Get help from the best in academic writing.

Public Schools vs Private Schools Essay

Table of Contents Introduction Close comparison of public and private schools Conclusion References Introduction Comparing private and public schools can be more or less like comparing oranges and apples, two very disparate things that can never be held on similar standards. Choosing the best school for your child is one of the most important decisions parents have to make for their children but most parents rely on rumors and hearsay in deciding on whether to send their children to a private or a public school. The best ways to determine whether you are making the right decision for your child is by visiting the school and asking for clarification from teachers for all your queries. What school your youngster attend to is a personal decision which is greatly determined by the family values, special needs of the kids, his mannerisms and interests. This essay critically compares the differences and similarities, advantages and disadvantages and the issues that a rise in both private and public schools that affects the education of the children mainly preschool kids the its effects they on the kids future life. Close comparison of public and private schools Statistics show that some time back private school used to do better than public schools but recently this gap has been narrowing and making it harder for parents to choose between a private independent school with a high price tag on it, from a local public school which is relatively cheaper (Diana, 2006). According to Maureen ( 2011, pp.10) public schools usually have larger class sizes due to the fact that they are required to admit every child who meets the qualifications set by the government. This offers an advantage to the pre-school children by improving their communication and socializing skills since they interact with more children from different races, cultures and social classes. However, large classes are also disadvantageous in that it reduces the ratio of teachers to students and this tends to limit the teacher’s concentration on students hence limiting the children’s there performance. The average ratio of teachers to students in public schools is 1:17while in private schools its 1:9. Private schools on the other hand are very selective in terms of their admissions. Some schools cannot admit students from certain religions, races or even economic status. This tends to reduce the population of private schools. Some of the long term effects to children attending privately owned pre-schools are poor socializing skills due to the low population size and similar social classes, religion and lack of diverse cultures (Robert, 2011, pp4). Get your 100% original paper on any topic done in as little as 3 hours Learn More Public schools are cheaper and they are funded by the government and some of them are usually underfunded. They are a part of the large school system which is part of the government and this makes them vulnerable to the political influence hence exposes them to political vulnerabilities which if experienced affects their performance. The economic status of the country and the government also greatly affects the operations of public schools. Their curriculum is determined by the government and as you know different regions face different challenges hence the need for different curriculum to meet the different needs. (GreatSchools, 2010, pp.5) Private schools on the other hand charge a higher tuition fee which is the major source of its funds. This makes them independent and protects them from the political realm hence they are free to determine their own curricula which is usually single minded, producing best results by providing the best quality of education possible (Eddie , 2011, pp.4) In cases of children with special needs public schools usually have special programs and specially trained teachers who are well trained to work with such children. In contrast most private schools lack these programs and they are sometimes forced to deny such kids admission to their institutions and sometimes these services may be offered at an extra cost. Conclusion Is the question about which schools are better, private or public schools, answered yet? I bet not since there are no clear conclusions since they both have advantages and disadvantages as we have seen. In a nut shell the best school for ones child depends on the values, mannerisms, family, back ground, needs and interests of both the parents and the children. In other words one man’s meat is another man’s poison. References Diana, J. S. (2006). Public Schools Perform Near Private Ones in Study. Web. Eddie, R. (2011). Pre School Education:Private Schools Vs PublicSchools. Web. We will write a custom Essay on Public Schools vs Private Schools specifically for you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Great Schools Staff. (2010). Private versus public. Web. Maureen, B. (2011). Public vs. private: Which is right for your child? Web. Robert, N. (2011). Private vs Public Schools: Class Size. Web.

San Diego Miramar College Biology 9 Questions Discussion

San Diego Miramar College Biology 9 Questions Discussion.

each q going to be 1-2 paragraphs only referance to use is the book which i will provide as soon as you reply Question 1Why do some species demonstrate seasonal dimorphism? What environmental triggers stimulate these physical changes? What physiological processes might play a role in these physical changes?Question 2When faced with limited resources, how do individual organisms respond in terms of allocation of those resources? Provide an example and include how allocation of limited resources affects evolutionary fitness (survival and reproduction).Question 3Which structure in the human body is responsible for filtration? Why are the physiological processes of this structure important for survival?Question 4Peppered moths responded to environmental change (namely pollution) by shifting their morphology to a darker color. Why was this change in color morph important to the survival of these populations? Explain how this change is expressed at the population level, rather than the individual level. (Hint: think in terms of adaptation and evolution). Question 5How did the role of humans as predators likely impact populations of prey species? Provide relevant examples.Question 6What is biomagnification? How were raptor species (e.g., peregrine, American kestrel) affected by biomagnification of the insecticide, DDT?Question 7What is a dead zone? How does a dead zone form? What are the ecological consequences of a dead zone?Question 8Choose one of the ecosystems (e.g., montane, arctic tundra, tropical rainforest, etc.) that we discussed in lecture. Provide a description of the ecosystem services (with more detail than is in the slide). How can we manage this ecosystem’s homeostasis? What measures of management and conservation should be taken?Question 9What is the Tragedy of the Commons? Provide an example of how this economic theory applies to ecology and ecological homeostasis. Include any relevant details to support your answer.
San Diego Miramar College Biology 9 Questions Discussion

The Movie “Into the Storm” Critical Essay

online assignment help The Movie “Into the Storm” Critical Essay. This paper seeks to explain the historical background, character development, and the overall value of the movie, Into the Storm. The paper begins by a short movie summary followed by the film’s character development. It then gives a detailed historical background of the film by comparing and contrasting historical accuracy if the movie. The paper concludes by giving a summary and stating whether the film is entertaining and if it can be used as a teaching tool. The movie, Into the Storm, takes the audience through the life of Winston Churchill, a former prime minister of Britain and it runs for about 99 minutes. Winston Churchill is elected the prime minister of the country at a time when the Nazis had started to attack the lower European countries and France. Churchill refuses to engage in dialogue with Germany despite numerous persuasions from various leaders. Instead, he reaches out to the American president, Theodore Roosevelt, for a close personal friendship. The movie depicts Churchill as a self-centered leader who is determined to win the war without much assistance from other countries. In addition, Churchill comes out as an impulsive leader whose focus is only on the war without realizing the consequences on his political career. After the war, Churchill loses in a general election. The movie analyses Churchill’s life both as a prime minister and as a common citizen after he loses the presidency. It paints a clear picture of the events that unfolded during the Second World War with Churchill as the prime minister and the effects of the war on his political and marriage life thereafter. It expresses the Churchill’s determination towards winning the Second World War with the assistance of only a few friends. The movie, Into the storm, is written by Hugh Whitmore, directed by Thaddeus O’Sullivan, and produced by Frank Doelger. The main characters include Brendan Gleeson playing the role of Churchill, Iain Glen who plays the role of King George, Janet McTeer playing the role of Clemmie Churchill, James D’Arcy playing the role of Jock Collville, and Len Cariou playing the role of Roosevelt. Brendan Gleeson emerges as the protagonist in the movie. His voice together with his comic actions and firm stand on issues make him fit to play the role of Churchill who espoused such traits. At times, he uses his speech unintelligibly and when in private places, his face is full of sorrow and confusion, and Churchill equally exhibited such traits during his time. Churchill’s strong stand comes out in Gleeson when persuaded by some leaders to accept talks with Germany and he strongly disagrees with them saying that peace can only be found through violence. In another realistic scene, Gleason (Churchill) tells Iain Glen (King George VI) that a Germany will soon invade Britain. These occurrences happened during Churchill’s time and thus the characters contribute significantly towards the development of the movie plot. The movie, Into the Storm, shows the lives of Churchill and his wife in the period between 1940 and 1945 when Churchill was the Britain’s Prime Minister. The movie then takes the audience through the period after 1945 as Churchill is removed from office in a general election. His wife comes out as a strong woman who endures her husband’s undesirable acts. In 1940, Churchill rises to power as the Prime Minister of Britain and serves until 1945. In this period, the country is engaged in a brutal warfare under his leadership with his sole aim being to emerge victorious in the war. Though the movie is limited to 99 minutes, it manages to cover most of Churchill’s life. With Gleeson representing the prime minister and Mc Teer representing his wife, the movie is entertaining and humorous. The two bring the real personalities to the real people, viz. Winston and his wife. At one point, Mc Teer tries to convince Gleeson that he must win the election, which is derived from the real occurrences that surrounded Winston’s bid to win an election in 1945. Even though the movie is brief and superficial, it manages to serve both the entertainment and training role. Historically, Churchill suffered a major blow in 1945 immediately after the end of the Second World War, as the country revolted and voted him out of office after all his efforts to defend Britain against invasion (Gilbert 1991, 76). His ambitions to lead the country for another term were cut short though he later secured the seat in early 1950s. As the election results are being tallied, Clementine tries to comfort her husband in a French coastal town where both are waiting for the election results to be announced. This scene is a true reflection of what happened as after the election, Churchill and his wife toured France as they waited for the results. The results took one month before official declaration and during this period, Churchill visited France probably to absorb the reality of losing the election. In the movie, Churchill blames his wife for almost everything including the resounding defeat during the elections, which again reflects the historical happenings surrounding Winston at the time. Reynolds notes, “For her part, Clementine was highly strung and needed frequent rests from her husband’s emotional and practical demands” (48). The correlation in these events is strong and thus the movie’s historical reflections are very true and real. Churchill was a great Englishman of the time and Britain believed in him as the leader that the people deserved. However, despite the peoples’ trust in him, his real character is seen in the movie as he introduced odd ideas in a bid to win the Second World War. Janet Mc Teer also comes out as the real wife to Churchill in the movie as she demonstrates her long-suffering in the hands of Gleeson in the movie. This movie is a great piece of art as it outlines all the odds and mistakes that Churchill, as a leader, did thus giving way to his fall. The movie is thus recommended for learners as it captures the relevant history surrounding Churchill’s life story during the Second World War in only about 99 minutes, which is a convenient duration for class work. However, in some cases, for example where detailed examination is required, the movie may not be recommended as it avoids details of the Second World War and only focuses on Churchill’s life as if he were the only participant in the war. The film does not run continuously as the director uses flashback at times to show the earlier history on the life of Churchill. This style is a bit confusing even though in this case it is used in a manner that does not divert the viewer’s attention. A good example of the style comes out clearly, as the director takes the audience through the history of Churchill before 1940. According to the movie, Churchill was the most powerful in 1940 and at this period, he was the key player in the World War II. However, after the United States joined the war in 1941, Churchill’s role diminished. Churchill’s ideas in the war conflicted with those of Roosevelt, the then American head of state. For instance, Churchill’s tactic was to attack the Mediterranean even though this move did not seem as the best way to handle the situation and at times, the American approaches were more plausible as compared to those of Churchill. Although Churchill is seen as a rude, impulsive, self-centered, and inconsiderate person, he was a great leader as he foresaw the danger that was brewing in Germany under the leadership of Hitler, who ordered massive firearms with the intention of expanding his territories. Churchill is one of the few leaders of the 1930s who managed to foresee the danger of the Nazi. In the movie, Churchill states categorically that Hitler is a time bomb waiting to explode anytime courtesy of his desire and greed to control Poland and other places. Unfortunately, the United States did not heed to these calls, which deepened Churchill’s differences with Roosevelt. However, Churchill was vindicated when Hitler finally turned against Jews and massacred millions of them during the infamous Holocaust. Throughout the film, there remains a balance between Churchill’s sleepless nights and the ongoing debate on his suitability in the Buckingham palace. On one side (debate around the Buckingham palace), the leader is described as unreliable and quick of anger, which is evidenced later in the movie as Churchill quarrels one of his servants for misplacing some bottles of paint. In the movie, Churchill comes out as strange character, when he demands an hour of uninterrupted nap every day. As the war continued and the ground floors of the building where he was living were attacked, he ordered his workers to take him to the top floor of the building. This move was considered as the most dangerous place, but he insisted on being there by asserting that it provided a good position to see the incoming enemies before they could make attacks. The movie portrays the legendary Winston Churchill as the real man on the ground. The characters chosen to represent various persons in the movie are charming and entertaining. However, the movie balances the two aspects of delivering the intended message as well as entertainment. The characters’ creative and innovative way of presenting events that rather happened a long time ago was a great achievement that must be acknowledged. The movie is entertaining and at some point, Churchill is seen in the bathing basin engaging in a friendly talk with Franklin Roosevelt, who sits not far away, then coming out of the bathtub and by accident drops the towel that he has tied on his waist. At this time, Gleason defenselessly picks the towel and quickly ties it in the waist. Even though the director chose to include some seemingly inaccurate elements for purposes of entertainment, he did not alter (even though he left out some contents) the historical content of the movie in terms of presenting Churchill’s life. However, the movie bypasses huge stretches of history that would be of great significance to the viewer if included. Some history especially that on the Atlantic Charter is overlooked and never reflected anywhere in the movie. In addition, the director left out the events that led to the general election that saw Churchill thrown out of office, which are only given a walkover approach. Lack of incorporation of these important historical events renders the movie incomplete and vague to some extent. The movie also fails to focus on the long history surrounding the Second World War. Instead, it focuses heavily on Churchill’s life and disregards other participants of the war. Therefore, it is incomplete since it leaves out crucial details concerning the war, which if included would make it more reliable for use in class. The choice of words is yet another concern. Churchill used strong words whenever he was angry (Catherwood 2009, 92), which is not reflected in the movie as Gleason has less command on the same. In addition, some words used in the movie are age-sensitive and not suitable for the young generation. Lack of a woven theme is another shortfall the movie experiences. The film is made up of short episodes that are not well interconnected. Although it has a perfect message, the flow of the message is below average. The movie is set against a background of the former British Prime Minister and his role during the Second World War. However, the movie leaves much history uncovered as it only runs for about 99 minutes, which is not adequate to cover all the events that characterized the period between 1940 and1945 when the Prime Minister was in charge. The movie is thus too shallow; however, Gleeson and Janet McTeer’s personalities in the movie compel the viewer to overlook the shortcomings of the movie as the two perform their roles innovatively and professionally. Overall, despite its shortcomings, the movie highlights important historical events, and thus I can use it in conjunction with other movies as teaching tools in my class. Reference List Catherwood, Christopher. 2009. Winston Churchill: The Flawed Genius of World War II. New York: Penguin. Gilbert, Martin. 1991. Churchill: A life. New York: Henry Holt and Company, LLC. Reynolds, David. 2005. “In command of History.” The New York Times, November 13. The Movie “Into the Storm” Critical Essay

Employee Empowerment and Conflict Resolution Essay

Training and employee empowerment I strongly agree that training does not give conclusive empowerment to the employees. Through training, employees get the skills to perform their duties, but this depends on other aspects. I would be best empowered by a manager who seeks to involve me in decision-making and consider my opinions. S/he should allow me to make decisions and work out problems on my own on top of trusting me. In addition, s/he should not keep grudges when I make a mistake; on the contrary, s/he should forgive and encourage me. A manager should be an understanding person who appreciates that we are all humans and will err at times. A motivating manager should not shout at me when I make mistakes but should extol me when I make an achievement. On the other hand, s/he should not accept all my decisions; at times, s/he should challenge my stand. Finally, s/he should not be an absolute decision-maker, but a collaborative leader, a problem solver, not a troublemaker. As a manager, I would empower employees by making sure they focus on customer needs. In addition, I would encourage and support them in creating a customer-oriented culture, allow them to make some decisions, leave them to solve problems and build trust in them. Finally, I would avoid direct control of the employees’ duties and responsibilities. An example is a case where I worked for a certain bank under a manager who was always at my back and shouted at me whenever I made mistakes. For many days, I lacked the confidence to perform and improve. Resolving Conflicts After doing the management style test, I realized that I am an accommodator, a manager/ leader who will not compete with employees or dictate their ways. I realized that, as a manager, I would seek contribution and cooperation from my juniors. Moreover, I recognized that I am a manager who will sacrifice in honor of the employees’ demands in a bid to offer them satisfaction. However, according to the conflict-management styles scoring graph, this amounts to low goal orientation and high relationship orientation, which shows that my concern for personal goals is low while my concern for relationships is deep. Sometimes back, I led a group of youths, and two of them quarreled over the use of the groups’ money. This conflict grew to the point where both almost fought. Each of the two believed that his case and argument was the correct one. Since I knew the source of the conflict and the nature of the conflict itself, I created time with each of them separately and advised them that altercation would not solve but aggravate our problem. In the end, both saw the need to agree and avoid conflicts. I then had time with both, where each apologized to the other and sought forgiveness. In this case, according to the Conflict Management Style Test, this would mean that harmony comes on the basis that the conflict would lead to the destruction of friendly relations. It would also mean that the confrontation fades by moving the discussion to a neutral ground. In addition, it shows that when two members of a group begin to differ, a nonpartisan party should explore their agreements and disagreements and then come up with a universal solution that accommodates everyone’s view. Get your 100% original paper on any topic done in as little as 3 hours Learn More

OC Cognitive Behavioral Therapies for Major Depressive Disorder Adolescents Paper

OC Cognitive Behavioral Therapies for Major Depressive Disorder Adolescents Paper.

PART 1: DUE 11.15.20Prepare an Outline for the Signature AssignmentInstructionsYour task this week is to complete an outline of your Signature Assignment. The outline should contain the following for two hypothetical studies, one that will use a qualitative method and one that will use a quantitative method.For the quantitative study, be sure to address the following in your outline:Include a brief explanation of the hypothetical study.Identify the research question you plan to answer.Identify the independent and dependent variables.Explain the analysis you plan to use to assess the findings from the study. For the qualitative study, be sure to address the following in your outline:Include a brief explanation of the hypothetical study.Identify the research question you plan to answer.Identify the type of qualitative technique you plan to use. Conclude with any questions you want your professor to answer. (Please do not send paragraphs asking “is this ok?”). These questions are optional, so if you do not have any questions, that is fine. Your grade will not reflect whether you had any clarifying questions. Length: 1-2 pages, not including title and reference pagesYour assignment should demonstrate thoughtful consideration of the ideas and concepts presented in the course by providing new thoughts and insights relating directly to this topic. Your response should reflect scholarly writing (where appropriate) and current APA standards.PART 2: DUE 11.22.20Propose Two Hypothetical Research StudiesInstructionsYour task this week is to build on the outline you completed in Week 11. Propose two distinct studies: one that will use a qualitative method and one that will use a quantitative method.For the quantitative study, be sure to address the following:Include a brief explanation of the hypothetical study.Include the research question you plan to answer.Include a description of the participants and explain how you would recruit them.Identify the independent and dependent variables.Comment on issues related to reliability and validity for this study, citing specific types of reliability and/or validity issues and how they might be addressed.Comment on the potential ethical issues for this study.Explain the analysis you plan to use to assess the study.For the qualitative study, be sure to address the following:Include a brief explanation of the hypothetical study.Include the research question you plan to answer.Include a description of the participants and explain how you would recruit them.Identify the qualitative method you plan to use.Comment on issues related to trustworthiness, credibility, and transferability for this study’s issues and how they might be addressed.Comment on the potential ethical issues for this study.Support your assignment with at least five scholarly resources. In addition to these specified resources, other appropriate scholarly resources, including seminal articles, may be included.Length: no more than ten pages (maximum of 5 pages per study), not including title and reference pages. You will not be marked down for writing less, but please meet the maximum page limit. If you only use four pages to explain one study, the limit for the second study is still five pages.Your assignment should demonstrate thoughtful consideration of the ideas and concepts presented in the course by providing new thoughts and insights relating directly to this topic. Your response should reflect scholarly writing and current APA standards.
OC Cognitive Behavioral Therapies for Major Depressive Disorder Adolescents Paper