Question 1 Please develop a “data architecture” for a hospital with a strong population health focus. Your architecture should

Question 1
Please develop a “data architecture” for a hospital with a strong population health focus. Your
architecture should take data from the operational side of the hospital (and community-based
or other organizations) all the way through to the analytical data side. You should consider
outside data sources that the organization team members may need for their population health
projects. It is expected that data for analytics, cost evaluations, dashboards, quality
improvement, and research will be available through the data architecture.
1) Please provide a well-develop diagram of your data architecture with notes, as needed,
where the text illustrates the figures and other items on your diagram.
2) Please describe why you selected the architecture structure that you did for the hospital
(e.g., local data control).[supanova_question]

Health Policy Project

Health Policy Project.

Description Hello, we are doing a project about tobacco use in New York. We have to come up with Element that is related to tobacco use, for example, lung cancer can be an element. You can come up with your own element you don’t have to use lung cancer that’s just an example. Then we have to write an overview of our element and come up with a policy statement.

Essay Help “>Essay Help


Choices of Imperialism or Colonialism

Question 1 Please develop a “data architecture” for a hospital with a strong population health focus. Your architecture should Choices of Imperialism or Colonialism.

It’s International Relation reaction paper. In this paper country to relate is U.S and need to use articles related to Imperialism or Colonialism of U. S and use 2 theories and lecture notes. (has to use 2 theories like defending on which topic you choose such as Imperialism by Isbister, Max Weber, Huntington’s theory and so on… The scholarly article must contain some form of empirical analysis to react and expected to draw upon class lectures and readings to create a theoretical lens for analysis and the written reaction. Paper must include: Thesis (very important) 10 points Selection and brief review of article, Creation of theoretical lens from materials 25 points, Reveiw of articles’s emphirical analysis(25) and Reaction (view) to article and issue with U.S is 20 points and conclution is 10 points. I included his comment for last paper as attached. He commented it was pretty good overall, but after the theories had to come back and use U.S examples as backup.

Essay Help “>Essay Help


The importance of standardized nursing terminologies

The importance of standardized nursing terminologies.

3-page paper, address the following: Explain how you would inform this nurse (and others) of the importance of standardized nursing terminologies. Describe the benefits and challenges of implementing standardized nursing terminologies in nursing practice. Be specific and provide examples.

Essay Help “>Essay Help


Since Volkswagen AG executives admitted the deception when the evidence was presented to them by the EPA, is there an ethical argument to excuse the behavior or mitigate the consequences?

Since Volkswagen AG executives admitted the deception when the evidence was presented to them by the EPA, is there an ethical argument to excuse the behavior or mitigate the consequences?.

Business law -ethical 

Please follow the instruction Was it in fact unethical to program the vehicles to emit less NOx pollution during tests, if such “adjustments” were legally permissible? Why? • Could Volkswagen AG have avoided this issue by disclosing the defeat device software to regulators? If so, what were the ethical arguments, if any, in favor of not disclosing the defeat device software?

• Since Volkswagen AG executives admitted the deception when the evidence was presented to them by the EPA, is there an ethical argument to excuse the behavior or mitigate the consequences?

Essay Help “>Essay Help


critical summary

critical summary.

  Assigned Reading

                                   Williston, chapter 6

  Learning Outcomes

By the end of this lesson you should be able to:

  Explain what naturism is and how it supports an oppressive conceptual framework

  Describe the three waves of feminism

  Explain how value hierarchies and dualisms work in patriarchal thinking

Explain the difference between ecofeminist views and ecofeminine views




Ecofeminism grew out of the larger feminist movement in the second half of the 20th-century. The main idea of ecofeminism is that there is an intimate connection between men’s domination of women and the human domination of nature.



Let’s begin with two important definitions:

  • Definition: Sexism is the view that women are inferior to men and ought to be subordinate to them
  • Definition: Naturism is the view that nature ought to be dominated by humans

The article The Power and The Promise of Ecological Feminism by Karen Warren (pp. 154-161) is a famous attempt to show how these two ideas are linked in the Western imagination. Warren begins by introducing the notion of a ‘conceptual framework.’ Conceptual frameworks are particular lenses through which we view the world, especially the relation among various kinds of entities in that world. Warren is especially interested in conceptual frameworks that involve oppression of one group of people over another, or of people over natural objects.

Be sure that you understand how both sexism and naturism are oppressive conceptual frameworks in this sense.

Warren’s innovation is to suggest that the same logic that underlies the domination of men over women also explains the domination of humans over nature. It follows that if we could rid ourselves of patriarchy, we might be able to establish a healthier relationship to the natural world.




On Domination

But what is the force of Warren’s claim here? Is it to suggest that all sexists are also naturists and vice-versa or that, historically, the two modes of domination have often been found together? Look carefully at Williston’s discussion of these problems (pp. 161-162), and then decide for yourself.

One of the best insights we find in ecofeminism is the idea that oppressive conceptual frameworks are usually supported by ‘value dualisms.’ Consider the opposed pairs:

  • Women/men
  • Nature/culture
  • Private sphere/public sphere
  • Emotions/reason



Ecofeminism Now

The items on the left have traditionally been seen as inferior to the items on the right. So, why don’t we just invert these value designations and say that the items on the left are superior to the items on the right?

Many feminists resist this move because it essentializes women. That is, it assumes, uncritically, that women are by their nature more emotional than men, and so on. But there is no reason to believe this is true. Read the article by Trish Glazebrook beginning on p. 164, to get a sense of this criticism as well as some additional updates that have been made to ecofeminist theory since the appearance of Warren’s article.



Finally consider Williston’s criticisms of ecofeminism (pp. 172-174), especially what he has to say about the feminist criticism of deep ecology. Do you agree with his claims? Why or why not?





Ecofeminism challenges traditional environmental ethics by showing us that we cannot think about environmental issues without also tackling the larger social problem of sexism. If successful, it widens and deepens our understanding of the complexities of the human/nature relationship considerably.


At least 500 words



The critical summary is your chance to reflect on the case studies at the end of the textbook’s chapters. They should be succinct and accomplish three broad goals: (a) convey the content of the

study; (b) assess the argument of the study; and (c) make reference to two themes from the relevant chapter that help elucidate your points. Your course materials contain a model summary and a guide to writing critical summaries. For each critical summary assignment, you will have a choice of case studies to write about, 3as follows:

Critical summary #: case study from chapter 6.






Tips for Writing a Critical Summary 

A summary is essentially a tool to help you in the task of careful and critical reading. Once acquired, the habit of critical analysis will serve you in everything you read. You should make it a practice to continue writing such summaries for your own benefit even when you are not required to turn them in. What follows are some tips on how to go about it.

A good piece of philosophical writing can generally be seen as an attempt to give reasons for believing a thesis. Your summary should do two things:

1.       Analyse the argument and exhibit its structure.

2.       Give a critical assessment of it.

1.       To exhibit the structure of an argument, you will distinguish: Premises (the propositions that the argument requires you accept at the outset), and conclusions (the thesis that the author is trying to get you to agree with).

Sometimes (not always), the conclusion will be meant to follow deductively. Other times the argument will not be so tight. It will often be useful to ferret out unargued assumptions, including especially unexpressed ones, which are needed for the argument to go through. (Note that the premises don’t necessarily come first. Often a writer, for reasons of convenience or style, will say not “A, therefore B,” but “B, because A.

Pick out all and only the main points. Use a Top-Down approach: that is to say, first ask yourself what, in a sentence or two, is the point of the whole passage or article. In your summary, you can start with that brief statement. Then go on to each principal part of the argument, and repeat the process until you have got down to a level of detail adequate for the space available in your summary. If the passage is very long, there will obviously have to be less detail. But mastery of a text requires the ability to summarize it to any desired length. When something remains unclear, don’t gloss it over, but draw attention to it. Pick out any “crux” or difficulty of interpretation. Don’t be afraid of admitting that you don’t understand something, but try to say as clearly as possible what you find had to understand, and why. Sharpen any difficulty found by offering alternative interpretations.

2.       Make very clear when you are no longer stating what your author says, but have come to your own critical assessment. At this point, indicate briefly whether and why you think the premises and assumptions you have been asked to accept are true or false, plausible or implausible. If the argument is deductive, indicate whether it is valid; if it is not deductive say whether your find it acceptable, and if not, why. One way is to look for more or less remote consequences of the thesis that may turn out to be unacceptable. It is always a useful exercise to try as hard as you can to find good reasons to disagree with what a writer says, especially if you agree. Conversely, if you disagree with the conclusion, try hard to make up an independent defence of it. It is generally a good idea to assume that the authors of philosophical texts are often wrong, but also that they are not idiots.

If the argument is bad, explain how:
o Are one or more of the premises false? (This makes the argument unsound)
o Does the conclusion follow? (This makes the argument invalid)
o Does the argument rely on assumptions that are unacceptable, or arbitrary, or debatable? o Does the argument contain crucial ambiguities? (An ambiguous word or phrase is one

that has more than one possible meaning. This can foul up an argument!) o Is rhetoric substituted for argument at some crucial stage?

In addition, point out anything about the logic of the substance of the argument that seems especially interesting. It can be interesting because you strongly agree or because you strongly disagree. In either case, you should try briefly to justify your view.


·         A summary is not easy. You should omit all the scholarly, decorative, and rhetorical features of an essay. This means: no introduction; no generalities; no background material; no footnotes; no bibliography; no quotations (except when the precise wording raises a problem to be discussed); no purple prose or fancy phrases.

·         Don’t necessarily follow the exact order of exposition of the original: many authors will use repetitions and amplifications that make it relatively easy to rearrange some topics.


·         Provide references to specific pages or sections — especially if you have rearranged the order. Good luck, and remember to enjoy yourself. If the enjoyment is mixed with pain, think of it as spice. 

Essay Help “>Essay Help


critical analysis of the arguments made in the article What is the point of saving endangered species?written by Michael Marshall.

critical analysis of the arguments made in the article What is the point of saving endangered species?written by Michael Marshall..

Your task is to provide a critical analysis of the arguments made in the articleWhat is thepoint of saving endangered species?written by Michael Marshall. The article is availableat should briefly summarise the article, but most of your grade will come from evalu-ating the authors’ argument. A good critical analysis will:•Accurately portray the authors’ main argument using tools from class.–Rather than simply summarizing the author’s argument, you must identify theirunderlying economic model, assumptions, and implications.–Your arguments should add value and be relevant to the topic at hand.•Critically discuss the article.–Critically analyse a subset of the author’s most important arguments. You canagree or disagree with each, so long as you properly apply economic conceptslearned in class.–Identify the most important assumptions and simplifications the author makes,their implications, and their appropriateness. It can be useful to carefully con-sider the quality of the evidence used to support each assumption.•Provide a coherent point of view on the problem at hand.1 –Be sure to develop an argument based oneconomicsrather than biology, psy-chology, etc.Appropriate audienceYour are writing for the general public. You should assume your reader has some famil-iarity with basic economic ideas, but you should avoid over-using economic jargon andmathematics. Think of your reader as someone with some understanding of economics andcurrent events, but lacks detailed knowledge of economic theory. This means you mustexplain economic concepts and specialized vocabulary without losing an intelligent reader’sinterest.StructureIt is important to structure your argument clearly. A good assignment will have threemajor components:1.Introduction:provides important context and background information, but focuseson presenting your main idea2.Body:contains most of your analysis. This is where you can give more details aboutyour reference article and support your own argument.3.Conclusion:provide closure by bringing together your main points to emphasizetheir importance

Essay Help “>Essay Help


Can a robot be conscious?

Can a robot be conscious?.

 Resources: Watch Star Trek: The Next Generation “The Measure of a Man”. (We will watch it in class). If you have not seen the episode, you may refer to the STAR TREK SUMMARY and the Videos and summary of the in Modules/ Schedule and Readings. Instructions: 1. Briefly explain what the Star Trek episode is about. What is the main issue discussed in the episode? Describe the philosophical issues involved in the episode. Only explain the relevant aspects of the plot. (Do not copy and paste from the internet, or the summary below). 2. Briefly explain Nagel’s theory of Consciousness. Be sure to cite page numbers. 3. Give me an argument for why Data is, or is not conscious. 4. Give an argument for why Data is, or is not a person. Who is “Data”?—what do you think is the identity of Data? Is Data a “person”? Why or why not. 5. At the end, the JAG officer made a ruling giving Data the right to choose. Is the ruling right granting Data his right to refuse? Discuss the issues for granting Data his right to refuse, or can he be forced to undergo the procedure? Why? Explain your argument sufficiently, using details, analogies, or other examples. Always include citation and bibliography. *DO NOT USE OUTSIDE RESOURCES. Do not copy and paste from the Internet, or from the summary below. Plagiarized papers will receive a 0. This essay is about your ability to explain media, explain Nagel’s theory of consciousness, and give your own arguments. *You MUST cite the Star Trek episode. Do not copy and paste the bibliography from the STAR TREK SUMMARY — it is intentionally in improper format. Use to find out information about the producer, director, studio, etc. Refer to “APA helpsheet” Preview the documentand for how to cite and give a bibliography for movies and non-print materials. *The goal in this essay to APPLY the issues of consciousness and personal identity to a piece of media. Good writing is about USING elements of examples (in this case, the Star Trek episode) to support your argument. By picking and choosing what is relevant, you are helping your reader organize theories in philosophy, compare or contrast positions, and to understand your own arguments. *Keep in mind your essays are to test your knowledge of the theories we explained (theories of mind, consciousness, personal identity, physicalism, dualism, etc.) If you cannot explain the theories, then how can you be sure you know them? Essays give you a chance to EXPLAIN these theories in your own words so that you can be certain that you have the correct interpretation of the theories and can use them in sophisticated conversations to support your arguments.

Essay Help “>Essay Help