Get help from the best in academic writing.

Purpose: Asking good questions is one of the best ways to give you direction in the early stages of

Purpose:

Asking good questions is one of the best ways to give you direction in the early stages of doing research, choosing sources, and taking notes for the CP paper in 39C. You can use this worksheet as a 30-minute exercise that helps you formulate analytical arguments about the sources you’re choosing as you begin your research. This worksheet will also help you get started assembling materials for the Reflective Introduction and your final ePortfolio that will be due at the end of the quarter.

Background:

As you work on the wide variety of assignments for 39C, it is a good idea to reflect periodically on your awareness and motivations regarding the function of your research methods, source selection, and note-taking in the context of the rhetorical triangle:

rhetor/writer/speaker/sender/maker

text/medium/genre/artifact/object

audience/reader/listener/receiver

Each time you find a new source, jot down your reasons for using it, the particular features of it that you find useful or fascinating, the relationship between maker/text/audience in the source itself, and the effect you believe your interpretation of the source will have on your readers.

REFLECTIVE QUESTIONS TO ANSWER ABOUT RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

You could consider answering one or two of these questions:

Which databases are ending up to be the most productive, and why?

Which search terms are working, and which aren’t?

How can I refine the nature of my search for sources so I get sources my intended audience would find convincing?

Write your own research-related questions to be answered in your Reflective Intro:

REFLECTIVE QUESTIONS TO ASK ABOUT CHOOSING SOURCES AND ARTIFACTS

Again, answering one or two of these questions can help you get a clearer picture of how you’re shaping your CP:

Why did I choose this source over other, similar sources?

Have I covered an array of points of view in my primary and scholarly sources?

What am I trying to establish in terms of my own credibility when I use this source?

What effect do I intend this source to have on my readers, and why?

How can vivid descriiption of this source help my argument?

Write your own source-related questions to be answered in your Reflective Intro:

REFLECTIVE QUESTIONS TO ASK WHEN YOU TAKE NOTES ON SOURCES

As you prepare to write, think about the features of the material you are analyzing, a hypothesis or argument you could develop, and the audiences you are attempting to reach. Answering one or two of these questions may help you take more effective notes:

What aspect of this primary or secondary source is the most useful for my topic?

How and where is this source appealing to a particular audience?

What are a few possibilities for an argument I could construct using this evidence?

Who is my intended audience, and how could I use this document to reach them?

Write your own note-taking questions to be answered in your Reflective Intro:

Drug Dealers

Drug Dealers.

 Drug Dealers 1,Title/cover page 2.Statement of the problem 3.Purpose and qbjectives 4.Literature review 5.Hypotheses 6.Data collection procedure a.sample b.schedule/questionnaire c.method of collection(e.g..interview,mailing,telephone survey etc.) 7.Data analysis plan 8.Expected outcomes

Essay Help “>Essay Help

https://onlinecustomessaywriting.com/

Petition for Writ of Certiorari

Purpose: Asking good questions is one of the best ways to give you direction in the early stages of Petition for Writ of Certiorari.

Write Petition for Writ of Certiorari from information provided in the paper details below (see attachment as an example). Be sure to read Maryland Rule 8-303 carefully for information regarding the procedure for filing a petition for a writ of certiorari. 1. A petition for writ of certiorari filed in the Court of Appeals seeking review of a decision of the Court of Special Appeals is to be filed no later than 15 days from the date of the mandate of the Court of Special Appeals. A petition seeking review of a circuit court decision on appeal from the District Court of Maryland is to be filed 30 days from the date of the judgment of the circuit court. 2. An original and seven copies of a petition are required. 3. A filing fee of $61.00 is also required. 4. A petition is not to exceed 3,900 words in length (not including attachments). 5. Attachments to the petition are: a. Docket entries evidencing the judgment of the circuit court. b. Any opinion of the circuit court. c. Any written order issued under Rule 2-602(b). d. If the case has not been decided by the Court of Special Appeals, all briefs that have been filed in the Court of Special Appeals; and e. Any opinion of the Court of Special Appeals. 6. An answer to a petition is due 15 days from the filing date of the petition. An original and seven copies of the answer must be filed. There is no filing fee for answers. 7. A cross petition requires a $61.00 filing fee, and an original and seven copies of the cross petition must be filed. 8. Petitions usually take six to eight weeks to be acted on by the Court. For more information or clarification, refer to Chapter 300 of Title 8 of the Maryland Rules. INFORMATION: Lot 31 Development Statutory Trust, Appellee, v. XXXXXXX XXXXX, Appellant. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 0F MARYLAND September Term, 2019 Petition Docket No. Petition for Writ of Certiorari COMES NOW, the Tenant XXXXXXX XXXXX, moves the Court under Md. Rule 8-301 for a writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review the above-captioned case. In support 0f this petition, and in accordance with Md. Rule 8-303(b)(1) and (2), the State notes the following: Further, the substitution of Plaintiff was not done properly. More particularly, 1. The original Appellee, LOT 31 DEVELOPMENT STATUTORY TRUST, brought this landlord tenant holdover action in the Fall of 2017. Defendant appeared pro se and explained to the Court, the Hon. John Moffett that his defense was retaliatory eviction. The Court told the Defendant that retaliatory eviction was something that had to be filed in Circuit Court. The Court entered judgement, the Defendant retained the undersigned to represent him on the appeal. After reviewing the defendants brief, the Attorney for the landlord Plaintiff agreed that the defense was cognizable in District Court and agreed that the matter should be remanded. The Circuit Court, the Hon. Gary Bair, reversed and remanded the case to District Court on or about February 26th 2018. 2. Shortly after the remand, LOT 31 DEVELOPMENT STATUTORY TRUST, the Plaintiff, apparently sold the building. Defendant, believing the new landlord did not go forward with the eviction, filed a pro se motion seeking the return of his bond on or about May 16th 2018. His money was returned, but the Court never acted on his motion. Instead, on or about July 6th, the clerk’s office sent out a notice marked “Hearing on Motion” set for August 1st 2018 at 10:15 am (Ex. A) . While Defendant had already received the return of his bond, this was the only motion pending according to case search. The Defendant believed that the August 1st proceeding was about his hearing for the motion to return his bond. Consequently, after discussing the notice he received with the undersigned (who was out of the state on vacation) he elected to go to Court and let the Court know the matter was moot, since he received his money. 3. That when Defendant arrived in Court on or about August 1st he learned that the Court intended to retry the holdover case that day. Defendant asked for a brief continuance to retain the undersigned. He did not have the exhibits to support his claim for retaliatory eviction . At the same time, he advised the court that the building had been sold and that he did not think that the new landlord was going to go forward with the eviction. It was only then Plaintiff moved to substitute a new Plaintiff for LOT 31 DEVELOPMENT STATUTORY TRUST. 4. The Court refused to grant Defendant a continuance. Defendant was unable to make an effective presentation of the retaliatory eviction defense and the Court entered a judgement for the Plaintiff. 5. That Defendant was unfairly surprised by the turn of events. The notice Defendant received does indicate only a hearing on a motion was scheduled on August 1st, not a trial. It was reasonable for him to wait until he knew there would be a trial before retaining counsel. The notices in this matter have been confusing Since the hearing on August 1st, the clerk’s office generated a notice confirming that the judgment entered November 1st had been vacated, and that Defendant “would be notified of further proceeding” (Ex. B). The Court had already gone ahead with those further proceedings on five days before. If Defendant was not properly prepared, it was because he was not properly put on notice. The undersigned is prepared to represent the Defendant at a trial on the merits and present evidence and arguments in favor of his retaliatory eviction defense. 6. Further, it appears the substitution of a new Plaintiff was not done properly, Rule 3-241 (b) provides that a party may file a notice of substitution, Plaintiff did not. The rule provides that the “notice shall set forth the reason for the substitution… and the notice shall be served on all parties according to rule 1-321…”. The Plaintiff gave no details about the sale or any election to go forward, and never served Defendant, who may have verified that whether the new landlord wanted to evict him. Indeed, had Defendant been given a timely notice of substitution he would have been aware that a trial was pending and retained counsel in time. 7. In short, Defendant believes he is the victim of retaliation, Plaintiff would never give any non-retaliatory reason why his lease was not renewed. He was never given proper notice that the trial would go forward on August 1st. The undersigned is prepared to represent the Defendant in this matter and requests a new trial.

Essay Help “>Essay Help

https://onlinecustomessaywriting.com/

Computer science,How can we protect the host machine from failure when it exceeds certain limitations?,

Computer science,How can we protect the host machine from failure when it exceeds certain limitations?,.

o   Why virtual machine is important and Advantage of virtual machine

o   Type of failure in the virtual machine.

 

·         The research questions

o   How can we protect the host machine from failure when it exceeds certain limitations?

1.      Define the limitations or the condition for the failure happened

2.      Protection “HW/SW” of failure

 

·         Preliminary literature

o   5 literature view

 

·         Research plan

o   Running the first time in normal situation and find the time and the when the failure happened

o   The second round running with implementation of protection and prediction and find the time and when the failure happened

o   Comparing the result 

o   Using Brute force

o   Divide and conquer

·         Testing

o   Using benchmark to test the performance of

o   Try to estimate the time

o   Find out which component fail in host (memory, I/O and etc) 

 

·         Conclusion

1.      Robust system

2.      Time

3.      Cost

 

·         Reference

o   10 references

 

Essay Help “>Essay Help

A Critical Evaluation of an Investment Opportunity at DynAviation: The Use of Tablets for Aircraft Maintenance.

A Critical Evaluation of an Investment Opportunity at DynAviation: The Use of Tablets for Aircraft Maintenance..

Present a business case that critically evaluates an investment opportunity within your employing organization (DynAviation). To develop your critical evaluation, you should: • Outline the background to and justification for your proposed investment (this should be informed by links to financial performance, environmental analysis, organizational strategy and corporate social responsibility) • Identify three options for the delivery of your chosen investment opportunity • Critically evaluate each option using suitable investment appraisal and risk analysis techniques • Discuss the tangible and intangible benefits of the investment both strategically and operationally (this discussion should address what the chosen option will achieve and a financial analysis that explains the effects of the investment) • Explain the risk management and mitigation techniques that will be used (this explanation should address how the risks to the achievement of the tangible and intangible benefits will be managed) Cover each learning out come; LO1 Assess information within the internal and external context of the decision LO2 Evaluate the role of financial information in the context of the whole organization LO3 Demonstrate the ability to analyse, understand and apply academic theory and thinking to the student’s own organization (or an organization of the student’s choice) The paper should be 1100 words long

Essay Help “>Essay Help

https://onlinecustomessaywriting.com/

Essay Writing at Online Custom Essay

5.0 rating based on 10,001 ratings

Rated 4.9/5
10001 review

Review This Service




Rating: