Get help from the best in academic writing.

Public Health Patient Interview Discussion

Public Health Patient Interview Discussion.

For this assignment, you will describe (in detail) how you would approach and assess the victim in the following scenario. Your submission should be a Word document (please proofread) and include enough detail to adequately describe the appropriate steps. You will include all steps that should be completed from the time you recognize the emergency until you actually begin bandaging or splinting for the victim.Scenario:You are enjoying the day at a local park when you suddenly hear someone yell for help. You make your way towards a young woman lying on the ground holding her knee, screaming for help. There are a few people nearby. It does not appear that she has any life-threatening injuries.
Public Health Patient Interview Discussion

PHIL1310 Comparing Perspectives on Your Research Topic. I’m studying for my Philosophy class and need an explanation.

Assignment 3.1: Comparing Perspectives on Your Research Topic

Due Sunday by 9:59pm
Points 90
Submitting a file upload
Available Nov 24 at 10pm – Dec 15 at 9:59pm 21 days

Description
Students will create the second part of their research manuscript.
Objectives

Explain what perceiving is and factors that influence our perceptions.
Describe the relationship between believing and perceiving.

Instructions
Using the following writing prompt, write an essay following the guidelines of your chosen topic for your research manuscript. The paper should be 500-750 words.

Write an essay that compares and contrasts two or more written texts that present different perspectives related to your research manuscript topic. Begin by comparing and contrasting the texts and their perspectives. Make sure to include the general context or situation related to your research topic. Then come up with insights of your own based on your comparison.

Assignment Submission

The use of outside resources is strongly recommended and all papers must be cited and written in APA format.
Once you have completed the assignment, click the Submit Assignment option in the menu to the right and select a format for submitting your assignment.
Click the Submit Assignment button when you are ready.

PHIL1310 Paper Guidelines
Rubric
Writing Assignments Rubric_2017

Writing Assignments Rubric_2017

Criteria
Ratings
Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Assignment Ideas

18.0 pts Ideas are clear, insightful, thought-provoking, and focused so that they consistently support the topic, thesis and audience for the paper.
15.0 pts Ideas are clear and focused to support the topic and a clearly-stated central idea, but are not consistently insightful or thought-provoking.
12.0 pts Ideas are clear but conventional or general, and support the topic, thesis, and audience for the paper.
9.0 pts Ideas are unclear or clichéd and demonstrate a lack of focus in support of the topic or a central idea, which may be vague or missing.

18.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Assignment Development

18.0 pts Development is fresh, with abundant details and examples that arouse audience interest and provide relevant, concrete, specific and insightful evidence in support of sound logic.
15.0 pts Development is adequate, but may lack depth, with details and examples that arouse audience interest and provide relevant, concrete, specific evidence in support of sound logic.
12.0 pts Development is sufficient but general, providing adequate but perhaps not interesting details, examples, and evidence that include no logical fallacies or unsupported claims.
9.0 pts Development is insufficient, providing scarce or inappropriate details, evidence, and examples that may include logical fallacies or unsupported claims.

18.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Organization

18.0 pts Organization is coherent, unified and effective in support of the paper’s purpose/ plan and consistently demonstrates effective and appropriate rhetorical transitions between ideas and paragraphs.
15.0 pts Organization is coherent, unified and effective in support of the paper’s purpose/ plan and usually demonstrates effective and appropriate rhetorical transitions between ideas and paragraphs
12.0 pts Organization is coherent and unified overall in support of the essay’s purpose/ plan, but is ineffective at times and may demonstrate abrupt or weak transitions between ideas or paragraphs.
9.0 pts Organization is confused and fragmented in support of the essay’s purpose/ plan and demonstrates a lack of structure or coherence that negatively affects readability.

18.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Style & Mechanics

18.0 pts Readable and rhetorically effective in tone, incorporating varied sentence structure, precise word choice and correct grammar, spelling and punctuation. (Mastery of style)
15.0 pts Style is readable and rhetorically effective in tone, incorporating varied sentence structure, effective word choice, and correct grammar, spelling and punctuation. (Effective style)
12.0 pts Style is readable, but unremarkable in tone, sometimes including a lack of sentence variety effective word choice, or some distracting, but not serious, errors in grammar, spelling and punctuation. (Readable but inconsistent style)
9.0 pts Style is incoherent or inappropriate in tone, including a lack of sentence variety, ineffective or inappropriate word choice, and serious errors in grammar, spelling and punctuation. (Ineffective style)

18.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Format

18.0 pts Format is correct, meets all assignment directions, and works expertly to support the essay’s purpose/plan.
15.0 pts Format is correct, meets all assignment directions, and works generally to support the essay’s purpose/plan.
12.0 pts Format is mostly correct, meets critical aspects of assignment directions, and works mostly to support the essay’s purpose/ plan.
9.0 pts Format is faulty, does not meet sufficient aspects of the assignment direction, and does not support the essay’s purpose/ plan.

18.0 pts

Total Points: 90.0

PHIL1310 Comparing Perspectives on Your Research Topic

NR 293 Chamberlain College of Nursing The Warfarin Drug Presentation

NR 293 Chamberlain College of Nursing The Warfarin Drug Presentation.

Please see the rubric below: MEDICATION IS WARFARIN 
One brochure 2 sided and one page paper 
The brochure must be written for everyone to understand, 7th grade level writing. 

Research the literature and obtain two to three resources for current, evidence-based information related to the pharmacological agent.
Develop a teaching brochure (2sided) and one page paper following these guidelines.a. Brochure

• Key/Relevant Drug Information (30 points/30%)
o DrugClass
o Mechanism of Action
o Drug Administrationand Dosage
o Drug Interactions
o Labeffects/interference
o Special Considerations
o Potential Side Effects/Adverse Effects/Toxicities
• Patient Education Considerations (35 points/35%)o NursingManagement
o PatientEducationConsiderations
o PatientAssessment
o SideEffects/AdverseEffects/Toxicities
o Special considerations
• Visual Effects/Creativity (10 points/10%)
o Developed per the required standard
o Appropriate for the intended audience
o Flesch-Kincaid reading level seventh grade or lowero Graphics enhance the purpose of the brochure
o Brochure is visually appealing
NR293 Pharmacology for Nursing Practice Medication Teaching Plan Guidelines

One Page Paper (15 points/15%)

Describes intended brochure audience
Describes intended use of brochure
Includeso Name
o Date
o Class
o Referencepage

APA Format (5 points/5%)

Includes no more than 3 unique errors with APA format (current ed.)
At least two (2) scholarly, primary sources from the last 5 years, excluding the textbook, are provided

Writing and Mechanics (5 points/5%)

Clearly written
Includes no more than three unique errors of grammar
Includes no more than three unique errors in writing mechanics
Paper is one page, excluding references and title page

NR 293 Chamberlain College of Nursing The Warfarin Drug Presentation

Greasy lake by T. Coraghessan Boyle

assignment writer Greasy Lake by T. Coraghessan Boyle and Where Are You Going, Where Have You Been? by Joyce Carol Oates are two works that have the generalized theme of death in them. They may differ in contextual ways, but the deeper theme they share is present. The more in depth comparisons are about teenagers trying to find their way through life as portrayed through their looks and actions, and the thought of how you perceive yourself can get you into trouble. Greasy Lake contains teenage bad boys trying to find their self identity, and Where Are You Going, Where Have You Been surrounds a girl who doesnt know the power of attention she attracts, until its too late. In Greasy Lake the main characters call themselves bad characters. They are putting on a faade of leather jackets, mischief and rock and roll. These main characters were Digby, Jeff and the narrator, who really didnt know what they were getting into late one night at Greasy Lake. What started out as a joke led to a string of unfortunate events, and how the three boys in the end realized that they were indeed, not bad characters anymore; hence the teenage self exploration. From a fight, to attempted rape, to the smashing of the narrators mothers car, one night was all it took for those boys to see that they werent who they thought they were. This all ties in with the theme because of the things that are going through the narrators head as he leads the readers through the events. The whole scene is dark to begin with. Its late at night when the boys arrive at the lake, they end up in trouble with a big greasy character, as they call him, and the whole lake is surrounded by death and decay. This can be an immediate connection to death. Another way to show discovery is how at the end of the story it reads as this, when the boys are ready to drive home: I just looked at her. I thought I was going to cry. (403) I believe at this point the narrator realizes that there will always be someone out there that will be tougher than you, and that will get you in the end. He realizes that sure, they were big and bad to themselves, until they met their match. This shows change in the characters which is a big indication of theme. Another indication would be the title, because greasy is generally something that is used in a bad way, so it doesnt in any way reflect life. Where Are You Going, Where Have You Been? is also, like stated before, about teenage perception and how it can or will get you into trouble. There is a girl, named Connie, who thinks that she is so pretty and is a completely vain character. She believes that she can get any guy she wants, and wants any guy she can get, until she attracts unwanted attention. This is a story in part created through a serial killer. Being about a serial killer alone shows darkness and death, but there are other examples of this theme. One would be how Connie would always sneak out with her friends to the burger joint across the street. This is an act of defying parents. She defies her parents because they treat her as if they dont care about her at all. This is also something that is negative and could relate to death. Connie ends up being so nave about who she may be showing off too, that she becomes trapped, alone, in her own home with a man outside, coming to kidnap her. This is another similarity to Boyles story, because there is a change in the character here as well. Connie changes because she goes from getting any guy she wants, and thinking that shes invincible, to be completely vulnerable in her own home. An example of how full of herself she is, is right in the first couple of sentences: She was fifteen and she had a quick nervous giggling habit of craning her neck to look into mirrors, or checking other peoples faces to make sure her own was alright. (427) This alone shows how all she cares about are looks. An example of confidence and then vulnerability comes when the kidnapper, Arnold Friend, comes to her house to get her. At first she is excited and plays it cool, thinking she can handle any situation. The feeling quickly changes though, when she realizes this is one situation she cant get herself out of, becoming vulnerable. Therefore, both Greasy Lake and Where Are You Going, Where Have You Been? have a shared theme, being that how you perceive yourself can get you into trouble. The boys from Greasy Lake met their match and learned that they really werent bad characters and Connie from Where Are You Going had a more unfortunate demise when she realized being too confident can get you into a bad situation. The stories also had recurring instances of death, from the decaying lake to Arnold Friend being a dark and scary character to Connie. All in all, even though the plots may have been different, the theme of death and teenage self exploration are present in these works.

Scavenger Hunt: PSU Abington Culture, homework help

Scavenger Hunt: PSU Abington Culture, homework help.

Go on a scavenger hunt around campus, alone or in groups, and take pictures of organizational rites, rituals, myths, or metaphors. While some of them might be hard to get,such as myths, be creative and find a representation of a myth and then explain your picture. Choose one or two to post in this forum, and talk about how they contribute to organizational culture here at Abington. *If you do the Lion Shrine, you must post at least one additional picture/explanation of a different myth, metaphor, etc.*Be sure to quote the reading and respond to 2 classmates. classmate 1. Before you ask, I worked overnight security at the University Park Football Stadium. Nice sunset, huh?When I think of organizational rituals and metaphors, I think of Penn State Football and its stadium. Each year, hundreds of Penn State fans and alumni flock to State College and harbor around the stadium to watch their lions play. Each year, they bring their families, meet old friends, and tailgate till kickoff.  The stadium, and the tailgate fields around it, stands as a hub that everyone can get together for those few times a year. Outside of football season, the stadium is used for weddings, camps, tours, and high-end gatherings for its alumni, community, and PSU prospects.     Classmate2: chose this picture because I don’t know anyone who doesn’t like the duck pond on campus. When I transferred back to Abington the biggest thing I remembered about campus was the duck pond. It is at the heart of the Abington Campus and gives it some of the character it has.Everyone likes the duck pond, and everyone knows the duck pond. To me the duck pond is what separates the Abington campus from others. It’s unique and interesting. The way it freezes in the cold winters is hauntingly beautiful. In the fall and spring its great to relax near it. Most of all it’s a piece of campus anyone can relax by. 
Scavenger Hunt: PSU Abington Culture, homework help

Philosophy homework help

Philosophy homework help. First you need to read a book named “NEW JIM CROW”Please select ONE question from EACHÿset belowÿ(total of 3 questions)ÿand answer those questions in a separate word document. Please stay close to the text and cite the text as appropriate in your responses. Responses for each question should be around 500 words.ÿPlease upload the document here before our next class on 3/20.ÿSet One:1. What role do mandatory minimum sentences play in the new Jim Crow?2 .Why does Alexander say that prison sentences are only a small part of the problem? What?s the rest of the problem with the new Jim Crow? ?3. What is the role of bureaucratic discretion in the new Jim Crow? Consider both the tremendous discretion of police officers and prosecutors and the relative lack of discretion of judges. Does this suggest anything about what fairer laws might look like?Set Two:1. What does Alexander mean when (quoting Reva Siegel) she calls slavery, Jim Crow, and mass incarceration ?preservation through transformation?? (p. 21) ?2. Consider Alexander?s argument about the origin of the War on Drugs, and tell an analogous story about the origins of the War on Terror. Is the analogy, or are limits to the analogy, revealing? Is this line of analysis fruitful at all?3. Was the new Jim Crow inevitable? What would have had to be different to have prevented it? ?ÿSet Three:1. Why has there been so little challenge to the new Jim Crow?2. Why does Alexander say that the Jena 6 struggle could not have given rise to a broader civil rights struggle? Following this logic, what might a campaign that could spark such struggle look like? If it had focal individuals (like the six teenagers in Jena), what kind of people in what kind of circumstances might they be? ?3. What is Alexander?s critique of affirmative action? Is this just a critique of the relatively exclusive focus of civil rights organization on affirmative action, or is it a critique of affirmative action programs themselves? Do you agree with her critique?Philosophy homework help