Get help from the best in academic writing.

# PLEASE READ THE BOOK AS THE INSTRUCTIONS. The Institute of Medicine’s (IOM) landmark publication – The Future of Nursing:

## Research Methods B

Research Methods B. I’m studying for my Management class and need an explanation.

Driver (Gender)
Incidents (Last 2 years)
Age (Years)
Experience (Years)
Annual Hours of Training (Mean)
Post-H.S. Education (Years)
3rd Shift (% of hours last 2 years)
Sleep (Reported daily mean in hours)
Caffeine Intake (reported daily mean in mg)

CH (M)
0
27
3
29
2
20
6.5
400

VB (M)
4
41
2
36
0
40
8.0
350

PP (F)
1
38
4
24
1
50
9.0
250

IW (M)
2
32
4
38
0
50
5.5
55

JS (M)
2
26
1
41
0
30
6.0
600

RF (M)
0
45
7
35
4
10
7.5
250

JS (F)
1
37
1
30
4
20
7.0
300

RA (M)
2
53
6
75
2
20
8.0
400

TL (M)
3
39
2
94
0
40
8.5
180

1. Use Excel to calculate correlation coefficients between the number of safety incidents over the last two years for this sample of drivers to each other variable for which a correlation coefficient is an appropriate measure.
2. Write one sentence that summarizes the relationship you found between number of incidents and each other variable you examined.
3. Based on your results, describe an experiment you would conduct in an attempt to identify a cause of safety incidents. Be sure to state your research hypothesis and identify the IV and DV in your proposed experiment.

Written Assignments (1) (4) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1)

Criteria
Ratings
Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeData Analysis

20.0 ptsExcellentSubmission includes at least 5 accurate correlation coefficients, and at least 5 appropriate summary statements that address both the direction and strength of the observed correlations.
16.0 ptsSatisfactoryAt least 5 correlations are addressed, but one correlation coefficient is inaccurate and/or one summary statement is inaccurate with regard to either strength or direction of the observed correlation.
12.0 ptsUnsatisfactorySubmission is missing at least one correlation coefficient, or more than one coefficient is inaccurate, or more than one summary statement is inaccurate with regard to either strength or direction of the observed correlation.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExperiment

20.0 ptsExcellentExperiment is logically based on correlational results, accurately states research hypothesis, contains an IV that is carefully controlled, and the IV and DV are accurately labeled.
16.0 ptsSatisfactoryOne of the elements from the Excellent category is missing.
12.0 ptsUnsatisfactoryMore than one element from the Excellent category is missing.

20.0 pts

Total Points: 40.0

Research Methods B

## CNL 515 Grand Canyon University Empathy Discussion

essay order CNL 515 Grand Canyon University Empathy Discussion.

Topic 2 DQ 1 (Obj. 2.1, 2.2, and 2.4) CNL-515 Define “empathy” and describe the role of empathy in counseling. Identify at least two techniques used to demonstrate empathy. Read and complete the “Empathetic Listening Practice Exercise.” What did you learn from the exercise? How do you know you were effective with the client? How well did you feel you attuned to your volunteer client? If using a volunteer, be sure you obtain a verbal consent from the volunteer. Include at least one scholarly reference in your response.This assignment is informed by the following CACREP Standard: 2.F.5.g. Essential interviewing, counseling, and case conceptualization skills.
CNL 515 Grand Canyon University Empathy Discussion

## Formal Analysis

Formal Analysis. Need help with my Art & Design question – I’m studying for my class.

Formal Analysis
It is an analysis of the material qualities of an object that are controlled by the artist, including elements such as line, space, shape/form, color, value, texture, scale, composition.
A formal analysis assumes a work of art is:

a constructed object
with stable meaning
that can be determined by studying the relationships between the elements

This is not a just description of the work but an exploration of why the form supports the content and context of a work, whereas a description would only state what appears on the surface. A formal analysis is meant to be pursued from an objective perspective and should not include opinions on the piece itself, or any outside information about the artwork, artist, or time period. Even if you ultimately use a formal analysis as part of a larger writing that expresses personal opinion and/or a reading into the meaning of an artwork, the portion of your writing that is devoted to a formal analysis should stay focused only on the material qualities of the work itself.
Formal Analysis Assignment Due before Week 3 Tutorial
1. Listen to the podcast, look at the websites, and read all three required readings.
2. Consider the three images that follow these instructions. Choose one of these images and, in your own words, discuss three formal elements of this image in relation to the principles of design, and provided vocabulary. Describe what elements you notice, what they look like, and what effect it has within the larger artwork. This discussion will be your formal analysis for this assignment. It would be helpful to view these images in person, and take notes while you are at the gallery to develop a thorough analysis.
3. This writing is 300-500 words. It should not be structured like a regular essay (i.e. you do not need an intro, body, conclusion or a thesis statement), but you should write out your analysis in complete sentences, contained within a single paragraph.
4. Make sure to include the artist, title, and year somewhere in this paragraph (most likely, you will do so within the first couple of sentences).
5. Be objective. Stay focused on the form of your chosen work – do not bring in outside information (like historical context, personal biography, or your judgement of taste i.e. like or dislike).
_________________________x000D_

IMAGES ________________________

Rembrandt Harmenszoon van Rijn Portrait of a Lady with a Lap Dog, (around 1665) Oil on Canvas – 81.3 x 64.1 cm.

Emily CarrChurch In Yuquot Village, 1929. Oil on Canvas, 108.6 x 68.9 cm

Formal Analysis

## CH 111 Rutgers University Synthesis of Strontium Iodate Monohydrate Lab Report

CH 111 Rutgers University Synthesis of Strontium Iodate Monohydrate Lab Report.

theoretical yieldWatch my introductory video by Clicking Here.
Click and watch each of the following videos.
Document Attached

Using the data provided, perform the calculations need to fill in the missing values on the report sheet. Do not use the data given in the videos.
Submit the lab as an attachment to this assignment (Word document only).

Professor’s Instructions
CH 111 Rutgers University Synthesis of Strontium Iodate Monohydrate Lab Report