Get help from the best in academic writing.

Professional Issues The Appearance of Professionalism

Share this: Facebook Twitter Reddit LinkedIn WhatsApp The professionalism of nurses at an Ottawa area hospital has been called into question via the appearance of their uniforms. As a part of the new service excellence plan being implemented at The Ottawa Hospital, a new dress code policy has been introduced which prevents nursing staff from wearing any scrub uniforms which have the depiction of cartoon characters or patterns on them (Appendix). Recently, The Ottawa Hospital has been working to change its image into that of an explicitly professional institution by providing “Service Excellence” to its patients (Bourgon, 2011). This policy has been implemented in response to a belief by management that nursing staff are not easily identifiable as care providers. The nursing staff argues that excellence will not be achieved due to low morale of staff and that the patient will benefit more from friendly, happy staff than those who have been angered by management. Nurses also express a concern of increased “White Coat Syndrome” due to the sterility and starkness that somber scrubs married with lab coats would bring to their patients. The articulation of this issue has raised a question; Does a nurse’s outward appearance influence their level of professionalism? When working with the public, first impressions serve to convey significant messages. At The Ottawa Hospital, the nurses’ professionalism is being questioned due to the first impression they present (Appendix). Management is suggesting that they appear less professional should their scrubs depict cartoon characters and/or prints. On the other hand, nursing staff are concerned that staff morale will decrease and therefore negatively impact the care being provided to the public should they be subjected to this new dress code policy. It is only fair to acknowledge that one’s perceptions should only be based on what a person knows rather than how they look. However, in reality, most people form opinions about those they encounter based mainly on appearance. The purpose of this paper is to prove that a nurse’s outward appearance has an impact on the level of professionalism perceived by patients and their families. Analysis A nurse’s outward appearance has an impact on the level of professionalism perceived by patients and their families because nurses represent their profession through appearance, behaviour and communication. Most patients have expressed that they believe a nurse to be more competent if they were clean cut and dressed appropriately (Thomas, Ehret, Ellis, Colon-Shoop, Linton,
Ameritech College Wk 9 Stimulate Macrophages & Endothelial Cells Questions.

I’m working on a nursing discussion question and need a sample draft to help me learn.

Case Study, Chapter 11, Innate and Adaptive ImmunityMelissa is a 15-year-old high school student. Over the last week, she had been feeling tired and found it difficult to stay awake in class. By the time the weekend had arrived, she developed a sore throat that made it difficult to eat and even drink. Melissa was too tired to get out of bed, and she said her head ached. On Monday morning, her mother took her to her doctor. Upon completing the physical exam, he told Melissa that the lymph nodes were enlarged in her neck, and she had a fever. He ordered blood tests and told Melissa he thought she had mononucleosis, a viral infection requiring much bed rest.1. Innate and adaptive immune defenses work collectively in destroying invasive microorganisms. What is the interaction between macrophages and T lymphocytes during the presentation of antigen?2. Melissa’s illness is caused by a virus. Where are type I interferons produced, and why are they important in combating viral infections?3. Humoral immunity involves the activation of B lymphocytes and production of antibodies. What are the general mechanisms of action that make antibodies a key component of an immune response?Discuss/ Answer the following: Identify the pathway tears follow, beginning with the structure that produces them and ending in the nasal cavity.Identify the layer of the eye that permits muscle attachment, the layer that contains photoreceptors and the layer that is highly vascular. Explain the relationship between the iris and the pupil ; and the relationship between the ciliary body and the lens. Differentiate between rods and cones and describe the macula, fovea centralis and optic disc. Explain what type of accommodation occurs when looking at a distant object compared to a close object. In general, compare the functions of the cochlea, saccule/utricle and semicircular canals.Describe how the cochlea accomplishes its function.Describe how the semicircular canals accomplish their function.Describe how the saccule/utricle accomplish their function.
Ameritech College Wk 9 Stimulate Macrophages & Endothelial Cells Questions

An Interview With Queen Latifah

An Interview With Queen Latifah. I’m studying and need help with a Business question to help me learn.

Purpose: Queen Latifah uses her star power to share her thoughts, messages, and confidence through radio, magazine, and television interviews. Now it’s your turn to get interviewed by the queen! For this assignment, Queen Latifah has recorded a series of video questions to help you reflect on what confidence is, why you need it, and why it’s an essential skill for your career. You’ll also get a chance to discuss someone in your own life who demonstrates confidence and explain how it has impacted their career success!
In this assignment, you will… ● Explain what confidence is and why it is an essential skill for career development. ● Explain how someone in your life demonstrates confidence. ● Explain how confidence has had an impact on the success of that person. ● Reflect on what you’ve learned from the person in your life who demonstrates confidence.
Follow the instructions below to get started on your interview with the queen! WRK110 Assignment 1 (revised 3/22/19) Page 2 of 4 Instundructions:
Step 1: Complete the activities in your Webtext for Weeks 1, 2, and 3. Those are completed already ● Use the Webtext to answer interview questions for weeks 1-3.
Step 2: Download and edit your work ● Download ○ After completing all the activities and templates in your Webtext, download your completed assignment from the Webtext. ○ (*** You will need to finish all writing templates before you are able to download the complete assignment) ● Edit Your Work ○ Use the Strayer University Writing Standards (SWS) to ensure your writing is clear, professional and ethical. For more information on the SWS, refer to the SWS link in the left side menu of Blackboard. Attached is the completed webtexts and answers under them that i wrote. What is need is for you to review and add the neccesarry information that i did not put. Basicallly make it sound better than what it is.
❏ Check your assignment for grammatical errors? ❏ Review what you’ve written for clarity? ❏ Reach out to your instructor if you have any questions? Now that you’re ready…
An Interview With Queen Latifah

Saint Leo University Elements of Mcdonaldization Essay

essay writing help Saint Leo University Elements of Mcdonaldization Essay.

I’m working on a humanities report and need a sample draft to help me learn.

To what extent has McDonaldization made your life seem irrational? As we participate in various institutions who exercise efficiency, calculability, efficiency and control, are we more or less human? Have we come to expect the sense these four elements as good, bad or indifferent? What can we do to resist these highly rational ways we behave, and how we then can try to re-establish our humanity? Give examples how we can resist McDonaldization and how we can return to rationality. Using two references other than the textbook and reader to support their arguments, students will prepare a three page paper.(double-spaced, font size 12, excluding reference and title pages)
Saint Leo University Elements of Mcdonaldization Essay

Howard University Mercy Housing Inc Question

Howard University Mercy Housing Inc Question.

I’m working on a research & summaries project and need support to help me learn.

You will identify a nonprofit, preferably local and introduce it to us. Prior to sharing its story with us, you will study the market of the service your selected organization provides and place the main issues it addresses in the context of the local, domestic and international levels. While researching about the nonprofit, you will reflect on the materials studied in the classroom and collect information about your nonprofit to further assess its structure, its marketing and communication strategies, its fundraising channels and its possible utilization of the earned income strategies. You will then prepare an 8-10 page paper (double-spaced, 12 pt.) summarizing the key descriptive topics for that nonprofit and how it contributes to the issue on the local, domestic and international levels. See Canvas for details in the “resources” section. I urge you to identify your nonprofit early in the course!Students complete the project throughout the semester. Several mile-stone assignments will help to progress with this assignment. They are:-Sharing the name of your nonprofit and a brief introduction of your organization (250 words);-Sharing the first draft and peer-reviewing the draft of others; the draft should already include the main sections of the final paper and be at least 5 pages long; comments received after this stage will allow you to do a follow-up research of your nonprofit;-Submitting final project and peer-reviewing the projects of others; the peer-reviews will help you to see whether you have successfully answered the questions raised during the draft reviewing stage.
Howard University Mercy Housing Inc Question

Very detailed project requiring close attention.

Very detailed project requiring close attention..

Reading Research Literature GuidelinesUpdated 8/11/2017PurposeThe student will read research literature to determine the research purpose, question, design, population, sample, limitations, data collection and analysis.Course OutcomesThis assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:CO2: Apply research principles to the interpretation of the content of published research studies. (PO4 and 8)CO4: Evaluate published nursing research for credibility and lab significance related to evidence-based practice. (PO4 and 8)Points: This assignment is worth 225 points.Due Date: Submit the completed Reading Research Literature form (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. by 11:59 p.m. MT Sunday at the end of Week 5.RequirementsDownload the research articles from the Chamberlain library.Retrieve the following research articles: Make sure you are viewing the full text PDF. If you view the article in HTML format, you may not be able to see the tables and figures that are referenced in the questions.Velayutham, S. G., Chandra, S. R., Bharath, S., & Shankar, R. G. (2017). Quantitative balance and gait measurement in patients with frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer diseases: A pilot study. Indian Journal Of Psychological Medicine, 39(2), 176-182. doi:10.4103/0253-7176.203132. http://proxy.chamberlain.edu:8080/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=122248443&site=eds-live&scope=site (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.Pals, R. S., Hansen, U. M., Johansen, C. B., Hansen, C. S., Jørgensen, M. E., Fleischer, J., & Willaing, I. (2015). Making sense of a new technology in clinical practice: A qualitative study of patient and physician perspectives. BMC Health Services Research, 15(1), 1-10. doi:10.1186/s12913-015-1071-1 http://proxy.chamberlain.edu:8080/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=her&AN=109884152&site=eds-live (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.Download the Reading Research Literature form (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..Watch the video on how to complete this assignment at http://www.brainshark.com/devry/vu?pi=zGCzbNjK4zHr05z0. (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.Type answers to the questions directly onto the form. Your form does NOT need to follow APA formatting; however, you are expected to use correct grammar, spelling, syntax, and write in complete sentences.Please post questions about this assignment to the Q & A Forum.Save the file by clicking Save as and adding your last name, e.g., NR439_W5_Reading_Research_Literature_Form_Smith.docx.Submit the completed form by 11:59 p.m. MT Sunday at the end of Week 5.**Academic Integrity Reminder**Chamberlain College of Nursing values honesty and integrity. All students should be aware of the Academic Integrity policy and follow it in all discussions and assignments.By submitting this assignment, I pledge on my honor that all content contained is my own original work except as quoted and cited appropriately. I have not received any unauthorized assistance on this assignment.Please see the grading criteria and rubrics on this page.NOTE: Please use your browser’s File setting to save or print this page.RubricNR439_Reading_Research_LiteratureNR439_Reading_Research_LiteratureCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeVelayutham, et al article: Question 1 PurposeIdentifies the purpose of the research article.10.0 ptsCorrectly identifies the purpose of the research article.9.0 ptsMostly identifies the purpose of the research article8.0 ptsSomewhat identifies the purpose of the research article.4.0 ptsOffers a purpose for the article, but incorrectly identifies it.0.0 ptsDoes not identify any purpose for the research.10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 2 Research QuestionIdentifies the research question implied in the study.10.0 ptsCorrectly identifies the research question in the study, or identifies the implied question, or indicates that no research question was given.9.0 ptsMostly identifies the research question that the author described.8.0 ptsSomewhat identifies the research question that the author described.4.0 ptsOffers a research question, but incorrectly identifies it.0.0 ptsDoes not identify any research question.10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 3 Research DesignDescribes the research design of the study.10.0 ptsCorrectly describes the research design of the study.9.0 ptsMostly describes the research design of the study.8.0 ptsSomewhat describes the research design of the study.4.0 ptsOffers a research design, but incorrectly identifies it.0.0 ptsDoes not identify any research design.10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 4 PopulationIdentifies and describes the population.10.0 ptsCorrectly identifies and describes in detail the population of the research article.9.0 ptsMostly describes identifies and describes the population of the research article.8.0 ptsSomewhat identifies and describes the population of the research article.4.0 ptsOffers a population, but incorrectly identifies it as the one in the research article.0.0 ptsDoes not identify any population.10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 5 SampleWas the sample adequate for the research design?10.0 ptsCorrectly explains if the sampling approach was appropriate for the research design studied, and if it was adequate.9.0 ptsCorrectly explains if the sampling approach was appropriate for the research design studied, but fails to correctly identify if it was adequate.8.0 ptsCorrectly explains the sampling approach, but incorrectly identifies if it was, or was not, appropriate or adequate.4.0 ptsMisidentifies the sampling approach.0.0 ptsDoesn’t explain any sampling approach.10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 6 Data CollectionDescribe the data collection procedure10.0 ptsCorrectly describes the data collection procedure in detail.9.0 ptsCorrectly describes the data collection procedure in general.8.0 ptsCorrectly describes most of the data collection procedure but fails to describe all of it.4.0 ptsIncorrectly describes the data collection procedure, or omits most of the information.0.0 ptsDoes not describe any data collection procedures.10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 7 Data AnalysisHow were the data analyzed10.0 ptsCorrectly describes how the all of the data were analyzed.9.0 ptsCorrectly describes how most of the data were analyzed.8.0 ptsDescribes how the data were analyzed, but may contain some misinformation.4.0 ptsDescribes incorrectly how data were analyzed, or omitted large portions of the information.0.0 ptsDoes not describe how data were analyzed.10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 8 LimitationsDescribes the limitations in the study.10.0 ptsCorrectly describes all of the limitations in the study.9.0 ptsCorrectly describes most of the limitations in the study.8.0 ptsCorrectly describes some of the limitations in the study, but may omit one or two.4.0 ptsMinimally describes the limitations of the study, or misidentifies them.0.0 ptsDoes not describe any limitations for the study.10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 9 ConclusionsDescribes the authors’ conclusions.10.0 ptsCorrectly describes all of the authors’ conclusions.9.0 ptsCorrectly describes most of the authors’ conclusions.8.0 ptsCorrectly describes some of the authors’ conclusions, but may omit one or two.4.0 ptsMinimally describes the author’s conclusions, or misidentifies them.0.0 ptsDoes not describe any author conclusions.10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 10 Advances KnowledgeHow does this advance knowledge in the field.10.0 ptsDescribes in-depth how this research advances knowledge in the field.9.0 ptsGenerally, describes how this research advances knowledge.8.0 ptsBriefly describes how this research advances knowledge in the field.4.0 ptsIncorrectly describes how this research advances knowledge in the field.0.0 ptsDoes not describe how the research advances knowledge in the field.10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePals et al article: Question 11 PurposeIdentifies the purpose of the research article.10.0 ptsCorrectly identifies the purpose of the research article.9.0 ptsMostly identifies the purpose of the research article8.0 ptsSomewhat identifies the purpose of the research article.4.0 ptsOffers a purpose for the article, but incorrectly identifies it.0.0 ptsDoes not identify any purpose for the research.10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 12 Research QuestionIdentifies the research question implied in the study.10.0 ptsCorrectly identifies the research question in the study, or identifies the implied question, or indicates that no research question was given.9.0 ptsMostly identifies the research question that the author described.8.0 ptsSomewhat identifies the research question that the author described.4.0 ptsOffers a research question, but incorrectly identifies it.0.0 ptsDoes not identify any research question.10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 13 Research DesignDescribes the research design of the study.10.0 ptsCorrectly describes the research design of the study.9.0 ptsMostly describes the research design of the study.8.0 ptsSomewhat describes the research design of the study.4.0 ptsOffers a research design, but incorrectly identifies it.0.0 ptsDoes not identify any research design.10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 14 PopulationIdentifies and describes the population.10.0 ptsCorrectly identifies and describes in detail the population of the research article.9.0 ptsMostly describes identifies and describes the population of the research article.8.0 ptsSomewhat identifies and describes the population of the research article.4.0 ptsOffers a population, but incorrectly identifies it as the one in the research article.0.0 ptsDoes not identify any population.10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 15 SampleWas the sample adequate for the research design?10.0 ptsCorrectly explains if the sampling approach was appropriate for the research design studied, and if it was adequate.9.0 ptsCorrectly explains if the sampling approach was appropriate for the research design studied, but fails to correctly identify if it was adequate.8.0 ptsCorrectly explains the sampling approach, but incorrectly identifies if it was, or was not, appropriate or adequate.4.0 ptsMisidentifies the sampling approach.0.0 ptsDoesn’t explain any sampling approach.10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 16 Data CollectionDescribe the data collection procedure.10.0 ptsCorrectly describes the data collection procedure in detail.9.0 ptsCorrectly describes the data collection procedure in general.8.0 ptsCorrectly describes most of the data collection procedure but fails to describe all of it.4.0 ptsIncorrectly describes the data collection procedure, or omits most of the information.0.0 ptsDoes not describe any data collection procedures.10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 17 Data AnalysisHow were the data analyzed?10.0 ptsCorrectly describes how the all of the data were analyzed.9.0 ptsCorrectly describes how most of the data were analyzed.8.0 ptsDescribes how the data were analyzed, but may contain some misinformation.4.0 ptsDescribes incorrectly how data were analyzed, or omitted large portions of the information.0.0 ptsDoes not describe how data were analyzed.10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 18 LimitationsDescribes the limitations in the study.10.0 ptsCorrectly describes all of the limitations in the study.9.0 ptsCorrectly describes most of the limitations in the study.8.0 ptsCorrectly describes some of the limitations in the study, but may omit one or two.4.0 ptsMinimally describes the limitations of the study, or misidentifies them.0.0 ptsDoes not describe any limitations for the study.10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 19 ConclusionsDescribes the authors’ conclusions.10.0 ptsCorrectly describes all of the authors’ conclusions.9.0 ptsCorrectly describes most of the authors’ conclusions.8.0 ptsCorrectly describes some of the authors’ conclusions, but may omit one or two.4.0 ptsMinimally describes the author’s conclusions, or misidentifies them.0.0 ptsDoes not describe any author conclusions.10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 20 Advances KnowledgeHow does this advance knowledge in the field.10.0 ptsDescribes in-depth how this research advances knowledge in the field.9.0 ptsGenerally, describes how this research advances knowledge.8.0 ptsBriefly describes how this research advances knowledge in the field.4.0 ptsIncorrectly describes how this research advances knowledge in the field.0.0 ptsDoes not describe how the research advances knowledge in the field.10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStyle and WritingNames file, includes name on paper. Writes in complete sentences with no grammar, spelling, or syntax errors.25.0 ptsCorrectly names file, includes name on paper. Writes in complete sentences with no grammar, spelling, or syntax errors.22.0 ptsOne to four errors in grammar, spelling, and syntax.20.0 ptsFive to eight errors in grammar, spelling, and syntax.10.0 ptsNine to twelve errors in grammar, spelling, and syntax0.0 ptsThirteen or more errors in grammar, spelling, and syntax.25.0 ptsTotal Points: 225.0
Very detailed project requiring close attention.