Get help from the best in academic writing.

PSYCH 301 Capella University Academic Voice and Plagiarism Discussion

PSYCH 301 Capella University Academic Voice and Plagiarism Discussion.

I’m working on a psychology question and need guidance to help me study.

Part of scientific research includes conveying knowledge (about theory, research, etc.) to others in an ethical manner, avoiding plagiarim for more). This is a key professional skill to develop. In this activity, you will practice using your own and applying in-text citations.Review the following original and plagiarized passages:ORIGINAL AUTHOR’S THOUGHTSThe correlational method can be very useful, but it must be used with caution. If knowledge of one variable (age) helps predict another (buying), does that mean that one causes the other? Not necessarily. It is possible that the first variable caused the second, or that the second variable caused the first, or that some other variable caused both variables. Without further research we cannot know which possibility is true. For example, a researcher might find a negative correlation in schools between the number of teachers monitoring hallway behavior and the number of acts of aggression in the hallway. It is possible that more teachers in the hallway caused lower aggression, but it is also possible that there were fewer teachers in the hallway in the face of aggression because they had left to avoid it. Knowing that there is a correlation between two events does not tell us which, if either, is the cause. In fact, it is quite common to have a third variable cause a correlation between two other variables. For example, sunburn and outdoor temperature are correlated. Does this mean that hot weather causes sunburn or that sunburn causes hot weather? Of course not. The summer sun causes both sunburn and hot weather. Cum hoc propter hoc—correlation does not imply causation.ReferenceFeenstra, J. (2020). Social psychology (2nd ed.). Zovio.REWRITE BY SOMEONE WANTING TO WRITE ABOUT THE ARTICLE AND ITS FINDINGS“The correlational method can be very useful, but it must be used with caution.” If knowledge of one variable (height) helps predict another (weight), does that mean that one causes the other? Not necessarily. It is possible that the primary variable caused the secondary, or that the secondary variable caused the primary, or that some additional variable caused both variables. We cannot understand what chance is true without further studies. For example, ice cream consumption and violent crime are correlated. Does this mean eating ice cream causes violent crime? Or, does a spike in violent crime cause consumption of ice cream? Probably neither… rather, a common factor (e.g., heat) may be to blame for both. “Cum hoc propter hoc—correlation does not imply causation.”Define academic voice and plagiaris.Apply your knowledge of academic voice and plagiaris to the rewritten passage, locating and identifying errors.Rewrite the passage appropriately using your own wordsBe sure to utilize strategies for Quoting, Paraphrasing & summarizing avoiding direct quotes and appropriately utilizing in-text citations.Demonstrate the importance of developing a strong academic voice for both your education and career.What are some key features of academic writing that might be particularly relevant within your own program/intended career?What types of plagiaris do you find most difficult to avoid?What methods/strategies can you use to ensure that you avoid these errors in your own work?
PSYCH 301 Capella University Academic Voice and Plagiarism Discussion

Comparative Representation Assignment Artificial Intelligence.

We have covered the following methods of representing knowledge: 1) Agent programs
2) Trees
3) Optimization problems 4) Games 5) Constraint satisfaction problems 6) Propositional and first-order logic
Assignment: a) Create a simple game. You may not use a game that appears in our text book.[15 points]
b) Define your simple game with respect to PEAS (Performance Measure, Environment, Actuators,
and Sensors) for each method of representing knowledge 1) – 6) above. [30 points]
c) Describe how your game would be played by an AI in each of the methods of representing
knowledge 1) – 6). [30 points]
d) Create a trace of the AI’s play of two test games for each method 1) – 6) [25 points]
Comparative Representation Assignment Artificial Intelligence

Math !! NEED HELP ASAP!!!~ 🙂 TY!

Math !! NEED HELP ASAP!!!~ 🙂 TY!.

 Multiply. EXPLAIN!  A.     B.       C.   D.   Simplify completely.      A.       B.       C.        D. 
Math !! NEED HELP ASAP!!!~ 🙂 TY!

Evidence Worksheet 3

best essay writers Evidence Worksheet 3.

I’m working on a psychology question and need support to help me learn.

Please complete this assignment in Canvas, and submit your responses by the deadline. Here’s a word doc version you may work from: Evidence Worksheet 3.docxModule 4: Developmental Pillar: Learning, Lifespan Development, LanguageAssignment: Evaluating the Evidence Worksheet 3 (10 points 3We are consistently presented with claims about human behavior and mental processes on a near daily basis. It is important that we begin to develop skills required to critically evaluate these claims. These critical thinking skills will help us understand what we are being asked to believe, evaluate the evidence supporting claims, and assist us in deciding whether we want to base our own judgements on these claims. Below you will find two claims related to Module 4. Select one and proceed with completing the evidence worksheet.Claim 5: Children raised in similar ways have similar personalities.-OR-Claim 6: Too much sugar causes hyperactivity in children.Choose ONE of the Claims above to evaluate. Which type of claim is it: Frequency, Association, or Causal? EXPLAIN your answer.Search for and read ONE primary source of evidence related to this claim (i.e., a peer-reviewed scientific journal article written by the researchers themselves). If you begin with a media article or other non-scientific website (secondary source), find the original research journal article described in the secondary source. You could begin with a simple Google search of the question related to the claim, but again, you’ll want to find a primary research source, perhaps from a link in a secondary source, through scholar.google.com (Links to an external site.), or better yet, in the library’s PsycArticles + PsycInfo (Links to an external site.) database (log into my.rockford.edu > Library > scroll down to Databases by Subject > Psychology > select PsycArticles + PsychInfo (not PsycTests)). You could also look into an article from the References section from the Module 4 Required Readings (Noba chapters). Please email me if I can be of assistance. WHERE did you find evidence? Provide the researcher’s name, year of publications, and weblink or “digital object identifier” (doi) for the article or the abstract you evaluated.For example, if I were investigating the claim that “Humans use 10% of their brain capacity,” I might start by Googling “Percent of brain humans use,” which would bring me to this secondary source media article. (Links to an external site.)From here, I would select the link for the “study published (Links to an external site.)” mentioned in the media article, which would bring me to the primary source journal article, in this case, a systematic review of several studies. So, my answer to this question would be: Herculano-Houzel (2009), doi: 10.3389/neuro.09.031.2009 (Links to an external site.)WHAT did the evidence say? Briefly describe the researcher’s methods and conclusions. If you do not have access to the full article, briefly describe the Abstract for the article, in your own words.What TYPE of evidence was it? List only the types of evidence the researcher produced.Case studySurveyCorrelational studyQuasi-experimental studyLongitudinal studyControlled Experimental studySystematic review or meta-analysis of many studiesEvaluate whether the types of methods used in the study (descriptive, correlational, or experimental) appropriately matched the type of claim (frequency, association, or causal).RATE the strength of the evidence on a scale of 1-10 (with 10 being the strongest), and EXPLAIN why you gave that rating.
Evidence Worksheet 3

STU Wk 5 Sickle Cell Anemia Child Disease Management Discussion

STU Wk 5 Sickle Cell Anemia Child Disease Management Discussion.

Approaches to Disease Managementdiscuss the following:A 2-month-old is identified during newborn screening with sickle cell anemia.How would you manage this patient at 2 months, 2 years, 6 years, and at 13 years old?What are the issues for each stage in development?Where would you refer this child?How would you coordinate the care of this child?.Submission Instructions:Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sourcesApproaches to Health Management in Pediatric Primary Care 3Read and watch the lecture resources & materials below early in the week to help you respond to the discussion questions and to complete your assignment(s).(Note: The citations below are provided for your research convenience. You should always cross reference the current APA guide for correct styling of citations and references in your academic work.)Read and watch the lecture resources & materials below early in the week to help you respond to the discussion questions and to complete your assignment(s).(Note: The citations below are provided for your research convenience. You should always cross reference the current APA guide for correct styling of citations and references in your academic work.)ReadMcCance Burns, C. E., Dunn, M. A., Brady, A. M., Starr, B. N., Blosser, G. C., & Garzon, L. D. (2017).Chapter 27, 29, 30, and 34Supplemental Materials & ResourcesAmerican Academy of Pediatrics, Section on Ophthalmology, American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus, American Academy of Ophthalmology, & American Association of Certified Orthoptists. (2008). Red reflex examination in neonates, infants, and children. PEDIATRICS, 122(6), 1401-1404.Rosenfeld, R.M., Shin, J.J., Schwartz, S. R., Coggins, R., Gagnon, L., Hackell, J.M., Hoelting, D., Hunter, L.L., Kummer, A.W., Payne, S.C., Poe, D.S., Veling, M., Vila, P.M., Walsh, S.A., & Corrigan, M.D. (2004). Clinical practice guideline: otitis media with effusion. Official Journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, 130(5): S95–S118.Al-Yassin, A., Osei, A., & Rees, D. (2012). Folic acid supplementation in children with sickle cell disease. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 97(Suppl 1), A91.2-A92.Hallas, D., & Shelley, D. (2009). Role of pediatric nurse practitioners in oral health care. Academic Pediatrics, 9(6), 462-466.Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.Discussion RubricCriteriaRatingsPointsIdentification of Main Issues, Problems, and Concepts5 pointsDistinguishedIdentify and demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the issues, problems, and concepts.4 pointsExcellentIdentifies and demonstrate an accomplished understanding of most of issues, problems, and concepts.2 pointsFairIdentifies and demonstrate an acceptable understanding of most of issues, problems, and concepts.1 pointsPoorIdentifies and demonstrate an unacceptable understanding of most of issues, problems, and concepts.5 pointsUse of Citations, Writing Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines3 pointsDistinguishedEffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and extended referencing. High level of APA precision and free of grammar and spelling errors.2 pointsExcellentEffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing. Moderate level of APA precision and free of grammar and spelling errors.1 pointFairIneffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.0 pointPoorIneffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. An unacceptable use of citations and extended referencing. APA style and writing mechanics need serious attention.3 pointsResponse to Posts of Peers2 pointsDistinguishedStudent constructively responded to two other posts and either extended, expanded or provided a rebuttal to each.1 pointsFairStudent constructively responded to one other post and either extended, expanded or provided a rebuttal.0 pointPoorStudent provided no response to a peer’s post. 2 points
STU Wk 5 Sickle Cell Anemia Child Disease Management Discussion

wireless technology

wireless technology. I need help with a Management question. All explanations and answers will be used to help me learn.

Write a fully developed paper in which you:

Compare the pros and cons of 3G and 4G technology to determine the best uses of 3G and 4G technology in today’s applications.
Describe how an enterprise would use 3G, 4G, WWAN, and WiMAX to improve business. Explain why they would use one solution over the remaining three (3).
Analyze the changes in 4G technology since the printing of the textbook in 2009 and identify those of importance for a user of 4G technology.
Take a position on the following statement, “Wireless application protocol is a necessity for wireless communication organizations and their users.” Then, explain your position with supporting evidence.
Use at least three quality resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and similar websites do not qualify as quality resources.

900 words
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

Be typed, double-spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required page length.

wireless technology

Essay Writing at Online Custom Essay

5.0 rating based on 10,001 ratings

Rated 4.9/5
10001 review

Review This Service




Rating: