Get help from the best in academic writing.

POLSC 4310 University of Rio Grande Woburn Families US Judicial Process Case Discussion

POLSC 4310 University of Rio Grande Woburn Families US Judicial Process Case Discussion.

You will need to be concise, like a good lawyer, determining the essence of the situation(s) and what the readings REALLY mean. Consider the implications of Chapter 6 and associated readings, paying particular attention to the Galanter piece and the theme from “Before the Law.” Think about the hurdles faced by ordinary people who, for whatever reason, find themselves in need of the help or the protection of the law. This may be the victim of domestic abuse or a victim of identity theft caused a major corporation’s negligence. They might be the family in a rural setting who, seduced by the promise of wealth promised by a drilling company find their only source of water polluted by a slurry of chemicals from the drilling operation or from hydrocarbon contamination from the oil and gas production the well creates. I want you to focus most intensely, however, on the situation(s) of the Woburn families in Harr’s A Civil Action. How do the readings (and video) relate to their plight? It might help you to return to our first meeting in July. Recall the systems analytic approach I suggested then. Apply the tools it offers here. Required book: Murphy, Walter F., C. Herman Pritchett, Lee Epstein and Jack Knight. 2006. Courts, Judges, and Politics: and introduction to the judicial process. 6th ed. Boston; McGraw Hill. (required)
POLSC 4310 University of Rio Grande Woburn Families US Judicial Process Case Discussion

PH 304 SDSU Potential Effects of COVID 19 Pandemic on Future Birth Rate Discussion.

“Changes in Fertility” shows that 50% of all countries currently have fertility rates lower than 2.1. However in recent years, many of those countries have fertility rates lower than 1.5. What do you think that will mean for future population projections? Global events like the CoVid-19 pandemic can impact fertility dramatically. Fertility rates doubled following the bubonic plague. Do you think the world will experience an increase or a decline following CoVid-19? In recent decades many countries have experienced major reductions in the average number of births per woman. Approximately a quarter of all countries in 1975 had more than 5 births per woman per lifetime. Today, that is less than 5% and by 2025 no country is predicted to have fertility rates greater than 5 births per woman per lifetime.Developed Countries – Population trends show substantial projected declines in fertility. Global fertility is projected to fall from:2.5 in 2010-20152.4 in 2025-20302.0 in 2095-2100.Least Developed Countries – Steep reductions are also projected for the group of least developed countries, which currently has a relatively high average level of fertility, estimated at:4.3 in 2010-20153.5 in 2025-20302.1 in 2095-2100However, for countries with high levels of fertility, there is significant uncertainty in projections of future trends. Fertility declines that are slower than projected would result in higher population totals in all subsequent time periods.To achieve the substantial reductions in fertility, it will be essential to support continued improvements in child mortality and access to reproductive health care services, including family planning, especially in the least developed countries, with a focus on educating and enabling women.Adolescent FertilityWhile women today bear fewer children on average over a lifetime, some regions of the world are still characterized by high levels of adolescent fertility (births to mothers aged 15-19 years). Since adolescent childbearing can have adverse health and social consequences both for the young mothers and for their children, it remains a topic of concern for many countries.Regions of the world, the adolescent birth (ages 15-19) rate in 2010-2015:Africa at 99 per 1,000 Latin America and the Caribbean at 67 per 1,000(The ratio of adolescent to total fertility was 16% in Latin America and the Caribbean) PreviousNextnk the world will experience an increase or a decline following CoVid-19?
PH 304 SDSU Potential Effects of COVID 19 Pandemic on Future Birth Rate Discussion

BUS 499 Strayer Univeristy Internal and External Environment.

External and Internal EnvironmentsOverviewIn this assignment, you are to use the same corporation you selected and focused on for Assignment 1.Using the corporation you chose from Assignment 1: Strategic Management and Strategic Competitiveness, examine the industry in which the entity operates. Use any or all of the following resources to conduct research on the company:Company website.Public filings from the Securities and Exchange Commission EDGAR database.Strayer University’s online databases.The Nexis Uni database,Other miscellaneous sources. Note: the company’s annual report will often provide insights that other resources may not include.RequirementsWrite a four- to six-page paper in which you do the following:Choose the two segments of the general environment that would rank highest in their influence on the corporation you chose. Assess how these segments affect the corporation you chose and the industry in which it operates.Considering the five forces of competition, choose two forces of competition that you estimate are the most significant for the corporation you chose. Evaluate how well the company has addressed these forces in the recent past.With the same two forces in mind, predict what the company might do to improve its ability to address these forces in the near future.Assess the external threats affecting this corporation and the opportunities available to the corporation. Give your opinions on how the corporation should deal with the most serious threat and the greatest opportunity. Justify your answer.Give your opinion on the corporation’s greatest strengths and most significant weaknesses. Choose the strategy or tactic the corporation should select to take maximum advantage of its strengths, and the strategy or tactic the corporation should select to fix its most significant weakness. Justify your choices.Determine the company’s resources, capabilities, and core competencies.Go to Basic Search: Strayer University Online Library to locate quality references. Note: Wikipedia and similar websites do not qualify as academic resources. Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:This course requires use of new Strayer Writing Standards (SWS). The format is different than other Strayer University courses. Please take a moment to review the SWS documentation for details.Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; references must follow SWS or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required page length. Use the Assignment 2 Template [DOC] to ensure that your assignment meets the above requirements.The specific course learning outcome associated with this assignment is as follows:Analyze the effects of the general environment, competition, threats, opportunities, strengths, and weaknesses relative to a corporation.Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic and organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the scoring rubric. By submitting this paper, you agree: (1) that you are submitting your paper to be used and stored as part of the SafeAssign™ services in accordance with the Blackboard Privacy Policy; (2) that your institution may use your paper in accordance with your institution’s policies; and (3) that your use of SafeAssign will be without recourse against Blackboard Inc. and its affiliates.
BUS 499 Strayer Univeristy Internal and External Environment

Beauty of Nature as appreciated by Wordsworth

Beauty of Nature as appreciated by Wordsworth Poetry, which came much before prose in human history, has been a vehicle for the spiritual and social progress in man. The natural world with its great beauty and mystery has long been a source of inspiration to poets. The Romantic poets like Wordsworth and Keats, who were active in the nineteenth century, experienced the most inspiration through nature, which they captured in their poetry. William Wordsworth, especially, in his poetry, uses descriptions of nature to raise the mind to mystic heights. With the advent of the Industrial Revolution, the attitude of people changed – from an awe of nature to a desire to harness everything natural for the benefit of man, which the Romantic poets viewed with concern. In his poems “The World is Too Much with Us” and “Nutting”, William Wordsworth makes use of the portrayal of the beauties of nature to deplore the greed of man who is mindlessly exploiting nature. Written in Germany, the poem “Nutting” evokes Wordsworth’s remembrance of turbulent feelings he had when he had gone’ nutting’ as a boy. William Wordsworth writes about a beautiful, pristine wood whose beauty and purity he had destroyed by his greed to gather the nuts .Continuing in the same vein, in “The World is too much with Us”, the poet laments the heartlessness of humankind, which has come under the sway of unfathomable avarice, and which no longer is moved by the beauty of nature. Wordsworth describes the secret, unexplored place he went to after clambering over rocks and stepping over tangled ferns in “Nutting”. It is a place of perfect peace where the poet’s heart experiences great joy. He describes the nook where he sits down among the flowers under the trees The poem conveys a deep sense of peace and meditation attained by man by connecting with nature. The final lines of the poem convey the spiritual feeling that the beauty of nature inspired in the poet. The symbolism of the plentiful hazelnut clusters which cover the trees alludes to the bounty of nature. The tattered old clothes the boy wears symbolizes the poverty of spirit of man. The poet describes how the unsullied nook is ravaged by the violent acts of the boy. Although he is now rich with the nuts he came to gather, he feels a twinge of guilt and pain when he gets a final glimpse of the virgin nook he has destroyed. The symbolism of the earth being exploited mercilessly and violently by man is evident in this poem. He tells us to cultivate a ‘gentleness of heart ‘and exhorts us to be gentle with nature so that we are in harmony with it. Wordsworth continues to regret the crass, materialistic attitude of man in his Petrarchan sonnet, “The World is too much with us.” He cries out that we waste our resources by consuming too much. He states that we are not in tune with nature any longer as we have become too insensitive. Using the powerful imagery of howling winds which are gathered up like flowers, the poet conveys a sense of urgency in his poem. By portraying the sea as laying bare its bosom to the moon, he alludes to the connectedness of every great and small thing in nature.. He feels angry that the beauty, mystery and force of nature have no effect on the insensitive soul of man, who is out of harmony with nature. The mercenary goals of man disgusts him so much that he wishes he were born as a pagan, who would have had a better communion with the sea and the land. For Wordsworth, nature is not something to be consumed and exploited, but nature is something that leads man to the universal soul. He makes use of his great descriptive talents to portray that humanity is losing its connected feeling with nature by following the materialistic ideals of getting and spending.

William H Turner Technical Arts Heart Diseases Presentation

order essay cheap William H Turner Technical Arts Heart Diseases Presentation.

PowerPoint Presentation:Identify a vulnerable population or a community health issue to guide health technology, community resources, screening, outreach, referral and follow up to improve health outcomes in the community.
· Discuss your chosen vulnerable population and their community and public health challenges towards improving their health outcomes.· Illustrate an interdisciplinary approach to improve their health outcomes of your chosen community.· Examine information technology systems used to identify, communicate, and address health concerns of the community.· Examine evidence-based practices associated with improving outcomes in community and public health.· Illustrate the impact that barriers to healthcare access and challenges to improve health outcomes have on community and public health.· Use evidence-based practices to guide health teaching, health counseling, screening, outreach, disease and outbreak investigation, referral, and follow-up throughout the lifespan.
Minimum 10/maximum 15 slides, including speaker notes, excluding the title and reference slidesreference within 5 years
William H Turner Technical Arts Heart Diseases Presentation

Intro to Management – Levels of Planning

Intro to Management – Levels of Planning.

Consider current events related to this unit’s topic by conducting a short article search on the following levels of planning in business: strategic, tactical, and operational.Read an article published within the previous year related to one or all three levels of planning above.Summarize the information in your own words. Follow the discussion board rubric on the course syllabus for minimum required length.Describe a) what you learned from this information and b) how it relates to this unit’s topic. Be sure to identify which key term or phrase from this unit relates to your response. Include the article title, name(s) of author(s), the publication date, and, if available, the web link.*
Intro to Management – Levels of Planning

Contrasting Arguments Against Physicalism

Select two of the arguments against physicalism (Nagel’s bats vs Chalmers’s zombies, Nagel’s bats vs Jackson’s Mary / Fred cases, or Chalmers’s zombies vs. Jackson’s Mary / Fred case; Raffman’s argument on the persistence of phenomenology can also be one of the positions you discuss, if you want) and explain how both arguments are supposed to work. Make sure you identify at least one key difference in how these two arguments challenge physicalism. Then weigh up the two arguments, considering this difference. Which argument do you think is the strongest, and why? Physicalism is the view that everything there is to the world can be explained in terms of the physical, as such that all physical facts exhaust all facts to the world. Qualia are qualitative experiences which are perceived by a person and appear contest the view of physicalism (Block, 1994). Sensations (colour, smell etc.) appear secondary to any quality of matter (mass, volume etc.). Physical objects cause the mind to experience conscious experience and also imposes how we sensationalise our experience with the physical world. Supervenience can be summarised as follows: “x supervenes on y if and only if x changing requires that y also changes”. This can be derived to say that if y stays the same then there is no way x can change, but y can change without any change in x. For example, an essay supervenes on the ordering of the words; let us say you finish reading a copy of this essay and want something different to read, so you are given another essay and as you are reading it you realise it has the same words ordered in the same way as the first copy. Were you given a different essay to read? Regarding physicalism, supervenience states that the mind supervenes on the brain in such that any mental change requires there to be a physical change, e.g. antidepressants. However, it is believed that even with a different brain, or no brain at all, the same mental state can occur. Arguments against physicalism, such as David Chalmers zombie argument and Thomas Nagel’s bat argument, take into account qualia and independent experience to challenge physicalism. In his article, Chalmers’ poses the question “Is consciousness logically supervenient on the physical?” believing that if consciousness supervenes all, it must supervene locally rather than globally; that is all the microphysical facts of an organism entail all the facts about that organism. In order to investigate this, he considers the possibility of philosophical zombies – an exact carbon copy of yourself, exhibits the same behaviour, same physiological functions and all, yet it does not experience any sensational phenomenon, i.e. there is nothing it is like to be a zombie. For example, Siri will respond to you cleverly but only because it is programmed to do so, we would not consider it conscious because it does not feel anything, nor does it have a sense of itself. Although the idea of a philosophical zombie seems impossible, as Chalmers says himself, “intelligent behaviour and consciousness go hand in hand” (Chalmers, 1996), he is not arguing that zombies could exist, but that the fact that they are logically conceivable is enough to render the supervenience claim false. The simplest form of his argument is as follows (1) Zombies are conceivable; (2) Anything that is conceivable is possible; (3) Zombies are possible. Whether or not conceivability can be used as a guide to possibility needs to be considered. Zombies are not nomologically possible as they do not obey the laws of nature, however they are still logically possible as they are conceivable and that the “burden of proof is on those who deny that they the possibility” (Chalmers, 1996). Take the essay example from before, if I print off two copies they are still the same essay, they still serve the same function of being read and marked. The situation is different in the case for consciousness. A molecule by molecule duplicate of a human does not guarantee it having conscious thought, and thus physicalism does not capture all there is to the world. Consciousness is more of an add on to the physical, meaning zombies could be possible, which contradicts the fact that they are not possible. Hence, supervenience fails. Nagel asks in his article “What is it Like to be a Bat” what it is like, for the subject of experience, to have an experience. Nagel chooses to use a bat as an example as he believes we can confidently say a bat experiences conscious thought, and that they are distinct enough from humans that we have no idea what it is like to experience conscious phenomenon as a bat. Nagel, however, explicitly states that the point he is trying to make with this metaphor is not an epistemological one (Nagel, 1974), i.e. he is not saying that we can not imagine what it means to behave as a bat, but rather we would need to see through the bats point of view to know what it is like to experience as a bat. Which leads to the question of how we can frame the problem of consciousness in order to obtain any sense of objectivity on the subject. He argues that that any attempts made to explain consciousness in an objective fashion would be undermined by the subjective nature of it. It is obvious that the more epistemic progress made to explain something, the more objective an explanation becomes. However, consciousness is a mental phenomenon that cannot be reduced to physicalism as the subjective point of view must be discarded. In this sense, it seems that detaching oneself from their own subjective way of looking at things to gather an objective explanation is counterintuitive as they are moving away from the very thing they want to investigate. Thus, it is impractical to consider any conscious experience as objective. Phenomenological sensation must be attributed to something physical if physicalism is to be defended, but as Nagel states “every subjective phenomenon is essentially connected with a single point of view, and it seems inevitable that an objective, physicalist theory will abandon that point of view” (Nagel, 1974). Although, Nagel concludes his article in doubt as he calls it a mistake to claim physicalism as false, as the prospects for an objective science on the consciousness are limited. Both Chalmers and Nagel go about attempting to refute physicalism in very different ways; Chalmers proposes a philosophical zombie with no consciousness and hence nothing it is like to be a zombie, whereas Nagel presents a creature with a consciousness to argue that we cannot know for sure what it is like to be that creature. In terms the strength of each philosopher’s argument refuting physicalism is, Chalmers’ zombie argument stands as a more reasonable than Nagel’s bat argument. Chalmers’ argument is not an uncontroversial one, meeting its share of criticisms and objections. For example, conceivability arguments are hampered by intellectual limitations (Chalmers, 1996), as Chalmers puts it, but conceivability is a stronger guide to explainability than it is to possibility; if zombies are conceivable, then no reductive explanation of consciousness is satisfactory. Consciousness escapes the net of reductive explanation, which further supports Chalmers’ claim that if zombies are conceivable then supervenience fails and therefore so does physicalism. Nagel’s argument on the other hand entirely depends on knowledge which is currently unobtainable. While he does firmly assert that a theory of physicalism will not hold up if an objective explanation of the consciousness were formed, he poses doubt by calling it a “mistake” to disregard physicalism as a false theory. He says that it would be more reasonable to say that “physicalism is a position on cannot understand because at present we do not have any conception of how it might be true” (Nagel, 1974). Nagel’s claim that a bat’s mind is inaccessible can also be criticised as that we can determine any important functions of a bat’s consciousness from our own perspective, as Dennett contends that it is clear a bat can only detect objects in the range their echolocation allows (Dennett, 1991). This suggests we can learn a lot about what it means to be a bat without actually being a bat. Both philosophers, David Chalmers and Thomas Nagel present arguments against physicalism. Ultimately Chalmers’ zombie argument is the stronger out of the two as its problems only lie in its first premises, everything else follows logically; and even if conceivability is not as strong a guide to possibility, it is still a good guide to explainability. Nagel on the other hand presents his argument in doubt, not explicitly condemning physicalism, but rather being unsure of whether or not it can be true as current knowledge puts us at a disadvantage when trying to explain the consciousness objectively. References Block, N. (1994). Qualia. In S. Guttenplan, A Companion to the Philosophy of the Mind (pp. 514-520). Oxford: Blackwell Publisher. Chalmers, D. (1996). Can Consciousness Be Reductively Explained? The Conscious Mind, 93-99

Essay Writing at Online Custom Essay

5.0 rating based on 10,001 ratings

Rated 4.9/5
10001 review

Review This Service