Read the “In Re Yamashita” case, then write and submit your case brief. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/327/1/ Before you begin, however, to

Read the “In Re Yamashita” case, then write and submit your case brief.

https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/327/1/

Before you begin, however, to help you succeed, review the three attachments below before you begin the assignment.

The attachments (1) explain the case briefing process and (2) show the relationship between the court’s opinion and the brief.[supanova_question]

. Compare and contrast service learning and civic engagement as defined by the American Psychological Association

. Compare and contrast service learning and civic engagement as defined by the American Psychological Association.

Text book: “The SocialPsychology of Prosocial Behavior” Chapter 7 – Being the Helper and Being Helped Each answer should be a minimum of two paragraphs. Use examples to support your answers. 1. What is known as the combination of empathy, a sense of responsibility, and the capacity to feel concern for and attachment to other people? Discuss thoroughly and give two examples. 2. Compare and contrast service learning and civic engagement as defined by the American Psychological Association found here: https://www.apa.org/education/undergrad/civic-engagement.aspx. Give three examples of each. 3. Why do people differ in their prosocial tendencies? Discuss thoroughly. 4. What variables affect people’s reactions to assistance and willingness to help? 5. Discuss the key components of a prosocial personality.

Essay Help “>Essay Help

https://onlinecustomessaywriting.com/

[supanova_question]

Report on Harvey Norman – Management Decision Making

Read the “In Re Yamashita” case, then write and submit your case brief. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/327/1/ Before you begin, however, to Report on Harvey Norman – Management Decision Making.

Description

Report on Harvey Norman – Management Decision Making

Identify unknown decision making issues and provide recommendation to Harvey Norman Please see attached document for clear instructions 

Essay Help “>Essay Help

https://onlinecustomessaywriting.com/

[supanova_question]

Sinners in the Angry Hands of God

Sinners in the Angry Hands of God.

 Description When speakers give persuasive speeches, they utilize a variety of appeals and rhetorical devices to convey messages to their audiences and achieve their ultimate purposes. Write a 2-page essay in which you analyze the rhetorical devices the speaker uses in Sinners in the Angry Hands of God, to persuade his audience and achieve his purpose. The essay must be in 12-point font, Times New Roman font and be in proper APA format. Choose at least three rhetorical devices (literary elements) that make the work appealing and effectively contribute to the author’s purpose. Then write a thesis statement that identifies the devices and your opinion about their contribution to the work. Support your thesis statement with precise and relevant examples from the text of the speech. Use direct quotations, paraphrases, and summaries of the text to support the ideas in your analysis. Be sure to use parenthetical documentation to give credit to the author if citing from the text (see example below). If using a quote that is longer than three lines, use ellipses (…) to denote missing words, but you must never begin a quote with ellipses. Never drop naked quotes into your essay – you need to introduce your evidence with a transitional/ lead-in sentence (see example below). Example: Patrick Henry began his speech with a respectful tone that was meant to flatter the men present and make them feel as if he were one of them. His opening statement to the House, “Mr. President: No man thinks more highly than I do of the patriotism, as well as well as the abilities of the very men who have just addressed the House” (Allen & Holt McDougal, 2012), was an ethical appeal to get the audience to trust him and feel a sense of brotherhood with him because he claimed to respect them and support their patriotic ideals. OR Example: Patrick Henry began his speech with a respectful tone that was meant to flatter the men present and make them feel as if he were one of them. His opening statement to the House, “Mr. President: No man thinks more highly than I do of the patriotism, as well as well as the abilities of the very men who have just addressed the House” (Allen & Holt McDougal, 2012, p.122), was an ethical appeal to get the audience to trust him and feel a sense of brotherhood with him because he claimed to respect them and support their patriotic ideals. References page format: References Allen, J., & Holt McDougal. (2012). Holt McDougal Literature: Grade 11. Orlando, Fla: Holt McDougal/Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. Provide commentary for each example you draw from the text. The commentary should explain how the device effectively contributes to the overall purpose of the speech. The ratio is generally two commentaries for each detail. Do not just string one quote after another. You need to weave your commentary and your details together so that your essay flows smoothly from one idea to the next. Since this essay involves more than one example of more than one rhetorical device, the organization is of utmost importance. Organize paragraphs about devices used by order of importance and organize details and examples within each paragraph chronologically (the order in which they appear). Your conclusion should restate your main points and be insightful, but it must not be a repeat of your introduction. Avoid using the very same words you already used.

Essay Help “>Essay Help

https://onlinecustomessaywriting.com/

[supanova_question]

An Exegetical and Theological Analysis of Daniel’s Four Kingdoms (Dan. 2:31-49; 7:1-28)

An Exegetical and Theological Analysis of Daniel’s Four Kingdoms (Dan. 2:31-49; 7:1-28).

 An Exegetical and Theological Analysis of Daniel’s Four Kingdoms (Dan. 2:31-49; 7:1-28)—due November 26th (required for B&TS majors; by special request for others before September 28th). Description: This persuasive exegetical and theological research paper interprets Daniel 2 and 7 with regard to the four earthly kingdoms that precede God’s everlasting kingdom, then synthesize your conclusions with your understanding of systematic eschatology (i.e., dispensational vs. covenant theology, amillennial vs. premillennial theology, etc.). It must reflect the questions discussed in class, although you should argue your own position. Use the following paper outlines precisely, including headers, sub-headers and minimal word counts—not including footnotes and bibliography). A. Introduction (150 words) Thesis question: Which four kingdoms do these parallel chapters represent, and how does the fourth kingdom relate to the establishment of God’s kingdom? Discuss each of the following topics and texts in light of these questions. NOTE: The historical accuracy of the narratives and their historical markers is assumed in this paper. Do not discuss the date and composition of Daniel here. B. Contextual and Exegetical Arguments for Either the Greek or Roman View (1,600 words) 1. First kingdom: Nebuchadnezzar’s reign or the extended Babylonian Empire? 2. “Inferiority” of the second kingdom as it relates to Media or Persia 3. Worldwide extent and “four heads” of the third kingdom 4. Relevance of the “last” kingdom (before God’s kingdom) mentioned in Dan. 2, 7-8, and 11 5. Structural similarity and dates of Daniel 7 & 8, and their “four heads” and “little horn(s)” 6. Relevance of Jer. 51:11, 28, Isa. 13:17-19, and Dan. 5:31, 9:1, and 11:1 in the larger context 7. Relationship of the last kingdom to the establishment of God’s kingdom C. Conclusion (250 words) Include four items in this section: (1) a well-reasoned, summary response to the thesis question that flows from your analysis of the biblical texts, (2) a brief statement of the strongest points in your argument, (3) a brief discussion of the ramifications of this for your understanding of systematic theology, and (4) a description of how you might teach or preach this subject from these chapters in your church. Assessment: This task option will be assessed on the basis of the completion of each section and sub-section, soundness of the exegetical argument, number of sources substantively engaged, and general writing competency. NOTE: A copy of the grading rubric that will be used to score this paper is included at the end of the syllabus. Instructions for Formatting and Submission of Research Papers (required for both Research Paper options above; also, see “Biola University General Requirements for Written and Oral Projects” under “Class Policy Information”): • Use the exact letter/number outline formats given in this syllabus. Address each of the issues indicated separately. Include word counts for each major section as indicated in the assignment. NOTE: Word requirements reflect the minimum— you may write more if you wish. • Use only the Turabian “Notes and Bibliography Citation System” with “superscript note numbers.” An abbreviated Turabian Style Guide is available for PDF download on Canvas. Use footnotes (not endnotes) and include a full bibliography of all sources footnoted. Bibliographic entries must follow Turabian exactly. Footnotes should be formatted after this abbreviated pattern: 2Steinmann, Daniel, 331. If you are using an electronic version of a book where page numbers are not available, provide chapter or footnote numbers, along with the location number. • Title your uploaded electronic files after this pattern: “DAN Narratives JSmith.” • Demonstrate meaningful interaction with a minimum of twelve (12) different academic resource persons—fairly, respectfully, and evenly representing differing viewpoints. These may include class texts, articles, commentaries, and interviews with professors knowledgeable on this subject matter. Individual contributors to our texts constitute individual sources. Do not overuse any one source in your paper. Note: Internet sources should be avoided for this paper.

Essay Help “>Essay Help

https://onlinecustomessaywriting.com/

[supanova_question]

diverse workplace and leadership,Based on these differences explain the following: Describe the differences in culture and diversity by using Cultural Dimensions. Compare and contrast your culture or the diversity factors with the differences that were p

diverse workplace and leadership,Based on these differences explain the following: Describe the differences in culture and diversity by using Cultural Dimensions. Compare and contrast your culture or the diversity factors with the differences that were p.

the workplace is becoming more culturally diverse. It is important for leaders to understand and manage these differences in workplace culture and diversity.
Describe a time when you experienced culture or diversity differences in the workplace (either at your current or past place of work).
Based on these differences explain the following: 
Describe the differences in culture and diversity by using Cultural Dimensions.
Compare and contrast your culture or the diversity factors with the differences that were presented in the workplace.
Explain how you or your leader handled the cultural or diversity differences.
Determine how these differences could have been mitigated.
Examine the leadership style that you or your leader used to manage these differences.
you can use google scholar

Essay Help “>Essay Help

https://onlinecustomessaywriting.com/

[supanova_question]