PHIL 1002 York University Philosophy Abolishment of Death Penalty Question
PHIL 1002 York University Philosophy Abolishment of Death Penalty Question.
The aim of this short paper assignment is to accurately reconstruct and critically assess the argument described below:Reconstruct Jeffrey Reiman’s argument for abolishing the death penalty. Then, offer your own critical assessment of Reiman’s argument. In order to do this, you must either:i) critique this argument by presenting a strong objection to it, or:ii) defend it by considering a strong objection to it and responding to the objection. Your task will be both to clearly reconstruct an author’s argument (same as the previous argument) and offer your own (positive or negative) critical assessment of this argument. In this essay it is essential that you take a clear position and offer compelling reasons to support it. Below I have attached a Word file labelled, “PHIL 1002- Instructions for Assignment” Please follow everything exactly in that doc. Overall, make sure double-space, 12 font, times new roman preferred, WORD LIMIT IS 800 WORDS. Do not go over!!! That means it should be about 4-5 pages. You NEED to cite the assigned texts that I am attaching to this assignment as it will guarantee my mark higher than 80%. APA style is preferred. I also attached a doc labelled, “Sample Argument Reconstruction Essay”. This is an example of what my prof is looking for BUT this time we need to take a clear position and offer critical assessment thats positive or negative as well.I have also attached a doc labelled, “Lecture notes”- this not only has notes on Jeffrey Reiman’s argument on punishment but also what an argument is and how to put it into standard form. Which can also be used if necessary. I attached another doc labelled, “Jeffrey: course kit” which is the reading given to us on this approach that needs to be USED in the paper to cite. Please use at least a good 3 citations from the course kit and if you can try to put his argument into Standard form. Look at sample!
PHIL 1002 York University Philosophy Abolishment of Death Penalty Question
RSUNJNBP Business Ethics in Competitiveness Discussion
best assignment help RSUNJNBP Business Ethics in Competitiveness Discussion.
Discussion Prompt InstructionsOverviewThroughout the course, you will submit Reflective Responses to an instructor-provided prompt. Within each module, you will prepare the response that is well thought out and exemplifies that you have really thought about the issue.Reflective ResponseBento Cuisine is a lunch-cart business. It occupies a street corner in Texarkana, a city that straddles the border of Arkansas and Texas. Across the street-and across the state line, which runs down the middle of the street is Rico’s Tacos. The two businesses compete for customers. Recently, Bento has begun to suspect that Rico’s is engaging in competitive behavior that is illegal. Bento’s manager overheard several of Rico’s employees discussing these competitive tactics while on a break at a nearby Starbucks. Bento files a lawsuit against Rico’s in a federal court based on diversity of jurisdiction. What is the result?Instruction and GuidanceYour response should be one page, double-spaced, in length.**** I put the course summary below for sources. It is only an entry-level course in business and law, so please don’t use too complicated terms.
RSUNJNBP Business Ethics in Competitiveness Discussion
lab 6 taxonomy
lab 6 taxonomy.
see attached document
Learning Objectives
Apply Linnaean’s classification system to analyze how related any two organisms areExplain how advances in taxonomy such as phylogenetics have changed the way organisms are classifiedDistinguish between binomial nomenclature and common name
Introduction
Taxonomy is the classification (organization) of organisms into related groups. Very early on, scientists recognized
the importance of classifying or ranking organisms. In the 1700s, Carl Linnaeus (also known as Carl
von Linn� or Carolus Linnaeus) developed what is now known as the Linnaean Classification System.
At
the highest level in this system, everything in nature was divided into
three kingdoms: mineral, vegetable,
and animal. Linnaeus then ranked sequentially smaller groups within each
kingdom as class, order, genus,
species and variety. This contribution to science earned him the title
�The Father of Taxonomy�. His system is still, in an evolved form, used
today to classify living organisms. Starting with domain, there is a continual increase in specificity as organisms are classified into smaller and
smaller categories (Figure 1).
Figure 1: As the classification level becomes more specific, less organisms are described until a single species is classified.
In other words, the categories get smaller in terms of the number of organisms
that are included. As illustrated in Figure 1, the Linnaean system classifies organisms into sequential groups:
DomainKingdomPhylumClassOrderFamilyGenusSpecies
Interestingly, there is not a consensus definition of
�species� among scientists at this time. The biological species
concept is the most commonly used definition. Basically
it defines a species as a group of individuals that can
interbreed and create viable offspring. Sub-species are
used in some classifications and is generally accepted, but
not always included in the Linnaean system.
Table 1: Sample Classifications of Humans and a Red Maple Tree
Example
Human Being
Red Maple
Domain
Eukarya
Eukarya
Kingdom
Animalia
Plantae
Phylum
Chordata
Magnoliophyta
Class
Mammalia
Magnoliopsida
Order
Primates
Sapindales
Family
Hominidae
Aceraceae
Genus
Homo
Acer
Species
sapiens
rubrum
A useful tool to remembering the order of the Linnaean
classification system is developed by creating a mnemonic phrase using
the first letter of each classification. For example, Daring Kids Pick Cauliflower Over Fresh Grown Strawberries. Can you create any mnemonics to help remember the Linnaean classification system?
Binomial Nomenclature
Carl Linnaeus also helped to standardize the naming of species by introducing the binomial (two name) species name. Binomial nomenclature uses
the genus and species as the formal name of all organisms because they
are the two most specific levels therefore unique to the organism. For
example, human beings are Homo sapiens. Note that the genus
is capitalized while species is not and, since these are Latin names,
they are italicized. Some organisms can have more than one common name
(i.e. cougar, puma and mountain lion). Using binomial nomenclature
specifies a species.
Advances in Taxonomy
Taxonomy is in a constant state of flux. Traditional groupings of organisms were dependent on mostly morphological
traits, physiological similarities and, to some extent, embryological events. Consider what techniques
were available in the 1700s when Carl Linnaeus described his system for ranking life. Gross anatomy
could be studied and identified, but most forms of microscopy were not available.
Phylogenetics
With advances in molecular techniques, nucleic acid (DNA) sequences are used to classify organisms
based on their evolutionary history. These advancements have given birth to the field of phylogenetics.
Phylogenetics is the field of study that determines the
evolutionary relationships among groups of organisms
using morphological traits, behavioral information and molecular data.
Ribosomal RNA (rRNA) is currently
one of the genes of choice for phylogenetic studies. rRNA is necessary
for the production of proteins and, because all life forms require
proteins, it follows that all organisms include rRNA genes. Sequences
from specific regions of an rRNA gene demonstrate similarities amongst
different organisms, enabling evolutionary
relationships to be explored. It is well accepted that the more similar
the sequences are between
two organisms, the more closely related the organisms. As DNA sequencing
techniques improve (and
costs decrease) other regions of the genome are also being sequenced and
compared.
Hot Topics in Taxonomy
Keep in mind that new techniques aid in classifications and, at
the same time, cause previously well accepted classifications to become
obsolete. Currently, many sources list three domains: Bacteria, Archaea,
and Eukarya. Within Eukarya are four kingdoms: Protista, Plantae,
Fungi, and Animalia. The Kingdom Protista has historically been a
�catch-all� category for all single-celled eukaryotic organisms; but,
not plants, fungi or animals. However, molecular data has revealed
distinct relationships within the eukaryotes that has led to new ideas
about classifying organisms into kingdoms and a new level called “supergroups”.
In this classification system, organisms that share a common ancestor
are grouped together and organisms that were previously placed in the
Kingdom Protista are distributed throughout new categories. Recall that
the organization of organisms based on shared common ancestors is
considered phylogeny. The “supergroups” are Excavata,
Amoebozoa, Opisthokonta, Rhizaria, Chromalveolata, and Archaeplastida.
In this organizational system, animals fall within Opisthokonta and
plants are placed in Archaeplastida.
Classifications will continue to evolve as scientists are able to delve at increasingly deeper molecular levels.
For now, the Kingdom Protista will continue to be used in this manual as we briefly survey the three
domains (Bacteria, Archaea and Eukarya) and four kingdoms (Protista, Plantae, Fungi, and Animalia).
© 2014 eScience Labs, LLC.
All Rights Reserved
lab 6 taxonomy
MGT 404 SEU Implementing a Holographic Organization Design Case Study
MGT 404 SEU Implementing a Holographic Organization Design Case Study.
The Assignment must be submitted on Blackboard (WORD format only) via allocated folder.Assignments submitted through email will not be accepted.Students are advised to make their work clear and well presented; marks may be reduced for poor presentation. This includes filling your information on the cover page.Students must mention question number clearly in their answer.Late submission will NOT be accepted.Avoid plagiarism, the work should be in your own words, copying from students or other resources without proper referencing will result in ZERO marks. No exceptions. All answered must be typed using Times New Roman (size 12, double-spaced) font. No pictures containing text will be accepted and will be considered plagiarism).Submissions without this cover page will NOT be accepted.
MGT 404 SEU Implementing a Holographic Organization Design Case Study