please post 150 words for each post Discussion 1.2: Review a vision and mission statement of an organization you know. This can be the company you work for or simply an organization you would like to know more about. Using the information from the text or other outside evaluation tools, provide a critique of the vision and mission statements.Discussion 1.3: Review the cases in your text. A summary of these cases can be found in the content section of the book. You will each use one of these cases to produce a thorough analysis the last week of this course. Post your case selection and brief statement of why this case interests you. Each week, you can begin to analyze the case in preparation for that final assignment.
please post for both dicusion posts
I’m working on a business discussion question and need a sample draft to help me understand better.
3 discussion post need reply. Please keep in mind that you are also expected to engage in dialogue with your peers by making an additional 3-4 postings (each between 100-200 words). Please keep in mind that you are also expected to engage in dialogue with your peers by making an additional 3-4 postings (each between 100-200 words). Please keep in mind that you are also expected to engage in dialogue with your peers by making an additional 3-4 postings (each between 100-200 words).
Mt St Vincent University Cheating Academic Dishonesty & Malpractice Discussions
DUE: Sunday, Sept. 6th at 11:59 p.m.Reading to Summarize: Bell, D. (1987) And We Are Not SavedRequired Length: 2 to 3 pagesDouble-spaced, Times or Times New Roman Font in size 12, 1” marginsAPA formatting and citations are requiredThis assignment is to be submitted online via Canvas, not via emailA good summary is both important and challenging. Summaries are important because they serve as the basis for understanding others and for producing many other kinds of writing. Before you can agree or disagree with someone’s argument, you must recognize—and be able to restate—what that person has said. Before you can say something about how the author has (or has not) succeeded in defending his or her argument, you must be able to identify what his or her argument is. It is of no use to offer a response to someone’s argument, unless you have an accurate understanding of what the argument is.The fundamental purpose of a summary is to restate the thesis or main idea of the reading—and to do so in a way the original author would agree is accurate. A good summary also identifies the reasons the author offers in support of his or her thesis and provides the reader with precise details about the reading being summarized. You may choose to quote the original author directly or to paraphrase him or her but, in either case, you should use in-text citations in APA style.For this assignment, you will write a summary of an excerpt of Derrick Bell’s. book And We Are Not Saved: The Elusive Quest for Racial Justice (1987). You will find this reading under Module/Week 3 Readings. In this summary, you will identify the main point(s) the author makes as well as identify the evidence he uses to support it/them.Please Keep in Mind:Your task in a summary is to restate and describe the author’s argument, not to evaluate it or to respond to it (both of which can come later)Likewise, you are concerned with what the author says, not with how he says it (the latter of which you will do in the rhetorical analysis).
California State University Civil Rights Activist Derrick Bell Case Study
International Financial Reporting Switch in the US Essay (Critical Writing)
Table of Contents GAAP IFRS Contrasting GAAP and IFRS Conclusion References GAAP Three years ago, the U.S. SEC proclaimed its intention to quit GAAP standards and shift to IFRS. The proclamation was made tentatively, and the shift has not shown much progress since then. It is feasible to assume the transition was impeded by the sheer dissimilarity of the Principles and the Standards. IFRS and GAAP constitute two bodies of literature enlisting the principles of accountancy and reporting worldwide and in the U.S., respectively. While IFRS was designed as the unified language of accountancy that would efface the boundaries between the countries of the world, GAAP was developed by Americans and, presumably, for Americans. The differences, however, are not limited to the goals and scope of implementation. There is a gaping abyss of dissemblance between the Standards and the Principles; over time, an extensive body of fact sheets and other materials has appeared, running for pages and pages to account for every aspect of dissimilarity. The following paper is focused on the consolidation standards that GAAP and IFRS contain. Within the framework of GAAP and IFRS, the differences in consolidation are significant; for example, some of the entities that can be consolidated under GAAP would have likely ceased to be a part of the group under IFRS and vice versa (PwC, 2014). The Standards and the Principles are fundamentally different in the aspects of general requirements, which include differences in financial statement preparation and accounting policies, and consolidation models, with the focus on the models themselves, the concept of control, and potential voting rights. Beginning with GAAP, it can be seen that its requirements for consolidation concern preparing financial statements and accounting policies. Generally, within the frames of consolidated financial statements, the economic resources, either tangible or intangible, as well as the liabilities, expenditures, and savings, are accounted for without separating the parent organizations and the subsidiary organizations. Firstly, as per GAAP standards, preparing financial statements is compulsory. On the other hand, in some cases, the statements are not compulsory for companies whose parent is an investment establishment (PwC, 2014). Secondly, when a financial statement is being prepared, a three-month difference of the end of the financial year between the reporting and consolidated entities is excusable. Lastly and importantly, if the reporting entity faces some events that have critical effects, they should be recorded in the statement (KPMG, 2014). Such events can include, for example, the discovery of an error that disrupts the correctness of the statement, the discovery of information indicating the imparity of an asset (e.g., that a client went bankrupt), etc. The criticality of such events and their impact on the parent and subsidiaries are the reasons they have to be disclosed as per GAAP. As for the general accounting policies, the parent and subsidiaries can vary in their practices. For instance, they can evaluate inventories using different bases, classify, and present assets under diverse categories, and recognize their assets at diversifying times; such dissemblance is permissible under GAAP (KPMG, 2014). Get your 100% original paper on any topic done in as little as 3 hours Learn More The next aspect of GAAP’s consolidation that is worth considering is the consolidation model proper. The optimality of the consolidation model determines how the accounting process flow happens on all levels: from recording subsidiary-parent loans and charging payables to closing the parent organization’s books and issuing and reviewing financial statements. GAAP has two consolidation models. To make a consolidation decision, the potential subsidiaries are first to be assessed as to their conformity to the VIE (variable interest entities). If the subsidiaries cannot be accepted as VIE, they are subject to subsequent evaluation through the voting interest model (PwC, 2014). A parent establishment has a VIE as a priority if it is compliant to the following. First, the parent should have the power to set the direction for the VIE’s activities, including the most economically significant ones. Secondly, the parent should be prepared to shoulder the VIE’’s losses and be in the right to assimilate the benefits. Again, both the losses and the benefits should bear economic significance to the VIE (PwC, 2014). A parent organization can only have one VIE. The rest of the subsidiaries’ value is established through the voting control model, the second one under the GAAP. Within this model’s framework, potential voting rights are overlooked, with the focus on the actual ones. Importantly, the GAAP standards do not presuppose the existence of de facto control. Instead, the GAAP relies on the concept of effective control that has to deal with contract arrangements; at the same time, such a method of control is comparatively rarely implemented. It means that subsidiaries can be controlled directly or indirectly under GAAP, even if the parent owns fewer than half of the voting rights. Concerning voting rights, they are assessed within the VIE model. For non-VIEs, potential voting rights are unassessed. Having reviewed the consolidation aspects of GAAP, moving on to those of IFRS would be only logical. The Standards can be reviewed correspondingly from the points of general requirements and consolidation model since these aspects appear to present the most significant points of diversity. Considering the general requirements that IFRS imposes, it is worth stating that the preparation of financial statements is also obligatory. However, the dates on which the parent establishment and the subsidiaries issue their financial statements should correspond. If reporting on the same date is not possible (or practicable) the financial statements should be based on the most recent issues of the subsidiary establishments. When the dates on which the parent and the subsidiaries report are different, the latter should provide extra statements filled out as of the same date as the former (KPMG, 2014). However, when the date span does not add up to more than three months, the extra statements are not compulsory. On the other hand, if either a favorable or unfavorable event occurs after the reporting period end and the issuance date, the additional statements are obligatory (PwC, 2014). Concerning the policies, IFRS establishes that a similar transaction conducted by two or more entities should be accounted for using the same accounting policies. The policies should match across the entities for the sake of demonstrativeness and stability. Specifically, the policies and procedures should encompass any measurements and methodologies, etc. IFRS Subsequently, it is worth bringing IFRS’s consolidation model into focus. Keeping in mind the critical significance of a successful consolidation model, one can point out the fact that IFRS has a unified model to consolidate its entities. In a word, the model can be described as control-focused or “power-to-direct” (KPMG, 2014, p. 17). There are three indicators that an investor can direct the investee’s actions. We will write a custom Critical Writing on International Financial Reporting Switch in the US specifically for you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More First, an investor should be capable of controlling the actions that can impact the investee’s ROIs. Secondly, and more importantly, an investing entity certainly is the one in control if it is exposed to the investee’s ROIs. Finally, using the power to control, an investor should be able to influence the amount of ROIs (KPMG, 2014). As it was stated, the concept of control is at the baseline of IFRS’s consolidation model. The fundamentality of it can be further backed up by the fact that the Standards practice the so-called “de facto control” (PwC, 2014). Generally, a parent is supposed to control the subsidiaries if it owns more than 50% of their voting powers. De facto control outlined in the Standards subsumes the existence of the parent’s control despite some limitations. These can consist of holding less than half of the voting interest or being unable to exercise a legal or contractual right to direct the subsidiaries’ voting powers (PwC, 2014), for example, if a major stakeholder controls an investee that happens to be a public corporation. Although such a corporation can freely trade its share of stock, its actions are controlled de facto by the major investor (PwC, 2014). As to the potential voting rights, they are bound to be exercisable in a situation that requires decision-making to set the direction for economically significant activities. In other words, the Standards bid the rights to be substantive. Contrasting GAAP and IFRS From the abovementioned traits and practices of GAAP and IFRS, one can assume the two consolidation modes show significant diversity in terms of both general requirements and consolidation models. On the general scope, the preparation of financial statements is obligatory to both the Principles and the Standards, with excusable industry-based exceptions. However, there is a discrepancy of approaches to the date span and the submission of additional statements: While GAAP allows the differences in a year ends, IFRS bids the reporting entities to meet their year ends. In terms of accounting policies, the requirements are diametrically opposite: The Principles do not restrict the policies of the parent and subsidiaries to uniformity, while the Standards do. As to the consolidation model, GAAP’s are bipolar, while IFRS is unified. Contrastingly to the Principles, IFRS does not utilize the VIE entities assessment, and GAAP, unlike the Standards, is not reliant on de facto control. Generally, GAAP is regarded as rules-based, while IFRS is commonly thought to be based on principles. Principles, when clearly defined and practicable, can prove to be valuable assets to consolidation accounting. The strong points of IFRS include, namely, facilitated decision-making in terms of accounting for and preparing statements. Also, it provides a competitive advantage over the companies conducting similar transactions, industrial areas notwithstanding. The rule-based GAAP’s practices can substantially reduce risks and be competitively advantageous, but the advantage is only gained within the same industry, and the risks are further increased when the rules are not followed to the letter (Which Is Better, 2011). Conclusion Although GAAP offers clear ways of application and competitive comparability, there is a fact that speaks to the disfavor of the Principles: IFRS is either obligatory or preferable in dozens of jurisdictions, while GAAP is only used in one. The great diversity both in general requirements and consolidation models might trigger the lagging in adopting IFRS by the U.S., but once adopted, the Standards would certainly change the American accountancy for the better. References KPMG. (2014). IFRS compared to US GAAP: An overview. Web. PwC. (2014). IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences. Web. Not sure if you can write a paper on International Financial Reporting Switch in the US by yourself? We can help you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More Which is Better – Principles or Rules? (2011). Web.
CJSU 375 Colorado Technical University The Criminal Process Case Study
research paper help CJSU 375 Colorado Technical University The Criminal Process Case Study.
Assignment Description Jesse
James, a 20-year old, was arrested for killing a police officer. As a
newly elected prosecutor, you are responsible for prosecuting Mr. James.
You announce your decision not to seek the death penalty in this case,
but under your state’s law, the offense charged is considered special
circumstances, which would qualify as a death penalty case. Your
decision does not sit well with the law enforcement community.Assignment GuidelinesAddress the following in 900–1,200 words:
List the various hearings that will typically occur and how the case is affected by each event.
Provide an overview of the various courts in the typical state
system where Mr. James will appear and why he is appearing there, from
arraignment to trial and the various levels of appeal. Be sure to
provide specific information as it relates to any constitutional issues
that may be raised at each stage in the process.
What are the potential hearings that might be involved in this
case? Be sure to describe them from the time of arrest through appeal.
What are the relevant civil liberties issues pertaining to the 4th, 5th, 6th, 8th, and 14th Amendments present in this case?
Be sure to reference all sources using APA style.
CJSU 375 Colorado Technical University The Criminal Process Case Study
Rolex’s Competitive Advantage
This report will analyse Rolex and its competitors, in particular focussing on: The importance of strategic marketing Without doubt, marketing is the single most customer orientated department within an organisation. Without the customer there is no company. Marketing is the process carried out to identify, this report analyses the current marketing situation 1.2 An industry analysis The Swiss luxury watch-making industry is a very lucrative market and the many barriers make it extremely difficult for new entrants. Established companies such as Rolex maintain strong relationships with their distributors but are able to be very selective when it comes to choosing distributors to maintain the company’s image and market position. Regarding substitutes products, no serious or close substitute threatens the industry even though counterfeits are, like for the entire luxury industry, a problem. Competitive strategy in the luxury watchmaking industry Michael Porter uses the criteria of strategic advantage and strategic target to define three competitive strategies for outperforming rivals in the long-term.. 2.0 The story so far – situational analysis 2.1 The Company Arguably one of the most famous brands of all time, Rolex has a long history steeped in innovation and excellence, and a strong association to prestige, mystique and accomplishment in the minds of its customers. Established in 1905 by Hans Wilsdorf and his brother in law, the London based company – originally named Wilsdorf
TU TAM Well Validated Model to Forecast Technology Adoption Resolutions Discussion
TU TAM Well Validated Model to Forecast Technology Adoption Resolutions Discussion.
Define TAM and the components.Note how TAM is impacting educational settings. How information and communication innovation drives change in educational settings & how technology-based leadership has driven the digital age. Also, that the role of technology leadership incorporates with the Technology Acceptance Model. Give an overview and the findings. How senior leaders versus senior managers lead change in an organization (especially when it comes to technical change in an organization).When dealing with performing work, how is this implemented differently within the management versus leadership constructs?When implementing change in an organization, there are always culture issues that are faced, such as not accepting change, determine how differently this would be handled thinking about the management versus leadership constructs?Note : APA format with 5 pages.
TU TAM Well Validated Model to Forecast Technology Adoption Resolutions Discussion