Get help from the best in academic writing.

PSY 437 LRN WK1

PSY 437 LRN WK1. Paper details Instructions Present in a word processing document (e.g., MS Word) a copy the text for your Week 1 discussion’s main post. This requirement supports the provision of constructive, personalized feedback throughout the course. Turnitin will be used as part of this feedback process. This is a required task. The discussion grade will be managed via the Discussion rubric posted each week. However, not providing a copy of the discussion text here will result in the deduction of 1 point from the week’s discussion score.PSY 437 LRN WK1
FIN 335 New York University Adjustable ARM an Subprime Loans Discussion.

Answer all the below questions using the Cassidy book (Chapters 17-23 and conclusion) Using the prisoner’s dilemma show why a conservative bank would have to take great risks in the banking industry by offering liar loans, subprime loans, Adjustable ARM loans, etc.Show how a leveraged bank can make higher profits during a boom than an unleveraged firm. Then, show how a leveraged bank can lose much more of its capital during a recession than an unleveraged bank.Explain how Greenspan was guilty of the law of small numbers.Explain how the subprime loan market is a market for lemons.What is the problem with VAR (value at risk) models?Why did so many investment banks have to start buying CDO’s and other mortgaged backed securities themselves (rather than selling them to other investors). Why did they buy these assets?Why is the London Bridge a good analogy for what can happen in financial markets?How does the mark to market accounting system lead to more bubbles and crashes?What was the Fed’s initial response the crisis (before Bear Stearns)?Why did the government bailout Bear Stearns, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and AIG but not Lehman?
FIN 335 New York University Adjustable ARM an Subprime Loans Discussion

RES 811 Grand Canyon University Enhanced Synthesis Paper Reflection.

Synthesis is the act of creating something new from multiple existing entities. Synthesis of research, then, is creating a new idea from existing ideas. Synthesis of research is not a single innate skill. Rather, it is a process learned through time and practice. At the doctoral level, writing is a continual process of revision as learners improve skills and build subject matter expertise. In Topic 5, you submitted a Synthesis Paper and received both feedback from your instructor and a grade for your work. In this assignment, you will expand upon your original paper with additional research from outside sources, incorporate feedback from your instructor, and provide a reflection section addressing your revision process. General Requirements: Locate the Synthesis Paper you completed in Topic 5.Locate and download “Enhanced Synthesis Paper Template” from the Course Materials for this topic.Locate and download “Enhanced Synthesis Paper Resources” from the Course Materials for this topic.Review the articles by Baker and Pifer (2011), Gardner (2009), and Smith and Hatmaker (2014) located in the Course Materials for this topic.This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. Review the GCU APA Style Guide for Writing located in the Student Success Center.You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the directions in the Student Success Center. Directions: Select and read two articles from the Enhanced Synthesis Paper Resources list located in the Course Materials for this topic. Locate the Synthesis Paper you completed in Topic 5. Using the feedback provided by your instructor and information from the two additional articles you selected, write an Enhanced Synthesis Paper with Reflection (1,250-1,800 words). Include the following in your paper: A Reflection (250-300 words) that discusses your revision process and how you incorporated your instructor’s feedback into the revised version. Similar to the format of an abstract, this section will receive its own page following the title page and preceding the Introduction.An introduction that includes a brief description of each article and its purpose, identifies the three themes that emerged from your reading, describes how they will be discussed in the paper, and presents a clear thesis statement.Support for your identified themes with evidence from each article. Provide analysis of these findings to strengthen your narrative.A discussion of the conclusions that can be drawn when the articles are taken together as a single entity. What is the overall message of the group of articles?
RES 811 Grand Canyon University Enhanced Synthesis Paper Reflection

Importance Of Being Logically Consistent Philosophy Essay

How important is it to be logically consistent? To answer this question it seems prudent to first explain what it means to be logically consistent. In simple terms we would describe a series of statements as being logically consistent if it is possible for all statements to be true at the same time. In the same way we would describe a person to be logically consistent if it is possible for all their beliefs (and statements) to be true at the same time. Opposed to consistency is inconsistency. Using the above definition of consistency in reverse, we can describe a person to be logically inconsistent if it is impossible for all their beliefs to be true at the same time. There are two major views on the importance of logical consistency (or in reverse: how bad it is to be logically inconsistent). The first view is that logical consistency is of primary importance and that inconsistency is the worst intellectual crime of all. In the second view, the importance of consistency is degraded; consistency is still considered desirable but inconsistency isn’t all that bad. Traditional logical discourse is based on three laws of thought. The law of Non-contradiction No statement can be both true and false (For a statement cannot have both itself and its negation true at once) The law of Identity Everything is what it is and not another thing The law of Excluded Middle Every statement is either true or false (either it, or its negation must be true) [Aristotle, Metaphysics] A person cannot possibly follow those laws if they are logically inconsistent. This means that they are using a non-traditional form of logic. Avicenna took a very strong view against those who objected to the law of non-contraction… “”Anyone who denies the law of non-contradiction should be beaten and burned until he admits that to be beaten is not the same as not to be beaten, and to be burned is not the same as not to be burned.”[ Avicenna, Metaphysics, I] Yet alternative systems have been established, merely rejecting the traditional system is not bad in itself. It becomes a problem when a person is acting under a flawed or an imperfect system (a lay person may call them illogical… or insane) which could lead to the person performing actions detrimental to their life and happiness. This would seem to concur with the first view on the importance of consistency. Since inconsistency can lead to self destructive behaviour; being logically consistent is of critical importance! However this is clearly very extreme! Performing the occasional contradiction does not mean a person will accept all inconsistencies, nor does it mean they will engage in self-destructive behaviour. At the least all it means is that one of their beliefs turns out to be wrong. Walt Whitman is supporting of this view… “Do I contradict myself? Very well then I contradict myself, (I am large, I contain multitudes.)” [Walt Whitman, Song of myself, 1867] A contradiction does not break the human mind and is easily shrugged off. This supports the second view on the importance of consistency. Although it is desirable to be consistent (I mean, who wants to be wrong?) it is not that important. Yet again it is not quite this simple: Ex falso quodlibet ‘the explosion principle’. .[The Internet Encyclopaedia of Philosophy]If one claims something is both true and not true, one can logically derive any conclusion. By accepting even one inconsistency we can logically derive any conclusion. If we accept this principle then being inconsistent suddenly becomes very bad. From a strictly logical perspective it means that any and all conclusions we reach inferred by the contradiction (and if it involves a person’s beliefs, this means all) are logical. The explosion principle is evidence supporting the first view, if by making a contradiction we can logically reach any conclusion it is very important to be consistent! Otherwise we may make conclusions our common sense rejects completely… (bad). A common argument against inconsistency is that contradictions are meaningless. But the argument form ‘reduction ad absurdum’ relies on contradictions having meaning to find proof.[The Internet Encyclopaedia of Philosophy] If we assert that contradictions have no meaning then we can no longer use this argument for any proof or purpose. Since the utility derived from reduction ad absurdum is much greater than any derived from having meaningless contradictions, it is much more sensible to give contradictions meaning. Of course, just giving meaning to contradictions does not make them good or bad: but it does mean that (comparatively) they are not as bad as if we didn’t assign them any meaning at all. This supports the former view then, inconsistency is not (all) that important. There has been one longstanding contradiction in modern physics: it has now been solved but we may still look at it when interpreting the importance of consistency. In the theory of Quantum Mechanics we demand that electrons jump immediately from one orbit to another instantly; the quantum leap. [Bohr model, 1913] Electrons cannot ever occupy an intermediate orbit. Now for the contradictions…In the general theory of relativity [general theory of relativity , 1920] we demand that nothing can travel faster than light (300,000 km/sec). As we can see we cannot possible accept that both theories are true, but all physicists do! This shows that consistency is not all that important; physicists did not find themselves unable to work because these theories contradicted. Time to draw this essay to a conclusion…Inconsistency in its extreme can lead to self-destruction, yet common sense tells us that this is not probable. Common sense also tells us that contradictions are easy to make and have no big consequences. Strictly logically, consistency is much more important; if we are not consistent then the conclusions we logically derive are much different than those which common sense allows us to accept. Looking at ‘real world’ examples in modern physics of inconsistencies also demonstrates that is not that important, Physicists were able to operate under two apparently conflicting theories for years with no great drawback. In short, I will conclude that consistency is (although certainly desirable) not that important.

Stereotype in the movie Goonies

essay order Stereotype in the movie Goonies. Paper details   Describe a stereotype and stick with it in relation to the movie. Essay , you need to work up your outline and your rough draft. To clarify: Analyze and evaluate your selection of a movie (note ONE specific movie) in terms of some focused aspect of a stereotype that you choose. Think about how you did the advertisement analysis… you could even use some of the same terminology about logos, pathos, ethos if you find it appropriate. The key is to FOCUS on one movie, one particular stereotype, and go into DETAIL … instead of trying to solve the world’s problems. FOCUS. Use MLA formatted citations as usual. Your thesis must be sharp, focused, one-sentence statement of your evaluation based on the focuses you have chosen. It must be ARGUABLE, not some general feel-good observation. In other words, based on your analysis, you must have some JUDGEMENT or “verdict” which your detailed evidence proves through your logical, organized argument. The following is NOT a good thesis: Movie X displays stereotypes of women. Also not good: Our society has so much racism and we all should solve it. “displays” is not a judgement. and “our society” is not a movie. and, “so much racism” is not specific, not exact, and is obvious and boring. FOCUS on ONE aspect of ONE stereotype in ONE movie, and go into detail. Have an analyzed JUDGEMENT of that one movie in terms of that ONE aspect of ONE stereotype. Do not try to solve the world’s problems in college essays; it’s impossible, it’s boring, and it leads to thin “watered down” general statements that any junior high kid could say. Instead, FOCUS on one small thing and go into deep detail with examples, analysis, example, analysis, example, analysis over and over as you present your evidence leading to your final judgement as you make your case to your conclusion (“verdict” or “final judgement” … of the MOVIE and it’s treatment of the stereotype, in this case). You are creating an ARGUMENT about one small thing. The movie Goonies, The movie plot Facing foreclosure of their homes in the Goon Docks area of Astoria, Oregon, to an expanding country club, a group of children who call themselves “the Goonies” gather for a final weekend together. The Goonies include optimist lead Goonie Mikey Walsh, his older brother Brandon, the inventive Data, the talkative Mouth, and the overweight klutz Chunk. Rummaging through the Walshes’ attic, they come across a 1632 doubloon and an old treasure map purporting to lead to the treasure of legendary pirate “One-Eyed Willy” believed to be located somewhere nearby. Mikey considers “One-Eyed Willy” to be the original “Goonie.” The kids evade Brandon and make their way to an abandoned restaurant on the coast that coincides with the map; Brandon soon follows alongside Andy, a cheerleader with a crush on him; and Stef, Andy’s friend. The group quickly discovers the derelict restaurant is a hideout of the Fratelli crime family: Francis, Jake, and their mother Mama. The Goonies find a tunnel in the basement and follow it, but Chunk is captured by the Fratellis and imprisoned with their hulking, deformed younger brother Sloth. The Fratellis interrogate Chunk until he reveals where the Goonies have gone, and begin pursuit. Chunk is left behind with Sloth but befriends him. After Sloth frees both of them, Chunk calls the police and he and Sloth follow the Fratellis. The Goonies evade several deadly booby traps along the tunnels while staying ahead of the Fratellis. Finally, they reach the grotto where Willy’s pirate ship, the Inferno, is anchored. The group discovers the ship is filled with treasure and they start filling their pockets, but Mikey warns them not to take any on a set of scales in front of Willy, considering that to be their tribute to him. As they leave the ship, the Fratellis appear and strip them of their loot. They make the Goonies walk the plank until Chunk arrives with Sloth and distracts the Fratellis long enough for the Goonies to jump overboard. The Fratellis proceed to grab all the treasure they can, including those on Willy’s scales; this triggers another booby trap that causes the grotto to cave in. With Sloth’s help, the Goonies and Fratellis barely escape. The two groups emerge on Astoria’s beach, where they reunite with the Goonies’ families and the police. The Fratellis are arrested, but Chunk prevents Sloth from also being taken; he invites Sloth to live with him, which he accepts. As the kids describe their adventure to their parents, the Walshes’ housekeeper, Rosalita discovers that Mikey’s marble bag is filled with gems he took from the ship and had not been seized by the Fratellis. Mikey’s father triumphantly rips up the foreclosure papers, declaring they have enough money to negate the foreclosure. As the Goonies celebrate, they see the Inferno, having broken free of the grotto, sailing off on its own in the distance.Stereotype in the movie Goonies

New York University Resilience Equips Peer Responses

New York University Resilience Equips Peer Responses.

I’m working on a psychology discussion question and need support to help me understand better.

Each peer response 50-75 words. APA formatPeer #1 ElizabethResilience is the process of perseverance that one takes when faced with a tragedy, threats, or experiencing stress due to reasons such as relationship or family problems, critical health problems, financial constraints, death in the family, or workplace stress. Therefore, resilience is the ability of an individual to overcome a challenging experience. If a person is more resilient, they can empower their personal growth (“Building your resilience”, 2012).Resilience is an important trait to have and an essential protective factor in a child’s development because it equips the child to withstand life’s pressure. Therefore, when a child is more resilient, they are less affected with stress. Building a child’s resilience can be done during their upbringing or through culture, and it becomes a benefit to their mental health, which is a skill that they will take with them to adulthood. Therefore, resilience is a protective factor in a child’s development because it reduces the child’s chances of suffering from stress-related disorders such as depression and anxiety. An example of building resilience in a child can be through the development of social skills. As a parent, you create a child’s resilience by developing their essential skills, such as teaching the child how to build healthy relationships with peers and adults and identifying, expressing, and managing their emotions. Another essential skill that makes a child’s resilience is building their independence and confidence by taking up personal challenges. Recommendations that I would provide to a new parent to promote their child’s resilience are telling them to encourage their children to take up responsibilities that develop a sense of autonomy. Through such an action, it provides the child which an opportunity to learn about themselves, leading to self-growth (“Resilience”, n.d.). ReferencesBuilding your resilience. (2012). Retrieved 30 April 2021, from https://www.apa.org/topics/resilience#:~:text=Psychologists%20define%20resilience%20as%20the,or%20workplace%20and%20financial%20stressors.&text=That’s%20the%20role%20of%20resilience.Resilience. Retrieved 30 April 2021, from https://developingchild.harvard.edu/science/key-concepts/resilience/Peer #2 CleaResilience is the ability to experience a traumatic event or trial and instead of quitting you gather an internal strength and push forward, you don’t just quit and give up. This is an extremely important protective factor for children. When a child is faced with a problem they have a few options in how they choose to handle the situation, they can quit, or they can have a positive attitude and push themselves to keep going or try a new situation. From being a fifth grade teacher I see many kids who have a resilient attitude and those that definitely do not. Like all situations culture, support at home, income and the parent’s education all seem to affect the resilience of their child. For example, a child who doesn’t understand their multiplication facts but has a positive attitude, looks at different ways to problem solve and often times has support at home (and/or their parents have a good relationship with the teacher), the child is often able to overcome and push themselves into conquering this difficult situation. However, the child who lives in extreme poverty, has many issues at home that effect their stability (food security, abuse, poverty, etc) and their parent finds no value in education, that child is more likely to quit before they even try, reasoning that it doesn’t matter, they don’t care or school is stupid. “The development of resilience is facilitated by families that set high expectations for their children’s behavior from an early age. High expectations are reflected in authoritative parent-ing that is warm and caring, that establishes clear organizational patterns, and that consistently sets and enforces limits.” (Masten & Coatsworth, 1998; Palmer, 2008; Werner, 1990).For any new parent or those that are looking to promote resilience in their children my recommendations would be to create a strong bond with them, when they feel safe and know they can trust you it allows them to try new things and fail. When we give our children situations where they can try something new or it is a situation where we purposely let them fail we are able to build and teach them the value in failing and how we can learn and grow from that. When we take the stress away, and the uncertainty of failure we allow them to see it is human nature to fail and it is what we do with that that counts. It is important to note that “when looking at adjustment over time, Bonanno (2012) has found that resilient individuals may experience transient distress during and/or immediately after a traumatic event, but these reactions are usually mild and unlikely to interfere with ongoing ability to function.” Our attitude about failure and the support we give to our children greatly determines the attitude of our children.References:Juntunen, C.L. & Schwartz, J.P. (Eds). (2016). Counseling across the lifespan (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://viewer.gcu.edu/V6W8wFPeer #3 LauraAccording to the text, resilience is defined as the positive, constructive way an individual adapts when significant conflicts occur (Juntunen & Schwartz, 2016). Researchers continually investigate factors that contribute to the development of resilience in children, and methods to effectively enhance resilience from an early age. Studies indicate that when resilience is developed in childhood, it contributes to a healthy development, and assists individuals positively contribute to the progress and prosperity of their society (Center on the Developing Child-Harvard University, 2021). If providers understand how to build protective experiences and coping skills in early childhood, these techniques can effectively counterbalance any significant adversity that occurs throughout life. Likewise, this data can also successfully help policymakers and influencers develop best practices and programs to help children develop resilience and reach their fullest potential (Center on the Developing Child-Harvard University, 2021). One way to develop resilience in children is through building strong relationships with important adults in their home, family, and community. As resilience is the result of a combination of protective factors, it has been shown that one strong predictor of resilience stems from the interaction between biological factors and the environment that can positively develop a child’s ability to come with adversity (Juntunen & Schwartz, 2016). As such, facilitating adult-child relationships can strengthen adaptive skills, increase social competence, develop a sense of identity, and develop resilience. Likewise, other strengths associated with thriving and resilience includes helping children find their purpose, religious involvement, modeling compassion, and psychological endurance (Sherry et al., 2018). Further, while resilience is best developed at a young age, it can be strengthened at any age. As such, parents can incorporate age-appropriate, health-promoting activities to help a child develop resilience. Some activities that help include regular physical exercise and healthy living, stress-reduction practices, like mediation or yoga, and involvement in programs in the school district or community that build executive function and self-regulation skills. These are ways to help children develop appropriate coping methods, adaptability, and healthy, constructive behaviors (Center on the Developing Child-Harvard University, 2021).References:Center for the Developing Child-Harvard University. (2021). Resilience. https://developingchild.harvard.edu/science/key-concepts/resilience/#:~:text=Resilience%20is%20the%20result%20of,prolonged%20periods%20of%20toxic%20stress.Hamby, S., Grych, J., & Banyard, V. (2018). Resilience portfolios and poly-strengths: Identifying protective factors associated with thriving after adversity. Psychology of Violence, 8(2), 172–183. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000135undefinedJuntunen, C.L. & Schwartz, J.P. (Eds). (2016). Counseling across the lifespan (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://viewer.gcu.edu/V6W8wF
New York University Resilience Equips Peer Responses

EN102 Grantham Uncovering The Rhetorical Self Discussion Help

EN102 Grantham Uncovering The Rhetorical Self Discussion Help.

Uncovering Your Rhetorical SelfPurpose of the assignment: To analyze the rhetorical choices we make in order to craft the persona we choose when we interact with others.Procedure: For this assignment, you will write a short essay (250-500 words) analyzing the rhetorical choices you make using at least two of the following:•your appearance (clothing, hair, body art, makeup, accessories, and so forth)•your living space (décor, furniture, tidiness/cleanliness, and so forth)•your social media activities (“about” information, photos, posting, commenting, and so forth)•where you shop and the products you buy •your behavior in different social groups (family, friends, work, classes, older people, younger people, and so forth)As our textbook states, “all of us work to craft a persona for ourselves to help us appeal to specific groups and gain social standing” and “it’s important to acknowledge that we positon ourselves differently in different social groups: how we react in relation to our friends is probably different from how we act with families or with employers” (pp. 22-23). Many times we are not consciously aware of the choices we make when we post something on social media or dress a certain way, but we make those choices nonetheless with specific aims in the backs of our minds: To be perceived a certain way or to be accepted in a certain way by the groups with which we interact. In order to begin this assignment, brainstorm the social groups you interact with (work, friends, family, social media, and so forth) and the types of dress, décor, products, and behaviors associated with each. (You may recall prewriting strategies such as freewriting and bubble charts from previous classes; also, consider writing a “zero draft,” as described in Chapter 12 of your textbook.) You do not need to share your prewriting strategies for this assignment; they are solely for your use.
EN102 Grantham Uncovering The Rhetorical Self Discussion Help

Essay Writing at Online Custom Essay

5.0 rating based on 10,001 ratings

Rated 4.9/5
10001 review

Review This Service




Rating: