Get help from the best in academic writing.

PLEASE READ THE BOOK AS THE INSTRUCTIONS. The Institute of Medicine’s (IOM) landmark publication – The Future of Nursing:

PLEASE READ THE BOOK AS THE INSTRUCTIONS. The Institute of Medicine’s (IOM) landmark publication – The Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing Health has significantly changed the nursing profession. Review the IOM 2010 Report – The Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing Health. Identify and discuss one (1) example of the impact the Future of Nursing report has had on the Advanced Practice Nurse role – Clinician, Educator, Researcher, Administrator, Entrepreneur, Consultant, or Leader. IOM Report Retrieved August 20, 2018 from The Future of Nursing *Note: You can read the book online or download a free PDF copy. See the right side of the website. Do not purchase the book. Additional Resource: Campaign for action. (2018). Progress continues on IOM future of nursing report recommendations. Retrieved August 20, 2018 from https://campaignforaction.org/progress-continues-iom-future-nursing-report-recommendations/
Table of Contents Introduction Choosing an example for consideration Understanding Locke’s stance Reviewing the position of Nietzsche Conclusion Works Cited Introduction Today, I will think of the differences between objectivism and subjectivism. I will not review their philosophical foundation. Instead, I will speak of the role of subjectivism and objectivism in understanding reality – argue that objectivism (science), not subjectivism (existential perspectivism), is the best way to know truth about the world. To make my argument, I will estimate the following statement from the perspectives of different epistemologies: cancer is a critical health condition. Choosing an example for consideration My argument is based on the belief that science, not personal experience, is the best way to know truth about reality because it is empirical evidence that is a more comprehensive and reliable source of knowledge compared to individual’s experience or perception of the world. Understanding Locke’s stance I will prove my argument by contradiction between two opinions. John Locke claims that “all ideas come from sensation or reflection” (Locke). He believes that the foundation of knowledge is personal experience. In his view, it is true for both external subjects and internal operations. In this way, there are two ways for obtaining knowledge. The first one is the operation of a human mind and senses. It is connected to understanding external developments and phenomena, such as ideas of “yellow, white, heat, cold, soft, hard, bitter, sweet, and all those which we call sensible qualities” (Locke). This process is known as sensation. Another way is reflection. It is associated with one’s soul and the processes of thinking, reasoning, questioning, and other similar activities. According to Locke, the combination of the two is the foundation for understanding the main ideas about reality. Reviewing the position of Nietzsche On the other hand, Friedrich Nietzsche states that even though knowledge may come from sensation and experience and “all our categories of reason are of sensual origin, [they are] derived from the empirical world” (Nietzsche). It means that atoms and cells cannot be subjective. The operation of a human body (biological processes) cannot be subjective. All of the natural developments and phenomena are complex subjects. All in all, universal knowledge cannot be subjective because the only way to generate it is through empirical information, and empirical information is external, not internal (Nietzsche). In this way, subjective opinion (existential perspectivism) cannot help understand reality completely due to the complexity of this reality and the fact that a single subject does not exist. Conclusion That said, my belief is that Locke’s ideas can be applied to understanding simple ideas about reality, such as colors or weather. Instead, they are not helpful for obtaining knowledge about more complicated issues, such as cancer. Locke himself recognizes that his theory can be used for explaining the process of learning similar to that of children because it is based on observing the world. In this way, how does one know that cancer is a serious health concern if they have not faced it? By no means, if external data is not studied. However, external data is impossible to collect without conducting experiments or consulting educational materials that, in turn, are science. Get your 100% original paper on any topic done in as little as 3 hours Learn More Therefore, it is evident that subjectivism is limited if viewed from the perspective of understanding reality by observing the world. On the other hand, objectivism – empirical science supported by facts, such as instances of cancer criticality – is the best way to know that cancer is indeed a significant health concern. It is true because science provides external data that is the only foundation for making this assumption universally true, and it is Nietzsche’s stance. Works Cited Locke, John. Complete Works of John Locke. Delphi Classics, 2017. Google Books. Web. Nietzsche, Friedrich. Complete Works of Friedrich Nietzsche. Delphi Classics, 2015. Google Books. Web.

Research Methods B

Research Methods B. I’m studying for my Management class and need an explanation.

In an attempt to learn more about forklift accidents, your research team conducted some descriptive research by randomly observing several drivers during their shifts and talking with warehouse team leaders about this problem. Your observations and discussions seemed to indicate that older drivers who were less educated had more safety violations and were involved in more accidents. To follow up on these findings, you gathered additional data about these and other forklift driver characteristics to see whether age, education level, or other variables predicted on-the-job accidents. These data are displayed in the table below.

Driver (Gender)
Incidents (Last 2 years)
Age (Years)
Experience (Years)
Annual Hours of Training (Mean)
Post-H.S. Education (Years)
3rd Shift (% of hours last 2 years)
Sleep (Reported daily mean in hours)
Caffeine Intake (reported daily mean in mg)

CH (M)
0
27
3
29
2
20
6.5
400

VB (M)
4
41
2
36
0
40
8.0
350

PP (F)
1
38
4
24
1
50
9.0
250

IW (M)
2
32
4
38
0
50
5.5
55

JS (M)
2
26
1
41
0
30
6.0
600

RF (M)
0
45
7
35
4
10
7.5
250

JS (F)
1
37
1
30
4
20
7.0
300

RA (M)
2
53
6
75
2
20
8.0
400

TL (M)
3
39
2
94
0
40
8.5
180

1. Use Excel to calculate correlation coefficients between the number of safety incidents over the last two years for this sample of drivers to each other variable for which a correlation coefficient is an appropriate measure.
2. Write one sentence that summarizes the relationship you found between number of incidents and each other variable you examined.
3. Based on your results, describe an experiment you would conduct in an attempt to identify a cause of safety incidents. Be sure to state your research hypothesis and identify the IV and DV in your proposed experiment.

Written Assignments (1) (4) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1)

Criteria
Ratings
Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeData Analysis

20.0 ptsExcellentSubmission includes at least 5 accurate correlation coefficients, and at least 5 appropriate summary statements that address both the direction and strength of the observed correlations.
16.0 ptsSatisfactoryAt least 5 correlations are addressed, but one correlation coefficient is inaccurate and/or one summary statement is inaccurate with regard to either strength or direction of the observed correlation.
12.0 ptsUnsatisfactorySubmission is missing at least one correlation coefficient, or more than one coefficient is inaccurate, or more than one summary statement is inaccurate with regard to either strength or direction of the observed correlation.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExperiment

20.0 ptsExcellentExperiment is logically based on correlational results, accurately states research hypothesis, contains an IV that is carefully controlled, and the IV and DV are accurately labeled.
16.0 ptsSatisfactoryOne of the elements from the Excellent category is missing.
12.0 ptsUnsatisfactoryMore than one element from the Excellent category is missing.

20.0 pts

Total Points: 40.0

Research Methods B

CNL 515 Grand Canyon University Empathy Discussion

essay order CNL 515 Grand Canyon University Empathy Discussion.

Topic 2 DQ 1 (Obj. 2.1, 2.2, and 2.4) CNL-515 Define “empathy” and describe the role of empathy in counseling. Identify at least two techniques used to demonstrate empathy. Read and complete the “Empathetic Listening Practice Exercise.” What did you learn from the exercise? How do you know you were effective with the client? How well did you feel you attuned to your volunteer client? If using a volunteer, be sure you obtain a verbal consent from the volunteer. Include at least one scholarly reference in your response.This assignment is informed by the following CACREP Standard: 2.F.5.g. Essential interviewing, counseling, and case conceptualization skills.
CNL 515 Grand Canyon University Empathy Discussion

Formal Analysis

Formal Analysis. Need help with my Art & Design question – I’m studying for my class.

Assignment task:
Formal Analysis
It is an analysis of the material qualities of an object that are controlled by the artist, including elements such as line, space, shape/form, color, value, texture, scale, composition.
A formal analysis assumes a work of art is:

a constructed object
with stable meaning
that can be determined by studying the relationships between the elements

This is not a just description of the work but an exploration of why the form supports the content and context of a work, whereas a description would only state what appears on the surface. A formal analysis is meant to be pursued from an objective perspective and should not include opinions on the piece itself, or any outside information about the artwork, artist, or time period. Even if you ultimately use a formal analysis as part of a larger writing that expresses personal opinion and/or a reading into the meaning of an artwork, the portion of your writing that is devoted to a formal analysis should stay focused only on the material qualities of the work itself.
Formal Analysis Assignment Due before Week 3 Tutorial
1. Listen to the podcast, look at the websites, and read all three required readings.
2. Consider the three images that follow these instructions. Choose one of these images and, in your own words, discuss three formal elements of this image in relation to the principles of design, and provided vocabulary. Describe what elements you notice, what they look like, and what effect it has within the larger artwork. This discussion will be your formal analysis for this assignment. It would be helpful to view these images in person, and take notes while you are at the gallery to develop a thorough analysis.
3. This writing is 300-500 words. It should not be structured like a regular essay (i.e. you do not need an intro, body, conclusion or a thesis statement), but you should write out your analysis in complete sentences, contained within a single paragraph.
4. Make sure to include the artist, title, and year somewhere in this paragraph (most likely, you will do so within the first couple of sentences).
5. Be objective. Stay focused on the form of your chosen work – do not bring in outside information (like historical context, personal biography, or your judgement of taste i.e. like or dislike).
_________________________x000D_

IMAGES ________________________

Rembrandt Harmenszoon van Rijn Portrait of a Lady with a Lap Dog, (around 1665) Oil on Canvas – 81.3 x 64.1 cm.

Emily CarrChurch In Yuquot Village, 1929. Oil on Canvas, 108.6 x 68.9 cm

Formal Analysis

CH 111 Rutgers University Synthesis of Strontium Iodate Monohydrate Lab Report

CH 111 Rutgers University Synthesis of Strontium Iodate Monohydrate Lab Report.

theoretical yieldWatch my introductory video by Clicking Here.
Click and watch each of the following videos.  
1. Experimental Video: Click Here
2. Gravity Filtration Video:  Click Here
3. Precipitation Explained:  Click Here
Document Attached

Using the data provided, perform the calculations need to fill in the missing values on the report sheet. Do not use the data given in the videos.
Submit the lab as an attachment to this assignment (Word document only).

Professor’s Instructions
CH 111 Rutgers University Synthesis of Strontium Iodate Monohydrate Lab Report