read an article and respond to two questions

Conflict in the Work Place

Share this: Facebook Twitter Reddit LinkedIn WhatsApp Kathryn Moultrie The conflict in my workplace that I was involved took place in the unit (ICU/Open heart), I was assigned to for eight months s staffing resource nurse. I had admitted a critical patient; acute status asthmaticus, who initially refused a much needed intubation/sedation, I had admitted a critical patient; acute status asthmaticus, who initially refused a much needed intubation/sedation, I felt my person-centered high quality approach, and knowledge of her condition allow her to agree to treatment, though she was afraid, it was a very difficult situation for our entire team After three days of caring for this patient (who did amazingly well), now do for extubating, I was informed during the unit huddle that my assignment had been changed. I emphatically disagreed with the charge nurse, but remained silent, trying to wrap head and thoughts around what was just said. I immediately thought of our new “speak-up initiative” policy. I quietly after huddle say to my charge nurse that I really need to understand her clinical reasoning for the change in assignment The charge nurse explained to me that her decision to change the assignment was based on the complexity of the case, and the connection to the family, especially the mother; “insisting that you” continue to care for her daughter, concerns me” and I feel this would only create a stressful situation for the rest of the staff who will be caring for the patient. I had spent 3 12 hour shifts taking of this patient with a colleague (a staffing resource nurse (Moultrie 2015). Part 2: Identify the Group Members The group members were charge nurse, the Intensivist caring for the patient, the respiratory therapist a staffing resource nurse and colleague (ICU and Trauma ICU experience), and myself both, a part of hospitals staffing resource (full time employment status) department; assigned to the unit for the next 8 months. Though the family was present, they were not included in the conflict nor the Intensivist. Professionally, my inner thoughts were; exclusion from the team, within our unit or distrust. I felt puzzled by this decision not wanting to react (Chapter 3: Understanding Group Dynamics and systems (n. d.), p. 70). My colleague felt you need to talk to her. I don’t believe this conflict or situation was gender or cultural biases, contributing negatively to group It felt inter personal Understanding Group Dynamics and systems (n. d.), p. 70). Part 3: Gender or Cultural Biases Professionally as I said before, my inner thoughts were; exclusion from the team, within our unit or distrust, puzzled by this decision and not wanting to reaction, not bias (Chapter 3: Understanding Group Dynamics and systems (n. d.), p. 70), I remained silent. I can honestly say that gender or cultural biases did not contribute positively or negatively to the group dynamics. According to Shackelford, B., (2011), the most common forms of bias in the workplace can be subtle. I was never sure what had contributed to this conflict. After we discussed the patient and family and continuity of care, related to a new approach to her [patient] care, and the importance of having a win-win outcome for the patient and the organization’s quality of care, she reversed her decision (Chapter 3: Understanding Group Dynamics and systems (n. d.), p. 70). Part 4: Verbal and nonverbal behavior In this conflict the verbal behavior that I notice that was not helpful from a group member (respiratory therapist) was the statement; “why is she doing this”? The nonverbal behavior of my facial expression let her know that I was not in agreeance with R.T. and could we talk. Group behavior arises in phrases that include the person’s perception, level-headedness, as well as the communications taking place, both intentionally and unintentionally, between people present. This conflict to me is an example of positive feedback that was change provoking (Chapter 3: Understanding Group Dynamics and systems (n. d.), p. 75). Part 5: Evaluation of the Interdisciplinary Rounds Video using the Assessment Tool My thought on the video is it was well organized and the right team players were present, but my ratings were low (2’s) in two area’s communications and situation monitoring. Some members of the team did not use clear, brief layman’s terms with the family present, even though the Physician (intensivist), did interject and break down some of the terms, check-backs were not always used to insure the information was well understood and communicated to the family. An intubated patient not being fed, dietary concerns seemed overlook, however dietary immediately identify the goals and visions. What bothered me most was the alarming of the Ventilator, I felt the respiratory therapist position should have been at the ventilator, monitoring the patient’s status and securing the alarm, I sensed some uneasiness in the wife, that she may have been slightly overwhelmed. The continuous disruptive alarming of the ventilator, I feel impacted the entire teams ability to be focused on the patient and his family (Christiana Care, (2012, Video and Team Dynamics Assessment Tool, (n. d.). In conclusion, According to, Bill Shackelford author of Minority Recruiting: Building the Strategies and Relationships for Effective Diversity Recruiting. In his article for Workforce Diversity Network, Shackelford says the ability to grasp, how bias creeps into today’s progressive workplace starts with an expanded definition, which is: “Bias: “Intended and unintended, aware and hidden, mindsets, manners and actions that have a negative and disparity impact on sections of the people/society, or favor one sections of the people/society” (Shackelford, B., (2011). Conflict in the workplace can be an example of positive feedback that can provoke change. Interdisciplinary rounds, (in some areas) are a new care coordination strategy in several health care settings, and are conducted in many ways (Shackelford, B., (2011). References Chapter 3: Understanding Group Dynamics and systems, ( Retrieved from: http://www.sagepub.com/upm-data/27380_Chapter3.pdf Christiana Care, (2012), Interdisciplinary Rounds. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C31k-CU6Bqg Team Dynamics Assessment Tool, (n. d.), NU 414 Assignment, Retrieved from Web site http://www.ahrq.gov/professionals/education/curriculum-tools/teamstepps/instructor/reference/tmpot.pdf Freshman, B., (2010), et al, Collaboration across the disciplines in health care. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers. Mack, R. (2016), NU 414 Interprofessional Teams, On-line Course and Syllabus, Saint Joseph’s College Maine https://sjcme.brightspace.com/d2l/le/content/16265/Home Shackelford, B., (2011), The New Face Of Bias In The Workplace, Part 1 – The Subtlety of Bias http://www.workforcediversitynetwork.com/res_articles_newfaceofbias_Shackelford.aspx Share this: Facebook Twitter Reddit LinkedIn WhatsApp

Strategic integration section

essay help online Strategic integration section. I need help with a Computer Science question. All explanations and answers will be used to help me learn.

1 – Study Questions 1-8, Exercise 2, 4 & 5.
2 – Essay Assignment 1: Review the strategic integration section. Note what strategic integration is and how it ties to the implementation of technology within an organization.
3 – Essay Assignment 2: Review the information technology roles and responsibilities section. Note how IT is divided based on operations and why this is important to understand within an organization.

The above assignment should be two pages in length (one page for each question) and adhere to APA formatting standards.

Attached material below.
Strategic integration section

RWS 05 Grossmont College English Plascencia Academic Writing Essay

RWS 05 Grossmont College English Plascencia Academic Writing Essay.

Introduction. Look at the sample Letters of Recruitment
on Canvas for ideas. An introduction is a place to set your tone (as in
anyintroduction). You are welcoming the reader to the department,
thechallenge of this important decision: choosing a major.
Establishingyour inviting and gracious tone can be short, focused and
charming.
Start to introduce the curriculum. That’s how most
students arrange this letter. Some will provide a BRIEF overview of
courses, units required, etc., but they then begin to discuss the 2-3
specific courses, some specific work in these courses that will entice
the reader, informthe reader of some of the more technical work, etc.
Building your authority in this letter is paramount. The technical,
discipline-specific parts of this letter will make or break this
academic authority.
Next is the faculty. Some of you might want to discuss
the professors while you are talking about the course in the section
above (see:curriculum). That makes sense. But often students discuss
2-3courses, in the previous section, and then 2-3 professors in a
different section. You can mix this strategy. You might discuss one of
the professors as you are explaining the curriculum. And then 2 other
professors in this section we’re calling the faculty section of your
paper.
Department/major facilities might enhance your argument.
Facilities might also be part of the discussion of curriculum.
Explaining the kind of work spaces and/or tools or simulations students
have access to can be quite interesting and illustrative of your major
and professional discourse.
Students often move to internships, clubs, or organizations
that are affiliated with the major/department. Be specific if you can
and hopefully this discussion can shed light on the discourse (what a
speaker talked about at a club meeting, what an organization does in the
community, etc.).
Study abroad might be another section/discussion that
can enhance your LoR. I talked about how the academic part of a study
abroad trip would be quite interesting. Sharing how you traveled and
partied in a foreign city doesn’t quite do enough for a letter like this
(some clever writing might be able to do a bit of both: the academic
and exciting cultural experience).
You might talk briefly about job opportunities for
people graduating with this major; students have cited Department of
Labor statistics, or given some data on salaries, different professions,
job titles, etc.
That’s a wrap! Provide a nice brief farewell. See the samples for ideas, too.
RWS 05 Grossmont College English Plascencia Academic Writing Essay

Mathematics homework help

Mathematics homework help. This paper should give an overview of how IPT and CBT are utilized to treat depression. Including underlying theories of why depression manifests as well as treatment interventions and structure of therapy.,Overview of how IPT and CBT are utilized to treat depression,Please complete a 5 page APA Style paper (Including Cover and Reference Page).,This paper should give an overview of how IPT and CBT are utilize to treat depression. Including underlying theories of why depression manifests as well as treatment interventions and structure of therapy.,Then compare the two approaches.,Finally, identify which approach you believe is most affective.,Please include at least 2 outside sources (peer reviewed journal articles preferred) in addition to the text.,More details;,IPT and CBT best for depression in children and young people, says network meta-analysis,Amongst children and young people the point prevalence of depression ranges from 1.9-3.4% in primary school children and from 3.2-8.9% in adolescents ,(Birmaher et al, 1996; Costello et al, 2003; Kovacs et al, 1984).,The use of medication to treat depression in children and young people is somewhat controversial due to mixed evidence concerning the efficacy and safety of antidepressants, alongside evidence of an increased risk of suicidal behaviour in children and adolescents (Jureidini et al, 2004; Qin et al, 2014).,There are several types of psychotherapies available for treating depression in children and young people (Weisz et al, 2006; Weisz et al, 2013). Whilst it is generally accept that various forms of psychotherapy are beneficial for treating depression in children and young people, recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses have challenge this. For instance, Weisz et al. (2006) found the effect sizes for cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) to be much lower than those documented in a previous meta-analysis by Reinecke et al (1998). Moreover, there are some discrepancies between meta-analyses that suggest CBT is superior to non-cognitive treatments (David-Ferdon & Kaslow, 2008; Watanabe et al, 2007) and meta-analyses which suggest that non-cognitive treatments such as interpersonal therapy (IPT) are as efficacious as cognitive treatments (Hetrick et al, 2015).,Attachments,Click Here To Download,Mathematics homework help