. Tracking approval ratings seems to be a useless and unheard of practice, but these may determine the future of a country. Extreme candidates are the biggest threat to low approval ratings and with presidents who have been synonymous with the word scandal. In Mexico AMLO (an extreme left-Chavez loving-candidate) is gaining more and more steam ahead of the 2018 elections and this could be dangerous. In France as well, Marine Le Pen (a far-right candidate) was favorite to win the presidency[22] due to the 4% approval rating of Hollande. Approval ratings in some way also show how effectively a democracy is working, high approval rating usually mean the public is content with their elected leader (in this case the government is of the people), the opposite is true of low approval ratings, they are usually only in power due to themselves controlling the power and unwilling to let it go. EPN has been surrounded by corruption his whole career, it comes as no surprise that he may be in power due to this as well, something very common in Latin American countries. If a person is this disliked, why not get rid of him or at least seriously investigate him? I guess power and corruption are the true leaders of Latin America and Mexico. Bibliography #YoSoy132. “Manifesto of #YoSoy132 to the Peoples of Mexico.” 23 May 2012. Kraul, Chris, and Cecilia Sanchez. “PRI Wins Governorship of Mexico’s Most Populous State.” Los Angeles Times. The World, 04 July 2005. Aguayo Quezada, Sergio. Remolino: El Mexico de la Sociedad Organizada, los poderes facticos y Enrique Pena Nieto. 2014 Candon-Mena, Jose Ignacio. “Movimientos por la democratización de la comunicación : los casos del 15M y #YOSOY132.” Razon y Palabra 82 (2013). Conn, Clayton . “Mexico Remembers 2006 Atenco Tragedy When Police Raped, Killed.” Telesur. 3 May 2016. Emequis. “Peña Nieto: ¿Por qué y cómo ganó la Presidencia?” Vanguardia. 11 July 2012. Gomez, Magdalena. “Ayotzinapa: de la crisis humanitaria a la crisis de Estado.” El Cotidiano 30.189 (2015): 50-59 Negrete-Cárdenas, Sergio. “La brújula perdida de Enrique Peña Nieto.” Analisis Plural (2016): 45-58. Okeowo, Alexis. “THE GAS-PRICE PROTESTS GRIPPING MEXICO.” The New Yorker. 24 Jan. 2017 Politico, Animal. “Así ocurrió la matanza del Ejército en Tlatlaya, según la CNDH.” Vanguardia.22 Oct. 2014. Robertson, Jordan, Michael Riley, and Andrew Willis. “How to Hack an Election.” Bloomberg. Bloomberg Businessweek, 31 Mar. 2016. Stargardter, Gabriel. “Los 8 escándalos que han marcado el sexenio de Peña Nieto.” Reuters. 21 Aug. 2016 “Tlatlaya, a un año de la masacre.” El Economista. 30 June 2015. “A 8 años del conflicto y abusos en San Salvador Atenco.” Terra. Redaccion Mexico, 2 May 2014 [1] This means that “by pointing a finger” to someone the president chose as the next president [2] This was the case in the 2000 election when PAN (Vicente Fox) got 42.52% and PRI (Francisco Labastida) got 36.11% [3] The voter turnout was unusually low, due to the candidates not being the optimal choices of the public [4] Chris Kraul and Cecilia Sanchez in the LA Times [5] A quote given to the LA Times [6] Conn. A violent and unnecessary intervention [7] Community Front in Defense of Land [8] 2 Spanish girls, a Chilean girl and a German girl. Terra [9] I am 132. A group of 131 student formed this protest group, with a manifesto, to stand up against EPN and his actions in Atenco claiming he is not a viable presidential candidate to represent them [10] He named the Bible and a book by an author which was not the correct author of the book [11] Endorsement from the biggest television communication company in Mexico. Vanguardia [12] There was a 63% voter turnout [13] Chris Kraul and Cecilia Sanchez in the LA Times [14] Bloomberg Businessweek story on Andres Sepulveda [15] As of January 2017 [16] Known as the Tlatelolco Massacre were police attacked citizens protesting [17] United Warriors [18] Until day 11 when EPN talked about the case. It is unclear if this means 11 days after the event or the day 11 of October [19] Human Rights National Commission report on the massacre [20] Reuters by Stargardter [21] The White House scandal [22] The elections that took place on April 23, 2017 put her in second place behind a centrist Emmanuel Macron, which is good news

EHS Trump versus Biden Major Candidate Messages Analysis Discussion

EHS Trump versus Biden Major Candidate Messages Analysis Discussion.

I’m working on a rocket science discussion question and need support to help me study.

For this activity, you are going to look for examples of messages in the Biden and Trump presidential campaigns that reflect concepts in social psychology. These messages can be in the form of campaign ads, speeches, tweets or other social media.My advice is to take a look at both candidates a bit. Read and listen to their messages. Start to get an idea of what they are both about. Then, go back to your textbook and online content and look for terms, studies, and/or theories that are reflected in the messages. Remember, politics is about persuading people, influencing people, and appealing to people’s self-concept and self-worth. This is done in a variety of ways including trying to create conformity, appealing to prejudices and fear, creating an environment of obedience, and understanding how voters think and protect their self-concepts through cognitive dissonance etc.Write an analysis of both campaigns. Your analysis will include:1) An introduction2) A relatively brief description of each candidate the some of the major messages/platforms presented by both. Include what you read and watched to help you develop this understanding.3) Apply at least two different social psychological terms to the messages/vibe of each candidate. Define the terms and provide a few examples for each term to justify your answer. (Note: You can use two sides of the same term but this will only count as one term.) Include images or quotes if you can in the body of your paper to demonstrate the messages.4) Share what you thought of this exercise. What is easy or difficult? Did it help you dig into the candidates a bit more deeply than you normally would have? Did it help to take a more “academic” approach to thinking about politics than the common emotional approach?5) Concluding paragraph6) Citations for the terms and messages7) Reference section at end8) Word count will not be specified this time. You should know what is expected by now. Be thoughtful. Be clear. Don’t plagiarize.The font should be Times New Roman 12-point unbolded• Double-space your lines and use 1-inch margins• Follow APA style for formatting your citations and your reference page. Here are some sources:In-text citations:,the%20end%20of%20the%20paper.Reference section:…
EHS Trump versus Biden Major Candidate Messages Analysis Discussion

DeVry University Accounting Profession Competencies Discussion

DeVry University Accounting Profession Competencies Discussion.

1. Search the website to select and read any three recent articles relating to footnote disclosures, SEC, XBRL, EDGAR, IFRS, or reporting requirements. Referring to the articles you selected and reviewed for this week’s reading assignment, discuss any one topic. How does this topic impact U.S. companies in general or a specific company that you’ve work for? 2. In what types of situations does an accountant or auditor use a framework for ethical analysis to make decisions? Provide examples. 3. Why should directors, executives, and accountants understand consequentialism, deontology, and virtue ethics?
DeVry University Accounting Profession Competencies Discussion