Rasmussen College Human Services Resource Specialist Responses Discussion

This problem uses Consumer Price Index (CPI) data

This problem uses Consumer Price Index (CPI) data.

This problem uses Consumer Price Index (CPI) data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) from 1913 to 2015. Note the years may be hidden, scroll to go all the way back to 1913.a.) Use the annual CPI values to convert the given cost of an iPhone 6s in 2015$ into every other years’ dollars. Assuming the iPhone 6s existed back then of course. How did people communicate without cell phones?b.) Take the ratio of each year’s annual CPI to the previous value and scale the second quantity to 1 by simply dividing the two values. Note: parts c-e below!c.) Compute the annual inflation rate by subtracting 1 from the ratio from part c. Format as percentage to 2 decimal places.d.) In what year did inflation increase the most? Note there is a way to get Excel to do this for you. First find MAX annual inflation rate. Then use MATCH to find which value this is in the column for inflation rates: 1,2,3,… Then you can use INDEX to pull the year from this row, or just find it yourself!e.) Does inflation always increase from year to year? Answer should be yes or no.
This problem uses Consumer Price Index (CPI) data

Analysis Of Lolitas Enslavement To Humbert English Literature Essay

essay writing help Vladimir Nabokov’s novel Lolita depicts the relationship between a young girl and a much older3333 man. Humbert Humbert is in his late thirties and forties throughout the book and he talks the reader through how this relationship with Lolita made him feel and how it progressed as she got older and they moved around becoming closer as the months went on. Humbert Humbert narrates the entire book and he expresses to us how Lolita was in his words, but we never hear how it was for her, her side of the story, and how she felt in reality and not just how Humber Humbert thought she felt and was. It can be seen as how he wanted to ensure the reader believed him, about how he didn’t approve himself of the relationship he had and longed for with Lolita. It also however, makes the reader wonder was Lolita in one sense a slave to Humbert in that she was trapped as his daughter and lover because she had nobody else, the novel only gives Humbert’s point of view so there is nothing saying he isn’t making up Lolita’s personality to make himself look better to the reader. Humbert Humbert begins the book with a short chapter one his love for Lolita. He claims that his love for Lolita was only so strong because he had once loved a young girl before her for one summer, Annabel. He initially comes to meet Lolita when in chapter ten he moves to New England, to the house if Mrs Haze, 342 lawn street as she extended an invitation to him when he was stuck unsure of where he’d b going [1] . He sees Lolita for the first time in the garden and he describes her as if she was the young girl from his past, Annabel, and in doing this he seems to of immediately fallen for Lolita. Seeing Lolita was so much like Annabel, Humbert decides to accept Mrs. Haze’s invitation to stay on at the house. As the novel progresses we learn hoe Humbert’s ‘fondness’ for Lolita grew. He describes how he used to look at her and watch her sometimes. The reader quickly learns how fascinated he was becoming with Lolita, he would go into her bedroom from time to time and touch her things to be near her, “My heart seemed everywhere at once. Never in my life – not even when fondling my child – love in France – never” [2] . Lolita it seems had no idea as to what Humbert was doing. It is during this part of the book that Humber first kisses Lolita, it was just on her eyelid but to him this created agony, when describing it in the book Humbert says “never have I experienced such agony” [3] . Humbert becomes increasingly close to Lolita and her mother, mainly so he can continue being around the “hot little haze”. Even though he continually tries to justify his actions the reader still has no reason to trust him because he clearly tells of his deceit and the feelings he should not be having. After Lolita leaves for camp, Humbert and Charlotte Haze get engaged, this is purely from Humbert’s point of view just another way to stay in the house without question. However while Lolita is still at camp her mother gets run over by a car swerving from a dog and she is killed. Humbert now has to go and get Lolita from camp and tell her about her mother. They go to stay in a hotel and on the way she kisses him and again in the hotel. Humbert realises he still loves her and thought of being a good father figure leaves him. Also in the novel, towards the end or Part One, Humbert and Lolita’s relationship turns clearly sexual and it makes the reader question him, and whether we can trust how he describes the affair and how he says the Lolita seduced him in the hotel and not the other way around. Could Lolita of been too young to understand what was going on, the initial advance she makes on Humbert while she was so young is also questionable, Humbert was the only one she had at this point in her life, Humbert himself says how it was probably nothing huge for her, just exploring and living her adolescent life. And as Simone de Beauvoir says “She is already free of her childish past, and the present seems but a time of transition; it contains no valid aims, only occupations” [4] .He also tells her at the end of Part One the truth about her mother and this upsets Lolita, drawing her closer and closer to Humbert, “in the middle of the night she came sobbing into mine, and we made it up very gently. You see, she had absolutely nowhere else to go” [5] . In the novel the reader learns slowly realises the level of jealousy and power that Humbert has for Lolita. She becomes exiled from society and hence has this in common with Humbert. They are both exiles, both separate from society, in confusing moral places where it seems the rules of life have changed. The difference between Humbert and Lolita is that he chose to be in exile, he comes of his own accord to America from Europe, whereas Lolita is forced into exile after the death of her mother. She is separated from her hometown and the people she knows, except of course for Humbert as she goes travelling around with him. They never stay in the one place for too long, constantly on the move. As they travel they live by new life rules which they conjure themselves, where their relationship isn’t twisted or strange as it would be seen in other places. They become so separate from society that they don’t seem to realise what consequences their actions should have or how bad the relationship between them is on moral ground. Humbert constantly tries to reassure the reader that he is not a monster and it questions whether he believes this or is just trying to make the reader believe it. Lolita on the other hand doesn’t show too much awareness that she is a victim of Humbert, but again this is all through the words of Humbert and the reader need to decide whether to believe Humbert’s word or not. Lolita doesn’t ever speak throughout the book to the reader and this lack of self-representation in the book can be seen as her enslavement to Humbert. Lolita is trapped with Humbert when he takes her from camp because she has nowhere else that she can go. They accept this and live in exile. Lolita was stuck with Humbert and he wanted to believe that she wanted to be there and blinded himself of her unhappiness, he believed she was in love or falling for him as more than a father figure but it can be said that “The adolescent girl wishes at first to identify herself with males; when she gives that up, she then seeks to share in their masculinity by having one of them in love with her; it is not the individuality of this one or that on which attracts her; she is in love with man in general” [6] . As Lolita was growing and they stopped in places Humbert’s control over her life never lessened. She was not allowed to go out and do things with other kids her age because Humbert was jealous and kept Lolita away from society; she was his slave in one way. He wanted Lolita to himself and her desire to mingle with boys her own age puts a strain on her relationship with Humbert, he can’t bear this. Each of them by the end of the book undergoes more exile, from themselves. Humbert ends up in prison and Lolita with Dick Schiller, her new life without Humbert where the past was to be left in the past and he was just her father, and she was a new person, one he didn’t completely recognise, because she was happy and free of his control. Her new life away from him hurt Humbert and he had to accept that she was lost; driving away from her he says “I was driving through the drizzle of the dying day, with the windshield wipers in full action but unable to cope with my tears” [7] . Nabokov writes Lolita in a first person narrative, Humbert Humbert’s narrative. Nabokov writes it in such a way that the reader is almost compelled to question the words of Humbert throughout the entirety of the book through puns and word games. He also urges the reader to do this when he, on numerous occasions Humbert admits that he fakes parts of his history and his identity to ensure he gets what he wants. It makes the reader also question his trustworthiness; it makes the reader overlook part of his lies and his true character. Humbert’s lies make the reader wonder whether everything he says about Lolita and how she acted was true or not. By reading it and not taking it account Humbert’s lies, the reader could easily forget that Humbert is actually talking about rape, murder and paedophilia. Humbert’s understanding of Lolita even though we only hear his side of it, can be examined and deemed wrong. He doesn’t seem to be able to see Lolita’s unhappiness even though he says enough to make the reader be able to see it. He seems to ignore anything that might injure his plans to stay with Lolita; it leads the reader again to question Humbert telling of the story and his portrayal of Lolita. However Nabokov never fully reveals whether Humbert’s idea of Lolita is true, her mental and physical slavery to Humbert is evident throughout the entirety of the novel. In the story of Lolita by Vladimir Nabokov, Humbert Humbert is uncontrollably in love with Lolita Haze, and the novel expresses all of his feelings and actions, thoughts and wants throughout his life centred on Lolita. However the question of whether she was in love with him or not is not answered. The reader hears only of Lolita and how she felt through the eyes of Humbert and the words of Nabokov, Lolita did act towards him as though she loved him but she was alone in the world other than Humbert, it’s easily confused to being a woman in love or a woman stuck. Lolita’s lack of self representation in the novel is evidence of her enslavement to Humbert, he lets slip how Lolita wanted a life outside the life that they had together, when she wanted to be in the play and hang out with people her own age, the jealousy and control Humbert Humbert had at this stage of her life meant she couldn’t leave and she was his enslaved to him. The reader of this novel is given the task of interpreting the words of Humbert Humbert and deciding if they are true or not, they must decide whether to believe his words and whether how he depicts Lolita is right. Lolita was a very young girl for the most part of the book and cannot be held accountable for a lot of what happened, she was growing up and exploring, whereas Humbert was a much older man and knew what was going on wasn’t right. Humbert was Lolita’s only family so to speak, and he clearly took complete advantage of this in their relationship. His enslavement of Lolita and the way some critics feel he misrepresented her can be seen as many things, such as paedophilia, child-manipulation and abuse. Lolita, it can be said, was very much made out to be different than what a lot of readers come to the conclusion of and this is because Lolita doesn’t get to put across her own view of the years with Humbert, the years she was lumbered with him as her only companion.

Relationship between Social Work Practice and Social Policy

Relationship between Social Work Practice and Social Policy. An understanding of contemporary social work practice is not possible without a knowledge of social policy. To gain an understanding of social work practice and whether it is or is not possible to do so without the knowledge of social policy, it is necessary to discuss certain aspects of this topic. Therefore, this essay will identify and explain the influence of legislation and social policy, such as the Mental Health Act 1983, on the impact it has on social work. Define the function of social policy. Explain how social policy and the law respond to social exclusion and social inclusion. Explain how theory and knowledge of the law and social policy responds to social problems, therefore giving a clear viewpoint of how a contemporary social worker can practice professionally and appropriately. The first place to start is to define what social work means which can be put as simply as social work is there to empower individuals who may be in a state of vulnerability at a point in their lives, to support engagement and participation in society, as well as, ensure their human rights and well-being are protected (Horner, 2012). For social workers to help people live better lives, social policies enable development, implementation of services and influence the social situations of individuals who may be marginalised, such as people with mental health issues, in poverty and LGBTQ. However, it is worth noting that some social policies may hinder social workers ability to effectively deliver a service to users (Adams, 2002). For example, since the 1960’s legislation and policies have encouraged interprofessional and inter-agency collaboration which the NHS and Community Care Act 1990 helped improve further (SCIE SCIE, 2009). On the contrary, Frost, Robinson and Anning (2005) point out that although agencies work together in collaboration, their own individual policy and procedures can hinder the correct support leaving people who require intervention without the support they need. (Adams, 2002). This is contested by Lymbery (1998) who states that social workers and changes in society can influence law and social policy to allow a better service to individuals who need support, this can be seen in mental health, poverty, domestic violence and many more situations faced by society. For instance, before the establishment of the National Health Service (NHS), the mental health service was governed by the 1890 Lunacy Act and this brought in regulations to detain and supervise any individual who was deemed to have a mental illness (Moncrieff, 2003). Mental health views and opinions have been one of constant change and criticism. At the end of the 19th century people were treated as if they had an illness and placed in asylums under the 1890 Lunacy Act, as such, they were treated more clinically without someone to advocate for them, which when reflecting on, gives the view that they were ill-treated without the level of compassion given today. On the other hand, when the shift from institutionalisation to community care happened it could be criticised that individuals were placed further into a mental health state due to potentially becoming homeless and without important in-patient care (Horner, 2012). The influence of social work during the change from one to another can be seen in the changes in law and social policy as practitioners became able to provide help and support to those who had left institutions and enable better treatment and services to individuals suffering from mental health. For example, when individuals were marginalised and placed within an institution under the 1890 Lunacy Act, they were dealt with by psychiatrists and viewed as having an illness which needed treating in a clinical way (Prior, 1992). This meant that a social worker would not be supporting this individual whilst incarcerated, instead they would only become involved once the individual had been released from the asylum by supporting the individuals in housing, finances and health care. However, by the mid-20th century, there was a considerable shift towards mental health being allocated to community care rather than institutions which were supported by the Mental Health Act 1959. (Killaspy, 2006). Furthermore, Enoch Powell spoke in 1961 regarding the eradication of Victorian asylums and transferring the treatment of individuals to hospitals and the growing profession of social work within the community (Bennet, 1979). The process, unfortunately, has been slow in providing the correct care and support for individuals facing times of mental health and amendments have had to be made to the Mental Health Act to provide the legislation to allow social workers to advocate for individuals in these times. Recently, a pledge had been made by former Prime Minister Theresa May to challenge mental health issues and a white paper has been published which is proposed to replace the Mental Health Act 1983 (Samuel, 2019). At this point, it is worth highlighting the process of how legislation comes into existence. The white paper that Theresa May has put forward allows consultation and discussions with groups who are interested and/or affected by the topic, in this case, mental health, as well as, make amendments and final changes to the paper before it can be presented as a bill in parliament. From this point, the bill will be debated on and once approved by each house of parliament it would be given royal assent, this is where the Queen formally agrees to the bill. Once this stage is completed the bill would become law and referred to as an Act (Gov.UK, 2017). It is important to understand that laws which are created are set principles and procedures that must be adhered to. This is to ensure justice is served within society, whereas social policy is created to guide agencies and support society (Spicker, 2019). In addition to this, social policies change in reflection to the political ideology at the time. For example, the Labour party, which is a socialist group, have throughout history fought for social justice and equality. From improving housing, education and unemployment at the start of the 20th century to providing equality for marginalised groups such as the LGBTQ by introducing the Civil Partnerships Act 2004, the Equality Act (Sexual Orientation) Regulations Act 2007 and the Human Rights Act 1998. Furthermore, Jeremy Corbyn who is the party leader at present still stands by the ideology that the Labour party is for the people and there to advocate for the everyday person and improve lives (Labour.org.UK, 2019). Whereas, the Conservative party, which is a neoliberalist group, view society as a marketplace and people as consumers who should not be leaning on the government for support without regard to the reasons support is required. For example, in April 2017 the government announced that cuts will be made to benefits such as Child Tax credit and Disability as it is a drain on society and reduce motivation for individuals to find employment (Bloom, 2017). Therefore, it is clear to see that a social worker must adapt to constant change depending on the political view in place in reflection to what help they can offer. The influence the labour party gave was for social workers to work with individuals closely and work through the process with them. However, the influence the conservative party gave was for social workers to signpost and empower individuals to take responsibility for their situations. As a social worker, it is important to understand the theory and ideologies within the law and social policy and how they respond to social issues. As stated previously social workers have had to adapt to changes within the law and social policy due to which political party has been in power. Two main ideologies, social democracy and neoliberalism, have shaped social policy in the UK through history (Krieger, 1999). Social democracy is defined as a political, social and economic viewpoint that supports interventions to promote social justice (George and Wilding, 2013). This viewpoint influenced the development of the welfare state through research and reports demonstrating the need to tackle inequality in society. In 1942 Sir William Beveridge established that there were five key issues: want, disease, ignorance, squalor and idleness which needed addressing in society (Cunningham and Cunningham, 2017). This enabled legislation and policies to be created, such as the 1944 Butler Act, the Family Allowance Act 1945, the 1946 National Insurance Act and the 1946 National Health Act which helped challenge these issues (Field, 2011). Following on from the acknowledgement of inequality and the fact that Britain was now governed by the Labour party influenced the work in society as the government took responsibility for care in the community. Offering care to individuals with disabilities, mental health issues and older people just to name a few (Thane, 2009). From understand this concept, it is clear that social democracy places society as a priority and not as a means to make a profit as such will implement community services, financial assistance and healthcare with little cost to the individual (George and Wilding, 2013). On the contrary, the viewpoint of neoliberalists is individuals should seek to support themselves without leaning on the government and address their situations without much intervention (Thorsen, 2010). The conservative party, who are neoliberalist, have demonstrated their opposition to social democracy since the 1980s with changes to social policy which puts more emphasises on individual taking responsibilities for the own situations in life rather than living off the state (King and Wood, 1999). Margaret Thatcher was a significant person in promoting this ideology. For example, she promoted home ownership, offering residents in council houses to buy their home which led to a reduction of social housing available for people who couldn’t afford a mortgage. Furthermore, she promoted the transition of state own businesses to become privatised such as telecommunications and utilities which led to higher costs to the consumer placing them into a state of poverty (Ball, 2013). Although there are conflicting views between these ideologies it is worth noting that they both helped marginalised groups gain social inclusion, such as the LGBTQ, which can be seen with Thatcher decriminalising homosexuality and Blair introducing the Equality Act (Sexual Orientation) Regulations Act 2007 as well as the Human Rights Act 1998 (Kollman and Waites, 2011). Considering social exclusion, Hills, Le Grand and Pichaud (2002) understood this to be the process in which individuals or groups are denied full access to various rights, opportunities and resources that are available to other individuals or groups, and which are essential to social integration and human rights; including housing employment, healthcare and education. The concept of social exclusion emerged from Peter Townsend and the publication of his book ‘Poverty in the United Kingdom’ in 1979, which argued that people were unable to participate in normal society due to the lack of income, therefore they were excluded due to the consequences of poverty and inequality (Levitas, 1996). For example, before the welfare reforms of the 1990s single mothers were excluded from the welfare system due to the prejudice against unwed mothers and the viewpoint that employment was the acceptable way of contributing to society. Consequently, the lack of support in childcare, mothers were unable to seek employment which hindered their involvement in society (Burchardt, Le Grand and Piachaud, 2002). However, it can be suggested that the concept had roots from Emile Durkheim (1893) and his social theory, which was concerned with social order and the view that people had a role to play in society and if changes were to occur this would upset stability (O’Brien and Penna, 2007). In today’s society, there has been a shift from the term social exclusion to social inclusion which takes the focus away from the concept of poverty and inequality and places more on the promotion of integration (Jackson, 1999). This was demonstrated with the New Labour government as they aimed to bring an end to social exclusion by redistributing wealth through the tax and benefits system, tackling ethical inequalities and providing a voice for marginalised groups, such as, unemployed, single parents and disabled (McNeil, 2012). The progress that the New Labour government made was successful in tackling social exclusion. One of the most successful changes New Labour made was the New Deal programme which changed working lives for people by giving incentives and motivation to seek employment. For instance, the working families tax credit was introduced in 1999 which enabled low-income workers to receive a financial supplement on top of their earnings (Kennedy, 2009). On the contrary, it is argued by the Department of Work and Pensions (2010) that there was a lack of further support and provisions for individuals who were recovering from drug and alcohol addiction which could have been due to the unsustainable financial investments made by New Labour to tackle these issues. As a social worker, it is the fundamental duty to focus on meeting human needs and promoting social inclusion by influencing the development of positive policies and procedures which promote respect towards individuals’ beliefs and lifestyles (BASW, 2014). To conclude, law and social policy are constantly changing which has been explained throughout this essay. From the Victorian days of asylums to the present where social work has a platform and works with society to promote social justice, social exclusion and human rights. Therefore, it is important to acknowledge and understand when changes to policies occur to ensure that the service continues to be supportive and productive within the standards of legislation and social policy. References Adams, R. (2002) Social policy for social work. Basingstoke: Palgrave. Ball, J. (2013) The Thatcher effect: what changed and what stayed the same. Available at https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2013/apr/12/thatcher-britain (Accessed 13 August 2019). BASW. (2014) Code of Ethics. Available at: https://www.basw.co.uk/about-basw/code-ethics (Accessed 15 August 2019). Bennett, D. (1979) Deinstitutionalization in two cultures, The Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly. Health and Society, 57(4), pp. 516-532. Bloom, D. (2017) The 5 Tory benefit cuts taking force this week that could affect you. Available at https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/tory-benefit-cuts-today-disability-10144250 (Accessed 14 August 2019). Burchardt, T., Le Grand, J., and Piachaud, D. (2002) Social exclusion in Britain 1991-1995, Social Policy and Administration, 33(3). pp. 227-244. Cunningham, J. and Cunningham, S. (2017) Social work and social policy. 2nd edn.London: Sage Publications. Department for Work and Pensions. (2010) Alcohol misusers’ experiences of employment and the benefit system. Available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/214493/rrep718.pdf (Accessed 13 August 2019). Field, F. (2011) The welfare state – never ending reform. Available at: http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/british/modern/field_01.shtml (Accessed 13 August 2019). Frost, N., Robinson, M., and Anning, A. (2005) Social workers in multidisciplinary teams: issues and dilemmas for professional practice, ChildRelationship between Social Work Practice and Social Policy

My case study is on a patient who went to the ER. The patient presented with shortness of breath

My case study is on a patient who went to the ER. The patient presented with shortness of breath (SOB), fatigue, cough, mild fever, headaches, extreme sore throat, fatigue. The patient has a history of sever asthma amongst other medical issue. At the intake process the patient had a high heart rate even though he had been resting as well and high blood pressure leading the medical experts to think he was throwing a pulmonary embolism. This lead to multiple exams being doing xrays, CT, ekg and a full blood work. After everything came back it came out positive for COVID-19 and due to his severe asthma is what increased his heart rate. After the paragraph of the background on the patient, we should proceed to talk about effects of COVID and symptoms and treating possibilities. As well as what can help and the dangers of COVID-19